Pope Francis: The devil is threatening the Syro-Malabar Catholic Church with division

 

Pope Francis meets with members of the Syro-Malabar Church on May 13, 2024, at the Vatican. / Credit: Vatican Media

Washington, D.C. Newsroom, May 13, 2024 / 16:53 pm (CNA).

In a meeting with Major Archbishop Raphael Thattil and members of the Syro-Malabar Catholic Church at the Vatican on Monday, Pope Francis urged unity and obedience amid a long-simmering liturgical conflict that continues to rock the Eastern church.

As some fear an imminent schism in the ancient Eastern-rite church, the pope stressed the importance of unity, saying: “Apart from Peter, apart from the major archbishop, there is no Church.”

He urged the faithful present at the Vatican’s Consistory Hall to “press forward” in obedience to the Church, saying: “You are obedient, and where obedience is present, there is the Church. Where there is disobedience, there is schism.”

What is going on in the Syro-Malabar Church?

The Syro-Malabar Church is an Eastern Catholic rite in full communion with the Roman Catholic Church. Members of the rite are often referred to as “St. Thomas Christians,” as its origins are believed to date back to the missionary preaching of St. Thomas the Apostle.

Today there are more than 5 million Syro-Malabar Catholics across the world in dioceses — or eparchies, as they are called — in India, the U.S., the U.K., Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and the Middle East.

For decades Catholics in the rite have been bitterly divided over whether priests should face the altar (“ad orientem”) or toward the people (“versus populum”) during the celebration of the Mass, which Syro-Malabar Catholics call “the Holy Qurbana.”

In 1999 the Synod of Bishops of the Syro-Malabar Archiepiscopal Church attempted to resolve the conflict by decreeing that all priests in the rite should uniformly face the people during the Liturgy of the Word and then face the altar during the Liturgy of the Eucharist.

This decree did not end the dispute, however, as several dioceses have continued refusing to implement the change, preferring to celebrate Mass facing the people.

Finally, the pope himself got involved when he set a hard deadline on eparchies to implement the decree by Christmas Day 2023.

Reportedly, most of the parishes in the rite complied with the pope’s deadline, but protests, Mass disruptions, and tensions persist.

Controversy over that question resulted in violence, caused hundreds of Syro-Malabar priests to defy their bishops, and led to fears of a new schism.

Pope addresses controversy

The pope condemned the division emphatically on Monday, saying that such arguments over the Mass are “incompatible with the Christian faith” and show a “grave lack of respect for the Blessed Sacrament.”

He called the rampant division within the rite the work of “the devil, the divider,” who he said “creeps in and thwarts the most heartfelt desire that the Lord expressed before dying for us: that we, his disciples, be ‘one,’ without division and without breaking communion.”

“The guiding criterion, the truly spiritual one that derives from the Holy Spirit, is communion: This requires us to do a self-examination of our dedication to unity and our faithful, humble, respectful, and obedient care for the gifts we have received,” he said.

Francis called on Thattil and other bishops and priests in the rite to foster discussion with dissenting forces, saying that “guarding unity is not a pious exhortation but a duty.”

“Let us meet and discuss without fear, that is fine, but above all, let us pray, so that the light of the Spirit, which reconciles differences and brings tensions back into unity, may resolve disputes,” he said, adding that the “dangerous temptation to focus on one detail, and an unwillingness to let it go, even to the detriment of the good of the Church … stems from a self-referentiality, which leads to listening to no other way of thinking but one’s own.”

In the same vein, he condemned previous efforts by “some members of the faith” to Westernize — or Latinize — the Syro-Malabar Church, which he called one of the “indispensable treasures in the life of the Church.”

Pope Francis meets with members of the Syro-Malabar Church on May 13, 2024, at the Vatican. Credit: Vatican Media
Pope Francis meets with members of the Syro-Malabar Church on May 13, 2024, at the Vatican. Credit: Vatican Media

“The Christian East allows us to draw from ancient and ever-new sources of spirituality; these become fresh springs that bring vitality to the Church,” he said, urging Syro-Malabar Christians to retain their self-identity as a “sui iuris” — self-autonomous — rite, “so that your great liturgical, theological, spiritual, and cultural heritage may shine ever more brightly.”

The pope also announced that he is officially granting the rite jurisdiction over Syro-Malabar immigrant Christians living in the Middle East.

“I wish to help you, not supersede you,” the pope said before going on to add that “because the nature of your Church sui iuris empowers you not only to examine carefully the situations and challenges that you face but also to take appropriate steps to address them, with responsibility and evangelical courage.”


If you value the news and views Catholic World Report provides, please consider donating to support our efforts. Your contribution will help us continue to make CWR available to all readers worldwide for free, without a subscription. Thank you for your generosity!

Click here for more information on donating to CWR. Click here to sign up for our newsletter.


About Catholic News Agency 12534 Articles
Catholic News Agency (www.catholicnewsagency.com)

7 Comments

  1. Could the Pope explain that to the Catholics banished from Parish Churches to gymnasiums in the name of Traditionis Custodes? To the Scottish Catholics who saw thriving Parishes Closee on a papal whim of anti-latin hatred?

  2. I believe the Holy Father shows he has not addressed the issues correctly or at all. Also, extending jurisdiction makes a headline but what substance did it bering; or is it merely legalism and doctrinaire?

    The idea that “disobedience” is immediately “schism” does 5 things,

    a) it feeds into the strained relations
    b) it appears to set up “the other side” as alienated
    c) it goes against the “bridge” themes
    d) it makes for heavy-handed excess of authority with no discretion
    e) it tells the ones who are so unhappy with Pope Francis that he again runs things to the edge.

    But I would append a 6th and a 7th observation. Pope Francis is often too hasty and becomes encumbered in the exaggerated “needs of the moment”. Thus even cuts across his own counsels, “time grater than space”, etc.

    Also, he needs to adjust his media team, they have schooled in making headlines and it is both wrong and unhelpful. Again, they are more often than not ideas-driven over reality, etc. The Holy Father should renovate the group.

    ‘ He urged the faithful present at the Vatican’s Consistory Hall to “press forward” in obedience to the Church, saying: “You are obedient, and where obedience is present, there is the Church. Where there is disobedience, there is schism.” ‘

  3. Evangelization and conversion are ongoing and never-ending opportunities. Evangelization fosters concord in place of discord.

    • In terms of the actual problem situation in the Syro-Malabar church, “evangelization” and “conversion” are not “bridges” in reconciliation when you are excluding and alienating parts. Also they are not helpful discernments from the governorate.

      Elsewhere the Holy Father was drawing outlines for archiving, where he noted “knowledge must be inclusive”: re, how much “risk of devaluation” comes with “exclusivity” and “ideology”. See the VATICAN NEWS link. If the themes are applied here as in the Vatican library system, his current approach to the Syro-Malabar impasse will be exacerbated by an exclusivity in regard to what would be considered irrelevant and/or toxic. How would the following is handling content?

      With respect to this particular item, about Vatican School of Library Science, the report is confusing in addition; and it is unclear if the jumble of ideas collected there and lack of cogency, definition and common sense, come from the translation, the reporting or the Holy Father’s own script -or some combination.

      I mentioned the media difficulties above; one would imagine that with such an active wide-ranging ministry as we see with Pope Francis, that the Vatican and the Curia would not leave so much to chance and to ambiguation.

      ‘ He again highlighted the need “to include and never exclude “anyone from knowledge and, at the same time, to protect from the “toxic, unhealthy and violent” information that can lurk in the world of social media and technological knowledge.

      This context, he remarked, requires “openness to discussion and dialogue, the willingness to welcome, especially those of marginality and material, cultural and spiritual poverty.” ‘

      https://www.vaticannews.va/en/pope/news/2024-05/pope-francis-knowledge-must-be-inclusive.html

    • “Do NOT think that I have come to bring peace on earth; I have not come to bring peace, but a sword. For I have come to set a man against his father, and a daughter against her mother, and a daughter in law against her mother in law; and a man’s foes will be those of his own household.”

      Jesus Christ, the first evangeliser. Matthew 10.

      • I think your resorting to Scripture like that leads nowhere likewise. The Pope already put a conclusion but he insists on a dialogue -in this case, a dialogue of obedience- to arrive at the conclusion known in advance. This dialogue and this obedience are posed out as ever ancient and ever new. Meantime, the dialogue being not yet concluded, he extended jurisdiction into Arabia. Is there some sort of “spiritual matchmaking” going on with these elements? Well if there is it should be declared in advance and have its lines shown not have it under wraps as if it is some sort of pregnant immaculata which it can’t be and can never be or become -that the alienated side “will never share in providentially”.

  4. Ah! That’s it. The devil made those Syro Malabar folks do it. To resist change to their venerable sacred liturgy deeply reflective of their culture. Such insight in a man is baffling.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

All comments posted at Catholic World Report are moderated. While vigorous debate is welcome and encouraged, please note that in the interest of maintaining a civilized and helpful level of discussion, comments containing obscene language or personal attacks—or those that are deemed by the editors to be needlessly combative or inflammatory—will not be published. Thank you.


*