Good Cop, Bad Cop

There are several problems with BLM’s rhetoric, tactics, and positioning when it comes to police, including a lack of charity and a deep ideological bias.

A man in Florissant, Mo., holds a flag in front of police officers during a protest against police brutality June 27, 2020. (CNS photo/Lawrence Bryant, Reuters)

The aftermath of the wrongful death of George Floyd has unfortunately seen another wrong: the perception of too many police officers as villains. Police are feeling it, painfully. Many of them are blaming not just bad police but Black Lives Matter for its language regarding police.

“As a police officer I see firsthand the damage that BLM [Black Lives Matter] is causing,” writes Joe, a former student of mine at Grove City College, class of 2003. He emailed me for the first time in years, quite upset. He was referring to calls to defund the police.

“We call for a national defunding of police,” candidly states Black Lives Matter at its website, under its hashtag #DefundThePolice. “If you’re with us, add your name to the petition right now and help us spread the word.”

Add your name, join the petition, spread the word—and defund the cops.

Under the tab “What Defunding the Police Really Means,” BLM leads with this terrible stereotype: “We know that police don’t keep us safe.”

That’s a stunning assertion that has really angered police—including black police. It has also angered black residents in black communities who feel the police do, in fact, keep them safe. Some have been very demonstrative and very vocal.

Asked about “Defunding the Police,” David Clarke, the former sheriff of Milwaukee County, Wisconsin (and African American), states emphatically: “The biggest losers in all this will be poor black people in crime-ridden ghettos. The police are the only thing standing between them and violent criminal predators. You’d have to loathe black people to do that to them.”

For the record, I’ve emailed with BLM defenders who say the call for defunding can mean different things to different people. Yes, I’m sure that’s the case. And yet, if BLM doesn’t mean defund the police but, say, reform the police, then why not change #DefundThePolice to #ReformThePolice? If you don’t want to defund the police, then don’t create slogans saying defund the police. That seems reasonable, right?

And yet, the likes of BLM activist Miski Noor insist that when fellow activists say they want to abolish the police, they “100%” mean they want no more police.

Police certainly interpret it that way. Why wouldn’t they? How do you expect police sensitive about their difficult jobs to react to language like “Defund the Police” and “We know that police don’t keep us safe?”

For police like Joe, this isn’t helpful.

“For the first time in my 15+ year career,” writes Joe, “I feel I can understand what the soldiers returning from Vietnam experienced upon returning to a thankless country.”

All Joe ever wanted to be was a policeman. While other Grove City College students went to law school or medical school or took glamorous jobs in New York or Washington, Joe went to police school. He learned how to chase down people who hurt people. He wanted to stop bad guys. He viewed police heroically, but now he feels helpless.

His sadness reminds me of another student-turned-cop that I reconnected with a few years back in Indianapolis. We got together for a beer and bite to eat amid the Ferguson, Missouri fracas. He told me it was a tough time. He suddenly faced suspicion from a black community he worked hard to establish friendships with. His fellow police officers (many if not mostly black) jokingly call him “the philosopher” because he engages in philosophical-theological conversations with street guys (black and white), ruminating with them about culture, society, religion, and race.

“I talk to them,” he told me with a smile. “I treat them with dignity. I tell them I just want to go home tonight and see my family. We talk about race. We talk about God.”

He forms a bond. He’s a good cop. But suddenly, he was getting treated like a bad cop.

For the record, both myself and friends have had experiences with bad cops. I know guys who were abused (in my case, white cops abusing white men). I personally had a moment with a police officer in Sacramento a few years ago that was shocking and scary. The guy was obviously having a lousy day and just snapped. “Let’s go,” said my wife. “Don’t say a word, just go, now.” I’ve observed police behavior not exactly exemplary. I was once at a picnic with an off-duty cop who drove with a beer between his legs when we dashed into town for a grocery run. “Hey, dude,” I said, “you’re a cop, what are you doing?” He shrugged and laughed.

But of course, as the saying goes, you don’t let a few bad apples spoil the bunch. Countless police devote themselves selflessly. Most people don’t go to work fearing a bullet in the head and never seeing their kids again. Police are under tremendous stress, and they are, yes, human.

Imagine the hurt they feel as neighbors and entire sports stadiums post banners touting an organization widely known for calling for their defunding.

Alas, from a Catholic perspective, there are several problems with BLM’s rhetoric, tactics, and positioning. First and foremost, it lacks charity. In casting such a broadly and hurtful stereotype of police, it refuses them the dignity of individuals that they merit. Again, look at the statement: “We know that police don’t keep us safe.” That brazen assumption is really outrageous.

On display here at a number of levels are identity politics at their worst, especially the organizing and defining of people (and even their behavior) according to groups. Such identity politics are antithetical to Catholic teaching, where we see people as individuals, brothers and sisters made in the image of God, as part of a universal Church. We don’t view them and judge them and define them by color, gender, race, ethnicity, sexual preference, place of origin. As John Paul II said, “every human being is special, precious, and unrepeatable.”

And then there is what BLM says at its website on issues that have nothing to do with policing or even with race and racial justice. BLM’s “What We Believe” statement describing itself is strikingly sexual and cultural and ideological, using words like “trans” four times, “queer” once, “heteronormative” once, and “comrades” twice. The website of BLM states that it seeks to “disrupt the Western-prescribed nuclear family structure.”

Yes, disrupt the “Western” family structure.

What does that goal have to do with George Floyd? Nothing. Obviously, it has nothing to do with George Floyd. And it was there at the website long before George Floyd was assaulted. It calls into question the underlying motives and inspirations and aspirations of this group touting racial justice.

These are red flags that Catholics, or anyone, should not ignore.

Stop the bad cops? Yes. Stop the abusers. Reform the police. You can do those things without endorsing a group that calls for defunding the police or disrupting the Western-prescribed nuclear family structure.

And above all, understand that not all cops are bad cops. We know that police do keep us safe, regardless of what BLM says to the contrary.

If you value the news and views Catholic World Report provides, please consider donating to support our efforts. Your contribution will help us continue to make CWR available to all readers worldwide for free, without a subscription. Thank you for your generosity!

Click here for more information on donating to CWR. Click here to sign up for our newsletter.

About Dr. Paul Kengor 54 Articles
Dr. Paul Kengor is professor of political science and executive director of the Center for Vision & Values at Grove City College. His books include The Crusader: Ronald Reagan and the Fall of Communism, Dupes: How America’s Adversaries Have Manipulated Progressives for a Century, Takedown: From Communists to Progressives, How the Left Has Sabotaged Family and Marriage, and, most recently, The Devil and Karl Marx: Communism's Long March of Death, Deception, and Infiltration.


  1. “Such identity politics are antithetical to Catholic teaching, where we see people as individuals”

    That may be a liberal view or a view that results from an atomized existence, but it’s not a Christian view, as if being incorporated into Christ destroys all other social bonds or associations which define our ethical self. Group identity does mean something, and has moral import, even if one disagrees with how that import is understood.

  2. Just for the record: Mr. Floyd died of a drug overdose. Based on records thus far released, I can see no evidence that his then lawful restraint (according to local police rules) played any role (there are no autopsy proven sequellae of that restraint), while his blood level of fentanyl was clearly in the lethal range. Whether tho dose was administered orally, rectally- Mr. Floyd did acknowledge “hooping” something earlier in the day-, nasally or intravenously has yet to be established. This was an inadvertent suicide. His rambunctious behavior-frenetic movement- seems to justify his continued restraint while awaiting the already called for-and later expedited-arrival of an ambulance. The important question seems to me to be: “should police, or, at least, supervisory police be empowered to carry a narcotic antagonist such as Narcan?”. I believe it would have been life-saving.

    • I read it was in fact three times lethal. Thank you for your comments. I believe this was not an wrongful death, but unintentional suicide.

    • Bill H,
      I dislike the trial by media phenomenon too but shouldn’t we refrain from posing alternate theories and let the facts come out in court?

    • You are quite right. It is far from clear that the officers are guilty of manslaughter, let alone murder. Assuming that they can get anything like a fair trial in this environment, I would not mind being their defense attorney.

    • So you would like a knee on your neck for that duration and unable to breath. Or would you like to see your kid or a close family member being murdered in that way. What a load of bollocks you claim and wake up and smell the coffee. This was cold blooded murder and there is no such thing as a good cop. They are all corrupt like my uncle was and I know the religious ones are the worst. Stop trying to justify this based on your description and own up to the truth, the Police murdered him FULL STOP.

  3. The underlying motives and inspirations and aspirations of BLM should be clear by now.
    Where’s the mystery?
    Read their manifesto. Look at their tactics.

  4. It’s the history of cops as enforcers of segregation in support of white supremacy doubled with its warrior cop imagery and ideology that are the roots of this present state of American policedom. It is deeply embedded in the mindsets of the cops and the proposed organizational reforms cannot easily eradicate this.

  5. It makes one wonder what folks who “took a knee” in support of BLM could have possibly been thinking. Anyone who has paid even casual attention over the years must have known how radical and violent they are. No excuse for anyone again to make common cause with them. They are a marxist organization to the core, inimical to the common good, Western Civilization, and to fundamental Christian values. They should be firmly opposed.

  6. Too many Catholics vote Democratic because they retain the “just off the boat” mentality of their immigrant ancestors, where the belief was that Dems supposedly helped the poor, and the Republicans were the fat cats. Or the voters are Union workers looking for yet another raise even though their state teeters on bankruptcy, and the Dems horse-trade on that vote. Reality changed decades ago but nobody told the Catholics. Or the Jews for that matter. Voting against your own personal morals because that’s how grandma voted can only hurt you and your children. At this juncture in history , a wrong vote might eradicate everything you hold dear. If you doubt that, remember that CHURCHES were forced CLOSED for the first time in our national history. When shut down or tiny church attendance was mandated by the govt, the orders were challenged in court in states like California and Nevada. Result? The SUPREME Court sided with the government!! Good-by Constitutional rights. Remember those judges are appointed by the party in power. Drop your partisan attachments and vote to save your country and your freedoms. You wont be sorry. Or, do what you have always done, and watch Rome burn.

  7. I don’t know about the extent to which police are moral or not. However, if they enforce unjust laws (even if they personally are guiltless), then they are part of the problem. The problems are the unjust laws which are unthinkingly enforced.

    As for protection, that is what the Second Amendment is for. It is unrealistic to expect police to keep you safe, except to the extent that they manage to capture and cause violent criminals to be incarcerated.

    Still, apparently it has been shown that MORE police are necessary to help cut down on crime. That would indicate that in addition to law reform police funding should be INCREASED.

  8. And look at their leadership public statements of their Marxist training; and look at the non profit money raising arm; one of the senior officials of that arm was given a 58 year sentence for terrorist acts and robberies done to support those terrorists in the 1970’s-1980’s – and Bill Clinton pardoned her after 12 years of time.

  9. Y’all know good chunk of BLM money goes to fund democratic candidates who are pro-abortion and anti-family among other things, right? What I don’t get is why the bishops don’t tell it like it is concerning both is beyond me…

2 Trackbacks / Pingbacks

  1. Good Cop, Bad Cop - Catholic Mass Search
  2. Good Cop | Mtv Elokuvat

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

All comments posted at Catholic World Report are moderated. While vigorous debate is welcome and encouraged, please note that in the interest of maintaining a civilized and helpful level of discussion, comments containing obscene language or personal attacks—or those that are deemed by the editors to be needlessly combative or inflammatory—will not be published. Thank you.