The Dispatch: More from CWR...

The tyranny of progressive groupthink

“The danger any student—or faculty member—faces today,” warn several scholars from Princeton, Harvard and Yale recently, “is falling into the vice of conformism, yielding to groupthink.”

(us.fotolia.com)

As a kind of back-to-school gift to students, professors at three of the nation’s prestige schools offered them a piece of good advice: “Think for yourself.”

“The danger any student—or faculty member—faces today is falling into the vice of conformism, yielding to groupthink,” warned these 26 scholars from Princeton, Harvard and Yale. Among the document’s signers were prominent Catholics Robert P. George of Princeton and Mary Ann Glendon of Harvard.

The professor’s statement came at the same time as—and could be read as a complement to—a statement by 180 evangelical leaders, including heads of seminaries, theologians, pastors, and journalists.

The Nashville Statement, so named for the city in which it was issued, is a forthright and fundamentally pastoral reiteration of traditional Christian teaching on sex in the context of our increasingly “post-Christian” culture. Among other things, it rejects same-sex marriage and insists it is “sinful to approve of homosexual immorality or transgenderism.”

Predictably, these views and those who hold them have been pilloried by progressive critics.

A writer in the New York Times, identified as founder of a group called Faithfully LGBT, no doubt spoke for many others in decrying the statement as supposedly representing “a renewed commitment to open bigotry.”

The Mayor of Nashville, who one suspects may perhaps not have read the professors’ warning against groupthink, hastened to tell the world that, despite the Nashville Statement’s name, it didn’t represent her city’s right-thinking views on the subject of sex.

This uproar is disturbingly typical of what’s likely to happen these days whenever serious Christians speak up on behalf of Christian ideas about sexual morality in the face of contemporary groupthink. Now, it seems, the Supreme Court itself will be weighing these issues during its new term that begins October 2.

The case—Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission—involves a Lakewood, Colorado, baker named Jack Phillips whose religious beliefs moved him to refuse to bake a cake celebrating the marriage of two men. Phillips was hauled before the state civil rights commission, which found him guilty of sexual orientation discrimination. State courts ruled against him, and now he has taken his case to the Supreme Court (where it may be joined by another, similar case involving a florist in Washington state).

The baker’s lawyers make a novel argument. Phillips, they say, is a “cake artist” for whom baking cakes is a form of expression. Compelling him to create a cake for a gay marriage would mean in effect forcing him to say something he doesn’t believe—a form of “compulsion of speech” ruled out by other Supreme Court rulings.

Phillips’ argument may be novel, but his situation isn’t. Since the Supreme Court in a 5-4 ruling discovered a constitutional right to same-sex marriage two years ago, others have been forced to lend their support over their conscientious objections. It will be a surprise if the Supreme Court doesn’t join the lower courts in pummeling the baker for resisting this imposition of groupthink.

Things like this don’t happen by accident. They reflect careful planning and generous funding by people pushing a new morality and the groupthink to go with it.

In their statement urging students to think for themselves, the 26 professors warn of a “tyranny of public opinion” which seeks to create the impression that the views currently “dominant” on many campuses are “so obviously correct that only a bigot or a crank could question them.”

To which I would only add: Not just students, and not just on campuses.


If you value the news and views Catholic World Report provides, please consider donating to support our efforts. Your contribution will help us continue to make CWR available to all readers worldwide for free, without a subscription. Thank you for your generosity!

Click here for more information on donating to CWR. Click here to sign up for our newsletter.


About Russell Shaw 180 Articles
Russell Shaw was secretary for public affairs of the National Conference of Catholic Bishops/United States Catholic Conference from 1969 to 1987. He is the author of 20 books, including Nothing to Hide and the highly acclaimed American Church: The Remarkable Rise, Meteoric Fall, and Uncertain Future of Catholicism in America.

7 Comments

  1. What’s needed for the Catholic student Russell is countermeasure. If we don’t offer anything [at least Evangelicals w/the Nashville Statement are openly professing sound moral doctrine] students become viable targets. The Church is fast become horizontal. Flattened with focus on diversity, green issues, healthy diet [the new morality]. Rather than vertical movement upward spiritually and morally. R Royal and Msgr G Murray expressed that pointedly on Worldover. The Church is once again revamping Liturgy. Along diverse cultural lines likely to veer from theologically foundational Latin. Furtively [sneakily] ‘examining’ Humanae Vitae. More discrediting of doctrine and disintegration of structure less universality inevitably spells heterodoxy. The Pontiff though presents a beautiful pastoral approach to a broken world. Embrace everyone as they are. There we agree. Except for abandoning Christ’s commandments. We ignore personal sanctity. It’s a major shift from Christocentric faith to Anthropocentricity. From Catholicism to Bahai.

  2. And the SJWs are going to read this statement or care because?

    This is why “conservatives” have been losing the culture war for the past 30 years.

  3. The phenomenon of which Shaw writes is not new. I experienced it as a student in Catholic high school and university (1963-1971). It is a product of Vatican II’s open-ended anthropocentric and horizontal shift in Catholic morals and practice (most especially in liturgical matters). I can assure Shaw it wasn’t easy for a high school or college student in the 1960s or 1970s to express “dubia” regarding the sea change occurring already in the Church and in society generally (all the while Shaw was serving as secretary for public affairs of NCCB/USCC).
    As I see it, after the noble initiative of JP2 and B16 to discover “continuity” in the verbose ramblings of Vatican II, Francis is adding his own verbose ramblings in confirmation of a “spirit of Vatican II” in rupture with Tradition.
    I realize that Shaw is writing generally about the dominance of groupthink in all US universities, but I think it would be a mistake to think that this is a phenomenon of the last 30 years. It goes back at least 60 years.

  4. And those Catholics who oppose with serious adult argument any jesuit or brogolian position will be met with the usual groupthink rancor.
    But I know longer care. The battle lines have been drawn within the RCC. Drawn by the bishop of Rome.
    Fight or be crushed with moderenst BS. It is what it is.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

All comments posted at Catholic World Report are moderated. While vigorous debate is welcome and encouraged, please note that in the interest of maintaining a civilized and helpful level of discussion, comments containing obscene language or personal attacks—or those that are deemed by the editors to be needlessly combative or inflammatory—will not be published. Thank you.


*