Cardinals follow the ceremony during the ordinary public consistory for the creation of new cardinals at St. Peter’s Basilica, Vatican City, Dec. 7, 2024. / Credit: Daniel Ibáñez/CNA
Rome Newsroom, Dec 8, 2024 / 18:36 pm (CNA).
A record 140 cardinals may attend an eventual conclave in the Sistine Chapel. There would have been 141, but Cardinal Miguel Angel Ayuso Guixot’s death on November 25 reduced the number by one. In all, the Sacred College now has 255 members.
The number of cardinal electors is the most critical data point to emerge from this weekend’s consistory. Of the 140 cardinal electors, 110 have been created by Pope Francis, 24 by Benedict XVI, and six by St. John Paul II. At the end of the year, on December 24, Indian Cardinal Oswald Gracias, created cardinal by Benedict XVI in 2007, will reach 80 years of age and will, therefore, no longer be able to participate in a conclave.
Another 14 cardinals will turn 80 in 2025. They are Cardinals Christoph Schoenborn, Fernando Vergez Alzaga, Celestino Aos Braco, George Alencherry, Carlos Osoro Sierra, Robert Sarah, Stanislaw Rylko, Joseph Coutts, Vinko Pulhić, Antonio Canizares Llovera, Vincent Nichols, Jean-Pierre Kutwa, Nakellentuba Ouédraogo and Timothy Radcliffe.
Two of these were created by St. John Paul II, four by Benedict XVI and eight by Pope Francis.
However, it will be necessary to wait until May 2026 to return to the figure of 120 cardinal electors established by St. Paul VI and never abrogated.
Pope Francis’s choices
For the first time, there is now a cardinal in Iran, Archbishop Dominique Matthieu of Tehran-Ispahan, a Belgian missionary. It is also the first time there is a cardinal in Serbia, with Archbishop Ladislav Nemet of Belgrade receiving the red hat.
Pope Francis has created cardinals from 72 different nations, and 24 of those nations have never had a cardinal before.
Pope Francis has also shown that he does not choose based on the traditional seats of cardinals. For example, there are no cardinals to lead the two historic European patriarchates of Lisbon and Venice, nor in Milan, Florence, or Paris.
There are exceptions, however. In this consistory, Pope Francis created cardinals in the archbishops of Turin, Naples, Lima, Santiago de Chile, Toronto, and the vicar general of the Diocese of Rome.
Naples entered the list somewhat surprisingly, with the pope’s decision communicated in a statement from the Holy See Press Office on November 4. Archbishop Battaglia of Naples replaced Bishop Bruno Syukur of Bogor, Indonesia, who had asked Pope Francis to remove him from the list of new cardinals for unspecified personal reasons.
The geographical balance of the College of Cardinals
The pope did not decide to replace a possible Indonesian cardinal with another cardinal from Asia.
Meanwhile, the percentage of Italian cardinals in the College of Cardinals is the lowest ever, at least in modern times. Only during the so-called Avignon Captivity (1309-1377) was the percentage of Italian cardinals so low.
However, to Italy’s 17 must be added Cardinal Pierbattista Pizzaballa, Latin Patriarch of Jerusalem, who is included in the quota of Asia, and Cardinal Giorgio Marengo, ordinary of Mongolia, also in Asia.
Cardinal Angelo Becciu is instead considered a non-elector, but this status is still being determined. Pope Francis had asked him to renounce his prerogatives as a cardinal but has continued to invite him to consistories and Masses, where he has always sat among the cardinals. If a decision is not made before then, the College of Cardinals, with a majority vote, will decide whether or not Cardinal Becciu will be admitted to the conclave.
Regional distribution
The balance crucially stays the same. Europe has received three more cardinals, in addition to the four Italians with the right to vote: Archbishop Ladislav Nemet of Belgrade (58 years old), Archbishop Rolandas Makrickas (52), coadjutor archpriest of the papal Basilica of Santa Maria Maggiore since March, and Dominican Father Timothy Radcliffe (79). Europe now has 55 cardinals.
Latin America has received five new cardinals. The purple has arrived in dioceses that have received it several times — with Archbishop Carlos Gustavo Castillo Mattasoglio (74) in Lima and Archbishop Fernando N. Chomali Garib (67) in Santiago de Chile — or only once — with Archbishop Luis Gerardo Cabrera Herrera (69) in Guayaquil, Ecuador and Archbishop Jaime Spengler (64, who is also president of CELAM) in Porto Alegre, Brazil.
The red birretta to Archbishop Vicente Bokalic Iglic (72) of Santiago del Estero is also a first. However, in this case, the ground had already been prepared by the recent decision to move the title of primate of Argentina from Buenos Aires to this seat. Overall, Latin America now has 24 cardinals (including Cardinal Celestino Aos Braco, emeritus of Santiago de Chile, born in Spain).
Asia has received four new cardinals. The pope gave the red hat to Archbishop Tarcisius Isao Kikuchi of Tokyo, 66, and to the bishops of two dioceses that have never had a cardinal at the helm: Bishop Pablo Vigilio Siongo David, 65, of Kalookan in the Philippines and Archbishop Dominique Joseph Mathieu, 61, of Tehran.
Africa has received two new cardinals, bringing the continent’s total to 18. The two new ones are Archbishop Jean-Paul Vesco, 62, in Algiers, and Archbishop Ignace Bessi Dogbo, 63, in Abidjan, Ivory Coast.
North America now has 14 electors, with the addition of Toronto Archbishop Francis Leo (53). Oceania has four electors, with the creation of Bishop Mykola Bychok of the eparchy of Saints Peter and Paul in Melbourne of the Ukrainians as cardinal. At 44, he has become the youngest member of the College of Cardinals.
National representation
Italy remains the most represented nation in the conclave, with 17 electors (plus two more in Asia). The United States has 10 cardinal electors, and Spain has 7 (with another 3 in Morocco, Chile, and France).
Brazil has increased to 7 electors, and India to 6 electors. France remains at 5 electors, to which Archbishop Vesco in North Africa has been added. Cardinal François-Xavier Bustillo, bishop of Ajaccio, is anagraphically Spanish although naturalized French.
Argentina and Canada join Poland and Portugal with four cardinal electors, while Germany is tied with the Philippines and Great Britain with three.
The weight of cardinal electors engaged in the Curia, in other Roman roles or the nunciatures, has decreased, like that of the Italians. They will be 34 out of 140, a historic low.
Of the 21 new cardinals, 10 (all electors) belong to religious orders and congregations, another record. The number of religious electors in the Sacred College has risen from 27 to 35. The Friars Minor joined the Salesians at five and surpassed the Jesuits, who remain at 4. The Franciscan family grows to 10 electors (5 Minors, 3 Conventuals, and 2 Capuchins). The Lazarists and Redemptorists rise to 2.
What would a possible conclave be like?
As of December 8, Pope Francis has created 78% of the cardinals who can vote in a conclave. This means that the cardinals created by Pope Francis far exceed the two-thirds majority needed to elect a pope.
This does not necessarily mean that the conclave will be “Francis-like.” Not only do the new cardinals all have very different profiles, but they have yet to have much opportunity to get to know each other. Popes have also used consistories to bring together cardinals to discuss issues of general interest.
Pope Francis had done so only three times: in 2014, when the family was discussed; in 2015, when the topic was the reform of the Curia; and in 2022, when the apostolic constitution Praedicate Evangelium, or the reform of the Curia now defined and promulgated, was discussed.
In this last meeting, the cardinals were divided into linguistic groups, with fewer opportunities to speak in the assembly together. This scenario makes the vote very uncertain.
Another fact that should be noted is that until St. John Paul II’s election, the cardinals gathered in the conclave were housed in makeshift accommodations in the Apostolic Palace near the Sistine Chapel. John Paul II had the Domus Sanctae Marthae (St. Martha House) renovated precisely to guarantee the cardinals who would elect his successor more adequate accommodations.
Today, however, Pope Francis lives in the Domus Sanctae Marthae. This means that, upon the pope’s death, at least the floor where the pontiff lives must be sealed, as the papal apartment is sealed. Sealing a floor of the Domus also means losing a considerable number of rooms. And with such a high number of voters, it also means risking not having enough rooms to accommodate all the cardinals.
The electors could be placed in vacant apartments within Vatican City State. This, however, would make them even more isolated. In practice, there is a risk that, during the conclave, the cardinals would not always be able to be together to discuss the election.
For these reasons, although Pope Francis has created more than two-thirds of the cardinal electors, it is by no means certain that the pope chosen in a future conclave will have the same profile as Pope Francis.
[…]
To me this exaggerates the circumcision question. They were doing this in my former parish in the late 1990’s so it’s not new; what seems to be happening is there is a purpose to make it theologically definitive.
I raised objections back then and it is not as if I wasn’t heard.
An interesting detail is that today’s exaggeration now involves a Pope just as the original stumbling block – circumcision – held up Peter the first Pope.
The Council of Jerusalem laid out 4 prohibitions and from the account in Acts the matter of circumcision was ultimately sidelined as not bearing on forward with any continuing importance.
The 4 prohibitions apply to everyone not merely to the unconverted. Peter put the stress on grace and hence the Council was a witness to the integrity and efficacy of baptism. The sense is very much that the conclusions reached are permanently enduring and unchangeable.
By this time Peter would have felt the further edification in his own baptism of Cornelius; however, to get to it he had to endure the imposition from Paul and yield to Paul.
In the CNA account above, the idea is given that at the time of the first Apostles, some “tradition” extends from the past. Is that really so? Surely it is our faith that what they were initiating in the Council of Jerusalem is Tradition as it comes forth from the Redemption.
Another insight from my former parish is that there could be a lot of mentalist engagement on all sorts of headings but “going forth” kind of stayed the same, which was generally immobile and well positioned in the comfort zone. What the mentalism achieved was raising mental connectivity and helping the group always behave in concert, quite artificial.
Theory and practice …… diverge? – converge? – both?
“You are making the Gospel a political party, an ideology, a club…”
Francis gave an ambulance to Ukraine, but he continually gives no truck to faithful Catholics.
Where’s the Holy Spirit in that?
“The Spirit makes us go out,…. to go on mission to discover who we are,” Francis said.
No, the spirit makes us go INto God. We go on mission [out to the periphery] to share with others the God in whom we are and in whom others may be.
Will someone mail him a catechism?
“And so,” he continued, “removing almost every obligation related to the Law, they communicate the final decisions, made — and they write this — by ‘the Holy Spirit and by us’ (cf. Acts 15:28).”
“This is how the apostles always act,” he underlined. “Together, without being divided, despite having different sensitivities and opinions, they listen to the Spirit.”
Listening to the Spirit of God leads one to follow His Law. His Law includes the Ten Commandments. Love of God is where the Spirit of God dwells. One does not love God if one does not follow all the words of command which God the Father, God the Son, and God the Holy Spirit speak.
Where the ‘spirit’ speaks differently from the eternal words of the Father and the Son, that ‘spirit’ is UNholy and is not from God. Logic and Reason vs. Francis.
Our God gave us Himself in the Incarnation and in His Spirit. Where the Spirit is, the Son is also. When the Son of God incarnates (appears in the flesh) to confirm Francis’ understanding of the ‘spirit,’ I’ll believe Francis.
Tongues, anyone? When the Holy Spirit anointed and empowered the Church at Pentecost, He proved His Presence with works and words and signs. Francis travels alone with none of the signs (fruits and gifts) of the Holy Spirit. Ergo.
Could he be urged to step aside?
We read: “In fact, he [the Spirit] is not only the light of hearts; he is the light that orients the Church: he brings clarity…”
Clarity. Indeed.
“Everything in the Church must be conformed to the requirements of the proclamation of the Gospel; not to the opinions of the conservatives or the progressives, but to the fact that Jesus reaches people’s lives,” (Pope Francis Feb 22).
Yes. However, Jesus said to Peter and the other Apostles, ‘Teach them all that I have commanded you. Repentance for the forgiveness of sins’. Christ Our Lord never said, ‘Forgive whether or not they repent of their sins’, as you did to Spanish seminarians regarding confession of sins, the sacrament of penance. Christ Jesus never said adultery wasn’t adultery as you did because of mitigating circumstances in Amoris Laetitia. You omitted grace in that section! The whole purpose of the crucifixion and resurrection, of the descent of the Holy Spirit upon the faithful. Our Lord never said about homosexuality, ‘God made you as you are, he loves you.
Today is the feast day of the Chair of Peter, on which you sit, instituted by Christ to defend the truth in the Apostolic witness of the Church. All the Apostles condemned homosexual acts, although you appoint homosexual advocates to key positions in the governance of the Church, continue to promote men to high office who believe Church teaching on homosexual behavior, in effect the scriptures themselves need to be revised.
As such it is you who excludes us, those who cannot surrender and repudiate the faith handed down to us from the Apostles. You call us dangerous, ‘backwardists’, persons closed to compassion. You expect us to leave the Catholic Church and join the equivalent of an enlightened men’s social club. That we resist. We remain true to the Chair of Peter, its long history of loyalty to Christ evident in its ample formal doctrinal documentation, not to the opinions of its occupant.
Truth and courage to say and do what is right. We bless those who lead by godly example. Thanks be to God for Christ inspired leadership.
Gospel – Good News of healing and empowerment.