Members of the choir sing during the annual Christmas concert at St. Malachy's Church -- The Actors' Chapel in New York Dec. 13, 2010. (CNS photo/Gregory A. Shemitz)
The
publication of the new English translation of the Roman Missal has helped
revive interest in the use of chant in the ordinary form of Holy Mass. The
Roman Missal includes many more chanted texts than did the previous edition,
allowing clergy and people alike to “sing the Mass, rather than merely to sing
at Mass,” as Msgr. Andrew Wadsworth, executive director of the ICEL
(International Committee on English in the Liturgy) Secretariat, said in
a 2010 address.
The
new Roman Missal includes a new translation of the General
Instruction of the Roman Missal (GIRM), which also has fostered greater
interest in chant. Citing Sacrosanctum Concilium (the
Second Vatican Council’s Constitution on the Sacred Liturgy) and subsequent
curial documents, the GIRM states that “the main place should be given, all
things being equal, to Gregorian chant, as being proper to the Roman Liturgy.…
Since the faithful from different countries come together ever more frequently,
it is desirable that they know how to sing together at least some parts of the
Ordinary of the Mass in Latin, especially the Profession of Faith and the
Lord’s Prayer, according to the simpler settings” (nos. 41-42).
When
Catholics think of Gregorian chant at Mass, many tend first to think of chants
associated with the Ordinary of the Massthat is, the parts of the Mass that
tend not to vary from day to dayfor example, the Kyrie, Gloria, Profession of
Faith (Credo), Sanctus, and Agnus Dei.
But
there is also another set of chanted prayers at Mass: the propers, that is,
five chants that are proper, or specific, to each Mass. The past two years have
witnessed a revival of interest in the propers in parishes in the
English-speaking world.
“I
would contend that there are two primary reasons for the increased popularity
of chanting the propers at Mass,” Father Dan Merz, associate director of the
Secretariat of Divine Worship of the United States Conference of Catholic
Bishops, told CWR. “First, there is a renewed
interest in the texts proposed by the Church herself for the Mass, as opposed
to individual choices that may not coincide with the rest of the Mass as well.
This goes together with the desire for more accurate translations of texts used
at the Eucharist and the other liturgies of the Church. The entrance and
Communion antiphons are often scriptural and serve as an official commentary or
meditation of sorts on the Mass of the day, as opposed to hymns or songs chosen
on the local level.”
“Second,
there is a renewed interest in chant itself, including Gregorian chant,” he
added. “Many Catholics grew up without any experience or knowledge of chant,
and so there is a natural desire to uncover a part of the tradition that was
lostat least to them.”
In
the Roman Missal (the liturgical book used by the priest at the chair and at
the altar), there are proper antiphons and prayers for Masses on different days
of the liturgical year: the Entrance Antiphon, Collect, Prayer over the
Offerings, Communion Antiphon, and Prayer after Communion. The texts of the
five chanted propers, however, are found not in the Roman Missal, but in
another liturgical book, the Graduale Romanum (used by the schola
cantorum, or choir), which, like the Roman Missal, was revised after
the Second Vatican Council.
In
his work The Reform of the Liturgy 19481975, published
posthumously in Italian in 1983, Archbishop Annibale Bunigni, who served as
secretary of the Consilium for the Constitution on the Sacred Liturgy (1964-69)
and secretary of the Congregation for Divine Worship (1969-75), recounted that
the Consilium entrusted the revision of the books of Gregorian chant to the Abbey of St. Peter of
Solesmes, the French Benedictine monastery that has been a center for chant
studies since its re-founding by Dom Prosper Guéranger in the 1830s. A revised Graduale Romanum
was issued in 1974, and its
introduction discusses the differences between the preconciliar and
postconciliar editions.
The
abbey of Solesmes has also published the Gregorian Missal, which contains the Order of the Mass
in Latin and English, as well as the five proper chants of the Mass (from the
Graduale Romanum) and the proper prayers for the Mass (from the Roman Missal)
for Sundays, solemnities, and feasts of the Lord.
The
five chanted propers in the Graduale Romanum are the introit (entrance chant),
gradual, Alleluia, offertory, and Communion chant. The gradual holds the same
place in the Graduale Romanum as the responsorial psalm does in the Lectionary.
During Lent, the tract replaces the Alleluia chant, and during Eastertide,
there are two Alleluia chants, the first replacing the gradual.
At
times, the texts of the introit and Communion chant for a particular day in the
Graduale Romanum differ from the texts of the Entrance Antiphon and Communion
Antiphon on that same day in the Roman Missal, and the text of the Alleluia for
a particular day in the Graduale Romanum at times differs from the text in the
same day in the Lectionary.
The
Graduale Romanum is not the only official liturgical book containing chants for
use at Mass. Following the Second Vatican Council, the Graduale
Simplex was developed by the Consilium in collaboration with the monks of
Solesmes. The Graduale Simplex, issued in 1967 and revised in 1974, is the
result of Sacrosanctum Concilium’s call for “an
edition [to] be prepared containing simpler melodies, for use in small
churches” (no. 117).
In
addition, the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops requested in 2001and
received from Rome in 2002the
permission to allow for the singing of the
Entrance Antiphon and Communion Antiphon from the Roman Missal. In the Church’s
liturgical discipline, these two antiphons are typically intended for
recitation when there is no singing (GIRM, nos. 48, 87).
Thus,
in the dioceses in the United States, the GIRM lists several legitimate options
for singing at the entrance and at Communion:
(1) the antiphon from the Missal or the antiphon with
its Psalm from the Graduale Romanum, as set to music there or in another
setting; (2) the antiphon and Psalm of the Graduale Simplex for the liturgical
time; (3) a chant from another collection of Psalms and antiphons, approved by
the Conference of Bishops or the Diocesan Bishop, including Psalms arranged in
responsorial or metrical forms; (4) another liturgical chant that is suited to
the sacred action, the day, or the time of year, similarly approved by the
Conference of Bishops or the Diocesan Bishop (no. 48, cf. no. 87).
Cantus, the Latin word translated as “chant” in the
fourth option, means “that which is sung,” Father Richard Hilgartner, executive
director of the USCCB’s Secretariat for Divine Worship, told Catholic News
Service in 2011, thus allowing for the singing of hymnsan option permitted in Musicam
Sacram, the 1967 curial instruction on sacred music, which
described hymns as a “custom legitimately in use in certain places and widely
confirmed by indults” (no. 32).
In
many parishes, this last option from the GIRMthe singing of a hymnis the sole
option at the entrance and at Communion that parishioners have experienced for
several decades. Likewise, at the offertory, few Catholics have heard the
option of an offertory chant from the Graduale Romanum, with most parishes
legitimately singing a hymn instead (GIRM, no. 74). After the first reading and
before the Gospel, most parishes use the Responsorial Psalm and Gospel
acclamation from the Lectionary, rather than the chants from the Graduale
Romanum or Graduale Simplex, which are also legitimate options (nos. 61-62).
Most
parishes in the English-speaking world, then, find themselves in a curious
position at this juncture in liturgical history. On the one hand, the Church
teaches that within the context of the ordinary form of the Mass, “the main
place should be given, all things being equal, to Gregorian chant, as being
proper to the Roman Liturgy” (GIRM, no. 41). On the other hand, another option,
also legitimate, has become ingrained in the practice of most parishes.
Practical aids to chanting the propers
“A
desire to sing the proper texts of the Mass as encouraged in Sacrosanctum Concilium (nos. 116-117) and prioritized in the
General Instruction on the Roman Missal (no. 48) has become increasingly
evident since the recent implementation of the new English translation of the
Roman Missal,” ICEL’s Msgr. Wadsworth told CWR. “One
of the obstacles to the practical realization of this desire is the relative
scarcity of chant resources in English.”
“My
first piece of advice to priests and their liturgical musicians is to consider
that the advent of the Internet has revolutionized the manner in which music is
published,” Msgr. Wadsworth added. “Publishers of liturgical music are no
longer the sole source of materials for music in the Mass. Much music is
available, and generally free of charge, through a number of important websites
that enable composers and musicians to share the fruits of their labors with an
immediacy that was previously unimaginable.”
“The
new edition of the Roman Missal contains more music than any of its
predecessors and that includes a certain amount of music for the singing of
proper texts, particularly in Holy Week and certain other feasts,” notes Msgr.
Wadsworth. “All of this music (including accompaniments) is to be found at the ICEL music page.”
Msgr.
Wadsworth paid tribute to the Church Music Association of America for its work
in making the Mass propers more accessible.
“One
organization, above all others, has made this quest its particular project in
recent years the Church Music Association of America (CMAA),” said Msgr.
Wadsworth, who described its website as
“a splendid resource at the service of all who wish to sing the proper texts
either in Latin or in English. Within this site there is access to a vast array
of musical resources, all free for download and immediate use.”
Jeffrey
Tucker, the managing editor of the CMAA’s quarterly journal, Sacred Music, told CWR that “the realization of the role of
propers came only in the last few years” and helped overcome debates between
proponents of different hymns.
“All
of us came to realize that the debate over hymns was rather pointless,” he
said. “The point of the Vatican II instructions was to proclaim the word. The
word is already given to us [in the propers]. That was an incredible
revelation. It changed everything.”
Msgr.
Wadsworth says that several resources offered by the CMAA are “highly useful”
for a parish “that might be making its first foray into the territory of sung
propers” or that otherwise wish to foster Gregorian chant: Adam Bartlett’s Simple English Propers,
Arlene Oost-Zinner’s Parish Book
of Psalms, the Simple Choral Gradual of Richard
Rice, and Father Samuel F. Weber’s
“extensive range of settings.”
“We
are certainly experiencing a Gregorian chant renaissance in our day, and we are
very blessed to see a flowering of new musical resources that find their
inspiration in the inestimable treasures of sacred music which the Second
Vatican Council spoke of and exalted,” says Bartlett, director of sacred music
at Saints Simon and Jude Cathedral in Phoenix.
Bartlett,
who has also developed the Lumen
Christi Missal, told CWR that
many parishes are not yet ready to take on the full
singing of these chants in their Latin settings, and it is for this reason that
both the Simple English Propers (SEP, 2011) and
the Lumen Christi Missal (LCM, 2012) were
developed and published. The SEP sets the text of the Graduale Romanum, in
English translation, for the entrance, offertory, and Communion for Sundays and
feasts and is intended for beginning and average parish choirs to undertake the
singing of the full proper of the Mass in simple musical settings that can be
sung effectively each week. The LCM, however, is a book for Catholics in the
pew, and it provides for them (among many other things) a repertoire of sung
propers in English that can be sung by ordinary parish congregations with a
sensitive and gradual introduction and with good catechesis.
Oost-Zinner
told CWR that her intention in developing the
Parish Book of Psalms was
“to write original, modal melodies for the short antiphons and use Gregorian
psalm tones for the verses. The melodies are based on the flow and sound of the
English text, similar to the way in which traditional Gregorian chant melodies
arose from the Latin text.” Msgr. Wadsworth describes them as “attractive
settings of responsorial psalms for use through the year.”
Father
Weber, a Benedictine who is currently stationed at St. Eugene’s Cathedral in
Santa Rosa, California and whose works are
available online, told CWR that he is working on three books that will be
published by Ignatius Press: The Propers of the Mass
for Sundays and Solemnities, The Sunday Vesper Book
for Parishes, and The Book of Responsorial
Psalms, Gospel Acclamations, and Sequences for Sundays and Solemnities.
“The
English antiphons [are] written in a chant style that grows out of the natural
pattern and flow of the English textand the polyphonic settings draw their
musical ‘grammar and vocabulary’ from traditional Catholic Church music,” says
Father Weber. “All the settings are for the approved English texts, however.
The ‘atmosphere,’ if you will, that this music creates, is the same as that of
the tradition of the Roman Rite, only using English words.”
Msgr.
Wadsworth also recommends several other resources for introducing the propers
in parishes. Referring to the archabbey in Indiana, he says that the “St.
Meinrad monk and prolific composer and arranger of chant, Father Columba Kelly,
OSB, has a number of useful resources on
the monastery’s site.” He also notes that “Corpus Christi Watershed has a
wide variety of resources that could be immediately helpful in a parish
context.”
The
Vatican II Hymnal, published in 2011,
“might be an excellent way to help congregations follow the wishes of the
Council and ‘pray the Mass,’” says Jeffrey Ostrowski, president of Corpus Christi Watershed. “This
book contains simple Mass settings approved by the USCCB, the complete
readings…and 100 percent of the Mass proper texts. With the Vatican II Hymnal, no matter how the choir sings the propers
(in English, in Latin, using psalm tones, etc.), the congregation can always
follow the prayers as the Council desired.”
“More
than 200 beautiful hymns for the congregation were also included, since it is
not always possible for choirs to be present at every single Mass,” adds
Ostrowski, who told CWR that “a huge
portion of the music provided by Corpus Christi Watershed comes from
contemporary composers.”
Referring
to The Anglican Use Gradual, published by C. David Burt in
2004, Msgr. Wadsworth said that “the musical experience of Catholics who
worship in accordance with the Anglican Use is put at the service of the wider
Church in [this] very interesting collection of chant.”
“Gregorian
chant both in English and in Latin in the Catholic Church is on the upswing,”
says Burt. “The Anglicans have a tradition of chant and hymns which has been
successful for many years.”
Burt
told CWR that “except for special occasions,
the preparation of the traditional Latin chants from the Graduale Romanum is
beyond the scope of most parish choirs. But the simpler chants in The Anglican Use Gradual and in Bartlett's Simple English Propers are quite within their reach.
Combining these chants with congregational hymns is also extremely effective.”
“There
are two further possibilities that offer the possibility of immediate
implementation with minimum preparation and even the most modest musical resources,”
added Msgr. Wadsworth. “There are a number of publishers that offer settings of
proper antiphons using simple Gregorian psalm tones; the work of Lawrence M.
Rutherford in his English Psalm Tone Propers would
be an example of such an approach. The hymn-writer Kathleen Pluth has produced
a collection of Hymns for the Liturgical Year which are often verse
settings of introits or other proper texts that may be sung to well-known hymn
tunes.”
“Since
most choirs are unfamiliar with singing the totality of antiphons of the Mass,
the beginning selection for this chant should be as familiar and simple as
possible, that is, in the vernacular and using plain chant or psalm tones,” says
Rutherford, whose English Psalm Tone Propers “fulfills
both of these requirements, as they are an uncomplicated method of introducing
chant to the Mass.” He said that his forthcoming work “is currently at ICEL and
the USCCB for their permissions.”
“My
interest in the proper texts lies in their ability to take evangelization to an
even deeper level,” says Pluth. “Pastors are undoubtedly aware that some
members of their congregations pray contemplatively. I believe that every
Catholic is called to a profound life of prayer, to the contemplative life…God
has wisdom to share with us, and the proper texts allow us to find that
wisdom.”
Pluth
and some of the other musicians and liturgists contacted by CWR recommend that
any parishes that wish to implement the propers do so over time.
“The
introduction of chant propers should be accompanied by educationnot only of
the musicians, but also of the congregation so that the people can appreciate
the scriptural roots, historical tradition, theological significance, liturgical
purpose, and pastoral value of these chant pieces,” says Dr. Paul Taylor,
executive secretary of the National Liturgical Council, an advisory body
established by the Australian Catholic Bishops Conference. “From a musical
point of view, proper chants (and ordinary chants) require proper training!
Otherwise, poorly prepared and sung liturgical music can have a negative effect
on the congregation it is meant to serve.”
“Whatever
one’s preferences among these options might be, any decision should not be made
based on one’s personal preferences, but on the common good of the whole parish
and in dialogue with the appropriate members of the parishfor example, the
music director, members of the choir, members of the liturgical committee,”
adds the USCCB’s Father Merz.
“I think [implementing propers] is relatively
straightforward: I always wonder why so little has been done to establish it in
the 50 years since Vatican II,” says Msgr. Wadsworth. “We have an opportunity
to do something about that now, and I believe that the effects would be
immediately evident and the improvement to the quality of our celebration of
the Mass very considerable.”