Illinois bill to ban government travel to pro-life states

Springfield, Ill., Sep 30, 2019 / 01:15 pm (CNA).- An Illinois state representative has introduced legislation to prevent government employees travelling to states which have enacted pro-life legislation.

The bill, introduced last week by Rep. Daniel Didech (D-Buffalo Grove), would ban any Illinois state agency from requiring or approving travel by any of its employees or officers to states that have enacted laws which prohibiting abortion at 8 weeks of pregnancy or upon the detection of a fetal heartbeat. The bill would also ban state-sponsored travel to jurisdictions that do not have exemptions for pregnancies resulting from rape or incest or that require an investigation in the cause of a miscarriage.

Didech filed HB 3901 Sept. 26, saying the measures is intended to protect Illinois employees.

“What these other states are doing is, to me, very dangerous. To a large extent, yes, abortion is a big part of it, but it’s not entirely about abortion,” Didech told the State Journal-Register.

“As a member of the legislature, I have the responsibility to protect our state employees.”

Since the beginning of the year, 12 states have passed measures to tighten restrictions on abortion. Several states, including Georgia and Missouri, which borders Illinois, have enacted so-called heartbeat bills that prohibit abortion after the detection of a fetal heartbeat, which can be as early as six weeks into pregnancy. Several of those laws are now under judicial review.

The Illinois bill would create a general prohibition on state employees or representatives from state-funded or approved travel to other states for any reason, including conferences, litigation, or for training.

“This is not like a boycott of those states or anything like that, although in effect, it may look similar,” Didech said.

“The purpose of the bill is to protect women who may not be able to get the health care they may need when they’re traveling on official state business,” he said, though it is unclear which other state’s legislation would create such effects. Many of the laws passed since January only apply to residents of the state.

Robert Gilligan, executive director of the Illinois Catholic Conference, which serves as the public policy voice for the state’s six Catholic dioceses, called the bill “absurd.”

“Where does this thinking begin and end?” he said to CNA Sept. 30.

“There are states that have weaker gun laws, different speed limits out West, different smoking laws – why don’t we protect our state employees when they travel to other states when they may not have the same laws as Illinois on these issues?” he asked.

“The obvious point is: why does this always have to come back to abortion?”

Gilligan told CNA that beyond taking a stand against other state’s views on abortion, there was no clear rationale for the measure.

“I mean it is absurd… do we prevent state employees from travelling to Flint Michigan where they have less safe water? This type of thinking is endless. State laws should pertain to what happens in Illinois, and this is an unjust law so it shouldn’t even be on the books.”

“Where does this type of thinking end and where do you draw the line?” said Gilligan.

“If the real aim of this bill is to protect people, surely we should ban travelling to states where they have different laws from Illinois on all sorts of things and it isn’t safe for them to travel to.”

Gilligan noted that the bill would allow state-sponsored travel in special cases, should the trip be deemed by a state agency to be necessary despite the ban, and suggested that the bill could prove to be almost unenforceable.

“If there is a conference and it’s determined that an employee needs to be there, they should go,” he told CNA. “And if they do not need to be there, they should not be spending state dollars going in the first place.”

The bill would also require the state Attorney General “to develop, maintain, and post on his or her internet website a current list of states that have enacted specified laws prohibiting or restricting abortion rights,” to which other departments would defer in making travel plans.

“I think we should have a list of all states with weaker air pollution laws, water laws, driving laws, gun laws, and we shouldn’t be sending people to those areas either,” Gilligan said.

If you value the news and views Catholic World Report provides, please consider donating to support our efforts. Your contribution will help us continue to make CWR available to all readers worldwide for free, without a subscription. Thank you for your generosity!

Click here for more information on donating to CWR. Click here to sign up for our newsletter.


  1. Less “absurd” would be a bill banning travel to states that have legalized Physician Assisted Suicide (successful only because couched as an “exemption” to homicide laws).

    And especially banning travel to my Washington State which earlier this year, amidst much media fanfare, passed a bill approving the “composting” of cremated human remains for application on, say, our famous orchards, e.g., apples for export to unsuspecting palates in, say, Wisconsin.

    Aborted children by the millions? Hey, even Soylent Green is no longer a 1973 Charlton Heston fiction movie. But legislators everywhere, especially sanctimonious Buffalo Grove, Wisconsin, still ain’t gotta clue.

  2. Is there anyone out there who can honestly say that he or she is surprised that the time has (finally?) come when someone has introduced a monstrosity like this and then IMMEDIATELY proceeded to wrap it in righteous clothing?


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

All comments posted at Catholic World Report are moderated. While vigorous debate is welcome and encouraged, please note that in the interest of maintaining a civilized and helpful level of discussion, comments containing obscene language or personal attacks—or those that are deemed by the editors to be needlessly combative or inflammatory—will not be published. Thank you.