The Dispatch: More from CWR...

Controversial Swiss theologian Hans Küng dies at age 93

Küng served as a theological adviser at the Second Vatican Council but repeatedly clashed with Rome in the years that followed.

Hans Küng receives an honorary degree from the National University of Distance Education in Madrid, Spain, Jan. 27, 2011. (Image: UNED)

CNA Staff, Apr 6, 2021 / 11:00 am (CNA).- The influential and controversial Swiss theologian Hans Küng died Tuesday at the age of 93.

The German Catholic Church’s official website said that Küng died on the afternoon of April 6 at his home in Tübingen, southwest Germany.

Küng served as a theological adviser at the Second Vatican Council but repeatedly clashed with Rome in the years that followed.

The tensions culminated in a 1979 declaration by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (CDF) that Küng had “departed from the integral truth of Catholic faith, and therefore he can no longer be considered a Catholic theologian nor function as such in a teaching role.”

The CDF cited his opinions on the doctrine of infallibility, expressed in his 1971 book “Infallible? An Inquiry,” as one of the reasons for the move.

From the 1990s, Küng championed the idea of a “global ethic,” emphasizing common ethical values in the world’s major religions.

Leading tributes to the theologian on April 6, Bishop Georg Bätzing, president of the German bishops’ conference, said: “With the death of Prof. Dr. Hans Küng, theological scholarship loses a renowned and controversial researcher.”

“In his work as a priest and scholar, Hans Küng was concerned to make the message of the Gospel understandable and to give it a place in the lives of the faithful.”

“I am thinking in particular of his efforts with regard to a living ecumenism, his commitment to interreligious and intercultural dialogue, and the Global Ethic Foundation he founded, with its important research and projects on peace, justice, and the integrity of creation.”

He continued: “Hans Küng never failed to stand up for his convictions. Even if there were tensions and conflicts in this regard, I thank him expressly in this hour of farewell for his many years of commitment as a Catholic theologian in communicating the Gospel.”

“The dialogue of religions in the effort for a global ethic was of great concern to him. Hans Küng was deeply influenced by the Second Vatican Council, whose theological reception he endeavored to achieve.”

Küng was born on March 19, 1928, in Sursee, in the Canton of Lucerne, Switzerland. After studying philosophy and theology at the Pontifical Gregorian University in Rome, he was ordained in 1954.

Reflecting on his life in a 2002 book, Küng said that after the 1979 Vatican ruling he remained “a Catholic priest in good standing.”

“I affirm the papacy for the Catholic Church, but at the same time indefatigably call for a radical reform of it in accordance with the criterion of the Gospel,” he wrote in “The Catholic Church: A Short History.”

In his tribute, Bätzing recalled a landmark meeting between Küng and Pope Benedict XVI in September 2005. The two men were colleagues at the University of Tübingen in Germany, but reputedly fell out over their theological differences.

Küng described the audience, which lasted several hours, as a “very constructive and even a friendly conversation.” But he continued to criticize Benedict XVI’s theological vision, claiming in a 2012 interview that the German pope had “a medieval idea of the papacy.”

Concluding his statement, Bätzing said: “Hans Küng leaves behind a rich theological legacy. We mourn a personality who may now find his peace in the hand of God.”


If you value the news and views Catholic World Report provides, please consider donating to support our efforts. Your contribution will help us continue to make CWR available to all readers worldwide for free, without a subscription. Thank you for your generosity!

Click here for more information on donating to CWR. Click here to sign up for our newsletter.


About Catholic News Agency 2270 Articles
Catholic News Agency (www.catholicnewsagency.com)

10 Comments

  1. Kung was correct in recognizing Pope Benedict’s idea of the papacy and of Christianity as ‘medieval.’ That concept is a very good thing. If only Kung has the faith or sense to recognize its value. Benedict’s theology was timeless, a thing for all ages.

    On the other hand, Kung’s theology wins whatever prize Kung sought in bringing God up to date, teaching that a progressive pace is needed to keep creation global and Christianity ecumenical. Now Kung has only to convince God of the value of Kung’s theology.

  2. Eternal rest ! His mercy as His Holy Will and Love – that the priest was called on the 5th day of the Divine Mercy Novena that exhorts The Church to bring those who have separated themselves from The Church – https://www.thedivinemercy.org/message/devotions/novena/fifthday
    May his prayers along with that of many bless The Church , esp. in places where there is loss of trust in His grace and power , that all of us desire ardently the marvelous exchange of the self will for The Divine Will in an ongoing manner , to thus also trust that , every look or touch , esp. if same has any origin in the carnal self will , when given to The Lord through The Mother and be united to The Passion is to help bring forth its oceans of graces and goodness for the good of many …

  3. His dissent was mostly respectful dissent, necessary to keep the Church vital and meaningful. In heaven there is no dissent but on earth there must be, how else can we feel confident that men and women are serious about trying to reach God ?.His views were always worth careful consideration. Observing Vatican II closely as I was fortunate to do, I thought his contribution was immense. In a way the Abelard of our age. May he find pleasure in discourse with Thomas Aquinas and the other greats.

  4. Re whether Kung’s dissent was mostly respectful dissent – to quote The Pillar (pillarcatholic.com), Apr. 6 – “But theologians at the Council criticised Kung privately. In his diaries, Fr. Henri de Lubac lamented the priest’s ‘juvenile audacity’ and ‘incendiary, superficial, and polemical approach to theological engagement'”.
    I’ll go with de Lubac.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

All comments posted at Catholic World Report are moderated. While vigorous debate is welcome and encouraged, please note that in the interest of maintaining a civilized and helpful level of discussion, comments containing obscene language or personal attacks—or those that are deemed by the editors to be needlessly combative or inflammatory—will not be published. Thank you.


*