St. Anselm: Sounding the charge for religious freedom

Catholics often find themselves in the middle of the argument Anselm found himself in—between what is right and what is legal. St. Anselm chose the moral side of the argument and the government exiled him.

St. Anselm of Canterbury in an English glass window of 19th century. (Wikipedia)

With the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993, Congress prohibited “the federal government from substantially burdening a person’s exercise of religion unless it demonstrates that doing so both furthers a compelling governmental interest and represents the least restrictive means of furthering that interest.” But as the American tradition of religious freedom is overthrown for the American religion of political correctness, many Catholics in America are looking to our bishops for guidance. And it is often difficult to find the leadership so sorely wanted and needed.

In this ongoing theater marked too much by ineptitude, confusion, and lack of clarity, there is no better saint to look to for the inspiration to claim and cling to our religious freedoms than St. Anselm of Canterbury whose feast day is celebrated on April 21st.

Miscreant to monk

St. Anselm was born in 1033 near Aosta, now in Italy, a Burgundian town in the region of Lombardy. Though he was a pious boy with a love for learning, as a young man Anselm was drawn into the waves of the world. His behavior soon earned the displeasure of his father, and he fled from home. In 1059, he came to Normandy, intrigued by the reports of the Benedictine monastery of Bec, whose prior was a fellow Italian by the name of Lanfranc, master of a widely celebrated center of study at Bec.

Anselm sought out the abbey, became a student of Lanfranc, and, after distinguishing himself as a brilliant disciple, he donned the monastic habit. The wondrous piety and wisdom of Brother Anselm caused his rapid rise in authority, succeeding Lanfranc as prior, only three years after taking his vows, upon his superior’s appointment as prior at a monastery in Caen.

Anselm held this post in peace for fifteen years, until the death of Abbot Herluin, the founder and first abbot of Bec. Anselm was unanimously elected to succeed him. Hearing this, Anselm fell on his face before his brethren and wept as he begged them not to lay the burden of abbacy on him. His brethren, in turn, fell on their faces before Anselm and begged him to accept the office. A new abbot rose from the floor.

Calm before storm

During his years as abbot, Anselm distinguished himself as one of the great scholastics and increased the fame of Bec as an intellectual stronghold. His writings and teachings reflected his motto, “I believe so that I may understand,” articulating brilliant theological and philosophical thought in clear, common language and in a manner of utmost gentility and charity.

But beneath his modest surface, Anselm possessed a flinty strength of will and even a pugnacious spirit—a will and a spirit that would be forced to the fore, to the abbot’s dismay. Anselm’s election engendered an association with England, which led to an antagonistic relation with the King of England. It was in this conflict that Anselm comported himself as a rare hero for the Faith, whose service went far beyond the pen and whose gumption far exceeded the typical temper of the bookish.

Abbot Anselm had cause to travel to England on occasion to manage property the abbey owned there; and, in his first year as abbot, he met with his old teacher, Lanfranc, who had been appointed Archbishop of Canterbury. Anselm’s fame as a wise and wonderful scholar preceded him in England, and he made such a favorable and widespread impression that many great men sought his friendship and counsel, including William the Conqueror, who sent for Anselm to hear his last confession when he lay dying in Rouen in 1087. Two years later, at the death of Lanfranc, Anselm was widely beheld as his obvious successor.

A terrible honor

The heir to the crown after William the Conqueror was William the Red—arguably the unruliest man to occupy the throne of England. At the death of Lanfranc, William II was eager to plunder the ecclesiastical revenues of Canterbury and, to this vicious end, kept the see vacant and the English Church in anarchy for four years. In 1093, however, the English bishops proposed the archbishopric to Abbot Anselm, who refused saying that he, as a monk and man of letters, was unfit to deal with kings.

All England refused his refusal, hailing him as Archbishop of Canterbury upon his next reluctant arrival on business. Meeting King William, Anselm spoke plainly against the evils that plagued the country before seeing to affairs that occupied him for several months. When it came time for Anselm’s return to Bec, William forbade him.

The people’s universal desire for Anselm’s election filled his ears, and King William issued his permission that prayer might be said for his royal acceptance of Anselm’s appointment to Canterbury. As these prayers were offered in every church, William fell ill and repented his resistance. He summoned Anselm. The bishops forcibly ushered him to the king’s chamber, where the king enacted his decision despite Anselm’s protestations. The king gave a sign. The captive’s fingers were pried apart. The episcopal crozier flashed and was thrust forcibly into his hand. Another sign from the sickbed, and the monk was hauled to the church as Te Deum was sung. Anselm was enthroned Archbishop of Canterbury.

Prior to his compulsory enthronement, Anselm issued three conditions to the king: that he return the seized land of the Holy See; that he accept the spiritual authority of the archbishop; and that he acknowledge the papacy of Urban II. William reluctantly accepted; and thus began the violent and strenuous relationship between the monk and the king. Anselm was consecrated Archbishop of Canterbury—a man of peace plunging into a storm.

Archbishop in exile

The central ecclesiastical dispute with William II was his imposition of feudal fealty upon the ministers of the Church as subjects. Maintaining the traditions of William the Conqueror, William the Red demanded that no one in his dominions would acknowledge any pope or prelate unless at his command, or that any ruling from Rome should be enacted without his permission. William the Conqueror had wielded this power with discretion and deference for the Church. William the Red wielded it with cruelty and contempt for the Church.

Anselm staunchly resisted the assertion of earthly sway over the liberty of the Church. Hence, troubles brewed quickly between the two. Within a month of Anselm’s consecration, William’s rapacity returned with his health and he demanded that the lands he relinquished be returned together with funds to support a conflict against his brother, the Duke of Normandy. Anselm dutifully delivered five hundred marks to the king. Upon learning the amount was deemed insufficient and even insubordinate, the archbishop replied no more could be offered since he had already given the rest of his wealth to the poor. King William was enraged. Through these initial frictions, Anselm maintained the integrity and internal authority of the Church in the face of the king’s commands that sought control over both Church and state.

Anselm also rejected the feudal rights claimed by medieval rulers to invest bishops with their insignias. When he asked the king’s permission to travel to Rome to receive the pallium of his office, the symbol of papal ratification, William refused saying that the dispute over the papacy between Pope Urban II and the Antipope Clement III was a matter for him to decide upon first. Anselm boldly insisted upon the legitimacy of Urban and called upon the king to honor the conditions of his acceptance of the archbishopric. William then sent secret envoys to Rome to obtain the pallium and bear it to England. Upon accomplishment of this mission, Anselm refused to accept the vestment from the king’s hand and—spurning the king’s bribes—took it up himself from the altar where it had been laid during a solemn ceremony in Canterbury.

Finally, after an unsuccessful campaign in Wales, King William leveled a prejudiced indictment against Anselm for providing an insufficient company of knights. The archbishop refused to heed the king’s summons to answer the charge in court and asked leave to travel to Rome. The king denied his request, threatening to exile him should he disobey. Rather than submit to the hostile king, Anselm set sail, and was received in honor by Pope Urban II. A letter of remonstrance was sent to King William after Anselm’s case was examined, finding the archbishop guiltless of undue homage to the king due to his manifest devotion to God and His Church.

Libertas Ecclesiae Semper

In 1100, his third year of exile in Lyons, Anselm received word of King William’s suspicious death, found killed upon the hunt with an arrow lodged in his lung. His successor, Henry I, bade Anselm return to the See of Canterbury, where the selfsame struggles began again when Henry imposed feudal compliance from the archbishop. Again Anselm refused. Again he was exiled. Again he stood up for the truth that the Church is not subject to any king save the King of Kings.

Anselm was a champion who fought and suffered to maintain the distinction between the sovereignty of worldly and otherworldly provinces. In fighting this good fight, Anselm proved a patriot of heaven, dedicated to the holy liberty of Holy Mother Church. Anselm’s were times when bravery was required to be Catholic, and no less can be said of present times. Profound courage is required today to face authentic persecution, especially from the powers of the state. The Catholic refuge is in the power that does not reside in earthly kings, but in the heavenly King and His ministers. Strength, security, and freedom spring from the liberty of the Church, and St. Anselm is the exemplar of such valor—a crusader for religious liberty.

St. Anselm was not afraid to discriminate between the secular and the sacred. He lived to both preserve and reform the Church of Christ and was persecuted for Christendom. Today Christendom is no more, with not one nation left that acknowledges the vital role of the Catholic Church in society. The same corruption, however, that Anselm fought against to rescue Christendom remains, and we need to fight against it to restore Christendom. In fact, Catholic lawyers, politicians, and laymen should defend the Faith vigorously in order to support their bishops who, as public figures, are often too enmeshed in policy, politics, and diplomacy to preach freely.

Render to Caesar…

While grave evils such as abortion are still largely condemned by faithful Catholics—lay and clerical alike—from their rostrums and pulpits, more must be said about the sterilization of birth control. More must be said about political charlatans and immoral legislation. More must be said against save-the-planet, open-borders globalism. More must be said about the duty of Catholics at the voting booth. But that would make a stir indeed. The more regulation interferes with religion, the more it becomes a religion, and it is not just up to bishops to reject false creeds.

Catholics often find themselves in the middle of the argument Anselm found himself in—between what is right and what is legal. St. Anselm chose the moral side of the argument and the government exiled him. But Christ pointed out the graven image of the “divine” emperor’s head to the Pharisees and said, “Render to Caesar the things that are Caesar’s, and to God the things that are God’s.” For it is in His Divine Image that we are made. The coin can go to the State, but men must go to the Church—even if that means being cast away by society.

St. Anselm led a charge for religious freedom at the end of the eleventh century when the English monarchy of the Middle Ages was very eager to hedge the Church in and worked hard to strip it of its rights, hence the Gregorian movement of asserting and preserving the liberty of the Church over the license of the state. Though the Church reserved the right to reprimand kings, this did not necessarily give the Church preeminent status in the political realm. William II was nearly excommunicated but for Anselm’s intercession, and Henry was excommunicated for his resistance to the Church’s rule. Despite such measures, troubles continued to brew and spread in England with regard to the authority of the Catholic Church. As it was then, so is it now. Hostility is mutable in form but implacable in nature. Anselm adhered to the movement of ecclesiastical reform and is now championed as a hero of the liberty of the Church, as a hero of religious freedom. St. Anselm, pray for us!

If you value the news and views Catholic World Report provides, please consider donating to support our efforts. Your contribution will help us continue to make CWR available to all readers worldwide for free, without a subscription. Thank you for your generosity!

Click here for more information on donating to CWR. Click here to sign up for our newsletter.

About Sean Fitzpatrick 21 Articles
Sean Fitzpatrick is a graduate of Thomas Aquinas College and serves on the faculty of Gregory the Great Academy in Elmhurst, Pennsylvania. He teaches Literature, Mythology, and Humanities. Mr. Fitzpatrick’s writings on education, literature, and culture have appeared in a number of journals including Crisis Magazine, Catholic Exchange, the Cardinal Newman Society’s Journal for Educators, and the Imaginative Conservative. He lives in Scranton with his wife, Sophie, and their seven children.


  1. St. Anselm’s article was interesting. In particular, the comparison of the then and now. Sadly, history repeats itself and government usurp’s it’s power over what morality dictates.

  2. Unfortunately, there seems to have been conflicts between Church and State from nearly the beginning. In France, long before it was unified ca.1500 there was a disagreement called “Gallicanism.” French kings demanded the right to elect Bishops etc. Catholics north of the Alps were often offended by the constant election of Italian prelates and Popes. Imagine what was said behind closed doors when the handsome, charismatic Polish Cardinal was chosen Pope…and after him, the “Pope’s Rottweiler,” the brilliant, orthodox Joseph Ratzinger! It’s the world, the flesh and the devil always their best to destroy Holy Mother Church.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

All comments posted at Catholic World Report are moderated. While vigorous debate is welcome and encouraged, please note that in the interest of maintaining a civilized and helpful level of discussion, comments containing obscene language or personal attacks—or those that are deemed by the editors to be needlessly combative or inflammatory—will not be published. Thank you.