
Vatican City, Aug 25, 2017 / 12:02 pm (CNA/EWTN News).- After his recent visit to Russia, Vatican Secretary of State Cardinal Pietro Parolin said a key message of his overall “positive” trip was the crucial role the country plays in working for peace, which he voiced to President Vladimir Putin.
“I tried above all to say this, this was the message that I wanted to convey: that Russia, because of her geographic position, her history, her culture, her past and her present, has a great role to play in the international community, in the world,” Cardinal Parolin said Aug. 25.
Because of her role, Russia also has “a particular responsibility regarding peace,” he said, adding that “both the country and her leaders have a great responsibility regarding the building of peace and they must really strive to put the higher interests of peace above all other interests.”
Cardinal Parolin spoke to Alessandro Gisotti from the Secretariat for Communications after returning from his Aug. 21-24 visit to Russia, during which he met with leaders of the Russian Orthodox Church and civil authorities.
Having met with the Pope immediately after returning to Rome, Cardinal Parolin said Francis was happy to hear about the “positive result” of the visit to Russia.
Pope Francis, he said, “is very, very attentive to all opportunities for dialogue that there can be, he is very attentive to value all the dialogues we have and he is very happy when making steps in this direction.”
Overall, the cardinal said that for him, “the result of this trip is a very positive result and so my sentiments are, of course, sentiments of gratitude to the Lord for having accompanied me during these day.”
The meetings “were characterized by a climate of cordiality, a climate of listening, a climate of respect. I would define them as meaningful encounters, they were also constructive encounters,” he said.
In addition to sharing how he was moved by the faith and religiosity of the Russian people, both Catholic and Orthodox, Cardinal Parolin said many different issues were addressed, including Ukraine and Syria.
Suggestions for future areas of collaboration between not only the Holy See and Russia, but also the Catholic Church and the Russian Orthodox Church, were also discussed, such as the release of prisoners in Ukraine, the restitution of Church property confiscated during the communist regime, and collaboration in providing humanitarian aid to Ukraine and the Middle East.
However, Cardinal Parolin stressed that the proposals made “must be verified and possibly implemented after an adequate discernment and study.”
Given the overall positive result of the visit, “I would say that in the end – to use this word – it was a useful trip, it was an interesting trip, it was a constructive trip.”
Below is CNA’s full English translation of the interview:
Q: Eminence, there was understandably great expectation for your visit to Russia. What sentiments do you have coming back to the Vatican?
I think the balance of this trip is a very positive balance and so my sentiments are, of course, sentiments of gratitude to the Lord for having accompanied me during these days. We were able to realize the program that was already fixed, to keep the scheduled encounters, and I have to say that these meetings – at the level of civil authority with President Putin and with the Minister of Foreign Affairs Lavrov, and then with the leaders of the hierarchy of the Russian Orthodox Church, Patriarch Kirill and Metropolitan Hilarion – were characterized by a climate of cordiality, a climate of listening, a climate of respect. I would define them as meaningful encounters, they were also constructive encounters. I feel that I have to put a bit of emphasis on this word: “constructive encounters.” Of course, then, there was also the part of the encounter with the Catholic community. Above all thanks to the conversation and dialogue we had with the bishops in the nunciature, it was possible to know from a bit closer the reality, the life, of the Catholic community in Russia, her joys, her hopes, but also her challenges and the difficulties she has to face. For the latter, in part, it was possible to represent them, to expose them to the authorities. I cite one for all: the theme of the restitution of some churches that were confiscated during the time of the communist regime and for which there still has not been any restitution in the face of the need of the Catholic community to have adequate places of worship. So, I would say that in the end – to use this word – it was a useful trip, it was an interesting trip, it was a constructive trip.
Q: Have you already had the chance to speak with the Holy Father about the trip? What can you share about what you said?
Yes, naturally as soon as I returned I went to the Holy Father to give him a short, brief, concise account of both the contents and the results of the trip and naturally I conveyed the greetings that were given on the part of all parties I met, from the affection and closeness of the Catholic community, to the respectful greetings of the authorities. I remember that President Putin – I think it was also recorded in the public part of the meeting – underlined the living memory he keeps of his meetings with Pope Francis in 2013 and 2015. And then also the fraternal greeting of Patriarch Kirill. Of course the Pope was pleased with these impressions, of these positive results which I communicated; the Pope, as we know – he repeated also in this circumstance – is very, very attentive to all opportunities for dialogue that there can be, he is very attentive to value all the dialogues we have and he is very happy when making steps in this direction.
Q: What were the principle themes discussed in the meeting with Patriarch Kirill?
I would say that fundamentally we considered this new climate, this new atmosphere which reings in the relations between the Russian Orthodox Church and the Catholic Church; this new climate, this new atmosphere which has been established in recent years and which, naturally, has had a particularly significant moment and strong acceleration thanks to the meeting in Havana between the Patriarch and the Pope, which this event followed. Truly, I noted from the part of both Orthodox interlocutors how they were moved by the experience of the visit of the relics of St. Nicholas of Bari to Moscow and St. Petersburg, but in the sense that they were touched by the faith and religiosity of the people. It was highlighted that as many Russians who belong to the Orthodox tradition but don’t practice, drew close to the Church on this occasion. It was truly a great event both in terms of size – there were two and a half million faithful who visited the relics – and in terms of the impact of faith and spirituality that this event produced. We then went through some of the steps that have been taken and those that will be, which ought to be the steps taken in the future. To me it seems that on their part, as naturally also on our part, they do not want to exhaust the potential that this new phase has opened, and naturally the collaboration can take place in various areas, at various levels: from cultural collaboration – academic – to humanitarian…this point was heavily stressed, that in front of the situations of conflict that exist in the world, the two Churches can really carry out an incisive and effective humanitarian work. Also touched on – with respect and at the same time frankness – themes that are a bit prickly in relations between the two Churches; however, we tried to give – at least in my opinion, what I took away – a rather positive sense, that is, to explore shared ways to tackle and to try to solve these problems. And of course even these shared paths, these concrete proposals that emerged must be verified and possibly implemented after an adequate discernment and study.
Q: Now, Eminence, regarding more sensitive themes: the question of Ukraine is one of the most delicate in relations between the Holy See and Russia. You visited Ukraine a year ago. Is there some news after your visit?
New, until now, there is none…perhaps it’s premature to think about something new. The Lord – we hope – will make it sprout and bear fruit, if there were those seeds of good that we tried to plant. However, as noted, the question of Ukraine is one of the issues of greatest concern for the Holy See: the Pope has spoken many times about this topic…It’s obvious that this could not be treated, this theme; it could not be forgotten in that circumstance. I would say that above all in the sense of trying to see, to evaluate, whether there were any concrete steps that could be made toward a lasting and just solution to the conflict, which are virtually the agreements reached between the two parties. And it is well known that the Holy See has first of all insisted on the humanitarian aspects starting with the Pope’s great initiative in Ukraine (last year’s collection). In this sense, for example, one of the themes is that of the freeing of prisoners: this is one of the “humanitarian” topics that could really be important in giving some impetus to the entire process, even politically, to get out of this stasis and and to advance – for example – the topic of the truce, the ceasefire, the topic of security conditions in the area, the topic, also, of the political conditions in order to make progress in the global solution. So we hope that something can help to walk in the right direction, taking into account – when we talk of solutions, of humanitarian issues – that we are speaking about people and speaking about suffering. And I think that this is what everyone must have in mind precisely to try to make an extra effort to go in the right direction.
Q: The media naturally gave a lot of attention to the encounter in Sochi with Vladimir Putin. How did the meeting with the Russian president go?
I would say that the meeting with President Putin enters a bit into the evaluation that I have at the beginning: it was a cordial meeting, it was a respectful meeting in which we were able to address the issues that at least we had in our hearts to discuss, such as, for example, the Middle East, the situation of Syria in particular, and in this context also the issue of the presence of Christians: we know that one of the coincidences that there are between Russia and the Holy See is precisely this attention to the situation of Christians, the theme of Christian persecution, which we tend to widen to all religious groups – naturally – and to all minorities, trying to involve even Muslims, as was done for example in that seminar that took place in Geneva last year. Then, on the topic of Ukraine, we have already spoken a bit; the theme of Venezuela: I saw that some media also reported some statements that were made in this sense. So, other than bilateral themes, which I mentioned at the beginning, we presented some situations of difficulty for the Catholic community. I tried above all to say this, this was the message that I wanted to convey: that Russia, because of her geographic position, her history, her culture, her past and her present, has a great role to play in the international community, in the world. A great role to play. And so it has a particular responsibility regarding peace: both the country and her leaders have a great responsibility regarding the building of peace and they must really strive to put the higher interests of peace above all other interests.
Q: Finally, Eminence, other than the most significant encounters, is there another moment or specific aspect you want to highlight?
Yes, there was the beautiful moment of Mass together with the Catholic community. The cathedral was crowded with people and it was a bit of a surprise, because it was a holiday, so that many people weren’t expected. Then, of course, the faith and devotion of this people always moves me: how the participate in Mass, with such attention, with such reverence, with such silence, they are present there. And I think that they came more than anything to express their attachment to the Pope and the fact of being members of the universal Church. So that was a nice moment. Another beautiful moment was the brief visit to the Sisters of Mother Teresa who work in Moscow. We were able to meet and greet the people they assist, even there it was shown a great affection toward the Pope. And then, the last thing that I want to recall: I was very impressed by the visit we made one evening to the Cathedral of Christ the Savior, the Orthodox cathedral of Moscow; the cathedral that was blown up during the communist regime. So it was also a moment to remember this painful history in the age in which they wanted to completely eradicate the faith from the hearts of believers and eliminate every dream of the presence of God and the Church in that land. Something they weren’t able to do, because God is greater than the projects of men.
[…]
Lord have mercy.
A wonderful syncretic assembly of all types! What a sad lot!
“Lord Have Mercy.”
No doubt, the atheist materialists overpopulation alarmist globalist and their ilk, have a strong presence in The Vatican, claiming for themselves or for Caesar, what belongs to God, The Ordered Communion Of Perfect Complementary Love, The Most Holy And Undivided Blessed Trinity, Through The Unity Of The Holy Ghost (Filioque), The Author Of Love, Of Life, And Of Marriage, and thus The Author Of our unalienable Right to Life, to Liberty, and to The Pursuit of Happiness, the purpose of which can only be, what God intended.
It is indeed heartbreaking that Vatican II, which did away with The Charitable Anathema, led to error being able to take root, despite the efforts of the Faithful Popes, to weed it out.
We can know through both Faith and reason, that it is never necessary or proper to destroy an innocent human life, in order to save a human life, and that mandating a vaccine that uses the cells of an aborted child, who obviously could not have given their consent, and that furthermore, does not provide immunity from disease, or stop the spread of disease, and in some persons, can actually cause disease, due to the imbalance of iron, can never be justified, because we simply do not know for certain, whether these vaccines, in certain individuals, will correct the proper balance of FURIN, which regulates HEPCIDIN, which regulates Iron, or possibly make it worse.
Mandating a “vaccine”, that does not provide immunity from disease, or stop the spread of the disease, has not been adequately tested to determine both the short term and long term effects on targeting the spike protein of COVID 19, which includes the addition of a FURIN receptor, cannot possibly be necessary or proper, and does not pass the Law Of General Applicability Test because FURIN levels and thus Hepcidin levels , and thus Iron levels, can differ among human persons. AND “Even if selective inhibition of individual PCSKs can be achieved, systemic long‐term inhibition will most likely have detrimental effects, as PCSKs are required for the activation of hundreds of cellular substrates. Thus, local applications such as targeted treatment of tumors or topical treatment of bacterial and viral infections may be more feasible than systemic therapy. Finally, the ability of tumor cells or pathogens to evolve resistance or evasion mutations remains poorly investigated. For example, several substrates such as dengue virus prM harbour suboptimal furin target sequences and may optimise their cleavage sites upon therapy to enable sufficient cleavage in the presence of inhibitors.” https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6682551/ See -Therapeutic inhibition of FURIN
These vaccines were created to provide systemic long term inhibition, not short term.
How could it be Constitutional to mandate an injection that does not provide immunity from COVID 19, or stop the spread of COVID 19, and there has not been any risk/ benefit assessment done to determine the long or short term possible harm to those most susceptible, nor is there any liability protection. For these reasons, it is not possible for anyone to provide informed consent. They simply do not know what exactly they are consenting to in regards to this experimental injection.
Speech that is not grounded in Truth, can have harmful consequences.
Why then, the push to continue to mandate these injections and boosters while any scientific evidence that may provide an explanation as to why a risk/benefit analysis must be done, is being censored and Medical experts are losing their jobs, along with a multitude of persons who could not, in good conscience, submit to these injections?
Some scientific information that would be helpful to know while performing a risk/benefit analysis of COVID 19 vaccines:
https://www.google.com/search?q=the+spike+protein+of+covid+mimics+hepcidin&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&hl=en-us&client=safari
Hepcidin and the spike protein :
https://www.google.com/search?q=hepcidin+and+the+spike+protein&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&hl=en-us&client=safari
POSTTRANSLATIONAL PROCESSING OF HEPCIDIN IN HUMAN HEPATOCYTES IS MEDIATED BY THE PROHORMONE CONVERTASE FURIN:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2211381/
FURIN AT THE CUTTING EDGE: FROM PROTEIN TRAFFIC TO EMBRYOGENESIS AND DISEASE:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1964754/
Iron dyshomeostasis and ferroptosis in Alzheimer’s disease: Molecular mechanisms of cell death and novel therapeutic drugs and targets for AD. – Abstract – Europe PMC:
https://europepmc.org/article/pmc/pmc9523169
Furin inhibits epithelial cell injury and alleviates experimental colitis by activating the Nrf2-Gpx4 signaling pathway – PubMed:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33640301/
NRF2 and BACH1 inhibit and promote ferroptosis, respectively, by activating or suppressing the expression of genes in the major regulatory pathways of ferroptosis: intracellular labile iron metabolism, the GSH (glutathione) -GPX4 (glutathione peroxidase 4) pathway and the FSP1 (ferroptosis suppressor protein 1)-CoQ ( …Feb 2, 2022 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov › … Ferroptosis: regulation by competition between NRF2 and BACH1 and propagation of the death signal – PubMed
Frontiers | The role of B cells in COVID-19 infection and vaccination:
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2022.988536/full
Furin inhibits epithelial cell injury and alleviates experimental colitis by activating the Nrf2-Gpx4 signaling pathway – PubMed: 🙏🌷💕
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33640301/
NRF2 plays a critical role in mitigating lipid peroxidation and ferroptosis – ScienceDirect:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213231718310267 (Niemann-Pick ?).
My question to those in the Vatican etc., –
Since it is never necessary to destroy an innocent human life to save a human life, this is a Pro-Life question:
How exactly does this vaccine restore the proper balance of FURIN which regulates HEPCIDin which regulates iron and thus correct iron imbalance, given the fact that this proper balance is necessary for both maintaining health and fighting disease?
The Faithful, who respect and affirm The Sanctity of Human Life from the moment of conception to natural death, need to know.
Godspeed🙏💕🌹
May Our Blessed Mother’s Immaculate Heart Triumph soon and restore Peace in her Son’s One, Holy, Catholic, And Apostolic Church.
Sciacca, the birthplace of Fauci’s father is in the Agrigento region of Sicily where my mother was born. She emigrated to Brooklyn with little education as was my father born in Leocata adjacent to Agrigento [Akragas] noted as the Valley of the Temples. Difference is Fauci’s Dad had higher ed prestigious Columbia U pharmacy his Mom forebearer Swiss artist. My point is the influence of higher education, a certain cultural sophistication that lends to free thought, questioning of facts essentially what is true. There were Catholic kids in my neighborhood who achieved high levels of ed and accomplishment. Hopefully, I’m not drifting too far afield in the question of a boy with like background becomes a humanist finding Catholicism wanting in areas. And there were some from my roots that abandoned religious belief, that there is a good God and a moral ordering of nature the basis of scientific research. Perhaps I can’t answer the question, perhaps it’s the mystery of free will and beyond all the variables that only God is aware of. We didn’t produce any humanists in my neighborhood that I’m aware of. Columbia U is notable for its humanist predilection. A gifted scientist nonetheless an advocate of abortion considering it a health rights issue. I won’t question why this wayward Vatican selected Fauci for his expertise. It’s a wayward Vatican. My neighborhood did not produce saints far from it. Neither, I should add do I ascribe to Skinnerian environmental determined ethics. Although there is a nuance of truth in it. My query is more the disquiet that a humanist can be at ease in conscience with the approval of the inhuman carving, dismembering, saline solution scorching, of a fellow human. Somewhere along the line intellectual arrogance. Grace refused the sin against the Holy Spirit.
If the dimension of “consciousness” alone is summation of the personal soul, then is Hegel still in charge? Been there, done that…faith as the diminishing margin allowed by scientific advancement.
The precise moment of emergence as an integral human person is better termed the “ontological leap (into) the uniquely human factors of consciousness, [and!] intentionality, freedom, and creativity.” (International Theological Commission, “Communion and Stewardship,” Origins, July 23, 2004). More than simply another step in mechanistic or even wraparound evolutionary complexity, the ontological leap (sometimes mistranslated and flattened as an “evolutionary leap”) evidences a spiritual simplicity irreducible to either one dimension, or to mere complexity, or to a “an aspect of a universal consciousness.”
The term “ontological leap” appears earlier in John Paul II, “Message on Evolution to the Pontifical Academy of Sciences,” (October 23, 1996). He wrote: “…the experience of metaphysical knowledge, of self-awareness and self-reflection, of moral conscience, freedom, or again of aesthetic and religious experience, fall within the competence of philosophical analysis and reflection, while theology brings out its ultimate meaning according to the Creator’s plans” (n. 6).
Whatever will the next for days of the conference dispense to a waiting audience? But, hey, 1996 and 2004 both precede the New Age, or the current moment, or the latest in mass immunology, or amorphous Bidenism—-and therefore no longer exist.
Deepak Chopra professes a universal consciousness that assimilates what we call God. An amorphous godlike presence, although He doesn’t believe in a personal god. As such God is everywhere but nowhere as a definitive presence. His thought is eclectic, largely a development elicited from Hinduism and Buddhism. Specifically Brahmanism. “If Brahman is the One that becomes the many, then isn’t the becoming many an eternal and infinite unfolding?” (Deepak Chopra Twitter Sep 5 2013). Deepak apparently perceives himself as a Brahmin. If according to this pseudo religion, more a philosophy, the many of us who are individual manifestations of this collective consciousness he is among the exceptional enlightened, naturally privileged people entitled to rule and dominate society. Being as we understand it is not, in this pseudo religion identified in definitive beings such as persons rather in various phases of consciousness. For Chopra and his followers wisdom is found in Brahman the One who becomes many. Morals as we understand in Christianity found in the order of nature, and in revelation, specifically Christ, are for the Brahmin convenient for practical reasons rather than the pathway to eternal life. For example healthy lifestyle and social integration. As Cardinal Ravasi says in opening remarks that “the body is a fundamental reality of human existence and of communication” taken in context of the highlight of this health conference, health as understood by Deepak Chopra we already sense a Cathartic distancing of body from soul. As if the body were a practical appendage to the soul. Vatican Franciscus is leading us down a rosy path to anthropomorphism.
I wonder if there was any mention of the role of maintaining the proper balance of FURIN, HEPCIDIN, And IRON, in order to maintain Health and fight disease at this particular “Health” conference, and if not, why not?
https://www.google.com/search?q=iron+in+health+and+disease&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&hl=en-us&client=safari