French Cardinal Jean-Pierre Ricard of Bordeaux is pictured in a 2013 photo at the Vatican. He has admitted to abusing a 14-year-old girl 35 years ago. (CNS photo/Max Rossi, Reuters)
Rome Newsroom, Nov 7, 2022 / 09:00 am (CNA).
A French cardinal said on Monday that he had abused a 14-year-old girl several decades ago and was making himself available to authorities.
Cardinal Jean-Pierre Ricard said in a statement: “Thirty-five years ago, when I was a parish priest, I behaved in a reprehensible way with a young girl aged 14. My behavior has inevitably led to grave and lasting consequences for this person.”
Ricard added he was withdrawing from his functions and had spoken to the victim about the abuse.
“I renew here my request for forgiveness and also ask her entire family for forgiveness,” he said.
The statement was read at a press conference by the president of the French bishops’ conference, Archbishop Eric de Moulins-Beaufort of Reims.
The archbishop said that charges had been filed with the attorney general and the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith in response to Cardinal Ricard’s confession.
The 78-year-old Ricard was bishop of Bordeaux, in the southwest of France, from 2001 to 2019, Reuters reported.
The current archbishop of Bordeaux, Jean-Paul James, said: “I express my deepest sympathy to the victim concerned. And I share the pain of all those, especially in the Diocese of Bordeaux, who are hurt by these revelations.”
According to Moulins-Beaufort, nine French bishops as well as two retired bishops are currently the subject of a civil or Church investigation.
Pope Francis received French President Emmanuel Macron on Oct. 24 at the Vatican.
Before the meeting, a group of victims of sexual abuse urged Macron to directly raise the issue of whether the Church in France was too slow in reacting to a landmark investigation of sexual abuse released one year ago.
According to an independent report published in late 2021, hundreds of thousands of children were abused in the Catholic Church in France between 1950 and 2020.
The French bishops are currently meeting in Lourdes for their fall plenary session.
If you value the news and views Catholic World Report provides, please consider donating to support our efforts. Your contribution will help us continue to make CWR available to all readers worldwide for free, without a subscription. Thank you for your generosity!
Click here for more information on donating to CWR. Click here to sign up for our newsletter.
Washington D.C., Feb 16, 2023 / 16:50 pm (CNA).
When several people in Washington, D.C., for the March for Life visited the National Archives Museum last month they were taken aback when staff told them to c… […]
Dainelys Soto, Genesis Contreras, and Daniel Soto, who arrived from Venezuela after crossing the U.S. border from Mexico, wait for dinner at a hotel provided by the Annunciation House on Sept. 22, 2022 in El Paso, Texas. / Credit: Joe Raedle/Getty Images
CNA Staff, Sep 9, 2024 / 06:00 am (CNA).
Long a champion of immigrants, particularly those fleeing war-torn countries and impoverished regions, Pope Francis last month delivered some of the clearest words in his papacy yet in support of migrants — and in rebuke of those who turn away from them.
“It must be said clearly: There are those who work systematically and with every means possible to repel migrants,” the pope said during a weekly Angelus address. “And this, when done with awareness and responsibility, is a grave sin.”
“In the time of satellites and drones, there are migrant men, women, and children that no one must see,” the pope said. “They hide them. Only God sees them and hears their cry. This is a cruelty of our civilization.”
The pope has regularly spoken out in favor of immigrants. In June he called on the faithful to “unite in prayer for all those who have had to leave their land in search of dignified living conditions.” The Holy Father has called the protection of migrants a “moral imperative.” He has argued that migrants “[must] be received” and dealt with humanely.
Migrants aboard an inflatable vessel in the Mediterranean Sea approach the guided-missile destroyer USS Carney in 2013. Carney provided food and water to the migrants aboard the vessel before coordinating with a nearby merchant vessel to take them to safety. Credit: Commander, U.S. Naval Forces Europe-Africa/U.S. 6th Fleet, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons
The Catholic Church has long been an advocate and protector of immigrants. The U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) notes on its website that “a rich body of Church teaching, including papal encyclicals, bishops’ statements, and pastoral letters, has consistently reinforced our moral obligation to treat the stranger as we would treat Christ himself.”
The Catechism of the Catholic Church teaches that prosperous nations “are obliged, to the extent they are able, to welcome the foreigner in search of the security and means of livelihood which he cannot find in his country of origin.”
Popes throughout the years, meanwhile, have expressed sentiments on immigration similar to Francis’. Pope Pius XII in 1952, for instance, described the Holy Family’s flight into Egypt as “the archetype of every refugee family.”
The Church, Pius XII said, “has been especially careful to provide all possible spiritual care for pilgrims, aliens, exiles, and migrants of every kind.”
Meanwhile, “devout associations” throughout the centuries have spearheaded “innumerable hospices and hospitals” in part for immigrants, Pius XII said.
Implications and applications of Church teaching
Chad Pecknold, an associate professor of systematic theology at The Catholic University of America, noted that the catechism “teaches that nations have the right to borders and self-definition, so there is no sense in which Catholic teaching supports the progressive goal of ‘open borders.’”
“There is a ‘duty of care’ which is owed to those fleeing from danger,” he told CNA, “but citizenship is not owed to anyone who can make it across a national border, and illegal entry or asylum cannot be taken as a debt of citizenship.”
Paul Hunker, an immigration attorney who previously served as chief counsel of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) in Dallas, agreed.
“States have to have responsibility for their own communities, they have to look out for them,” he told CNA. “So immigration can be regulated so as to not harm the common good.”
Still, Hunker noted, Catholic advocates are not wrong in responding to immigration crises — like the ongoing irregular influx through the U.S. southern border — with aid and assistance.
Paul Hunker, an immigration attorney and former chief counsel of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) in Dallas, says Catholic advocates are not wrong in responding to immigration crises — like the ongoing irregular influx through the U.S. southern border — with aid and assistance. Credit: Photo courtesy of Paul Hunker
Many Catholic organizations offer shelter, food, and legal assistance to men, women, and children who cross into the country illegally; such groups have been overwhelmed in recent years with the crush of arriving migrants at the country’s southern border.
“It’s the responsibility of the federal government to take care of the border,” he said. “When the government has created a crisis at the U.S. border, Catholic dioceses are going to want to help people.”
“I completely support what the Catholic organizations are doing in Mexico and the United States to assist people who are there,” Hunker said. “The people responding are not responsible for these crises.”
Latest crisis and legal challenge
Not everyone feels similarly. Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton has launched an investigation of multiple Catholic nonprofits that serve illegal immigrants in the state. Paxton alleges that through the services it provides to migrants, El Paso-based Annunciation House has been facilitating illegal immigration and human trafficking.
A lawyer for the group called the allegations “utter nonsense,” though attorney Jerome Wesevich acknowledged that the nonprofit “serves undocumented persons as an expression of the Catholic faith and Jesus’ command to love one another, no exceptions.”
There are considerable numbers of Church teachings that underscore the need for a charitable response to immigrants. In his 1963 encyclical Pacem in Terris, Pope John XXIII argued that man “has the right to freedom of movement and of residence within the confines of his own state,” and further that “when there are just reasons in favor of it, he must be permitted to emigrate to other countries and take up residence there.”
In the encyclical Caritas in Veritate, meanwhile, Pope Benedict XVI in 2009 acknowledged that migration poses “dramatic challenges” for nations but that migrants “cannot be considered as a commodity or a mere workforce.”
“Every migrant is a human person who, as such, possesses fundamental, inalienable rights that must be respected by everyone and in every circumstance,” the late pope wrote.
Edward Feser, a professor of philosophy at Pasadena City College in California, noted that the Church “teaches that nations should be welcoming to immigrants, that they should be sensitive to the hardships that lead them to emigrate, that they ought not to scapegoat them for domestic problems, and so on.”
Catholic teaching does not advocate an ‘open borders’ policy
Yet Catholic teaching does not advocate an “open borders” policy, Feser said. He emphasized that the catechism says countries should accept immigrants “to the extent they are able,” and further that countries “may make the exercise of the right to immigrate subject to various juridical conditions.”
There “is nothing per se in conflict with Catholic teaching when citizens and politicians call on the federal government to enforce its immigration laws,” Feser said. “On the contrary, the catechism backs them up on this.”
In addition, it is “perfectly legitimate,” Feser argued, for governments to consider both economic and cultural concerns when setting immigration policy. It is also “legitimate to deport those who enter a country illegally,” he said.
Still, he acknowledged, a country can issue exceptions to valid immigration laws when the moral situation demands it.
“Of course, there can be individual cases where a nation should forgo its right to deport those who enter it illegally, and cases where the manner in which deportations occur is associated with moral hazards, such as when doing so would break up families or return an immigrant to dangerous conditions back in his home country,” he said.
“Governments should take account of this when formulating and enforcing policy,” he said.
The tension between responding charitably to immigrants and ensuring a secure border was perhaps put most succinctly in 1986 by the late Father Theodore Hesburgh, who served as chairman of the U.S. Select Commission for Immigration and Refugee Policy that was created by the U.S. Congress in the early 1980s.
“It is not enough to sympathize with the aspirations and plight of illegal aliens. We must also consider the consequences of not controlling our borders,” said the late Father Theodore Hesburgh, who served as chairman of the U.S. Select Commission for Immigration and Refugee Policy that was created by the U.S. Congress in the early 1980s. Credit: Photo courtesy of University of Notre Dame
Writing several years after the commission, Hesburgh explained: “It is not enough to sympathize with the aspirations and plight of illegal aliens. We must also consider the consequences of not controlling our borders.”
“What about the aspirations of Americans who must compete for jobs and whose wages and work standards are depressed by the presence of large numbers of illegal aliens?” the legendary late president of the University of Notre Dame reflected. “What about aliens who are victimized by unscrupulous employers and who die in the desert at the hands of smugglers?”
“The nation needn’t wait until we are faced with a choice between immigration chaos and closing the borders,” Hesburgh stated nearly 40 years ago.
On March 31, 2021, the Vatican vaccinated 100 people staying at homeless shelters in Rome / Vatican Media
Vatican City, Oct 27, 2021 / 07:30 am (CNA).
Vatican City is providing a third dose of the COVID-19 vaccine, with priority given to the vul… […]
13 Comments
The extent of corruption in the Church is physically nauseating at this stage. Is this predatory monster going to be defrocked of his cardinalatial scarlet and laicized like McCarrick? Is he going to be prosecuted by French authorities under French criminal law for his rape of this 14-year-old girl? Is His Eminence Jean-Pierre Ricard going to be publicly deputed by the appropriate Vatican authorities and the French bishops’ conference to a life of prayer and penance in a strict monastery for his “reprehensible” crimes? Since he is a Bergoglio protege, we can guess what the answers are. And how many more predatory monsters are there among the “princes of the Church”?
I pray for this priest of God and the young woman he abused when she was 14. Sin is real; repentance and remorse are possible; forgiveness and reconciliation are made possible by Christ’s sacrifice on our behalf. We don’t hold people in their sin who have asked forgiveness.
That is the catechism and the most constructive ethos from an anthropological perspective. And we have the directive from Christ, himself. But I do note that Jesus forgive nearly every type of sin while personally present on earth (of course with the injunction to go and sin no more), EXCEPT the sin of corrupting a child.
It is if he doesn’t truly repent which, given his age, is reasonably questionable. To suddenly repent decades later? Sorry, but I don’t buy it. If he’s not genuinely repentant he’s goin to Hell.
Is he “repentant” because he got caught. If there is one victim, there’s likely more.
Our Blessed Lord Himself made it clear that it was indeed unforgivable, and that when the corrupter of children was flung into the depths of the sea with a millstone round his neck, into the depths of the sea was precisely where he would stay.
Sir, perhaps more biblical study, and less flaunting to total strangers of your purported diaconate, would be to your spiritual advantage.
I have no authority of absolution. I do wonder what Christ holds in these cases since the clue he left us in the case of leading children astray is ominous.
35 years later at age 78 after a life spent in the highest reaches of the hierarchy? I think it would be irrational to accept simpliciter his “asking forgiveness” now.
While it may seem this HIGH RANKING CHURCHMAN should be commended for coming clean, it is beyond reprehensible that he waited until he had lived out his life in a position of power and ease. He’s 78. He won’t be spending much time in prison for CHILD RAPE. He’ll be dead soon. His victim’s soul was murdered decades ago. May God have mercy on his soul.
11 Bishops in France so far including one cardinal, are being investigated for committing or hiding abuse. What does this say about character and leadership for a people who are defined by the extent to which they follow the character and the ways of doing life as Jesus demonstrated in a clear and decisive manner in how he lived and taught his disciples! I will ask this question. Most people in the modern ‘christian’ west have no idea who Jesus was and is, his character attributes etc etc and who would be the cause of this ignorance? Jesus is a threat to the Catholic Church as it has become, and a threat to the economic paradigm of modern western culture! Just as he was a threat to the power base of the Pharisees and King Herod and that is why he was set up with the Romans to be crucified! Mankind has ‘defined’ god in his own image!
A very different attitude to Cardinal Jean-Pierre Richard is evident in most responses here to the attitude of responses to Cardinal Pell’s series of trials and the ultimate overturning of his conviction. A different response was also evident in Cardinal Pell’s relationship with Ballarat priest serial child abuser Father Ridsdale whom Cardinal Pell lived with and later supported in a court appearance. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gerald_Ridsdale#:~:text=Ridsdale%20was%20born%20at%20St,where%20he%20was%20a%20chaplain.
The extent of corruption in the Church is physically nauseating at this stage. Is this predatory monster going to be defrocked of his cardinalatial scarlet and laicized like McCarrick? Is he going to be prosecuted by French authorities under French criminal law for his rape of this 14-year-old girl? Is His Eminence Jean-Pierre Ricard going to be publicly deputed by the appropriate Vatican authorities and the French bishops’ conference to a life of prayer and penance in a strict monastery for his “reprehensible” crimes? Since he is a Bergoglio protege, we can guess what the answers are. And how many more predatory monsters are there among the “princes of the Church”?
I pray for this priest of God and the young woman he abused when she was 14. Sin is real; repentance and remorse are possible; forgiveness and reconciliation are made possible by Christ’s sacrifice on our behalf. We don’t hold people in their sin who have asked forgiveness.
That is the catechism and the most constructive ethos from an anthropological perspective. And we have the directive from Christ, himself. But I do note that Jesus forgive nearly every type of sin while personally present on earth (of course with the injunction to go and sin no more), EXCEPT the sin of corrupting a child.
I hope that you’re not suggesting that this prelate’s sin is unforgivable.
It is if he doesn’t truly repent which, given his age, is reasonably questionable. To suddenly repent decades later? Sorry, but I don’t buy it. If he’s not genuinely repentant he’s goin to Hell.
Is he “repentant” because he got caught. If there is one victim, there’s likely more.
Our Blessed Lord Himself made it clear that it was indeed unforgivable, and that when the corrupter of children was flung into the depths of the sea with a millstone round his neck, into the depths of the sea was precisely where he would stay.
Sir, perhaps more biblical study, and less flaunting to total strangers of your purported diaconate, would be to your spiritual advantage.
I have no authority of absolution. I do wonder what Christ holds in these cases since the clue he left us in the case of leading children astray is ominous.
35 years later at age 78 after a life spent in the highest reaches of the hierarchy? I think it would be irrational to accept simpliciter his “asking forgiveness” now.
While it may seem this HIGH RANKING CHURCHMAN should be commended for coming clean, it is beyond reprehensible that he waited until he had lived out his life in a position of power and ease. He’s 78. He won’t be spending much time in prison for CHILD RAPE. He’ll be dead soon. His victim’s soul was murdered decades ago. May God have mercy on his soul.
11 Bishops in France so far including one cardinal, are being investigated for committing or hiding abuse. What does this say about character and leadership for a people who are defined by the extent to which they follow the character and the ways of doing life as Jesus demonstrated in a clear and decisive manner in how he lived and taught his disciples! I will ask this question. Most people in the modern ‘christian’ west have no idea who Jesus was and is, his character attributes etc etc and who would be the cause of this ignorance? Jesus is a threat to the Catholic Church as it has become, and a threat to the economic paradigm of modern western culture! Just as he was a threat to the power base of the Pharisees and King Herod and that is why he was set up with the Romans to be crucified! Mankind has ‘defined’ god in his own image!
This Cardinal needs to be laicized. Prison is simply not sufficient punishment.
A very different attitude to Cardinal Jean-Pierre Richard is evident in most responses here to the attitude of responses to Cardinal Pell’s series of trials and the ultimate overturning of his conviction. A different response was also evident in Cardinal Pell’s relationship with Ballarat priest serial child abuser Father Ridsdale whom Cardinal Pell lived with and later supported in a court appearance.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gerald_Ridsdale#:~:text=Ridsdale%20was%20born%20at%20St,where%20he%20was%20a%20chaplain.