The Dispatch: More from CWR...

Judge again bars mandatory COVID shot for Michigan student athletes

Sixteen Christian students at Western Michigan University object to shots on religious grounds.

Sophomore Sydney Shafer, a guard on the Western Michigan University women’s basketball team, is one of 16 plaintiffs in a federal lawsuit over the university’s policy requiring athletes get a COVID-19 shot. (Photo: Ashley Huss / Western Michigan University)

A federal judge in Kalamazoo, Mich., issued a preliminary injunction Thursday barring Western Michigan University from enforcing a policy requiring all student athletes receive a COVID-19 gene-therapy injection, something 16 Christian student athletes say violates their constitutionally protected religious beliefs.

U.S. District Judge Paul L. Maloney agreed to the preliminary injunction after an hourlong hearing at the Federal Building in Kalamazoo. He extended an existing restraining order against the university pending publication of his opinion on the preliminary injunction. The ruling means a growing list of Christian student athletes are protected from facing a do-or-don’t-play decision under Western Michigan’s COVID-19 athletic policy. The policy does not apply to the general student body at the 20,500-student university, nor to those who play recreational sports.

“It’s a huge second-step win because now this order stays in place indefinitely,” said David A. Kallman, senior legal counsel for the Great Lakes Justice Center, which represents the 16 athletes in the case. “We’re very thrilled for our clients. Now, all the fall sports and everybody that’s participating and playing right now, they’re going to be able to play.”

Since Judge Maloney issued a temporary restraining order on Aug. 31, a dozen additional Christian athletes signed onto the suit against the university. The case was originally filed Aug. 30 on behalf of four women’s soccer players whose petitions for a religious exemption to the mandatory COVID jab were denied by Western Michigan. All of the additional plaintiffs had their religious-exemption petitions denied by the university, which said mandatory vaccines help “avoid the significant risk posed to the intercollegiate athletic programs of a COVID-19 outbreak…”

The sports represented in the lawsuit now include football, women’s soccer, women’s basketball, men’s baseball, women’s cross country and track, and the dance team. Under Western Michigan’s COVID policy, athletes who do not get the COVID shot faced being removed from team competition. Six of the students identified themselves as Catholic, with the others from a variety of Protestant churches. Their petitions ranged from a few sentences to multiple pages with footnotes citing medical research, Scriptural references and church documents on moral considerations involved with vaccines.

Kaelyn Parker, a Catholic student on the WMU dance team, said the use of fetal tissue from aborted children in vaccine development is immoral. “The research to develop these (so-called) vaccines has been proven to have used fetal tissue from aborted babies,” she wrote in her petition for religious exemption. “I am a total pro-life advocate and volunteer for many right to life and church pro-life activities.” She cited Pope St. John Paul II’s 1995 encyclical Evangelium Vitae, which said use of embryos or fetuses in medical experiments “constitutes a crime against their dignity as human beings, who have a right to the same respect owed to a child once born, just as to every person.”

The Charlotte Lozier Institute reports that of the mRNA COVID vaccines developed under emergency authorization in the United States, those from Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna used cell lines derived from abortions in some of the confirmatory lab testing. United States bishops have said those shots are morally permissible because of the remoteness of material cooperation in the evil of abortion. Johnson & Johnson and AstraZeneca used abortion-derived cell lines in their vaccine development and/or production, something much more morally problematic for Catholics.

Danielle Natte, a Catholic dance team athlete, also opposes the shots due to moral issues with use of tissue from aborted children. “As a follower of Jesus Christ, I believe that life begins at conception. I believe that using preborn fetal tissue in the manufacturing process of vaccines misaligns with God’s purpose for human life,” Natte wrote in her petition. “I believe as a follower of Jesus Christ, we as believers should preserve the sanctity of life and not cooperate (in) unrighteousness.”

Several of the athletes expressed concerns about reported side effects of the COVID shots, including myocarditis, an inflammation of the heart muscle. Others cited worries that the spike proteins used in the COVID mRNA shots could accumulate in the ovaries, something that could affect ability to conceive children. Some challenged the safety and efficacy of the shots. 

As of Aug. 27, more than 13,900 people have died in the United States after taking a COVID shot, according to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) at the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. That’s more deaths than for all other vaccines combined since 1990. More than 18,000 people became permanently disabled after taking a COVID shot, and more than 650,000 adverse reactions were reported. Adverse reactions have included myocarditis, heart attack, Guillain-Barré syndrome, stroke, anaphylaxis, venous embolism, miscarriage, Kawasaki disease and thrombocytopenia, a low blood platelet count. According to federal data from VAERS Analysis, COVID shots given since December 2020 have a death rate of 25.29 deaths per million doses. That compares to 1.05 deaths for measles vaccines, 0.03 deaths for flu vaccines and 0.9 deaths per million doses for tetanus shots.

Sydney Shafer, a member of the WMU women’s basketball team and part of the Fellowship of Christian Athletes, worries the COVID shots could prevent her from one day having children. “Fertility is something that God gave me that I do not want to jeopardize,” Shafer wrote in her exemption petition. “I hope to have children one day and getting this vaccine would jeopardize that, considering that we do not know the long-term effects this vaccine places in our bodies. I also do not want to put anything unnatural in my body and jeopardize what God made me to be.”

In its response to the lawsuit, Western Michigan said it does not challenge the sincerity of the religious beliefs of student athletes, but wondered if it should not have offered them a chance to apply for a religious exemption in the first place. “Based on plaintiffs’ allegations and arguments, WMU would have been better off if it had made no allowances for a religious exemption — which it was constitutionally permitted to do,” read the university’s legal filing, prepared by attorney Michael S. Bogren of Grand Rapids. 

The university said the vaccine policy does not discriminate against religion because it applies to all athletes regardless of religious belief. Student athletes have no constitutionally protected interest in participating in intercollegiate athletics, WMU wrote, although the students did not make that argument in the original suit. Although the religious exemption forms were marked “denied” by the university, “each is more accurately described as granting the exemption but denying the specific accommodation that the Plaintiffs requested,” the university’s brief reads. 

“I thought, ‘Wow, this is an interesting spin to say the least,’ ” Kallman said. “We’re not going to let you play, we’re not going to let you compete on the teams we’re not going to let you practice, we’re not going to give you access to our facilities, we’re not going to let you have access to the team training tables — you can’t do any of that stuff, but we granted your exemption.”

Athletes always have another option, WMU wrote in its brief, “They are free to transfer to a school with a different vaccination policy.”

The university argued it should not be held to a judicial standard known as strict scrutiny. In his opinion granting the original restraining order, Judge Maloney said Western Michigan must meet the burden of strict scrutiny. At the time, the judge said the vaccination requirement for student athletes “is not justified by a compelling interest and is not narrowly tailored.”

The student athletes in the case offered to be subjected to other measures to prevent the spread of COVID, such as regular testing, wearing of masks, etc. Some of the students volunteered to take prophylactic medications such as Ivermectin, an anti-parasite medication used more than 3.7 billion times in the developing world to treat and prevent river blindness. 

A number of states in India used Ivermectin to drastically reduce daily cases and deaths from COVID. An analysis of 63 medical studies on the use of Ivermectin to treat and prevent COVID showed the drug resulted in 86 percent improvement in mortality, hospitalization, recovery and cases when used as a preventive agent. It showed a 70 percent improvement when used in early treatment of COVID. Use of the drug has been widely mocked in mainstream media because of its dual use in veterinary medicine to treat parasites. Unfounded stories circulated in media outlets recently claiming a wave of emergency room visits by people overdosing on Ivermectin from agricultural supply stores.


If you value the news and views Catholic World Report provides, please consider donating to support our efforts. Your contribution will help us continue to make CWR available to all readers worldwide for free, without a subscription. Thank you for your generosity!

Click here for more information on donating to CWR. Click here to sign up for our newsletter.


About Joseph M. Hanneman 79 Articles
Joseph M. Hanneman writes from Madison, Wisconsin.

7 Comments

  1. If Chairman Joe hears that U.S. District Judge Paul L. Maloney has supported religious exemptions from mandatory vaccines, he will likely request the judge’s resignation letter, as he has all the Trump appointees to boards of the service academies. He might even pull out his mighty pen and sign multiple Executive Orders against those who request such exemptions. I am grateful to these young students who adhere to their religious convictions in the face of being ostracized from participating in the sports they choose. In the end, if we have no religious convictions, we are devoid of any meaning in our lives. Hooray for these young champions! Win or lose in the sports, they are all winners in the end!

  2. What shamefully inaccurate reporting!! The deaths and adverse effects reported to VAERS are deaths and illness for ANY reason, NOT deaths/illness related to the vaccine. (Which, by the way, is NOT “gene therapy”). And the required data reported to VAERS is different from all other vaccines because of the vaccine’s status as approved for emergency use. This spreading of misinformation is way more dangerous than any vaccine!

    • Scientists should not be tampering with R.N.A. and or D.N.A as it is the containment vessels for the soul. The scientific community has embraced wickedness. Also Bill Gates is a college drop-out who happened to have billionaire parents who happened enroll him in an elite private school which was one of the few schools to have a computer at the time which is why he was able to create Microsoft Windows.Can’t you see that the Devil is using the m.R.N.A.in the vaccines to replace the Holy Spirit Fire Gene that all Humans carry with a satanic strand of D.N.A. remaking the taker of the vaccine in the image of the Devil with the gene code 6-6-6.

  3. Let your conscience be your guide. I am a COVID vaccine proponent.

    Excerpts from Catholic News Service…
    “People are sick, and infection is spreading rapidly among the unvaccinated.”

    “there is no church law or rule that obligates a Catholic to receive a vaccine — including COVID-19 vaccines.”

    “The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith has declared the COVID-19 vaccines to be morally licit and has said they can be used in good conscience. At this moment during the coronavirus pandemic, the church has both the opportunity and the obligation to encourage the people of God to get vaccinated against COVID-19.”

    I take issue with the unscientific assessment of COVID failures. According to the CDC and FDA the vaccine is proven to be extremely effective with millions in the US having been vaccinated. If the vaccinated show signs of COVID/DELTA their sickness is minor with no hospitalization.

    • As I posted above, I have seen this information before and it refers to the Covid 19 vaccine. It is actually compared to other vaccines in different columns. There is also much evidence that Ivermectin is helpful in fighting Covid. Probably the biggest problem we have -and not only in regards to Covid 19- is the is in selective reporting when what are need are open and public dialogues. Perhaps this article (and other studies like it) is wrong, but the results are better debated than silenced.
      https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2052297521000883

  4. “COVID-19 gene-therapy injection”
    haven’t heard the vaccine called that one yet, lol

    Gee, who paid CWR to run this article? Especially with all its awkward shilling for the horse worm drugs towards the end?

    Is this how this site pays the bills?

1 Trackback / Pingback

  1. Canon212 Update: What Kind of Catholic Does a Twisted FrancisBishop Produce? – The Stumbling Block

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

All comments posted at Catholic World Report are moderated. While vigorous debate is welcome and encouraged, please note that in the interest of maintaining a civilized and helpful level of discussion, comments containing obscene language or personal attacks—or those that are deemed by the editors to be needlessly combative or inflammatory—will not be published. Thank you.


*