The Dispatch: More from CWR...

Students say changes at Rome’s JPII Institute undermine its mission

“With this new process, the continuity of the identity of the Institute is dead…” says a faculty member at the Institute.

Archbishop Vincenzo Paglia in a 2015 photo. (CNS photo/Jeffrey Bruno)

Vatican City, Jul 26, 2019 / 11:45 am (CNA).- More than 150 students at the Pontifical John Paul II Institute in Rome have signed a letter saying that newly approved statutes will undermine the institute’s mission and identity.

“We want to express our greatest concern: the loss of the formational approach, and therefore, of the identity of the Pontifical Theological Institute John Paul II,” the students wrote in their July 24 letter, which was sent to Archbishop Vincenzo Paglia, the institute’s grand chancellor, and Msgr. Pierangelo Sequeri, its president.

“Many students have expressed their immense concern after the unexpected publication of the new statutes and the new program of studies for our new Institute, together with the sad news of the expulsion of two professors whose chairs have a central role in the formation offered by the institute,” they added.

The letter was sent soon after the approval of new statutes for the Institute, two years after Pope Francis announced that he would reestablish the school, broadening its focus on theology to include the “science of the family.”

The pope called for the development of new statutes to govern the school, which was legally reconstituted in 2017.

A faculty member at the Institute expressed concern to CNA that the new statutes concentrate the hiring of faculty and development of curriculum in the chancellor’s office, now occupied by Paglia.

The faculty member said that tenured professors will no longer be involved in the search for new faculty members, and will only be able to stop a new hire with a two-thirds majority vote. This, the professor said, will be “practically impossible” because of faculty appointment recently made at the institute.

The professor said that when the Pontifical John Paul II Institute was founded, it had been especially important to then-Pope John Paul II that tenured professors consent to new faculty appointments, “to secure the continuity of the Institute’s identity.”

“With this new process, the continuity of the identity of the Institute is dead,” the professor told CNA.

The professor also confirmed that the Institute’s faculty chair of moral theology will be eliminated, an idea he called “inconceivable.”

He also said that the new process for hiring faculty is a break with ordinary academic practices.

“I don’t remember any academic precedent that has ever eliminated chairs and tenures by arguing that the current Institute is a totally new organization and that therefore the previous professors with tenure have no rights: this is simply a juridical scam.  And the juridical scam is being used against the two experts of morals: (Monsignor Livio) Melina and (Father Jose) Noriega.”

Melina and Noriega will not return to teach at the John Paul II Institute next year. Technically, because all professors will be given new contracts under the new statutes of the Institute, they were not fired; instead, their contracts have not been renewed.

They will, reportedly, be able to continue working with students completing dissertations under their direction.

At the time changes to the Institute were announced in 2017, Paglia said that faculty would not be cut, but rather expanded, bringing in new professors and experts to discuss themes relevant to the “sciences of marriage and family.”

But Italian Catholic news agency La Nuova Bussola Quotidiana reported this week that all faculty members in Rome were recently informed that, because of the new statutes, professors would be suspended until they could be evaluated in light of the Institute’s needs, and possibly reassigned to teach new courses in the fall.

Melina, who was reportedly informed that he will not continue at the institute, earned in 1985 the first doctoral degree given by the Institute, and served as its long-time president.

His dismissal, and that of Noriega, came as a shock to many at the Institute.

“All these decisions about curricula and personnel have been made during the summer, without the input of a single faculty member,” one professor told CNA.

Among new faculty members appointed to teach at the university is Fr. Maurizio Chiodi, who argued in 2018 that the use of artificial contraception could, in some cases, “be recognized as an act of responsibility that is carried out, not in order to radically reject the gift of a child but because in those situations, responsibility calls the couple and the family to other forms of welcome and hospitality.”

The letter sent by the students raised particular concern about the reported elimination of the Institute’s chair of moral theology.

“At the center of our concern regarding the identity of the Institute is the suppression of the chair of fundamental moral theology. We know how important that study of human action was for Pope John Paul II, to the point of entrusting the (moral theology) chair precisely to the first president, Cardinal Carlo Caffarra,” their letter said.

After voicing objection to the reported dismissal of Molina and Noriega, the students’ letter said that the Institute seems to be remaking itself in a way that models a secularized approach to studying the family.

The letter asked: “Why continue to study at the John Paul II Institute if it does not seem to propose anything different from what we can find among the curricula of secular universities, usually in more attractive and effective ways?”

A source connected to the Institute told CNA that the newly approved statutes also raise concerns about the Institute’s academic integrity and reputation.

“Any reputable academician would be concerned about how the academic aspect of the Institute has been handled. Pope Francis deserves that Amoris laetitia be fairly discussed, rather than it being imposed by theological partisanship. This new approach to the faculty and curriculum totally imperils the credibility of the Institute,” the source said.

“I also wonder: There are clear academic guidelines standardized by the European Union that have to be respected if the Institute wants its degrees to be valid. Have these norms been taken into consideration?”

The source noted the importance of due process in academic settings, in order to protect academic freedom.

The new processes, he said “are violating all academic standards, thus casting a big shadow over the credibility of the Institute.”

“When John Paul II created the Institute,” he said, “he did not fire teachers in other universities who thought differently from him, like Bernhard Häring or others opposed to Humanae vitae, even at pontifical universities. Instead, he created an institute to address the issues in dispute in an academic manner.”

In response to recent criticisms, Sequeri told CNA that the new statutes will strengthen the Institute’s identity.

“The approval of the statutes and of the new study plan of the John Paul II Institute put into effect the reform that Pope Francis asked for in the motu proprio Summa familiae cura; they reiterate and relaunch with new strength John Paul II’s original inspiration, and give a specific centrality to family, which is now the object of study from every perspective.”

With regard to theology, Sequeri said that “the new study plan strengthens the theological reflection on family. The study of moral theology is part of the theological reflection. The study of moral theology is still critical and it is framed in a broader area of studies which consents to better understand the reality of families.”

“By focusing on the issue of the Gospel’s sense of family life, ecclesial reflection can more vigorously move towards the anthropological-cultural change that influences all aspects of life and requires an analytic and varied approach.”

Paglia declined to comment.

The Pontifical John Paul II Institute for Marriage and the Family was founded in 1981 in order to develop the themes in John Paul II’s 1960 book “Love and Responsibility,” written when he was still Cardinal Wojtyla, and as well as the theology of the body he developed while pope.

While the Institute’s main headquarters remains in Rome, the school has campuses all over the world, including Washington DC, Nigeria, Spain, Brazil, Mexico, India and South Korea, among others. It is not yet known how the new statutes might impact those campuses.

Andrea Gagliarducci contributed to this report.

If you value the news and views Catholic World Report provides, please consider donating to support our efforts. Your contribution will help us continue to make CWR available to all readers worldwide for free, without a subscription. Thank you for your generosity!

Click here for more information on donating to CWR. Click here to sign up for our newsletter.

About Catholic News Agency 10250 Articles
Catholic News Agency (


  1. “Pope Francis announced that he would reestablish the school, broadening its focus on theology to include the “science of the family.””

    Instead of lousing up something that seems to have been working just fine, perhaps the Pope should have founded his own institute.

  2. Andrea Gagliarducci outstanding CNA journalist generally provides in depth analysis by juxtaposing the more important criteria thereby remaining a journalist first rather than opine. All that I can add within my limited knowledge is opinion, though well founded on the circumstantial evidence. The dismantling of the original Academy by Pope Francis dismissing all members followed by dismissal of Josef Seifert an original member from his professorial position at a Spanish seminary by the local Ordinary apparently for Seifert’s disagreement with sections of Amoris Laetitia tells the story behind the story [most likely known by Gagliarducci] of doctrinal disagreement. Apostolic Tradition v New Paradigm. Prof Seifert’s independent founding 2017 of the John Paul II Academy for Human Life and the Family is a countermeasure to the doctrinal distortions expected to develop at the Pontifical Academy for Life indicated early on by appointments of new members including advocates of abortion as means of pop control, those advancing secular humanist morality. The students including the interviewed professor perhaps should have been aware beforehand. They now know “the continuity of the identity of the Institute is dead”. Catholic Tradition is now dead at a dead pontifical institute, which death to the distress of the faithful seems to prevail at the Vatican. Nevertheless it is alive and well at the John Paul II Academy for Human Life and Family.

  3. President Sequeri explains that “the new study plan strengthens the theological reflection on family. The study of moral theology is PART of the theological reflection. The study of moral theology is still critical and it is framed in a broader area of studies which consents to better understand the REALITY of families” [brackets and caps added].

    Why is more fully human moral theology no longer the broader context?

    Aha, predictable exploitation (!) of Pope Francis’ evocative (halfway-house for some?) principles (Evangelii Gaudium, 2013): “the whole is more than the part;” and “realities are more important than concepts.”

    With the ADULTERATING, flat-earth new-paradigm of “anthropological-cultural” change, how does the new frame—-the “broader area of studies”—-differ in the long run from, say, placing traditional marriage within the other broader area of studies of “gender theory?” And what about its silent partner, so to speak, of (ordained) “consenting adults”?

    Marriage of a man and woman is first reduced to a binary anomaly within the frame of undefined (redefined?) marriage and family. But this REAL “reality of families” is rooted in innate Natural Law—-more real than any secondary “theological reflection.” Now is it to be broadly bracketed aside at the John Paul II Institute, as it is already in the secular world by Supreme Court fatwas, and punitive litigation—the frosting on the cake!

    Are traditional marriage and family more than an abstruse theological “concept,” or a social science construct, or not? Is the Incarnation real, or not? Or, is it now all about leading from behind, and access to secular, peer-endorsed publications? Convergence is always easier than conversion. . .

    The secular “throwaway culture” is prophetically denounced, but why, then, do these prophets at the same time “throw away,” in reality, Humanae Vitae, Veritatis Splendor and the Theology of the Body?

  4. “His Eminence” Paglia is a feline narcissist fraud, just like his friends McCarrick and Danneels, and the whole bunch who engineered the election of their fellow fraud “The Holy Father Francis.”

    It’s the pornocracy of the new Borgias.

    And let us all remember that, as their fellow-fraud “His Excellency” Robert Zollitsch, then-President of the “German Bishops Conference,” declared on his TV broadcast on Holy Saturday 2009: Jesus did not sacrifice his life on the cross for us to save us from our sins, he only did it in solidarity with us.

  5. Post-Dulles and post-Sullivan, Jesuit ecclesiology has become too sociological at the expense of Scripture and Tradition. Now with the move against the John Paul II Institute for Marriage and the Family–unless he is totally out of the loop and Paglia is just a loose canon–the Jesuit pope apparently wants to sacrifice Christian anthropology to the gods of psychology and personal experience, experience that is more informed more by fallen nature than by grace.

  6. This way of dismembering the real most Holy Catholic Church
    in a day or minutes, was practiced at the w Cardinal Müller and 2 of his priests’ collaborators about 3 yrs ago. They were ousted with NO EXPLANATION whatsoever and no MERCY, making archbishop LADARIA the prefect instead. A guy that manipulated Benedict XVI letter in order to portray Pope Francis in a better light. When caught was NOT FIRED, but descended to the 2 post of command. If we do not speak out or pray harder the minions will be rejoicing to see what they view as the final “destruction” of Christ true church. BUT WE KNOW BETTER, it will be their own destruction all together as they are ALL CLOSING RANKS making it easier to detect who is who, for when the final harvest arrives hell will be waiting.

5 Trackbacks / Pingbacks

  1. Students say changes at Rome’s JPII Institute undermine its mission -
  2. Students say changes at Rome’s JPII Institute undermine its mission - Mama Mary - Our Loving Mother
  3. The Vandals sack Rome….again – Catholic World Report
  4. JPII Institute VP says school’s identity is ‘seriously threatened’ – Catholic World Report
  5. PopeWatch: Vandals – The American Catholic

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

All comments posted at Catholic World Report are moderated. While vigorous debate is welcome and encouraged, please note that in the interest of maintaining a civilized and helpful level of discussion, comments containing obscene language or personal attacks—or those that are deemed by the editors to be needlessly combative or inflammatory—will not be published. Thank you.