In 1995 a ‘deeply embarrassed’ MLB owner apologized for event with anti-Catholic drag performers 


The “Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence” at an “LGBT pride” march in 1995. / Joe Mabel|Wikipedia|GFDL

Washington D.C., Jun 2, 2023 / 16:20 pm (CNA).

The Los Angeles Dodgers, it turns out, are not the first MLB team to find themselves in hot water over an invitation to the drag group calling itself the “Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence.”

Almost 28 years ago, the owner of the San Francisco Giants wrote a letter of apology to the Catholic League for hosting the drag group on the field before a game, according to correspondence the Catholic League shared with CNA on Friday.

In a letter dated Aug. 28, 1995, Catholic League President William Donohue raised his concerns with Giants owner Peter Magowan, who died in 2019, that the pregame ceremony designed to raise AIDS awareness “also seemed to open the door to anti-Catholicism.”

In response, Magowan expressed regret for the inclusion of the Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence at the event, saying “their acts of mockery” were “unfair to the Catholic Church.”

A national group of drag performers founded in 1979, the Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence dress as religious sisters, using Catholic religious imagery and themes in protests and sexualized performances to raise awareness and money for LGBTQ+ causes.

“We were informed that people dressed as Catholic nuns and as the pope were on the field. The ‘nuns’ apparently attend many AIDS-related events and are known as the ‘Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence,’” Donohue wrote. “If this group mocking Catholics and the Church did attend, the Catholic League would like to know why.”

Donohue added that “an event meant to raise money for AIDS should not become a forum for bigotry.”

In response, the Giants owner said that the team was “deeply embarrassed to discover the ‘Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence’ on the field during the pregame ceremonies” in a letter dated Sept. 5, 1995.

Magowan assured the Catholic League that “the Giants had no previous knowledge” that the anti-Catholic drag group would be participating in the ceremonies, explaining that the team relied on AIDS organizations to provide the 1,000 volunteers.

Though he said the team was not aware the anti-Catholic group would be there, Magowan reiterated that he “in no way condon[ed] the behavior of this group.”

“It was most regrettable, as their acts of mockery not only were unfair to the Catholic Church but also were a distraction to the worthy focus of the day,” Magowan said. “Let me assure you that stricter screening procedures will be implemented next year if a similar event is staged.”

The recent controversy erupted last week after the Dodgers announced that they would honor the Los Angeles chapter of the Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence with a “Community Hero Award” during their Pride Night at Dodger Stadium event on June 16.

Donohue told CNA that he believes “the difference between the Giants’ response in 1995 and the Dodgers’ response today is a reflection of the cultural changes we have been experiencing.”

“We have become increasingly secular, and indeed there is a militant streak evident among the ruling class,” Donohue said. “Perversely, in the name of tolerance and diversity, we have become increasingly intolerant of the diversity that Christianity provides.”

Donohue added that he believes “a restoration of our Judeo-Christian heritage is the answer, not more militant secularism.”

“As a sociologist, it is my conviction that we may be reaching a tipping point in our culture,” Donohue asserted. “The backlash against Bud Light, Disney, Target, the Navy — and now the Dodgers — suggests that the woke mob has gone too far.”

After initially receiving blowback from the Christian community, the Dodgers revoked their invitation to the drag group, only to reinstate it with an apology days later.

“The Los Angeles Dodgers would like to offer our sincerest apologies to the Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence,” the team said in an official statement on Twitter, adding: “We have asked the Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence to take their place on the field at our 10th annual LGBTQ+ Pride Night on June 16th.”

“We are pleased to share that they have agreed to receive the gratitude of our collective communities for the lifesaving work that they have done tirelessly for decades,” the Dodgers said. “In the weeks ahead, we will continue to work with our LGBTQ+ partners to better educate ourselves, find ways to strengthen the ties that bind, and use our platform to support all our fans who make up the diversity of the Dodgers family.”

Not all the team members agreed with the team’s decision to re-invite the anti-Catholic drag group.

In a personal statement, Dodgers pitcher Blake Treinen said that the team’s decision “disenfranchises a large community and promotes hate of Christians and people of faith.”

“Many of their performances are blasphemous, and their work only displays hate and mockery of Catholics and the Christian faith,” Treinen said, adding: “This group openly mocks Jesus Christ, the cornerstone of my faith, and I want to make it clear that I do not agree with nor support the decision of the Dodgers to ‘honor’ the Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence.”

If you value the news and views Catholic World Report provides, please consider donating to support our efforts. Your contribution will help us continue to make CWR available to all readers worldwide for free, without a subscription. Thank you for your generosity!

Click here for more information on donating to CWR. Click here to sign up for our newsletter.

About Catholic News Agency 8480 Articles
Catholic News Agency (


  1. June is the month of the Sacred Heart.
    June 16 is the feast of the Sacred Heart.
    Robert George has declared June the month to Celebrate Fidelity.

  2. The ONLY language the dodgers speak is – MONEY. boycott their games, don’t watch them on TV – don’t watch ANY baseball on TV – and let the organization know what you’re doing.

    This whole thing is disgusting.

  3. Well now, the Dodgers have got religion! It sounds almost synodal ” “In the weeks ahead, we will continue to work with our LGBTQ+ partners to better educate ourselves, find ways to strengthen the ties that bind, and use our platform to support all our fans who make up the diversity of the Dodgers family.”

    The difference is that in the Church “platform” of synodality, we still have an umpire who can tell a beanball when she sees it!

    Pope Francis has asked fans to pray at Marian shrines, and perhaps Theotokos will choose to intervene…and NOT simply move things along, harmonizing what Batzing, Hollerich, Grech & Co. have “aggregated, compiled and synthesized” from the “diversity of the Dodger family” (the hodge-podge/decapitated ‘sensus fidei’).

  4. Having slept on my earlier remark re synodality, yours truly also fully supports a kind of synod absent its own beanballs…St. John Paul II, in his “The Acting Person” (1979) is careful to both “bracket” ethics/morality to the side (more below) while then analyzing only what it means for the common good for real persons to then “act” responsibly together.

    Three points on how to do consultations (conflated with synods):

    FIRST, of “bracketing,” which is like a simplifying step in algebra, St. John Paul II writes: “The aim is to simplify subsequent operations and NOT [caps added] to reject what is withdrawn or to sever relations of what is outside to what remains in brackets.”

    SECOND, of “what is outside” he writes, for example: “The common good, however, belongs primarily to the sphere of being ‘together with others’ [‘walking together’ synodally?], while the acting together is insufficient [!] to disclose the hole reality of the common good, though it also plays its role in this respect.”

    His point is that by our virtuous decisions and actions we act-tually become more the moral persons were are meant to be.

    THIRD, it is elsewhere–and as pope–that St. John Paul II affirms (does not remain silent) the difference between “decisions” and “judgements” of informed conscience:

    “A separation, or even an opposition [!], is thus established in some cases between the teaching of the precept, which is valid and general, and the norm of the individual conscience, which would in fact make the final decision [no longer a ‘moral judgment’!] about what is good and what is evil. On this basis, an attempt is made to legitimize so-called ‘pastoral’ solutions [!] contrary to the teaching of the Magisterium, and to justify a ‘creative’ hermeneutic according to which the moral conscience is in no way obliged, in every case, by a particular negative precept [thou shalt not!]” (n. 56). And, ““The Church is no way the author or the arbiter of this [‘moral’] norm” (n. 95).

    THEREFORE, with the perennial Church trying to rally in the bottom of the ninth inning of a post-Christian world, and as only a first step and….and speaking now of bottoms!….poster-child Martin, Batzing, the Zdt et al (even Hollerich?) should not be dragged pit to pitch their beanball at the so-called Synod on Synodality in October 2023.

    Butt, who am I to “judge,” or decide, or whatever?

  5. Is it not also ironic in this “rainbow” month that on June 3rd we remember the martyrdom of the Ugandan martyrs, Charles Lwanga and Companions, who were martyred because they would not submit to Mwanga, the king’s daily requests “to commit unnatural and unchaste (read homosexual, sodomistic) acts. Might we not be far from similar threats in these deluded, postmodern times? These “martyrdoms” may not be of the bloody forms but may be attempts to “cancel” those who still recognize magisterial teachings, and the reality of universal, transcendent truth, goodness, and beauty…yes, even within the Church.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

All comments posted at Catholic World Report are moderated. While vigorous debate is welcome and encouraged, please note that in the interest of maintaining a civilized and helpful level of discussion, comments containing obscene language or personal attacks—or those that are deemed by the editors to be needlessly combative or inflammatory—will not be published. Thank you.