The Dispatch: More from CWR...

Archbishop Ladaria and the transgender movement

The ongoing discussion of, or agitation for, women’s ordination seems to be an exercise in never taking no for an answer.

Spanish Archbishop Luis Ladaria Ferrer, the prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, in a Sept. 8, 2015, file photo. (CNS photo/Paul Haring)

By Ed Condon

Vatican City, May 30, 2018 / 11:06 am (CNA/EWTN News).- This week Archbishop Luis Ladaria, Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, issued (another) definitive statement on the reservation of priestly ordination to men alone. In doing so he rightly noted that continued speculation about the possibility of women priests in some quarters was “of serious concern” and “creates serious confusion among the faithful.”

The ongoing discussion of, or agitation for, women’s ordination seems to be an exercise in never taking no for an answer, even when that answer is the unbroken practice of the Church for millennia and is definitively reaffirmed by the popes, including St. John Paul II and Francis.

Even as Archbishop Ladaria patiently underscored that as a “tenenda” teaching – one which is to be held by all the faithful – a male-only priesthood was simply not up for discussion, now or ever, one could detect soft rejection in how it was reported. Some media outlets, even ostensibly Catholic ones, insist that the teaching was “called definitive” rather than “is definitive.” It is a subtle qualification, but one which seeks to relativize the empirical; what is called definitive today might be called something else tomorrow.

The question/non-question of women’s ordination feels like it has been around forever, and refuses to go away. In reality it is a very modern issue. For almost two thousand years an all male priesthood was a given. It went undisputed even after the Reformation, which saw whole swathes of Christendom depart from basic sacramental truth and practice. Why then has it become such a fixture on the ecclesiastical landscape?

The movement for women’s ordination is rooted in the cultural revolution of the second half of the twentieth century. It is a strand of classical feminism, for which the stumbling block remains access to power. But the exclusion from power, if we must see it that way, applies to all the laypeople – men and women – who make up the vast majority of the Church.

As a lay man, I feel no particular disenfranchisement because of this. Nor do I feel that the simple fact of being a man gives me some smug internal consolation that “I could if I wanted to.” I no more feel I could have been a priest had I wanted to than I can make myself a father. That I am neither a father nor a priest does not challenge my identity as a man, nor does my inability to make myself either. I am who and what God made me, with my own dignity and vocation.

Sadly, you do not have to look far in the world to see people for whom identity as a man or a woman is a profound source of existential crisis. The unwillingness of some thinkers, both in and out of the Church, to move past a stance of “no means not yet” in relation to women’s ordination, and the focus on the priesthood as a sine qua non measure of equal dignity, represents a missed opportunity for the common expression and celebration of the real dignity and power of authentic womanhood and masculinity, both of which are under direct attack by the transgender movement.

The subversion of the basic facts of who we are is real. One isn’t even supposed to speak of the “fact” of being a man or a woman anymore.

Men and women are different. It should not be a controversial statement, but it is. In the world of gender fluidity nothing is certain, not even who you are. It is no surprise, then, if we end up with a generation of isolated existentialists. The Church has something to say to these people and it desperately needs to be heard.

There is no doubt about the created order or the essential dignity of men and women. Genesis tells us that “male and female he created them” and he knew what he was doing. Even from a more secularist perspective, the traditional feminist movement has always held the essential difference between men and women as not just a biological fact but an existential reality to be celebrated, even if there was a balance to be redressed.

An interesting side effect of the transgender movement is that Catholics and classical feminists suddenly find themselves fighting from the same corner. If they started speaking together on the real and inherent dignity of men and women, it would be a powerful force for sanity and good in our world.

Since Vatican Council II, the Church has made great strides in articulating the priestly vocation as a particular ministry of service, and not one of domination. Laypeople cannot “exercise” the power of governance, no. But they can “cooperate” in its exercise. At the local level, this means serving as ecclesiastical judges, as chancellors of dioceses, and so on. At the highest levels, more roles are opening up, even in the curia: last year Pope Francis appointed two women to senior positions at the Dicastery for Laity, Family and Life.

As this becomes more commonplace, it is to be hoped that the myopic focus of a few on women’s ordination will fall away, leaving Archbishop Ladaria, and even some of those he is currently correcting, free to focus their efforts where they can do the most good.

The transgender movement is leaving an increasing number of casualties in its wake. The best treatment that can be offered them is the truth that God made them who they are, loves them as they are, and knew what he was doing.

Ed Condon is a canon lawyer working for tribunals in a number of dioceses. On Twitter he is @canonlawyered. The opinions expressed in this commentary do not necessarily reflect the opinion of Catholic News Agency.

If you value the news and views Catholic World Report provides, please consider donating to support our efforts. Your contribution will help us continue to make CWR available to all readers worldwide for free, without a subscription. Thank you for your generosity!

Click here for more information on donating to CWR. Click here to sign up for our newsletter.

About Catholic News Agency 8393 Articles
Catholic News Agency (


  1. Unfortunately, I don’t trust these guys for a second. I think they are only announcing this now (why was there even a need to say anything now?) because they want to mollify some because they are getting set to announce married priests as the Amazon synod and deaconettes in the commission that is wroking on that.

    So first they announce women can’t be priests, then they say they can become deaconettes.

    • Samton I frequently read posts for some of the witticisms and need for humor. Deaconettes! It’s a killer.

  2. Cardinal Ladaria Ferrer is proving so far to be at least an advocate of Apostolic Tradition. Two issues which Pope Francis has already affirmed in accord with traditional doctrine transgender and male priesthood are however not among the more questioned controversial doctrines such as communion for D&R, interdenominational communion, homosexuality, and married priests. It’s these doctrinal matters that he is obliged to address. Since he really hasn’t insofar as I’m aware may indicate he’s as hogtied by his Boss as previous Prefect Cardinal Müller was. Unless he addresses them clearly in accord with Tradition his latest comments are simply window dressing. It leaves us with the ongoing desire for resolution on the part of traditionalists v the movement gaining momentum in Germany and elsewhere to implement changes to definitive binding doctrine without ‘corrective’, supplemental [if such were possible which I believe isn’t] definitive binding doctrine. That inability to make definitive change to standing doctrine is the apparent rationale of the move toward changing tradition by relying on leading premises that don’t quite define but rather suggest, lead to change as was forewarned by the late Cardinal Carlo Caffarra. Change takes place by fiat inexorably as we stand by and offer interpretations of announcements such as Cardinal Ladaria’s and discuss the Pontiff’s intent. Because of the obvious trend of changing tradition by practice rather than magisterial doctrine I don’t take comfort from Ladaria Ferrer’s comments. The Church if it is to salvage the faith must enact a Counter Reformation to the Protestant like Reformation occurring in its midst.

  3. Sammton, I hear ‘ya. We have seen their deceptive (and successful) ways for 30 years now in both the secular and the Church. But… this announcement may have been a response to the German bishop and Cardinal Schonborn O.P. who said that woman priests could be allowed via a council or to that effect. Just trying to give Ladaria the benefit of the doubt.

  4. Archbishop Ladaria gives clarity on male ordination to the priesthood. But does he say explicitly whether this established guidance applies to the reopened question of deacon ordinations (also part of Holy Orders)? When he established a Commission for the Study of the Diaconate of Women in 2016, Pope Francis referred to the “feminine genius”; and elsewhere two of his four open-ended and even cryptic “principles” for the Church are that “time is greater than space” and “realities are more important than ideas.”
    So, with regard to Holy Orders, is it now “time” for the biblical “deaconess” Phoebe to be morphed into (the reality-or-idea of) the ordained diaconate? Or, as a false precedent, and as with other non-ordained ministries, was her part surely different in kind as well as degree, that is, administrative (and sacramentally to simply protect baptized and dripping females from the eyes of the ordaining male priests)? In selecting his apostles Christ went less with the smell of the sheepskin (credentialed “genius”) and more with the smell of the unlettered fishermen.
    In its forthcoming work will the Diaconate Commission editors insert a creatively ambiguous footnote on deaconesses, then to be predictably downloaded to mutually contradictory national conferences of bishops? A pastoral exception to be decided through, what, local discernment? Archbishop Ladaria is clear that Odinatio Sacerdotalis (1994) does not disappear without a trace. But, as with Veritatis Splendor (1993), is the sidelined Gerhard Cardinal Muller and his relevant scholarship, Priesthood and Diaconate (2000/2002), now on the de facto and growing Index of Forbidden Books? Has Ladaria rendered the Diaconate Commission moot, or not?

  5. The pope, in due time, will issue one of his patented jesuit-speak rejoinders. The pope wants deaconess’s and his lieutenants will make it happen. Just watch.

  6. The left NEVER takes no for an answer, and that works for them in the political sphere. They regard the church as a political organization so it makes sense to them that they should push it over and over

  7. I could be wrong, but I think that I have seen a difference in Pope Francis since he stumbled so badly over the Chilean crisis. He seems to be awakening to the need to allow the teaching Church to be free to speak Truth. He may realize that there has been too much Bergoglio and not enough “Peter”. His personal preference and personality are not what the Church needs. Could we actually be turning a corner? I hope so!!

1 Trackback / Pingback

  1. Archbishop Ladaria and the transgender movement -

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

All comments posted at Catholic World Report are moderated. While vigorous debate is welcome and encouraged, please note that in the interest of maintaining a civilized and helpful level of discussion, comments containing obscene language or personal attacks—or those that are deemed by the editors to be needlessly combative or inflammatory—will not be published. Thank you.