Pope Francis meets with the Council of Cardinals on Feb. 5, 2024, at the Vatican. / Credit: Vatican Media
ACI Prensa Staff, Feb 6, 2024 / 15:55 pm (CNA).
The pope’s Council of Cardinals concluded a meeting at the Vatican this morning with Pope Francis to reflect on “the role of women in the Church.”
Three women also participated in the Feb. 5-6 meeting, notably including a female Anglican bishop, Jo Bailey Wells.
Wells is deputy general secretary of the Anglican Communion and was part of the first generation of women ordained vicars in the Church of England in 1995. She is currently married to an Anglican clergyman and is the mother of two children.
Wells is also known for her advocacy of “gender equality” and for having led an interfaith meeting attended by Pope Francis in Kazakhstan in October 2022. She has also been chaplain to the archbishop of Canterbury.
Also present at the meeting with the cardinal advisers of the Holy Father were Giuliva di Berardino, a consecrated woman of the Ordo Virginum (“Order of Virgins”) of the Diocese of Verona, Italy, and Linda Pocher, a teacher at the Pontifical Faculty of Educational Sciences “Auxilium” who previously participated in the last meeting in 2023.
In this most recent session, like the one held in December 2023, the members of the council delved deeper into the topic of the presence of women in the Church.
During the 2023 meeting, the pontiff invited theologians to reflect on the Church as “woman and spouse” and said that “one of the sins committed” has been the tendency to “masculinize the Church.”
The Council of Cardinals, also known as “C9” for its nine members, is the group of cardinals that collaborates directly with Pope Francis in the government of the Church. It has its origin in the general congregations that preceded the conclave in which Pope Francis was elected.
The C9 group has been functioning since September 2013, just six months after Pope Francis assumed the Petrine ministry.
Its objective is to help the pontiff “in the government of the universal Church” as well as to work on a revision of the apostolic constitution Pastor Bonus, which governs the Roman Curia, as Pope Francis has stated.
The members of C9 are Cardinal Pietro Parolin, Vatican secretary of state; Cardinal Fernando Vérgez Alzaga, president of the Governorate of Vatican City State; Cardinal Fridolin Ambongo Besungu, archbishop of Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo; Cardinal Oswald Gracias, archbishop of Bombay, India; Cardinal Seán Patrick O’Malley, archbishop of Boston; Cardinal Juan José Omella, archbishop of Barcelona, Spain; Cardinal Gérald Lacroix, archbishop of Quebec, Canada; Cardinal Jean-Claude Hollerich, archbishop of Luxembourg; and Cardinal Sérgio da Rocha, archbishop of San Salvador de Bahía, Brazil. The secretary of the council is Marco Mellino, titular bishop of Cresima, Tunisia.
Ambongo, president of the Symposium of Episcopal Conferences of Africa and Madagascar (SECAM), has become one of the main voices raised against Fiducia Supplicans, the Dec. 18, 2023, document of the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith that allows the blessing of homosexual couples.
Lacroix has recently been accused of abusing a 17-year-old girl almost four decades ago as part of a lawsuit against his archdiocese. The cardinal “categorically” denies the allegation.
This story was first published by ACI Prensa, CNA’s Spanish-language news partner. It has been translated and adapted by CNA.
If you value the news and views Catholic World Report provides, please consider donating to support our efforts. Your contribution will help us continue to make CWR available to all readers worldwide for free, without a subscription. Thank you for your generosity!
Click here for more information on donating to CWR. Click here to sign up for our newsletter.
Vatican City, Mar 13, 2020 / 01:47 pm (CNA).- Less than one day after the Diocese of Rome closed all Roman churches to the public, the cardinal who oversees the diocese reversed himself, saying he would leave that decision to parish pastors.
Both announcements came amid deliberations between Pope Francis and Cardinal Angelo De Donatis, the vicar general of Rome, who oversees the day-to-day operations of a diocese whose bishop is Pope Francis.
De Donatis published a letter March 13 explaining that he consulted with Pope Francis before closing the churches for private prayer March 12, and before opening them again March 13.
“After consulting our bishop, Pope Francis, we published yesterday, March 12, the decree that establishes the closure of our churches for three weeks,” Cardinal Angelo De Donatis wrote in a letter to the Diocese of Rome.
“A further conversation with Pope Francis, this morning, however, prompted us to consider another need: that because of the closure of our churches, other ‘least ones’ find a different kind of reason for uncertainty and confusion. The risk is for people to feel even more isolated,” he explained.
Before the initial decision’s reversal, Pope Francis had spoken out against “drastic measures” in response to the coronavirus in his morning homily televised throughout Italy and livestreamed online.
“Let’s pray for this, that the Holy Spirit may give to pastors the ability for pastoral discernment so that they might provide measures which do not leave the holy, faithful people of God alone, and so that the people of God will feel accompanied by their pastors, comforted by the Word of God, by the sacraments, and by prayer,” Pope Francis said March 13.
Pope Francis had prayed for authorities who “must decide … on measures that people do not like” in his homily the day prior.
In defiance of the initial church closure decree, the cardinal in charge of the pope’s charity office, Cardinal Konrad Krajewski, opened Friday his titular church, St. Mary Immaculate all’Esquilino, a church located in an ethnically-diverse, and poor, area of Rome.
“In full compliance with safety standards, it is my right to ensure an open church for the poor. At 8:00 this morning, I came here and opened the door wide. In this way the poor will be able to adore the Blessed Sacrament which is the consolation for all in this moment of grave difficulty,” Krajewski said, according to Vatican News.
The diocesan reversal came shortly after.
The revised decree clarifies that “non-parish churches” and other religious buildings will remain closed, while parishes and missionary churches dedicated to care for others can be reopened. The properties of religious communities and monasteries are only accessible to the members of their communities.
The decree “is therefore modified, placing the ultimate responsibility of entering the places of worship in the hands of priests and all the faithful, so as not to expose the population to any danger of contagion and at the same time avoid the sign of a physical prohibition on access to a place of worship by closing it, which could create disorientation and a greater sense of insecurity,” Cardinal De Donatis wrote.
“Every ecclesial precautionary measure must take into account not only the common good of civil society, but also of that unique and precious good which is faith, especially that of the least ones,” he said.
The vicar general exhorted Catholics to follow the Italian government’s quarantine measures until April 3, and to stay at home.
“Coronavirus infection is spreading exponentially. In a few days the number of infected doubles, and at this rate it is not difficult to predict that in two months it will reach the order of tens of thousands of people only in Italy,” De Donatis wrote in his letter.
“There is a clear risk of collapse of healthcare facilities, in which there are already many on ventilators, above all because of the disproportion between the available intensive care resources and the growing number of patients. A large number of people could die, especially the elderly and vulnerable people,” the vicar of Rome said.
There are 242 confirmed cases of COVID-19 currently in Lazio, the region surrounding Rome, as of March 13, according to the Italian Ministry of Health.
Coronavirus cases in Italy have grown quickly in recent weeks surpassing 17,500 documented cases. More than 1,250 people have died from COVID-19 in the country since Feb. 22.
A nationwide quarantine has been declared in Italy through April 3 in order to slow the spread of the coronavirus pandemic.
The quarantine restricts movement within Italy and requires people to stay in their homes except for cases of absolute necessity, which may include going to work, to the pharmacy or hospital, or to the supermarket.
On March 11, Italy’s Prime Minister Giuseppe Conte tightened the restrictions of a nationwide lockdown to include the closure of all restaurants, bars, and non-commercial businesses other than supermarkets.
In all cases, a distance of one meter must be maintained between people in public. Not following these regulations is punishable by fine or arrest.
The previous Diocese of Rome decree suspending all public Masses in the diocese until April 3 still stands, however now Catholics will once again have access to some parishes for private prayer.
“The spiritual need of the people of God to gather to celebrate the Eucharist becomes for us Christians the object of a painful renunciation. There is first the spiritual need for the charity of caring for our brothers. Unfortunately, going to church is no different than going to other places: it is at risk of contagion,” De Donatis wrote.
Pope Francis prays during Christmas Mass in St. Peter’s Basilica on Dec. 24, 2023. / Vatican Media
Vatican City, Dec 24, 2023 / 18:00 pm (CNA).
Below is the full text of Pope Francis’ homily for the Solemnity of the Nativity of the Lord, delivered on Dec. 24, 2023, in St. Peter’s Basilica.
“A census of the whole earth” (cf. Lk 2:1). This was the context in which Jesus was born, and the Gospel makes a point of it. The census might have been mentioned in passing, but instead is carefully noted. And in this way, a great contrast emerges. While the emperor numbers the world’s inhabitants, God enters it almost surreptitiously. While those who exercise power seek to take their place with the great ones of history, the King of history chooses the way of littleness. None of the powerful take notice of him: only a few shepherds, relegated to the margins of social life.
The census speaks of something else. In the Scriptures, the taking of a census has negative associations. King David, tempted by large numbers and an unhealthy sense of self-sufficiency, sinned gravely by ordering a census of the people. He wanted to know how powerful he was. After some nine months, he knew how many men could wield a sword (cf. 2 Sam 24:1-9). The Lord was angered and the people suffered. On this night, however, Jesus, the “Son of David”, after nine months in Mary’s womb, is born in Bethlehem, the city of David. He does not impose punishment for the census, but humbly allows himself to be registered as one among many. Here we see, not a god of wrath and chastisement, but the God of mercy, who takes flesh and enters the world in weakness, heralded by the announcement: “on earth peace among those whom he favors” (Lk 2:14). Tonight, our hearts are in Bethlehem, where the Prince of Peace is once more rejected by the futile logic of war, by the clash of arms that even today prevents him from finding room in the world (cf. Lk 2:7).
The census of the whole earth, in a word, manifests the all-too-human thread that runs through history: the quest for worldly power and might, fame and glory, which measures everything in terms of success, results, numbers and figures, a world obsessed with achievement. Yet the census also manifests the way of Jesus, who comes to seek us through enfleshment. He is not the god of accomplishment, but the God of Incarnation. He does not eliminate injustice from above by a show of power, but from below, by a show of love. He does not burst on the scene with limitless power, but descends to the narrow confines of our lives. He does not shun our frailties, but makes them his own.
Christmas Mass in St. Peter’s Basilica on the night of Dec. 24, 2023. Vatican Media
Brothers and sisters, tonight we might ask ourselves: Which God do we believe in? In the God of incarnation or the god of achievement? Because there is always a risk that we can celebrate Christmas while thinking of God in pagan terms, as a powerful potentate in the sky; a god linked to power, worldly success, and the idolatry of consumerism. With the false image of a distant and petulant deity who treats the good well and the bad poorly; a deity made in our own image and likeness, handy for resolving our problems and removing our ills. God, on the other hand, waves no magic wand; he is no god of commerce who promises “everything all at once”. He does not save us by pushing a button, but draws near us, in order to change our world from within. Yet how deeply ingrained is the worldly notion of a distant, domineering, unbending, and powerful deity who helps his own to prevail against others! So many times this image is ingrained in us. But that is not the case: our God was born for all, during a census of the whole earth.
Let us look, then, to the “living and true God” (1 Thess 1:9). The God who is beyond all human reckoning and yet allows himself to be numbered by our accounting. The God, who revolutionizes history by becoming a part of history. The God who so respects us as to allow us to reject him; who takes away sin by taking it upon himself; who does not eliminate pain but transforms it; who does not remove problems from our lives but grants us a hope that is greater than all our problems. God so greatly desires to embrace our lives that, infinite though he is, he becomes finite for our sake. In his greatness, he chooses to become small; in his righteousness, he submits to our injustice. Brothers and sisters, this is the wonder of Christmas: not a mixture of sappy emotions and worldly contentment, but the unprecedented tenderness of a God who saves the world by becoming incarnate. Let us contemplate the Child, let us contemplate the manger, his crib, which the angels call “a sign” for us (cf. Lk 2:12). For it truly is the sign that reveals God’s face, a face of compassion and mercy, whose might is shown always and only in love. He makes himself close, tender, and compassionate. This is God’s way: closeness, compassion, tenderness.
Pope Francis brings a figure of the Christ child over to the nativity scene inside of St. Peter’s Basilica at the end of Mass. Vatican Media
Sisters and brothers, let us marvel at the fact that he “became flesh” (Jn 1:14). Flesh: the very word evokes our human frailty. The Gospel uses this word to show us that God completely assumed our human condition. Why did he go to such lengths? Because he cares for us, because he loves us to the point that he considers us more precious than all else. Dear brother, dear sister, to God, who changed history in the course of a census, you are not a number, but a face. Your name is written on his heart. But if you look to your own heart, and think of your own inadequacies and this world that is so judgmental and unforgiving, you may feel it difficult to celebrate this Christmas. You may think things are going badly, or feel dissatisfied with your limitations, your failings, your problems, and your sins. Today, though, please, let Jesus take the initiative. He says to you, “For your sake, I became flesh; for your sake, I became just like you”. So why remain caught up in your troubles? Like the shepherds, who left their flocks, leave behind the prison of your sorrows and embrace the tender love of the God who became a child. Put aside your masks and your armor; cast your cares on him and he will care for you (cf. Ps 55:22). He became flesh; he is looking not for your achievements but for your open and trusting heart. In him, you will rediscover who you truly are: a beloved son or daughter of God. Now you can believe it, for tonight the Lord was born to light up your life; his eyes are alight with love for you. We have difficulty believing in this, that God’s eyes shine with love for us.
Christmas Mass in St. Peter’s Basilica on the night of Dec. 24, 2023. Vatican Media
Christ does not look at numbers, but at faces. However, who looks at him amid the many distractions and mad rush of a bustling and indifferent world? Who is watching? In Bethlehem, as crowds of people were caught up in the excitement of the census, coming and going, filling the inns, and engaged in petty conversation, a few were close to Jesus: Mary and Joseph, the shepherds, and then the Magi.
Let us learn from them. They stood gazing upon Jesus, with their hearts set on him. They did not speak, they worshiped. Tonight, brothers and sisters, is a time of adoration, of worship.
Worship is the way to embrace the Incarnation. For it is in silence that Jesus, the Word of the Father, becomes flesh in our lives. Let us do as they did, in Bethlehem, a town whose name means “House of Bread”. Let us stand before him who is the Bread of Life. Let us rediscover worship, for to worship is not to waste time, but to make our time a dwelling place for God. It is to let the seed of the Incarnation bloom within us; it is to cooperate in the work of the Lord, who, like leaven, changes the world. To worship is to intercede, to make reparation, to allow God to realign history. As a great teller of epic tales once wrote to his son, “I put before you the one great thing to love on earth: the Blessed Sacrament… There you will find romance, glory, honor, fidelity, and the true way of all your loves on earth” (J.R.R. TOLKIEN, Letter 43, March 1941).
Brothers and sisters, tonight love changes history. Make us believe, Lord, in the power of your love, so different from the power of the world. Lord, make us, like Mary, Joseph, the shepherds, and the Magi, gather around you and worship you. As you conform us ever more to yourself, we shall bear witness before the world to the beauty of your countenance.
Father Roger Landry, Catholic chaplain at Columbia University, discusses the protests at Columbia University in New York City on EWTN’s “The World Over with Raymond Arroyo” on May 2, 2024. / Credit: EWTN News The World Over / Screenshot
“The pontiff invited theologians to reflect on the Church as ‘woman and spouse’ and said that ‘one of the sins committed’ has been the tendency to ‘masculinize’ the Church”. Masculinity is God’s natural feature for men, as were the Apostles men. While a feminine presence, as natural exclusively to women is healthy and warranted, the effeminization of men in the Church is the real sin. That’s indicated in papal appointments of homosexual friendly prelates to leading positions at the Vatican.
Father Peter, your quote made me laugh: “‘one of the sins committed’ has been the tendency to ‘masculinize’ the Church” (!!!) (I looked into the report only diagonally so I have not noticed)
I wish it was so! To me, alas, the Church is full of effeminate men with an unresolved Oedipus complex (I share the view of Freud that narcissism often develops as a result of an emotional symbiosis = emotional incest with a mother). No man who is controlled by his mother (in his mind) and who was not emotionally separated from her, by his father, can provide a true father figure for the Church (or for anyone).
Pope Francis shows the features of such a man “under his mother”. His mucking with “a female principle” (Pachamama) is not accidental but an expression of his psyche which worships a female.
As for the “female bishop” = a priest (an oxymoron). Here is the Orthodox argument (one of): a priest is an icon (image) of Christ during the Eucharist. Christ is the Man. An icon of the Last Supper cannot use a woman instead of a man. This is why a priest must be a man.
Pope Francis said that “’one of the sins committed’ has been the tendency to ‘masculinize the Church’.”
Perhaps, and yet the other and larger sin throughout society has been to feminize what used to be masculine. One consequence is the pandemic homosexual lifestyle…and for which the Church offers nothing more that–what?–a deliberately ambiguous “blessing!”
A female “bishop” of the Anglican persuasion? Thank God that Ordinatio Sacerdotalis (1994), clarified not long after the first pseudo-ordination of Anglican female bishops, is on the books and cannot be easily buried. Still, the optics today speak louder than words.
How can that be? Virtually every non-clerical position in every parish I have contact with — and there are a half dozen — is occupied by a woman.
Bergoglio makes the most outrageous statements but he’s never expected to substantiate them.
I’m no theologian, but I’m pretty sure papal infallibility isn’t supposed to extend to just making stuff up and expecting people to take it all seriously.
Once again, we see that Bergoglio is a leftist, first and foremost.
“The pontiff invited theologians to reflect on the Church as ‘woman and spouse’ and said that ‘one of the sins committed’ has been the tendency to ‘masculinize’ the Church”. Masculinity is God’s natural feature for men, as were the Apostles men. While a feminine presence, as natural exclusively to women is healthy and warranted, the effeminization of men in the Church is the real sin. That’s indicated in papal appointments of homosexual friendly prelates to leading positions at the Vatican.
Father Peter, your quote made me laugh: “‘one of the sins committed’ has been the tendency to ‘masculinize’ the Church” (!!!) (I looked into the report only diagonally so I have not noticed)
I wish it was so! To me, alas, the Church is full of effeminate men with an unresolved Oedipus complex (I share the view of Freud that narcissism often develops as a result of an emotional symbiosis = emotional incest with a mother). No man who is controlled by his mother (in his mind) and who was not emotionally separated from her, by his father, can provide a true father figure for the Church (or for anyone).
Pope Francis shows the features of such a man “under his mother”. His mucking with “a female principle” (Pachamama) is not accidental but an expression of his psyche which worships a female.
As for the “female bishop” = a priest (an oxymoron). Here is the Orthodox argument (one of): a priest is an icon (image) of Christ during the Eucharist. Christ is the Man. An icon of the Last Supper cannot use a woman instead of a man. This is why a priest must be a man.
Once again we see individuals opposed to Catholic teachings taking part in the very highest decision-making councils of our Church.
This is no way to run any organization, let alone the Church Jesus founded.
What result can we expect other than chaos and confusion?
Pope Francis said that “’one of the sins committed’ has been the tendency to ‘masculinize the Church’.”
Perhaps, and yet the other and larger sin throughout society has been to feminize what used to be masculine. One consequence is the pandemic homosexual lifestyle…and for which the Church offers nothing more that–what?–a deliberately ambiguous “blessing!”
A female “bishop” of the Anglican persuasion? Thank God that Ordinatio Sacerdotalis (1994), clarified not long after the first pseudo-ordination of Anglican female bishops, is on the books and cannot be easily buried. Still, the optics today speak louder than words.
What? The Church has been ‘masculinized’?
How can that be? Virtually every non-clerical position in every parish I have contact with — and there are a half dozen — is occupied by a woman.
Bergoglio makes the most outrageous statements but he’s never expected to substantiate them.
I’m no theologian, but I’m pretty sure papal infallibility isn’t supposed to extend to just making stuff up and expecting people to take it all seriously.
Once again, we see that Bergoglio is a leftist, first and foremost.
dominus flevit