The Dispatch: More from CWR...

Second man accuses Chicago’s Father Pfleger of sex abuse

The Chicago archdiocese’s general counsel had “just received” the second allegation Sunday evening, a spokesperson told the Chicago Sun-Times.

Father Michael Pfleger, pastor of St. Sabina Church in Chicago, celebrates Mass at the church Nov. 22, 2015. (CNS photo/Jim Young, Reuters)

CNA Staff, Jan 25, 2021 / 02:24 pm (CNA).- A second alleged victim has accused activist Chicago priest Fr. Michael Pfleger of sexually abusing him as a minor decades ago, the Chicago archdiocese has confirmed to local media. The priest has strongly denied both accusations, which come from two brothers.

The Chicago archdiocese’s general counsel had “just received” the second allegation Sunday evening, a spokesperson told the Chicago Sun-Times.

“It is important to note that Fr. Pfleger remains removed from ministry pending the outcome of civil and church investigations,” said the spokesperson. “We will continue to follow our process as we do with all such allegations.”

Pfleger’s lawyers, James Figliulo and Michael Monico, issued a statement on his behalf.

“Father Pfleger has never abused them or anybody else. These allegations are false and are simply being made for money. This is a shakedown,” their statement said, according to ABC7 Chicago.

The two brothers were the youngest of five children who grew up in a poor neighborhood on Chicago’s west side, the Chicago Tribune reports. Their single mother insisted they go to church to avoid gangs and drugs. They joined the choir at Precious Blood Catholic Church, which was directed by Pfleger, then a seminarian. They said they were each sexually abused dozens of times over several years, beginning in the 1970s in Pfleger’s room at three churches, including Precious Blood and St. Sabina. They said they were 12 or 13 years old when the abuse began.

They said the priest would take them out for pizza, for movies, or for travel to other parishes to perform. Pfleger often gave them pocket money and once took them to the Six Flags amusement park in St. Louis, they said.

The brothers do not want to be named publicly to protect the privacy of relatives in Chicago and for fear of possible negative reactions from Pfleger’s supporters.

The men, both Black, are in their early 60s and live in Texas. The younger brother told the other brother that he had filed the complaint against Pfleger, and the older man said that he had also been abused by the priest.

Pfleger’s attorneys said one of the accusers had sent the priest a handwritten letter asking for $20,000, saying, “I am asking for a one time payment to help me move on in this troubled and confused time in my life. I did not want to put a price, but I must.” The attorneys suggested this supports the idea that accusers are seeking money.

The younger brother, who wrote the letter, rejected the claim that his motivation was purely financial, and said he wanted the payment to be proof that he was abused. He said he was motivated to come forward by a Nov. 28 televised interview with Archbishop Wilton Gregory of Washington. Gregory, a former priest and auxiliary bishop of the Chicago archdiocese, spoke about the Catholic Church’s failures to respond to child sexual abuse.

The brothers said they had met or seen Gregory several times. Gregory said in a statement he did not remember the brothers’ family but he voiced confidence in the archdiocese’s investigation, the Chicago Tribune said.

Cardinal Blase Cupich of Chicago asked Pfleger to step away from his duties in early January after the first accusation.

“Allegations are claims that have not been proven as true or false. Therefore, guilt or innocence should not be assumed,” Cupich said in a Jan. 5 statement about the first accusation. “Father Pfleger has agreed to cooperate fully with my request and will live away from the parish while this matter is investigated.”

The archdiocese reported the first allegation to the Illinois Department of Children and Family Services and the Cook County State’s Attorney.

Pfleger, who is white, has been a politically involved community leader based out of the predominantly African-American Saint Sabina Parish. He has served at the church since 1983 and is presently described as its senior pastor.

The 71-year-old priest indicated that many people had reached out to him after the Chicago archdiocese announced the first allegation Jan. 5. He said he was “devastated, hurt and yes angry,” but put his trust in God. He asked for prayers for his accuser.

Cupich’s Jan. 5 statement said the Chicago archdiocese “takes all allegations of sexual misconduct seriously and encourages anyone who feels they have been sexually abused by a priest, deacon, religious or lay employee to come forward.”

“It is crucial that you know nothing is more important than the welfare of the children entrusted to our care,” he said.

Pfleger’s biography on the Saint Sabina Church website said that since 1968 he has lived and ministered in the African-American community on the west and south sides of Chicago. He worked two summers in a Native American community in Oklahoma, and as a seminarian he interned at Cook County Jail and at Chicago’s Precious Blood Church.

He adopted an eight-year-old boy in 1981 and adopted another boy in 1992. In 1997, he became foster father to Jarvis Franklin, who was killed in 1998 in the crossfire of a gang shooting.

His causes include opposition to gun violence and support for gun control. He has also helped launch several employment and social services programs for youth, the elderly and the homeless.

At times he has voiced support for the ordination of women as Catholic priests, a position which the Church has held to be incompatible with the Catholic understanding of the priesthood.

Pfleger has often been a source of controversy. In 2019 he invited controversial preacher Louis Farrakhan to speak at his parish after Farrakhan was banned from Facebook for violating its hate speech policies. Farrakhan is the founder of the Chicago-based group Nation of Islam and has a history of anti-Semitic preaching.

During the controversial 2008 Democratic presidential primary, the late Cardinal Francis George publicly responded to comments Pfleger made deriding Sen. Hillary Clinton and advocating the candidacy of Illinois Sen. Barack Obama.

In addition, in 2011 George suspended Pfleger from his ministry at St. Sabina and barred him from celebrating the sacraments because of public statements Pfleger had made threatening to leave the Church if he were reassigned from his current parish. George reinstated Pfleger after the priest apologized.

Father Thulani Magwaza is serving as temporary parish administrator during Pfleger’s current absence. Magwaza stood in as parish administrator during the priest’s 2011 suspension as well.

If you value the news and views Catholic World Report provides, please consider donating to support our efforts. Your contribution will help us continue to make CWR available to all readers worldwide for free, without a subscription. Thank you for your generosity!

Click here for more information on donating to CWR. Click here to sign up for our newsletter.

About Catholic News Agency 9813 Articles
Catholic News Agency (


  1. Why there is not automatic excommunication for a priest or bishop or cardinal who openly makes public statements in support of abortion I will never understand. Laypeople have been excommunicated, justly, for such. No, I am not off topic.

  2. Yup, a proud product of the 60s, early 70s, seminary system. Great job, fathers.
    Now he is just another mediocre Roman collar who thinks he is a SJW.

  3. The hierarchy is at fault for not openly stating Catholic teaching in the public square,LOUD and CLEAR, but of also failing to discipline priests who make assertions ( like advocating for female priests) which mislead the flock. I think absolutely that priests ( or anyone) who betray their vows and are sexually abusive should be defrocked. However I have a great deal of trouble believing accusations which are coming 30 or 40 years after the fact. There is a statute of limitations ( or, there WAS) for a reason. Its impossible to defend oneself from such charges so many years later. What happened to Cardinal Pell is an object lesson in the reality that not every accusation is true. Ambulance chaser law firms trolling on TV for “clients” is a big problem in my estimation, especially when justice is not enough and financial payouts are part of the package. . Ditto the anti-church state laws being revised to extend the statute of limitations. In my opinion simple justice requires such claims cannot be made indefinitely.

  4. The poor hapless hierarchy still with no real plan to address an increasing dilemma, now for decades and a long history of not dealing with pedophile clergy. My question is… how are other religions handling the issue? Can we learn from them? Maybe our fathers consider them to be of a lesser God?

    We all know that predatory priests, both straight and homosexual are a menace, not only to the church, their parents and to society.

    Since this madness seems not to be mitigated the effort should not only come from the elusive top, it should come more from the “guys” rubbing shoulders with the bad. If a bad priest reveals his sins to a good and the good conceals the crime, how many bad guys do we now have?

    Perhaps the fathers would think of finally breaking with rusty tradition given that the fate of our church hanging in the balance. Ordain women with a call to the Lord. They have a nurturing quality, and are the heavy lifters of the burdens of society, not the machos.

    • Not sure I would ever describe people like Hillary Clinton, Kamala Harris, Maxine Waters, Elizabeth Warren, or Michelle Obama as nurturing. They don’t strike me as the type of people I would entrust with the well-being of my family and livelihood. They provide pretty good evidence that women can be as sociopathic and predatory as men.

    • There is no such thing as a tradition that is “rusty.” The Church does not do anything merely because of tradition. It is impossible for a woman to have a call to the priesthood. And the purpose of the priesthood has nothing at all to do with being “nurturing.” Consider learning a little bit about Catholicism before presuming to give advice to God and His Catholic Church.

    • “My question is… how are other religions handling the issue?”

      Not any better than the Church; and in many cases much worse. All you have to do is a quick online search for statistics, if you want your question answered and this isn’t just one of your usual “I hate the Church” rants.

      “Maybe our fathers consider them to be of a lesser God?”

      Could you translate that into English, please?

      “If a bad priest reveals his sins to a good and the good conceals the crime, how many bad guys do we now have?”

      Do you mean in Confession? The “good priest” most emphatically may not reveal the sins of the bad priest or of anybody else. Only if the “good priest” broke the seal of Confession would he be a bad priest relative to this.

      “Perhaps the fathers would think of finally breaking with rusty tradition given that the fate of our church hanging in the balance.”

      Ordination of men only is not a “rusty tradition.” It is simply a fact: the Church is not authorized to ordain women. And the only people who want that to happen are the ones who are seething with spite, pride, and hatred of the Church.

      “Ordain women with a call to the Lord.”

      God doesn’t wall women to the ministerial priesthood, so you’re talking about a null set.

      “They have a nurturing quality, and are the heavy lifters of the burdens of society, not the machos.”

      You are delusional. Either that or you’ve been living under a rock and have somehow not noticed the many, many women who are not “nurturing.” It’s also an insult to the many good and decent men who are lifting burdens to imply that they are not.

    • Morgan,
      Other denominations have the same sort of problems. Marriage is not a cure for deviancy.
      It’s really about our shared, fallen human nature, not about the Catholic Church.

  5. Presumably the truth of these allegations will never be proven one way or another. This notorious priest’s history is well known, however. He should have had faculties permanently revoked long ago and probably should never have been ordained in the first place.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

All comments posted at Catholic World Report are moderated. While vigorous debate is welcome and encouraged, please note that in the interest of maintaining a civilized and helpful level of discussion, comments containing obscene language or personal attacks—or those that are deemed by the editors to be needlessly combative or inflammatory—will not be published. Thank you.