Health care workers denied religious exemption to COVID-19 vaccine mandate settle lawsuit for $10.3M

CNA Staff   By CNA Staff

 

null / Shutterstock

Washington, D.C. Newsroom, Jul 29, 2022 / 16:10 pm (CNA).

A Christian litigation nonprofit announced Friday that it settled the “first classwide lawsuit for health care workers over a COVID shot mandate” in the United States. The settlement awards those workers more than $10.3 million.

Liberty Counsel brought the lawsuit against NorthShore University HealthSystem, located in the suburbs of Chicago, on behalf of more than 500 current and former workers who objected to its COVID-19 vaccine mandate on religious grounds.

These employees refused the vaccination due to its association with aborted fetal cells, according to Liberty Counsel.

The settlement was filed in the federal Northern District Court of Illinois, where it waits to be approved. In the settlement, NorthShore agrees to change its policy and consider rehiring workers who left because their religious exemption requests were denied.

NorthShore estimates that 523 workers requested and were denied religious exemption or accommodation to its policy requiring COVID-19 vaccination between July 1, 2021, and Jan. 1, 2022, according to the settlement. Of those, NorthShore estimates that 204 complied with the requirement while 269 were discharged or resigned based on their religious objection to a COVID-19 vaccine.

The settlement notes that Northshore approved the religious exemption and accommodation request from one person.

The Catholic Church’s position

Pope Francis and the Vatican have strongly encouraged Catholics to consider the COVID-19 vaccine.

The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith also issued a note on the morality of vaccines addressing concerns about their connection to abortion. It found that “when ethically irreproachable Covid-19 vaccines are not available … it is morally acceptable to receive Covid-19 vaccines that have used cell lines from aborted fetuses in their research and production process.”

The note also cautioned against mandates while emphasizing that Catholics must consider the common good in their decision.

“At the same time, practical reason makes evident that vaccination is not, as a rule, a moral obligation and that, therefore, it must be voluntary,” the note states.


If you value the news and views Catholic World Report provides, please consider donating to support our efforts. Your contribution will help us continue to make CWR available to all readers worldwide for free, without a subscription. Thank you for your generosity!

Click here for more information on donating to CWR. Click here to sign up for our newsletter.


About Catholic News Agency 10256 Articles
Catholic News Agency (www.catholicnewsagency.com)

4 Comments

    • Just as a reminder, for all those who insist that we continue to give Francis the benefit of the doubt long after all doubt has been dispelled, Francis went a little beyond strongly encouraging Catholics to consider getting the vaccine. He flat out declared it a moral obligation. Once again, he abuses his position, this time to coerce the faithful into submitting to a mandate which directly and, possibly, dangerously violates a person’s right to make his health care decisions.

    • It isn’t much for the individual, but 10.3 million is quite a bit the hospital. You can be sure the hospital’s insurance company–indeed all insurance companies–are taking notice.

  1. “Pope Francis and the Vatican have strongly encouraged Catholics to consider the COVID-19 vaccine . . .The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith also issued a note [that] cautioned against mandates while emphasizing that Catholics must consider the common good in their decision.”
    .
    As I recall, the Pope mandated it for the Vatican, and many diocese mandated it for their priests and lay workers.
    .
    I would like to see the Catholic Church sued next over this

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

All comments posted at Catholic World Report are moderated. While vigorous debate is welcome and encouraged, please note that in the interest of maintaining a civilized and helpful level of discussion, comments containing obscene language or personal attacks—or those that are deemed by the editors to be needlessly combative or inflammatory—will not be published. Thank you.


*