Beauty, Truth and Unity: Why Pope Francis is so concerned with the Liturgy

Hannah Brockhaus   By Hannah Brockhaus for CNA


Pope Francis at the general audience in St. Peter’s Square on May 4, 2022. / Daniel Ibáñez/CNA.

Rome Newsroom, Jul 21, 2022 / 01:00 am (CNA).

Pope Francis, on the Solemnity of Saints Peter and Paul, issued a letter to Catholics on the liturgy and the celebration of the Mass.

The letter was published just before the July 16 anniversary of his controversial motu proprio Traditionis Custodes, which introduced new rules restricting the celebration of the Traditional Latin Mass.

In Desiderio Desideravi, Pope Francis did not change Church law, but said he wanted “to invite the whole Church to rediscover, to safeguard, and to live the truth and power of the Christian celebration.”

“I want,” he wrote, “the beauty of the Christian celebration and its necessary consequences for the life of the Church not to be spoiled by a superficial and foreshortened understanding of its value or, worse yet, by its being exploited in service of some ideological vision, no matter what the hue.”

Why is this topic so important to Pope Francis? In a word, because he is concerned about unity, a liturgy expert said.

The pope is the guardian of unity in the Church, something which is threatened by liturgical in-fighting, Father Dominik Jurczak, a Dominican and expert in sacred liturgy, told CNA.

Jurczak is a lecturer at the Pontifical Institute of Sacred Liturgy, “the Anselmianum,” and at the Pontifical University of Saint Thomas Aquinas, “the Angelicum,” in Rome. He is also chairman of the International Liturgical Commission of the Dominican Order.

Father Dominik Jurczak, OP. Courtesy of Father Dominik Jurczak, OP.
Father Dominik Jurczak, OP. Courtesy of Father Dominik Jurczak, OP.

“Here is the reaction of Pope Francis,” the Polish priest explained. “We cannot use liturgy as a weapon. … We can organize debates on the liturgy, we can discuss which part of the liturgical renewal was done better or not. But we cannot disobey and we cannot use the liturgy to show that somebody else in the Church is not a part of the Church actually.”

Jurczak noted that, in some places, the celebration of the liturgy is subject to abuses which keep the reality of the celebration far from what it could and should be.

The focus should be on trying to celebrate the Mass well, according to the rubrics in place, he said.

Father Giovanni Zaccaria, secretary of the Liturgy Institute at Rome’s Pontifical University of the Holy Cross, said it is not wrong to have an attraction to the Mass as celebrated with one Roman Missal over another, as long as it does not become an idol.

“Because otherwise we risk creating division in the Church. And that is what the devil wants, that we become divided,” said Zaccaria, a priest of Opus Dei and author of the Italian language book “The Mass Explained to Teens (and Not Only to Them).”

The Roman Missal is the book containing the text and instructions for the celebration of the Mass. In the Roman rite, Mass is most often celebrated according to the 1970 Roman Missal, which was promulgated after the Second Vatican Council, though some communities use the 1962 or an earlier Missal.

“The most effective celebration is that which brings me to God by the power of the Holy Spirit. That is the most important thing,” Zaccaria underlined. “Then, certainly the relationship must be taken care of, that is, where one realizes what one is doing and that this is heaven on earth.”

Pope Francis also emphasized the importance of understanding what one is partaking in at Mass and other liturgical celebrations.

“We owe to the Council — and to the liturgical movement that preceded it — the rediscovery of a theological understanding of the Liturgy and of its importance in the life of the Church,” he wrote in Desiderio Desideravi.

The pope praised the study of liturgy in a scholarly setting. “Nonetheless,” he added, “it is important now to spread this knowledge beyond the academic environment, in an accessible way, so that each one of the faithful might grow in a knowledge of the theological sense of the Liturgy.”

Zaccaria and Jurczak both said that while liturgical formation can include formal study, it is not merely an intellectual act, but rather a deepened participation in the mystery of the celebration.

Valentina Angelucci, a doctoral candidate in sacred liturgy at the Anselmianum, agreed.

“To participate in the one mystery is to understand, that is, to be aware of the mystery that is going on,” she told CNA. The pope’s apostolic letter on the liturgy is also a good opportunity to refine the Church’s way of defining “participation” at Mass, she added.

“That participation,” she clarified, “does not mean making [people] do things,” such as taking on a role as lector or usher. “Participatory means that the people are present and realize that their presence at Mass is fundamental.”

Valentina Angelucci. Courtesy of Valentina Angelucci.
Valentina Angelucci. Courtesy of Valentina Angelucci.

Jurczak, the Dominican priest, said when discussing liturgical formation, “one of the mistakes is to treat the liturgy as an intellectual act.”

The answer to abuses within the liturgy after Vatican II, he said, is not “to adjust in an intellectual way, or to memorize, for example, the definition of the liturgy.”

“We need spaces for good liturgy, and that’s a huge desire in the Church, in different parishes, in different dioceses, the cathedrals, [spaces] where we can really taste good liturgy.”

What is the liturgy for?

“It struck me in that letter of Pope Francis,” Jurczak said, “that very often he is trying to remind us that in the liturgy is Jesus Christ, liturgy is about Jesus Christ, who is the priest and who is celebrating, and we are participating.”

Zaccaria, the Opus Dei priest, explained that through divine worship, Catholics “participate in the heavenly liturgy, where God is praised, eternally glorified by saints, by angels, by the whole of heaven.”

“The Mass, but also the Liturgy of the Hours, Lauds, Vespers, any liturgical action, any sacrament,” he told CNA, “puts us in communion with God, obviously eminently in the Eucharist.”

Angelucci, the doctoral candidate, emphasized that the liturgy is “a living thing.”

“The liturgy is not at the whim of the individual ever, because it is not ours. The liturgy is a gift, and above all … the work of the Trinity,” she said.

But the Church’s manner of celebrating the liturgy has and does change, she noted.

Angelucci told CNA that to think of “immobilizing [the celebration of] the liturgy is against the very nature of the liturgy, because the liturgy is a living thing.”

“For as long as it has existed, [the celebration] has been living with the people who celebrate it. And so it is a living thing that changes,” she said.

The councils and the missals

Zaccaria explained that before the Council of Trent in the mid-16th century, there was considerable variation in the liturgical books used throughout the Church.

Father Giovanni Zaccaria. Courtesy of Father Giovanni Zaccaria.
Father Giovanni Zaccaria. Courtesy of Father Giovanni Zaccaria.

The Council of Trent decided that the churches of the Roman rite should all use the same books, unless a local church could prove it had a tradition dating back more than 200 years.

A few years after the council concluded, St. Pope Pius V, on the directions of the council, issued a new missal. Because this form of the Mass came out of the Council of Trent, it is often called the Tridentine Mass (Tridentum is Latin for Trent).

Pius V’s Missal was the primary form of the Mass in the Roman rite for 400 years.

In 1962, before the opening of the Second Vatican Council, St. Pope John XXIII issued a revised version of the Roman Missal, including the reforms of Venerable Pope Pius XII, his predecessor.

But the 1962 missal, Jurczak explained, was intended to be “transitory.” It was “not the final product.”

After Vatican II, the missal promulgated by Pope Paul VI in 1970 came into force in the Catholic Church. Still today, it is sometimes called the Novus Ordo, or “New Order,” of the Mass.

In the Second Vatican Council, the Council Fathers took “the liturgy as the first argument,” and issued Sacrosanctum Concilium, a constitution on the sacred liturgy, as the ecumenical council’s first document, Jurczak said.

The Fathers’ idea was to renew the liturgy, Jurczak said. “And obviously the renewal process is not easy. Nobody knew how to do that and how to proceed.”

Popes since the Second Vatican Council — John Paul II, Benedict XVI, Pope Francis — “are trying to implement what Vatican II said” about the liturgy, he said.

Climate change

The experts made a distinction between the theological ideas the Council Fathers had for the Church’s liturgical renewal and what actually took place.

Zaccaria said one of the problems is that “in the years immediately following the Council, so basically the … late ‘60s, early ‘70s, and early ‘80s … the ecclesial climate was a climate of ‘everything is changing.’”

“Which was not true,” he went on. “However, there is a misunderstanding that is related to this idea of the ‘Spirit of the Council,’ that the ‘Spirit of the Council’ means that everybody does whatever they like. But the Council never said that. Nobody ever said that; I mean the documents, the liturgical books, they don’t say that.”

Zaccaria said the idea that everyone could do whatever they wanted was “in violent contrast to what was there before.”

“Because before, for example, to celebrate Mass there were pages and pages where you were told everything you have to do, how you had to hold your hands, how you had to move your feet, that is, everything was absolutely prescribed down to the last comma,” he said.

According to Zaccaria, the new liturgical books themselves are not the problem. Instead, “It’s the way the reform has been received” and implemented, he said.

When a priest does not celebrate the Mass according to the rubrics, when he freely changes things, the Mass appears to “have nothing to do with the divine,” to look more like a show, he said, adding that it is a natural reaction, in this situation, to take refuge in “the sure thing.”

This is where the reform, Jurczak said, “has created a huge tension inside the Church.”

“But the tension is not the most important thing. The most important thing is also the obedience and the reform or the renewal of the liturgy, which goes forward, and we are part of this movement.”

“What we can see,” the Polish priest said, “is that the liturgy, its missal, is very often used to force my position in the Church. That’s something improper, if not diabolical, in the entire discussion on the liturgy, because we are talking about the most holy, most secret spaces in the Church. And at the same time we are fighting against each other using the liturgy.”

This is precisely why Pope Francis reacted the way he did, Jurczak said.

Priest celebrating the traditional Latin Mass at the church of St Pancratius, Rome. Thoom/Shutterstock
Priest celebrating the traditional Latin Mass at the church of St Pancratius, Rome. Thoom/Shutterstock

Zaccaria said “there is nothing wrong with celebrating according to the liturgical Books of the Council of Trent. There is no problem, that is, in the sense subject to the indications that the pope recently gave in Traditionis Custodes.”

Zaccaria emphasized that one form of the liturgy must not become an ideology. “This applies to one camp as well as the other … those who are fans of the Missal of Paul VI and those who are fans of the Missal of Pius V.”

If someone decides, “after studying, thinking, praying, etc., that for me and for my community these liturgical books are more suitable, wonderful,” the priest said. “This is not a problem. As long as this is not an ideological position, that is, taken in opposition to the Second Vatican Council.”

He pointed to another constitution from the Council, Lumen Gentium.

Lumen Gentium said all members of the Church have the same dignity, all members of the Church are equally called to holiness, regardless of whether they are the pope or the last of the baptized. All members of the Church are priests according to the common priesthood of the faithful, so participation in the liturgy is an exercise of the common priesthood,” Zaccaria said.

“The reform of the Second Vatican Council,” he added, “stems from this vision of the Church, that is, the Church sees itself in this way and therefore celebrates according to this way of seeing itself.”

The 1962 Roman Missal puts the priest at the center, he said. “And in Paul VI’s Missal, the center is the Church, present, the whole Church, head and members, Body of Christ, present at that time in that place, in its different articulations,” he explained.

“Even there, if there is no priest, there is no Mass. He is not the center, though. It is a different vision of the Church,” he added, but “both are true.”

According to Jurczak, Pope Francis in Desiderio Desideravi is trying to make the liturgy “much more approachable to people, to make it much more understandable for people.”

While the pope is not offering anything “new,” so-to-speak, “we don’t need to have something new to go forward,” he said.

“The Liturgy,” the pope wrote, “does not leave us alone to search out an individual supposed knowledge of the mystery of God. Rather, it takes us by the hand, together, as an assembly, to lead us deep within the mystery that the Word and the sacramental signs reveal to us.”

“I think that Pope Francis tries to remind us that … even if I’m pro the ‘62 Missal or ‘70 Missal, if I’m in the former liturgy or renewed liturgy, we have to start again thinking about the liturgy itself, to stop fighting about rules. They are important, but we have to move back to the nature of the liturgy,” the priest said.

If you value the news and views Catholic World Report provides, please consider donating to support our efforts. Your contribution will help us continue to make CWR available to all readers worldwide for free, without a subscription. Thank you for your generosity!

Click here for more information on donating to CWR. Click here to sign up for our newsletter.

About Catholic News Agency 10868 Articles
Catholic News Agency (


  1. Father Dominik Jurczak is correct in his analysis of Pope Francis’ stated intention, which intention is stated in the title of the article, I endorse. Infighting for various reasons although many containing value in principle [example Jared Staudt’s Heaven on Earth: Liturgical Wisdom from Eastern Christianity is a continuation of the distancing from unity] lack that value in essence, which is that beauty more consistent with truth and unity.

  2. It’s great when even the experts cited by the article in defense of Francis remind us that “unity” in the patriarchate of Rome didn’t require liturgical uniformity before Trent and not even by QP. (Rather the “voluntary” abandonment of local liturgical diversity was due to the ultramontanist enthusiasm of bishops, who did not consult the faithful.)

  3. UNITY? The WAR over the TLM and the NO started at the TOP and has Divided the Church more than ANYTHING since the Reformation. The Hierarchy disagrees with the Hierarchy. The Laity is now split. Teachers have ZERO reference to consult. RESULT: The Empty Pews are growing. The Confusion from the Vatican multiplies every day. How can so many ‘learned’ men be so petty AND Stupid! Take your time on this, then the few Catholics remaining can REFORM what remains of the RCC! God PLEASE bring us Unifying Leaders!

  4. The statement of Fr. Jurczak that “The 1962 Roman Missal puts the priest at the center…” is an ideology in and of itself. He contradicts his own argumentation. He then goes on to opine that in the Novus Ordo, the church is at the center of the liturgy, yet another ideology. Neither of these conclusions is accurate. Any liturgy that elevates and focuses the faithful on that which is created ceases to be true liturgy, period.

    The simple goal of the liturgy is to place the Sacrifice of Calvary at the center. It is not about the personality cult of the priest or the talent and holiness of the congregation gathered. It is for Christ to be re-presented at the Cross and the Last Supper as saving victim who offers his flesh for the life of the world. Anything less is profane, phony, and an abomination.

  5. When Papa’s name comes up, controversy is sure to follow.

    Should not the pope do things according to Christ? The politically correct have a different agenda. The church is about saving souls and having them sanctified by the indwelling of God’s Holy Spirit.

    Cultural marxism has been examined and found wanting. The word of God is life, cultural Marxism is mans attempt to supplant God and implement a system that finds failure after failure.

    Isaiah 59:19 So they shall fear the name of the Lord from the west, and his glory from the rising of the sun; for he will come like a rushing stream, which the wind of the Lord drives.

    Psalm 144:1 Of David. Blessed be the Lord, my rock, who trains my hands for war, and my fingers for battle;

    1 John 4:4 Little children, you are from God and have overcome them, for he who is in you is greater than he who is in the world.

    1 John 3:8 Whoever makes a practice of sinning is of the devil, for the devil has been sinning from the beginning. The reason the Son of God appeared was to destroy the works of the devil.

    1 Peter 5:8 Be sober-minded; be watchful. Your adversary the devil prowls around like a roaring lion, seeking someone to devour.

  6. As soon as I started reading this the recent picture of the Priest in Chicago allowing two homosexual ‘married’ men to deliver a homily after the reading of the Gospel while the priest just sat there popped up in my head and wouldn’t go away.

1 Trackback / Pingback

  1. Beauty, Truth and Unity: Why Pope Francis is so concerned with the Liturgy | Franciscan Sisters of St Joseph (FSJ) , Asumbi Sisters Kenya

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

All comments posted at Catholic World Report are moderated. While vigorous debate is welcome and encouraged, please note that in the interest of maintaining a civilized and helpful level of discussion, comments containing obscene language or personal attacks—or those that are deemed by the editors to be needlessly combative or inflammatory—will not be published. Thank you.