Vatican reportedly rejects German bishops’ plan for intercommunion of spouses

Vatican City, Apr 18, 2018 / 10:58 am (CNA/EWTN News).- The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith has reportedly rejected a plan approved by the German bishops’ conference to publish guidelines permitting non-Catholic spouses of Catholics to receive the Eucharist in some limited circumstances.

Austrian news site kath.net has reported that Vatican sources say the CDF, with papal approval, has suspended the German bishops’ proposed plan, and sources close to the congregation have confirmed this to CNA.

It is not clear whether the Vatican has asked the bishops’ conference to modify the contents of draft guidelines, whether they have suspended the development of a draft while the matter is considered further, or whether it has been entirely rejected.

In February, Cardinal Reinhard Marx of Munich and Freising announced that the German bishops’ conference would publish a pastoral handout for married couples that allows Protestant spouses of Catholics “in individual cases” and “under certain conditions” to receive Holy Communion, provided they “affirm the Catholic faith in the Eucharist”.

The announcement was made “after intensive debate” at the conclusion of the general assembly of the German bishops’ conference, which was held Feb. 19 – 22 in the Bavarian city of Ingolstadt, and attended by 62 members of the bishops’ conference under the leadership of conference chairman Cardinal Marx.

Last month, seven German bishops sent a letter to the CDF and to the Pontifical Council for Promoting Christian Unity asking for clarification on the matter. The signatories did not consult beforehand with Cardinal Marx.

The seven bishops asked whether the question of Holy Communion for Protestant spouses in interdenominational marriages can be decided on the level of a national bishops’ conference, or if rather, “a decision of the Universal Church” is required in the matter.

The letter was signed by Cardinal Rainer Woelki of Cologne, Archbishop Ludwig Schick of Bamberg, Bishop Gregor Hanke of Eichstätt, Bishop Konrad Zdarsa of Augsburg, Bishop Stefan Oster of Passau, Bishop Rudolf Voderholzer of Regensburg, and Bishop Wolfgang Ipolt of Görlitz.

“From the view of the signatories, the goal in a question of such centrality to the Faith and the unity of the Church must be to avoid separate national paths and arrive at a globally unified, workable solution by way of an ecumenical dialogue,” the Archdiocese of Cologne told CNA Deutsch April 4.

The Code of Canon Law already provides that in the danger of death or if “some other grave necessity urges it,” Catholic ministers licitly administer penance, Eucharist, and anointing of the sick to Protestants “who cannot approach a minister of their own community and who seek such on their own accord, provided that they manifest Catholic faith in respect to these sacraments and are properly disposed.”

5 Comments

  1. ‘allows Protestant spouses of Catholics “in individual cases” and “under certain conditions” to receive Holy Communion, provided they “affirm the Catholic faith in the Eucharist”.’

    If they affirm it and actually believe it, why aren’t they Catholic?

    • Possibly because they came late in life to a different perspective on the eucharist. Possibly because the faith that they display is so deep and firm that the priest feels that any differences that may still linger are ‘angels dancing on the head of a pin’.

      • If that “different perspective” doesn’t agree with the Church’s teaching on the Eucharist, then reception of the Eucharist is a lie. Receiving Eucharist, by it’s very nuptial nature, is a declaration that you are in communion with Christ’s Church. If a person doesn’t think the Catholic Church is Christ’s Church, or if he doesn’t believe the Eucharist is the true Body, Blood, Soul, and Divinity of Christ, then he shouldn’t be performing a public act that affirms both of those truths. And if you do, in fact, believe those things, then become Catholic. Yes, it really is that simple.

        It’s like a man telling his girlfriend: “I believe in love. And I love you. And I want to always be with you.” And she says, “Then let’s get married!”

        And he replies: “Well, no, I think we should sleep together. I’m not ready for the commitment. But I do love you!”

        At which point it’s evident he doesn’t really understand or embrace love and marriage, and thus refuses to make the public commitment needed to declare his love for her and his fidelity to the nuptial covenant.

        This isn’t about nitpicking, but about letting one’s “Yes” be “Yes” and one’s “No” be “No,” just as Christ said.

        • Terrific reply and to the point. Thank you, Carl Olson.

          I would be curious to what and how Heller’s idea of a “different perspective” along with such a deep faith would render so little difference to what the Church has taught for two millennia.

      • One gets the impression these days that to some of the ecumenically minded hierarchs, as well as others, everything is “angels on the head of a pin” – after all, “All you need is love”

1 Trackback / Pingback

  1. Vatican reportedly rejects German bishops’ plan for intercommunion of spouses -

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

All comments posted at Catholic World Report are moderated. While vigorous debate is welcome and encouraged, please note that in the interest of maintaining a civilized and helpful level of discussion, comments containing obscene language or personal attacks—or those that are deemed by the editors to be needlessly combative or inflammatory—will not be published. Thank you.


*