The Dispatch: More from CWR...

Vatican’s doctrinal office: Don’t promote alleged apparitions connected to ‘Lady of All Nations’

The clarification relates to the alleged visions which Ida Peerdeman, a secretary living in the Dutch capital Amsterdam, claimed to have received between 1945 and 1959.

A detail from a painting depicting the Lady of All Nations. Credit: Judgefloro via Wikipedia (CC BY-SA 4.0).

CNA Staff, Jan 4, 2021 / 06:10 am (CNA).- The Vatican’s doctrinal office has urged Catholics not to promote “the alleged apparitions and revelations” associated with the Marian title of “Lady of All Nations,” according to a Dutch bishop.

The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith’s appeal was announced in a clarification issued Dec. 30 by Bishop Johannes Hendriks of Haar­lem-Am­ster­dam.

The clarification relates to the alleged visions which Ida Peerdeman, a secretary living in the Dutch capital Amsterdam, claimed to have received between 1945 and 1959.

Hendriks, who as the local bishop is primarily responsible for evaluating the apparitions, said that he had decided to issue the statement after consulting with the Vatican’s doctrinal congregation, which guides bishops in the discernment process.

The bishop said that the Vatican congregation regarded the title “Lady of All Nations” for Mary as “theologically acceptable.”

“Nevertheless, the recognition of this title cannot be understood — not even implicitly — as the recognition of the supernaturality of some pheno­mena from which it seems to have come,” he wrote in the clarification, published in five languages on the website of Haar­lem-Am­ster­dam diocese.

“In this sense, the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith reaffirms the validity of the negative judg­ment on the supernaturality of the alleged ‘apparitions and revelations’ to Ms. Ida Peerdeman approved by St. Paul VI on 04/05/1974 and published on 05/25/1974.”

“This judg­ment implies that everybody is urged to cease any propagation concer­ning the alleged apparitions and revelations of the Lady of All Nations. Therefore, the use of the images and prayer cannot in any way be consi­dered a recognition — not even implicitly — of the supernaturality of the events in question.”

Peerdeman was born on Aug. 13, 1905, in Alkmaar, in the Netherlands. She claimed that on March 25, 1945, she saw her first apparition of a woman bathed in light who referred to herself as “the Lady” and “Mother.”

In 1951, the woman reputedly told Peerdeman that she wished to be known as “the Lady of All Nations.” That year, the artist Heinrich Repke created a painting of “the Lady,” depicting her standing on top of a globe in front of a cross.

The series of 56 alleged visions concluded on May 31, 1959.

In 1956, Bishop Johannes Huibers of Haarlem declared that after an investigation he had “found no evidence of the supernatural nature of the apparitions.”

The Holy Office, the forerunner of the CDF, approved the bishop’s verdict a year later. The CDF confirmed the judgment in 1972 and 1974.

In his clarification, Bishop Hendriks acknowledged that “Through devotion to Mary, the Mother of All Nations, many faithful express their desire and their effort for the universal fraternity of man­kind with the help and support of Mary’s intercession.”

He quoted from Pope Francis’ encyclical, “Fratelli tutti,” published Oct. 3, in which the pope wrote that “For many Christians, this journey of fraternity also has a Mother, whose name is Mary. Having received this universal motherhood at the foot of the cross, she cares not only for Jesus but also for ‘the rest of her children.’ In the power of the risen Lord, she wants to give birth to a new world, where all of us are brothers and sisters, where there is room for all those whom our societies discard, where justice and peace are resplen­dent.”

Hendriks said: “In this sense, the use of the title Lady of All Nations for Mary is in itself theologically acceptable. Prayer with Mary and through the intercession of Mary, Mother of our peoples, serves the growth of a more united world, in which everyone recognizes themselves as brothers and sisters, all created in the image of God, our common Father.”

Concluding his clarification, the bishop wrote: “Regar­ding the mere title ‘Lady,’ ‘Madonna,’ or ‘Mother of All Nations,’ the Congregation generally is not opposed to its use, provided that this is clearly separated from the recognition of the alleged apparitions.”

“If the Virgin Mary is invoked under this title, pastors and faithful must ensure that all forms of this devotion refrain from any reference, even implicit, to alleged apparitions or revelations.”

Alongside the clarification, the bishop issued an explanation, also dated Dec. 30 and published in five languages.

In it, he wrote: “Devotion to Mary as the Lady and Mother of All Nations is good and valuable; it must, however, remain separate from the messages and the apparitions. These are not approved by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. That is the core of the clarification which has come about in accordance with the Congregation follo­wing the recent appearance of various national and inter­na­tio­nal reports concer­ning the veneration.”

The bishop said that he had issued the clarification as a result of conversations with CDF officials following the media reports and inquiries.

He recalled that the CDF had expressed concern in 2005 about the wording of an official prayer invoking the Blessed Virgin as Lady of All Nations “who was once Mary,” advising Catholics not to use the phrase.

Hendriks said: “It is permitted to use the image and the prayer — always in the way the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith approved in 2005. Days of Prayer in honor of the Lady of All Nations are also allowed; however, reference may not be made to the apparitions and messages which are not approved.”

“Anything that might be understood as (implicit) recognition of the messages and apparitions has to be avoided because the Congregation passed a negative judg­ment about these which was confirmed by Pope Paul VI.”

Hendriks noted that Bishop Hendrik Bomers, bishop of Haarlem from 1983 to 1998, authorized the devotion in 1996, although he did not pronounce on the validity of the apparitions.

He also acknowledged that Bishop Jozef Punt, bishop of Haarlem from 2001 to 2020, announced in 2002 that he believed that the apparitions to be authentic.

Hendriks said that Paul VI’s negative verdict would therefore “be new for many people.”

“In 2002, namely, when Bishop Punt took a position on the authenticity of the apparitions, only a clarification from the year 1974 was known,” he said.

“In the 1980s, my predecessor believed that it might be possible to authorize this devotion, and Bishop Bomers finally decided for that in 1996.”

Hendricks was appointed coadjutor bishop of Haar­lem-Am­ster­dam in 2018 and succeeded Punt in June 2020. (The diocese’s name was changed from Haarlem to Haar­lem-Am­ster­dam in 2008.)

Devotion to the Lady of All Nations is centered on a chapel in Amsterdam and promoted by the website

In his explanation of the CDF’s observations, Hendriks wrote: “For everyone who feels united in devotion to the Lady of All Nations is the good news in this clarification approved by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith that devotion to Mary under this title is permitted and words of appreciation are dedicated to it.”

“For many faithful, however, it will be especially painful that the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith and Pope Paul VI expressed a negative judgment about the apparitions. I want to say to all of them that I can understand their disappoint­ment.”

“The apparitions and the messages have inspired many people. I hope that it is a consolation to them that devotion to Mary under the title ‘Lady of All Nations’ remains in place, whether in the chapel in Am­ster­dam or at the Days of Prayer, at which in the past I myself was present several times.”

If you value the news and views Catholic World Report provides, please consider donating to support our efforts. Your contribution will help us continue to make CWR available to all readers worldwide for free, without a subscription. Thank you for your generosity!

Click here for more information on donating to CWR. Click here to sign up for our newsletter.

About Catholic News Agency 5131 Articles
Catholic News Agency (


  1. Reverse psychology? Why would the CDF reaffirm now after all these years what it twice affirmed 1972, 74, “the negative judg­ment of the supernaturality” of Ms Peerdeman’s alleged apparitions? Fratelli Tutti? Birth to a new world is eerily similar to the globally pregnant Pachamamma Vatican postage. Hopefully my cynicism is just that and devotion to Our Blessed Mother isn’t victimized to market a defective product.

  2. And no wonder, for Satan himself masquerades as an angel of light. It is not surprising, then, if his servants masquerade as servants of righteousness. Their end will be what their actions deserve. 2 Corinthians 11:14,15

    “I am the Lord, that is my name! I will not give my glory to another or my praise to idols”. Isaiah 42:8

  3. Personally I never thought the apparitions claimed by Ida were authentic, but were from fallen angels. Why would Mary wish to be called The Lady and not Our Lady? Many other aspects I don’t believe.

    • Mary doesn’t want to be called anything but a confessed sinner saved by the grace of God. The God-bearer did what God’s wants everyone to do… obedient to Him only.

      The chief end of man is to glorify God and enjoy Him forever.

  4. The 1956 judgment of Bishop Huibers—confirmed by the CDF in 1974—was “non constat de supernaturalitate”. This means that the supernatural character is not confirmed or establised. The English translation posted on the Vatican website of the CDF’s 1974 confirmation says the Bishop found “no evidence of the supernatural nature of the apparitions.” The posted German translation of “non constat de supernaturalitate” is “Übernatürlichkeit der Erscheinungen nicht feststeht”—“the supernatural character of the apparitions is not certain.” The Italian translation closely follows the Latin, but it uses the imperfect tense for the verb, constare. The Italian reads: “non constava della soprannaturalità delle apparizioni”—the supernatural character of the apparitions was not established. The French translation follows the Italian. It reads: “le caractère surnaturel des apparitions n’était pas établi”—the supernatural character of the apparitions was not established. There is a big difference between Bishop Huibers stating in 1956 that the supernatural character was not certain or established and saying he “found no evidence of the supernatural nature of the apparitions.” Catholics, of course, must abide by the decision of the CDF, but “non constat de supernaturalitate” does not mean the reported apparitions were clearly NOT supernatural. It’s only a judgment that the supernatural character was not confirmed or established.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

All comments posted at Catholic World Report are moderated. While vigorous debate is welcome and encouraged, please note that in the interest of maintaining a civilized and helpful level of discussion, comments containing obscene language or personal attacks—or those that are deemed by the editors to be needlessly combative or inflammatory—will not be published. Thank you.