The Dispatch: More from CWR...

7 things to know about Supreme Court nominee Ketanji Brown Jackson

Katie Yoder By Katie Yoder for CNA

Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson, with President Joe Biden, speaks after she was nominated for Associate Justice of the US Supreme Court, in the Cross Hall of the White House in Washington, DC, February 25, 2022. | Saul Loeb/AFP via Getty Images.

Washington D.C., Feb 25, 2022 / 17:00 pm (CNA).

President Joe Biden nominated federal appeals court Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson to the Supreme Court on Friday.

Here are seven things to know about the nominee:

1. Jackson’s legal background

The 51-year-old judge clerked for Justice Stephen G. Breyer — whose seat she would fill at the Supreme Court — in 1999 and 2000. Biden elevated Jackson to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, one of the most powerful courts in the country, in 2021. But Jackson first became a federal judge in 2013, serving the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia as a President Barack Obama appointee.

Jackson received her undergraduate degree, magna cum laude, and law degree, cum laude, from Harvard, before working as a federal public defender. Her resume includes serving as vice chair and commissioner on the U.S. Sentencing Commission, which establishes sentencing policies and practices for federal courts and advises both Congress and the executive branch.

She also worked at law firms such as Miller Cassidy, Larroca & Lewin, Goodwin Procter, Feinberg Rozen, and Morrison & Foerster.

2. Jackson’s personal life

Born in Washington, D.C., Jackson grew up in Miami. She attended Miami Palmetto Senior High, where she made waves on the speech and debate team. Even then, she hoped to one day become a judicial appointee, as she revealed in her senior yearbook.

Today, Jackson lives in Washington, D.C., with her husband, Patrick Jackson, a general surgeon at MedStar Georgetown University Hospital. The two married in 1996 after meeting at Harvard and have two daughters together: Talia, 21, and Leila, 17.

At the start of her legal career, while working for a Boston law firm, Jackson remembered the struggle between working in law and raising a family.

“Like so many women who enter Big Law, I soon found it extremely challenging,” she said in 2017, while speaking at the University of Georgia. “You start to feel as though the demands of the billable hour are constantly in conflict with the needs of your children.”

Jackson is also related, by marriage, to former Republican House Speaker Paul Ryan.

“Our politics may differ, but my praise for Ketanji’s intellect, for her character, for her integrity, it is unequivocal,” Mr. Ryan told the Senate Judiciary Committee of Jackson in 2012.

Jackson cites her father, who later became the chief attorney for the Miami-Dade County School Board, as her role model. One of her earlier memories is sitting next to him as a preschooler with her coloring books while he studied for law school.

Jackson’s mother worked as a high school principal. Her younger brother worked for the Baltimore police and served in the U.S. Army, including in Iraq, before becoming a lawyer. Two of her uncles also worked in law enforcement.

3. Making court history

If confirmed, Jackson would be the first Black woman to sit on the bench of the nation’s highest court. Biden first announced that he would nominate a Black woman to the Supreme Court on the campaign trail.

“I will nominate someone with extraordinary qualifications, charity, experience and integrity,” Biden repeated in January. “And that person will be the first Black woman ever nominated to the United States Supreme Court.”

Jackson could be the Supreme Court’s third Black justice, and the second Black justice on the current bench, with Justice Clarence Thomas. If confirmed, she would also be the sixth woman to become a Supreme Court justice, and join Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, and Amy Coney Barrett on the current bench.

4. Notable cases

While Jackson has served in her current position for less than a year, her earlier rulings as a district judge “comported with those of a liberal-leaning judge,” the New York Times reported.

Those include “blocking the Trump administration’s attempts to fast-track deportations, cut short grants for teen pregnancy prevention and shield a former White House counsel from testifying before Congress about President Donald J. Trump’s efforts to obstruct the Russia investigation.”

In Committee on the Judiciary v. McGahn in 2019, Jackson ruled that former White House counsel Donald F. McGahn II must comply with a congressional subpoena for his testimony about President Trump’s behavior during the Russia investigation.

During her time on the D.C. Circuit, Jackson has encountered at least one high-profile case — one that involved former president Donald Trump and the Jan. 6 riots at the U.S. Capitol.

In December, Jackson joined a unanimous ruling that Trump could not prevent the House investigation from certain records from the Trump White House, Vox reported. The Supreme Court later upheld that decision.

5. Jackson’s faith

At her nomination ceremony, Jackson began her speech by “thanking God for delivering me to this point in my professional journey,” and adding that “one can only come this far by faith.”

While the details of her faith are unclear, she served on the inaugural advisory board for a Christian school in Rockville, Maryland, from 2010-2011. The school backed Christian beliefs on marriage, gender, and the “sanctity of all human life from conception to natural death.”

During her confirmation hearings last year, she commented on her time at Montrose Christian School, which she described as a now-defunct K-12 private school.

“I was aware that Montrose Christian School was affiliated with Montrose Baptist Church,” she said. “I was not aware that the school had a public website or that any statement of beliefs was posted on the school’s website at the time of my service.”

When asked by Republican Senator Josh Hawley of Missouri about the First Amendment, Jackson responded, “I do believe in religious liberty,” calling it a “foundational tenet of our entire government.”

In response to the Supreme Court nomination, Charles Holmes Jr., an HBCU (Historic Black College and University) college director for The Summit Church, claimed a personal connection to Jackson on Twitter.

“My wife’s grandmother was led to Christ by Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson’s mother,” he typed. “My wife’s family wouldn’t be Christians if it wasn’t for Judge Jackson’s mother.”

6. What Biden says about Jackson

In a tweet announcing the nomination, Biden called Jackson “one of our nation’s brightest legal minds” and said that she will be “an exceptional Justice.”

During his formal announcement on Friday, Biden introduced Jackson as “a daughter of former public school teachers, a proven consensus builder, an accomplished lawyer, a distinguished jurist on one of the nation’s most prestigious courts.”

“Today, I’m pleased to nominate Judge Jackson who will bring extraordinary qualifications, deep experience in intellect, and a rigorous traditional record to the court,” he said.

7. What pro-life leaders say about Jackson

In response to the new nominee, pro-life group Susan B. Anthony List (SBA List) expressed concern over Jackson’s position on Roe v. Wade, the 1973 Supreme Court decision that legalized abortion nationwide. The Supreme Court is expected to decide a high-profile case that directly challenges Roe — Dobbs v. Jackson — later this year.

“Joe Biden is fulfilling his promise to only appoint justices who support the Roe v. Wade regime of abortion on demand up to birth,” president Marjorie Dannenfelser said in a press release. “Ketanji Brown Jackson is backed by many of America’s most radical pro-abortion groups. She is on record opposing the free speech rights of pro-life advocates pleading to save lives outside abortion centers and supporting the false claim that abortion is ‘health care.’”

Dannenfelser added, “We have no doubt she will work with the most pro-abortion administration in history to enshrine abortion on demand nationwide in the law.”

SBA List also noted that in 2001, Jackson co-authored an amicus brief in McGuire v. Reilly in support of a Massachusetts law that created a “buffer zone” preventing pro-life sidewalk counselors from approaching women outside of abortion clinics. Jackson’s clients include pro-choice groups such as NARAL and the Abortion Access Project of Massachusetts.

The March for Life also cautioned pro-lifers on Twitter about Brown’s record.

“March for Life opposes President Biden’s anticipated nomination of Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson for the U.S. Supreme Court based on her record of judicial activism,” the pro-life group said. “We expect her to be a reliable vote for the far left and the Biden administration’s radical abortion agenda.”

“We urge the Members of the Senate to stand for our nation’s mothers and most vulnerable unborn by rejecting this extreme nominee, and we encourage the nomination of a judge who will honor our Constitution and the right to life,” the group concluded.

As the head of Americans United for Life, Catherine Glenn Foster highlighted that abortion groups such as NARAL and Planned Parenthood applauded Jackson as the nominee “tragically, and literally within seconds of President Biden’s announcement.”

“Although Kentanji Brown Jackson has not yet explicitly stated her views on Roe or abortion, NARAL, Planned Parenthood, and other abortion activists see in her an ally for the moral crime of abortion,” she stressed in a statement.

When asked about her position on Roe v. Wade during her confirmation proceedings last year, Jackson responded: “As a sitting federal judge, all of the Supreme Court’s pronouncements are binding on me, and under the Code of Conduct for United States Judges, I have a duty to refrain from critiquing the law that governs my decisions, because doing so creates the impression that the judge would have difficulty applying binding law to their own rulings.”


If you value the news and views Catholic World Report provides, please consider donating to support our efforts. Your contribution will help us continue to make CWR available to all readers worldwide for free, without a subscription. Thank you for your generosity!

Click here for more information on donating to CWR. Click here to sign up for our newsletter.


About Catholic News Agency 4388 Articles
Catholic News Agency (www.catholicnewsagency.com)

14 Comments

  1. Biden promised he would do what he has done.and it is a certainty that his choice will be cheered by the liberal left, which is is it should be.

    From here it seems that the primary considerations for the choice were gender and race, with qualifications second – I am NOT saying she is unqualified.

    But – the choice seems to be both sexist and racist.

  2. One thing we can count on – ANYONE who opposes this nomination, no matter how good his or her reasons for doing so, will be immediately branded by the left as sexist and racist – that much we know for sure.

  3. The author leaves out the elephants in the room…poorly written opinions and her reversals, even by experienced liberal judges. As a former federal public defender she sees the Constitution as ‘living’ and her approach on crime is best described as ‘soft’.

    Reading her opinions and writings is disappointing to say the least.

  4. NARAL and Planned Parenthood endorsed Jackson “literally wrhin seconds” of Biden’s announcement.

    Q: Why not have NARAL and PP just di the announcement?

    • I’m specifically interested in her family’s religious experience and under which denomination was she
      “brought “ to Christ. Which brand Christianity was she subject to and am curious about the level of orthodoxy of her personal and familial history.

    • Oh yes, killing “undesirable human beings” isn’t that bad, and think of all the net benefits that come to us from doing it:

      – more money to go around by culling out “the losers;”
      – “safe” pharmaceuticals for us (the “winners”) developed from and/or tested with the cells of “the undesirables;”
      – salve for the haunted consciences of “progressive-Krisjuns;”
      – more millionaire abortionists on the payroll of “Margaret- Sanger-INC;”
      – more millionaires and billionaires in the BIG-PHARMA criminal enterprise; and
      – more crusading attorneys and judges and their decadent law schools confecting the sacrament of their human sacrifice cult.

      Enchantment for the party faithful…

  5. As George Weigel himself so eloquently wrote, John Paul II was very circumspect about directly confronting evil. Weigel has written a critical and needed history of John Paul II’s years as priest and bishop in Poland.

    What I learned from Weigel’s book is that holiness conquers evil, not confrontation. Karol Wojytwa was circumspect about directly criticizing the Polish regime. As Weigel has told us, some clergy paid a high price (and were even physically assaulted, imprisoned and murdered) during the course of their ministry.

    In this respect John Paul is a role model to clergy: a man of great personal holiness, and someone cautious about what he says in public forums.

    It is staggering to read that the same biographer who so diligently documented the life of John Paul II to actually ignore the very lessons that he communicated to his readers.

    John Paul II was careful what he said in public, yet George Weigel repeats the insults hurled at global leaders. John Paul II resorted to prayer, yet we now resort to cheering those engaged in violence.

    And perhaps most critically, both John Paul II and Ronald Reagan prevailed in a match against the Soviet Union without resorting to war.

    Even within his own country, Bishop Wojytwa was under tremendous pressure not to be seen endorsing acts of civil disobedience by Solidarnosc, the Polish Trade Union.

    Doctor Weigel, it would seem, has forgotten the very lessons John Paul II taught us about standing up to evil. We do not take cheap shots and publicly insult those who do evil, especially when they can inflict harm on members of the flock.

    How sad and pathetic that Russia demanded a security guarantee in the Ukraine and the West said “no.” We now portray Russia as bent on European hegemony, when it was our own insults, sanctions and wokeness that alienated the Russian government in the first place.

    Is Dr. Weigel familiar with terms like “detente,” “diplomacy,” or familiar with the biography of Henry Kissinger? Kissinger spent his career avoiding war with global and regional super-powers, not instigating wars with the same.

    Neither Henry Kissinger nor John Paul II publicly insulted adversaries. A lesson Dr. Weigel might want to absorb.

    • Pope John Paul II was much more vocal and direct especially with the Solidarity Movement. Because John Paul didn’t call some individual a ‘name’ , that was progress? His ‘working behind the scenes’ was much more public and demonstrative than that.

      You don’t get shot because of detente and gentlemanly discourse.

      Diplomacy works up to a point.

      Russia never ‘asked’ for a security guarantee. And the first Obama/Biden administration placated Putin and Crimea was annexed. The refusal of promised weapons to Ukraine in real time and Obama’s infamous ‘ wait until after the election’ declaration was all that Putin needed.

      The idea that Russia is paranoid about newly minted NATO members is absurd if one has studied Putin and his decades resolve to reclaim the stature – and territory – of the Soviet Union.

      When has NATO ever decided to arbitrarily invade a country? Putin uses that guise of NATO to justify his national aggression for territory and not that he fears NATO.

      Ask ‘super’ negotiator Kissinger about April, 1975 and his years of ‘diplomacy’ in that war.

  6. Biden said: ‘Judge Jackson…will bring…deep experience in intellect…to the court’. Right, if only Biden could define ‘deep experience in intellect’.

  7. In short, she is an ideologue slightly to the left of Trotsky and a Democratic Party flunky who won’t think twice about legislating from the bench to impose her political agenda. She also surely won’t hesitate to use the immense power of the position to punish those she regards as enemies. Her being a black woman should not shield her from the withering criticism she deserves or the opposition that should be mounted to oppose her nomination.

  8. So, um, does CNA still stand for “Catholic News Agency”?

    I ask because what news agency that claims to be “Catholic” slots a SCOTUS nominee’s position on abortion LAST on a list of pertinent facts about that nominee?

    I mean, last? Behind the nominee’s — *yawns lazily* —obligatory Ivy League educational background?

    Behind her marital status?

    Behind even the complimentary pabulum dished out on her behalf by the person nominating her?

    I mean, if abortion is last on *that* list, why mention it at all? Obviously, we don’t care.

    (Sigh.)

    If we treated our dogs the way we treat our own children, people would be being burned at the stake.

  9. I won’t share this simply because the author reports on her record with Trump’s accusations yet doesn’t report anything on John Durhams report and the clearing of Trump. It also doesn’t point out how this person is not unbiased otherwise she would be seeking investigation into Hunter Biden, Hillary Clinton and all the crooked democrats. Trump continues to get hit from all sides while democrats have no standards they are held to.

1 Trackback / Pingback

  1. 7 things to know about Supreme Court nominee Ketanji Brown Jackson – Via Nova Media

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

All comments posted at Catholic World Report are moderated. While vigorous debate is welcome and encouraged, please note that in the interest of maintaining a civilized and helpful level of discussion, comments containing obscene language or personal attacks—or those that are deemed by the editors to be needlessly combative or inflammatory—will not be published. Thank you.


*