Amarillo diocese disavows Fr. Frank Pavone statements, requests prayer

CNA Staff, Sep 17, 2020 / 05:15 pm (CNA).- The Diocese of Amarillo has spoken out about election-related comments from Fr. Frank Pavone, the national director of the pro-life group Priests for Life, and asked prayers for the priest.

In a Sept. 16 statement, the diocese noted that Pavone, in videos posted online, had condemned the act of “voting for candidates of a particular political party” and had reportedly suggested he might need to refuse absolution if such votes were confessed with contrition.

According to the diocese, Pavone also used “scandalous words not becoming of a Catholic priest.”

“These postings are not consistent with Catholic Church Teachings,” the diocese said in its statement. “Please disregard them and pray for Father Pavone.”

Pavone served on official Trump campaign outreach positions in 2016, and was originally a co-chair of Trump’s 2020 pro-life coalition, as well as an advisory board member of Catholics for Trump.

Canon law forbids clerics from having an active role in political parties unless they receive the permission of their bishop.

Although he has since stepped down from the two positions at the request of “the competent ecclesiastical authority,” he has still maintained public support for the re-election of President Trump, citing abortion and religious freedom as key issues of concern.

In tweets that were subsequently deleted, Pavone last weekend reportedly called Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden a “[expletive] loser” and said the Democratic party was “God-hating” and “America-hating” and that Biden’s supporters “can’t say a [expletive] thing in support of their loser candidate without using the word Trump.”

“What the hell do you have to say for yourselves, losers?” Pavone asked.

As the diocesan statement indicated, Pavone also reportedly tweeted that he would hear the confession of a Catholic who votes Democrat, “but we are trained that in the absence of repentance, absolution has to be withheld.”

In other videos posted on the Priests for Life Facebook page, Pavone referred to the “terrible mistake of even considering voting Democrat.”

Asked by CNA in April whether he had obtained permission from his bishop to officially campaign for Trump’s re-election, Pavone would not answer directly; he said that he had not been forbidden from doing so, and that communication with his bishop was a “dysfunctional process.”

The priest faced criticism from Church leaders ahead of the 2016 presidential election as well.

In November 2016, Pavone filmed a video at the Priests for Life headquarters, urging support for Trump. The video was staged with the body of an aborted baby laid before Pavone on what appeared to be an altar.

Bishop Patrick Zurek of Amarillo said soon after the video’s release that he would open an investigation into the incident, calling it “against the dignity of human life” and “a desecration of the altar,” and adding that “the action and presentation of Father Pavone in this video is not consistent with the beliefs of the Catholic Church.”

Pavone told CNA in April that “nothing happened” after the incident, and the Amarillo diocese has not responded to questions about its investigation or its outcome.

Pavone said he had done similar things before that incident.

“[W]ould I do it again? Absolutely,” he told CNA.

Pavone was incardinated in the Diocese of Amarillo, Texas, in 2005, when he transferred to that diocese from the Archdiocese of New York with plans to begin a pro-life religious order of priests. Those plans did not materialize, and Pavone found himself at odds with Bishop Patrick Zurek, soon after the bishop was installed in 2008.

In 2011, the dispute between Pavone and Zurek became public, after the priest was recalled to the diocese and suspended by the bishop. Pavone appealed to the Vatican, and the suspension was eventually lifted in 2012.

In April, the priest told CNA that his relationship with Zurek remained rocky, and that he was in the process of transferring to a new diocese.

The Diocese of Amarillo has not responded to repeated requests from CNA for clarity about Pavone’s political activity or ecclesiastical status, including requests to clarify whether he has faculties to minister publicly as a priest.

Pavone told CNA in July that he remains incardinated in the Amarillo diocese, “but my transfer has been canonically completed to a different bishop who has good will toward me and my work.”

He declined to name that diocese, saying that “the announcement of what diocese I’m in now is up to the same ecclesiastical authority to make.”

Pavone sought a transfer to the Diocese of Colorado Springs in 2016. Asked by CNA in April if his pending transfer was to that diocese, he would not say. The diocese told CNA then that Bishop Michael Sheridan had not received information from the Vatican indicating that Pavone was being transferred there.

If you value the news and views Catholic World Report provides, please consider donating to support our efforts. Your contribution will help us continue to make CWR available to all readers worldwide for free, without a subscription. Thank you for your generosity!

Click here for more information on donating to CWR. Click here to sign up for our newsletter.


  1. I stand with Father Pavone. I am sick and tired of these bishops who don’t even know their religion and are gutless and don’t have the nerve to stand up for life. Shame, shame, shame.

    • Agreed, Many Bishops are more interested in bringing in money and hiding sexual abuse then protecting the babies who cannot protect themselves.

  2. It seems from reading the article that Fr. Pavone is becoming increasingly angry and unhinged. His antics, language, and rhetoric are not befitting a Catholic priest. And of course, voting Dem can be forgiven with repentance, just like every other sin.

    • Why SIN in the first place…?
      There are certain parameters that we cannot
      cross….. you need to know in advance.
      P.S. they are written on the human ❤️

  3. I think Twitter is not a wise place for any of us to be.
    Fr. Pavone’s tone wasn’t appropriate but why are we more concerned with manners & decorum than the violent destruction of innocent life? Perhaps there are clergy who could say the same things more graciously but Fr. Pavone’s heart was in the right place.

    Even if Fr. Pavone said what he said in a mannerly way he’s still be in trouble. It’s really more about the message than the messenger here. You can’t be a Catholic in good standing & vote for candidates who embrace & endorse things like feticide, eugenics, etc. And if a priest says that publicly , no matter how courteously, his diocese is very likely to shut him down.

  4. The problem is that the battle against abortion and other sins is NOT going to be won by a priest speaking out politically (thereby doing more harm than good). It will not be won by ballot. The only way the battle will be won is by preaching and teaching Biblical truth from the pulpit with no punches pulled. And by offering support services for women who find themselves in a bad situation. It would help if priests could work with their Protestant counterparts so that Christianity presents a united front. It is not a Democratic problem or a Republican problem. It is a spiritual problem that has to be dealt with.

  5. You can actually say that the whole liberal thought that is growing in the USA is actually dysfunctional and dangerous.
    These people are so far removed from faith, family and creation in general. God Bless Priests for Life.

  6. Hasn’t it been said that in the “last days” those who stand for good and decency will be persecuted? Seems the church is on the side of those who aren’t good and decent. It has allowed itself to become politically radicalized. And that is why, I no longer am a Catholic. No respect for the pope. Doubt that this post will see the light of day.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

All comments posted at Catholic World Report are moderated. While vigorous debate is welcome and encouraged, please note that in the interest of maintaining a civilized and helpful level of discussion, comments containing obscene language or personal attacks—or those that are deemed by the editors to be needlessly combative or inflammatory—will not be published. Thank you.