Islamist kills teacher at French high school, bishop condemns the terrorist attack

 

Bishop Olivier Leborgne of Arras, France. / Credit: Diocese of Arras

ACI Prensa Staff, Oct 16, 2023 / 18:30 pm (CNA).

The bishop of Arras, France, Olivier Leborgne, condemned the murder of a teacher by a young Islamist and the terrorist attack in which two other people were seriously wounded.

In a statement from the diocese, the prelate said that he had received “with astonishment” the news of the tragedy that took place Oct. 13 at Gambetta High School in Arras located in northern France near the border with Belgium.

According to German news outlet DW, the government Pas de Calais Department (administrative district) reported a knife attack had taken place at the high school.

French Interior Minister Gerald Darmanin said police were on the scene and that the attacker had been arrested.

The president of France, Emmanuel Macron, condemned the “barbarity of Islamist terrorism” and said the police had prevented an attack at another place of the country.

In his statement, the bishop of Arras conveyed his condolences to the relatives and friends of the victims and said he “very strongly condemned this terrorist attack.”

“With the whole Church, I repeat that violence can never claim to be from God, and I reaffirm our confidence in justice and our country’s police,” he said.

The prelate thanked the teachers and those dedicated to education, and then invited “all Christians to pray for the victims and for our wounded world that is so wounded and to join all other people of goodwill for  justice and peace.”

A special time of prayer for peace was planned for 7 p.m. local time Monday at the cathedral in Arras, presided by Leborgne.

This story was first published by ACI Prensa, CNA’s Spanish-language news partner. It has been translated and adapted by CNA.


If you value the news and views Catholic World Report provides, please consider donating to support our efforts. Your contribution will help us continue to make CWR available to all readers worldwide for free, without a subscription. Thank you for your generosity!

Click here for more information on donating to CWR. Click here to sign up for our newsletter.


About Catholic News Agency 12178 Articles
Catholic News Agency (www.catholicnewsagency.com)

5 Comments

    • “Moderate Muslim Leaders”?

      How to Tell the Difference Between Radical Islamic Doctrine and Moderate Islamic Doctrine

      The terms “radical Islam” and “moderate Islam” have been bandied about in the Western world for many years, and the presumption in the use of these terms is that “radical Islam” teaches violence and terrorism and anti-Western values while “moderate Islam” teaches peace and harmony and pro-Western values. Below is a handy comparison chart so you can actually see some of the differences for yourself.

      Radical Islam Teaches the Following

      1. Muhammad is the ideal human being. One way we know this is because he married Aisha when she was 6 years old, but he considerately waited until she was 9 before consummating his marriage to her.
      2. Muhammad is Allah’s prophet.
      3. Muhammad is superior to Jesus Christ who was only a prophet and not God.
      4. Jesus Christ was not crucified.
      5. Sharia Law should be the law of every land.
      6. Death is the punishment for apostasy from Islam.
      7. The Qur’an is the perfect word of Allah that was dictated word for word to Muhammad.
      8. All true Muslims follow the commands of the Qur’an.
      9. Muslim husbands are commanded to beat disobedient wives.
      10. Muslims are commanded to wage jihad against non-believers in Islam. This includes killing them, torturing them, and humiliating them…unless they convert to Islam.

      But on the other hand….

      Moderate Islam Teaches the Following

      1. Muhammad is the ideal human being. One way we know this is because he married Aisha when she was 6 years old, but he considerately waited until she was 9 before consummating his marriage to her.
      2. Muhammad is Allah’s prophet.
      3. Muhammad is superior to Jesus Christ who was only a prophet and not God.
      4. Jesus Christ was not crucified.
      5. Sharia Law should be the law of every land.
      6. Death is the punishment for apostasy from Islam.
      7. The Qur’an is the perfect word of Allah that was dictated word for word to Muhammad.
      8. All true Muslims follow the commands of the Qur’an.
      9. Muslim husbands are commanded to beat disobedient wives.
      10. Muslims are commanded to wage jihad against non-believers in Islam. This includes killing them, torturing them, and humiliating them…unless they convert to Islam.
      __________________

      Now that you know some of the “differences,” it should be easy to understand what people mean when they refer to the teachings of “radical Muslims” and the teachings of “moderate Muslims.” It’s pretty obvious, isn’t it? No wonder many people declare that Islam is a “religion of peace.” They are basing this claim on the significant “differences” between the teachings of “radical Islam” and “moderate Islam.”

      It should also be easy to now understand why we are not at war with Islam itself or “moderate Islam,” nor should we even criticize or question any of its doctrines. It’s only “radical Muslims” with their “different teachings” that we in the West can oppose. Otherwise, we are simply bigots engaging in Islamophobia. Clear?!

      While considering the listed differences between “radical Islam” and “moderate Islam,” recall a similar distinction between “radical Nazism” and “moderate Nazism” that was prevalent during the Nazi regime in Germany from 1933 to 1945. Thank God we only went to war with “radical Nazism” and not Nazism or “moderate Nazism” – the “ideology of peace.”

  1. But let us not use these isolated and very uncommon acts of inexplicable violence, perhaps motivated (as per Francis) by a generic religious fundamentalism (you know, the attacker could have just as easily have been a Latin Mass attendee) as an excuse to even think about curbing migration from the Muslim world. These young men of military age are simply looking for a better life for themselves and their families (wherever they may be). Besides, there are a couple million residents of Gaza whom, we are being told by supporters of the only democracy in the Middle East, will be looking for a new home in Europe or North America. Now is absolutely not the time to shut the door, not that ever would be a good time.

  2. Dr. Veritatis above – I realize the problem of trying to differentiate between moderate and radical Islam.
    However, I am of the understanding that there are two parts of the Koran, the first when Mohammed was in Mecca and the second when he was in Medina. It is the second part in which he stopped trying to play nice.
    I agree that Pope Francis’ references to Islam as “a religion of peace” are naive/dishonest/dangerous – take your pick or combinations.

    • Gilberta:

      In and of itself, there is only Islam; not a radical nor a moderate Islam. As such, there is no legitimate distinction between a so-called radical and a so-called moderate Islam, and no real problem in trying to make such a bogus distinction that should not be tried (just like there is only Catholicism; not a radical nor a moderate Catholicism). People who push the false distinction do so in order to pretend that the fundamental doctrines of violence in Islam are only a fringe part of Islam practiced only by “radical Muslims” who have “hijacked the religion of peace.” This narrative is pure rubbish, but way too many gullible people continue to drink this Kool-Aid.

      With respect to the so-called Meccan/earlier part of the Qur’an and the Medinan/later part of the Qur’an, note the Islamic principle of abrogation wherein later passages and teachings (in time; not how they are often arranged in popular selling Qur’ans) take precedence and abrogate or make null and void earlier passages and teachings on the same topics. As such, the more violent or Medinan passages take precedence over and abrogate the more peaceful passages on the same topics.

      A great irony: the most fervent and faithful Muslims are those who practice and/or support Jihadi terrorism and seek to impose Islam on the world via a worldwide Caliphate. Many ignorantly refer to these Muslims as radical and not representative of true Islam when in point of fact they are among the best representatives of Islam in many respects. At the same time, the less fervent and less faithful Muslims are hailed as the best representatives of true Islam when in point of fact they do not fully practice their religion as they are commanded to do by Islam.

      Book Recommendation:

      1. “What Catholics Need to Know About Islam” by Dr. William Kilpatrick.

1 Trackback / Pingback

  1. Islamist kills teacher at French high school, bishop condemns the terrorist attack – Via Nova

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

All comments posted at Catholic World Report are moderated. While vigorous debate is welcome and encouraged, please note that in the interest of maintaining a civilized and helpful level of discussion, comments containing obscene language or personal attacks—or those that are deemed by the editors to be needlessly combative or inflammatory—will not be published. Thank you.


*