Catholic group decries Oklahoma execution, during which inmate vomited

Christine Rousselle   By Christine Rousselle for CNA

Samrith Na Lumpoon/Shutterstock.

Washington, D.C. Newsroom, Oct 29, 2021 / 17:09 pm (CNA).

A Catholic organization is calling on Oklahoma to stop executing prisoners following yet another botched execution Thursday afternoon.

Oklahoma executed John Marion Grant, the first of seven scheduled executions in the next six months, on Oct. 28. According to onlookers, Grant began convulsing and vomiting after being administered midazolam, the first drug in a three-drug cocktail used in lethal injections. Prison officials wiped Grant’s vomit off of his face and neck after “several minutes,” per the AP.

Grant was declared dead at 4:21 p.m., six minutes after he was officially described as unconscious.

“Oklahoma’s track record for botched executions is nothing short of horrendous,” said Krisanne Vaillancout Murphy, Executive Director of Catholic Mobilizing Network in a statement released by the group Oct. 29 which called the state’s execution protocol “particularly egregious.”

“The excessive pain and suffering experienced by John Grant during his execution last night warrants an immediate halt to the six pending execution dates in Oklahoma through March of next year,” she added.

Robert Dunham, the executive director of the Death Penalty Information Center, said it was “notable and unusual” for a condemned prisoner to vomit during their execution. Dunham told the Associated Press that he had “never heard of or seen that” prior to Grant’s execution.

Grant was sentenced to death in 1999, after he murdered a prison worker named Gay Carter. At the time of the murder, he was serving a 130-year sentence for armed robbery.

Grant’s execution was the first in the state of Oklahoma since the botched execution of Charles Frederick Warner in 2015. Following Warner’s execution, it was discovered that officials had used potassium acetate instead of potassium chloride to carry out the execution.

Warner had previously been scheduled to die the same night as Clayton Lockett, but his execution was delayed after Lockett’s went awry. Medical professionals repeatedly failed to insert an IV into Lockett’s veins, and the execution was halted after 33 minutes.

Lockett died 10 minutes after the execution was paused due to a massive heart attack.

While the Church teaches that capital punishment is not intrinsically evil, both Pope Francis and his immediate predecessors have condemned the practice in the West.

Regarding the execution of criminals, the Catechism of the Council of Trent taught that by its “legal and judicious exercise” civil authorities “punish the guilty and protect the innocent.”

St. John Paul II called on Christians to be “unconditionally pro-life” and said that “the dignity of human life must never be taken away, even in the case of someone who has done great evil.” He also spoke of his desire for a consensus to end the death penalty, which he called “cruel and unnecessary.”

And Benedict XVI exhorted world leaders to make “every effort to eliminate the death penalty” and told Catholics that ending capital punishment was an essential part of “conforming penal law both to the human dignity of prisoners and the effective maintenance of public order.”

In August 2018, the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith issued a new draft of the Catechism of the Catholic Church’s paragraph regarding capital punishment.

Quoting Pope Francis’ words in a speech of Oct. 11, 2017, the new paragraph states, in part, that “the Church teaches, in the light of the Gospel, that ‘the death penalty is inadmissible because it is an attack on the inviolability and dignity of the person,’ and she works with determination for its abolition worldwide.”

Reasons for changing the teaching, the paragraph says, include: the increasing effectiveness of detention systems, growing understanding of the unchanging dignity of the person, and leaving open the possibility of conversion.

Fr. Thomas Petri, O.P., a moral theologian at the Dominican House of Studies in Washington, D.C., told CNA at the time that he thinks this change “further absolutizes the pastoral conclusion made by John Paul II.”

“Nothing in the new wording of paragraph 2267 suggests the death penalty is intrinsically evil. Indeed, nothing could suggest that because it would contradict the firm teaching of the Church,” Fr. Petri continued.


If you value the news and views Catholic World Report provides, please consider donating to support our efforts. Your contribution will help us continue to make CWR available to all readers worldwide for free, without a subscription. Thank you for your generosity!

Click here for more information on donating to CWR. Click here to sign up for our newsletter.


About Catholic News Agency 5129 Articles
Catholic News Agency (www.catholicnewsagency.com)

3 Comments

  1. What about the human dignity of the people that these criminals ruthlessly butchered? What about the pain, terror, and suffering their victims were forced to endure? What about the lifelong trauma, sorrow, and grief that the families of these victims have to endure? Why do we never hear about any of that from Bergoglio, the CDF, and these so-called “Catholic” organizations?

  2. What hash recent Popes have made of the Church’s perennial teaching on capital punishment. It is not intrinsically evil, but it should be abolished because it is unnecessary and cruel. And although it has not been declared intrinsically evil, Francis’ change to the Catechism calling for its elimination is binding on Catholics. This despite the fact the Church upheld the validity of the death penalty right from the start.

    Incidentally, the facts of this case are particularly inconvenient for the proponents of abolition. The victim of this thug was a prison worker. So, locking up felons does not prevent them from harming innocents, does it?

    Finally, the fact the man executed vomited has no bearing on the question of whether capital punishment is justified for serious crimes. State should go back to firing squads, however.

  3. Like Scalfari, Biden does not take notes, and, you know, his short-term memory and cognitive faculties are not what they used to be be. At any rate, I hear there was much common ground on migration and climate change.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

All comments posted at Catholic World Report are moderated. While vigorous debate is welcome and encouraged, please note that in the interest of maintaining a civilized and helpful level of discussion, comments containing obscene language or personal attacks—or those that are deemed by the editors to be needlessly combative or inflammatory—will not be published. Thank you.


*