Questions remain about McCarrick, even as new scandals emerge

If the Vatican hoped to score even a qualified public relations victory with the announcement of the McCarrick verdict, news that broke heading into the weekend made that unlikely.

Pope Francis greets then-Cardinal Theodore E. McCarrick during his general audience in St. Peter's Square at the Vatican June 19, 2013. (CNS photo/Paul Haring)

(Rome, February 16th, 2019) The Vatican announced on Saturday that the disgraced former Archbishop of Washington, DC, Theodore, Edgar McCarrick, has been dismissed from the clerical state after being found guilty of several different canonical crimes, including “sins against the Sixth Commandment with minors and with adults” and “solicitation in the Sacrament of Confession” with “abuse of power” as an aggravating factor.

The Director ad interim of the Press Office of the Holy See told journalists at noon Rome Time on Saturday that the proceedings against McCarrick had been “extra-judicial” — meaning an abbreviated administrative process — and assured reporters that the rights of the accused were nonetheless fully respected throughout the process. “McCarrick’s lawyers played an active role in the course of some of the interrogations,” Gisotti explained, before reaffirming that the verdict and sentence are both final. “[N]o recourse is possible,” Gisotti said.

The Archdiocese of Washington issued a statement in response to the news on Saturday morning, saying the penalty, “underscores the gravity of his actions.” The statement went on to say, “Our hope and prayer is that this decision serves to help the healing process for survivors of abuse, as well as those who have experienced disappointment or disillusionment because of what former Archbishop McCarrick has done.”

It is remarkable that, in an age in which the supreme pastor and governor of the universal Church has insisted “clericalism” is the root cause of the leadership crisis in which the Church is currently embroiled, the worst punishment ecclesiastical authority can impose on a cleric is to make him a layman. Nevertheless, thus is Mr. McCarrick punished, neither too soon, nor too severely.

Church leaders in Rome and in the United States seem awfully anxious to put the dreadful business with “Uncle Ted” behind them, and let the healing begin. Before that can happen, however, several outstanding matters require address. Questions regarding who in the US hierarchy and in the Roman Curia knew what about McCarrick, and when, remain without satisfactory — or any — answer from the Vatican, while delivery on promises of transparency and “zero tolerance” continues to receive postponement.

Gisotti on Saturday quoted a communiqué from the Press Office dated October 6th, 2018, in which the Holy stated, “Both abuse and its cover-up can no longer be tolerated and a different treatment for Bishops who have committed or covered up abuse, in fact represents a form of clericalism that is no longer acceptable.” That same October 6th press release also promised, “We will follow the path of truth wherever it may lead,” quoting Pope Francis’ remarks in Philadelphia on September 27th, 2015.

Most importantly, it was in the October 6th communiqué that Pope Francis promised:

The Holy See will, in due course, make known the conclusions of the matter regarding Archbishop McCarrick. Moreover, with reference to other accusations brought against Archbishop McCarrick, the Holy Father has decided that information gathered during the preliminary investigation be combined with a further thorough study of the entire documentation present in the Archives of the Dicasteries and Offices of the Holy See regarding the former Cardinal McCarrick, in order to ascertain all the relevant facts, to place them in their historical context and to evaluate them objectively.

Insofar as the verdict and penal sentence announced Saturday constitute the conclusions of the matter regarding Mr. McCarrick, Pope Francis may say he has made good on his promise. We hope and expect more information will be forthcoming.

If Pope Francis and his lieutenants in the Vatican had hoped to score even a qualified public relations victory with the announcement of the McCarrick verdict, news that broke heading into the weekend made that unlikely.

On Friday, there was a story out of France — first reported by Le Monde — where the Apostolic Nuncio, Bishop Luigi Ventura, is under investigation for allegedly engaging in inappropriate contact with a male staff member at City Hall in Paris, during a reception held there in late January. The Press Office of the Holy See issued a terse statement saying the Vatican had learned of the investigation in the papers, and is “awaiting the results of the investigation.”

That is surely a case of bad timing, and may be much ado about nothing. Neither of those can account for what La Croix International reported, however, also on Friday.

A high-ranking official of the Apostolic Signatura — the highest ordinary tribunal in the Church’s justice system — Msgr. Joseph Punderson, was listed as “removed from ministry” by his home diocese of Trenton, New Jersey. Punderson appeared on the list of priests credibly accused of abuse, which the Trenton diocese published on Wednesday.

CWR attempted to contact Msgr. Punderson at his last known address, the Villa Stritch on Via della Nocetta, a residence for US clerics working in Rome, but was told Punderson left the facility in September of last year. A spokesperson for the Diocese of Trenton said Msgr. Punderson “resigned his position” last November. The Press Office of the Holy See did not respond to requests for information.

On Thursday of last week, the Wall Street Journal reported that the President of Pope Francis’ Commission for the Protection of Minors, Cardinal Sean O’Malley OFM of Boston, has been privately complaining at least since 2017 that the Holy See has not been keeping its promises of “zero tolerance” when it comes to abusive clerics. “An appeals panel set up by the pope had reduced the punishments of a number of Catholic priests found guilty of abusing minors,” The Journal reported. “In some cases, the panel canceled their dismissal from the priesthood and gave them short suspensions instead.”

The Journal article quoted O’Malley as telling the Cardinal Secretary of State, Pietro Parolin, “If this gets out, it will cause a scandal.”

A great many unanswered questions remain, meanwhile, in connection with the Bishop-emeritus of Orán, Gustavo Zanchetta, for whom Pope Francis created a tailor-made position in 2017, inside the powerful APSA — the Administration of the Patrimony of the Apostolic See — which looks after the Holy See’s real estate and financial holdings. Zanchetta is currently under investigation in his home diocese for possibly criminal malfeasance, including the sexual abuse of seminarians.

Despite repeated promises of zero tolerance and transparency, the Vatican has been even more laconic when it comes to what Pope Francis knew about Bishop Zanchetta and when he knew it, than about Mr. McCarrick.

If you value the news and views Catholic World Report provides, please consider donating to support our efforts. Your contribution will help us continue to make CWR available to all readers worldwide for free, without a subscription. Thank you for your generosity!

Click here for more information on donating to CWR. Click here to sign up for our newsletter.

About Christopher R. Altieri 179 Articles
Christopher R. Altieri is a journalist, editor and author of three books, including Reading the News Without Losing Your Faith (Catholic Truth Society, 2021). He is contributing editor to Catholic World Report.


  1. If there was a “plot” hatched a year-ago by PF to removed 88 year McCarrick (who may have been diagnosed with terminal cancer for all we know and hasn’t long to live), as a token meat to hungry mobs wanting clerical abuse justice, this might have worked. What threw PF off was Vigano exposing that Wuerl “lies shamelessly” and that McCarrick’s proteges are Tobin, Cupich, and Farrell in the US. McCarrick’s roommate and longtime partner, Kevin Farrell has been named Vatican Chamberlain. He will guide the process of the election of the next Pontiff. It that a simultaneous event? Cupich has been put in charge of leading up the world-wide summit on clerical abuse of minors by Bishops and Cardinals with no mention of homosexuality. Wuerl has only to make the gesture of retiring from being the Cardinal of DC, to being the Administrator of DC, effectively a no change. We all know more than what we did a year ago, but PF and his minyans as Vigano said, have no true intention to change. Dear Jesus, please heal your Church by cleansing the temple and returning your church to a house of prayer and not a den of thieves and frauds.

  2. Pope Francis would have likely continued to protect McCarrick if he had not been exposed as a serial rapist of men and boys. He sadly continues to protect other predators like Zanchetta and coverup artists like Wuerl, Cupich and Maradiaga because they support his ideological views. Nothing has changed, or will change as long as this Pontificate continues. Reform will have to come from the laity and law enforcement agencies.

  3. Regret to say that its time sainthood was revoked from John Paul II and I would say that his former secretary Cardinal Dziwisz should also be investigated. How much damage done to the Church during this pontificate and his successors left to pick. up the pieces. And I was an admirer of the late Pontiff, but now bitterly disappointed

    • Popes rarely get involved in the minutiae of vetting those selected to become Bishops, relying instead – perhaps entirely too much – on the recommendations of others who he trusts. Case in point, if Quarracino had not suppressed Kolvenbach’s scathing indictment of Bergoglio, he likely would never have received Pope St. John Paul IIs mandate to be ordained a Bishop. As events continue to unfold and the layers of the onion are peeled back, its quite apparent that there are a lot of intrinsically disordered sexual deviants masquerading as ordained clergy lying in wait intent on destroying the bride of Christ.

      Can. 1013 No Bishop is permitted to consecrate anyone as Bishop, unless it is first established that a pontifical mandate has been issued.

  4. This article is spot on! The Vatican MUST further investigate who knew, when and why McCarrick was continually promoted! In all the reading I have done about this disgusting situation, I believe Vigano told the truth and Francis knew back in 2013 AND TURN HIS BACK ON IT! As a result, he MUST resign and I think he KNOWS this and this is why we will hear no more about this, Rome thinking that McCarrick being “out” will satisfy. It will not! I pray everyday that a high ranking official in the Vatican will come forth, tell what he knows, resign and dedicate himself to a life of prayer and penance. Perhaps this will start a string of resignations and this disgusting filth can be cleaned from the Church. I also pray that the Roman Catholic Church will be the first worldwide institution to offer help to these poor souls with same-sex attraction and help them find their true humanity. I love the Church but I love God more.

  5. Asked: who knew about this Gran Affaire, for how long & said nothing ? My question: mr McCarrick endorsed, & promoted many for team Francis’ consideration & promotion . Who are they , & when did they receive the beneficio of his support , & where are they now ? He is gone , but They Are Not..!

  6. “…the worst punishment ecclesiastical authority can impose on a cleric is to make him a layman.”

    That pretty much says it all when it comes to many of the problems bishops and priests have had for many years. Active homosexuality is of course part of the cause, but the climate of privilege and expected deference, along with what amounts to sinecures for many clerics, have rotted the episcopacy and presbyterate. No checks and balances, no peer reviews, no accountability, no transparency: Is it any wonder that weak and sinful men succumbed? I think one part of the solution is to get rid of large dioceses. Make ones where bishops can actually have a pastoral relationship with their priests and people. And stop looking at laymen as the bottom of the totem pole. Where else do you have a smarmy 30 year old badger a congregation of PhDs, MDs, RNs, leaders of business with pious nothings?

1 Trackback / Pingback

  1. Questions remain about McCarrick, even as new scandals emerge -

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

All comments posted at Catholic World Report are moderated. While vigorous debate is welcome and encouraged, please note that in the interest of maintaining a civilized and helpful level of discussion, comments containing obscene language or personal attacks—or those that are deemed by the editors to be needlessly combative or inflammatory—will not be published. Thank you.