I saw and read Abp. Chaput's new column just a few minutes after posting some of his Foreword to Russell Shaw's new book on the Catholic Church in the U.S. Titled "The Gosnell story and its lessons",
the column recounts some of the details of the trial in Philadelphia
and then focuses ont the connection between media failure and lost state
of the culture at large:
The continuing debate over legalized abortion is a hot-button
national issue that drew half a million pro-life demonstrators to
Washington in January. The battle over abortion restrictions continues
in every state. Forty years after the Supreme Court’s Roe v Wade
decision, resistance to permissive abortion remains high. And the vivid
details of the Gosnell clinic tragedy have the kind of salacious appeal
that few national media would normally avoid if the issue were anything else.
But abortion is too often, and in too many news rooms, exactly the kind
of topic that brings on a sudden case of snow blindness.
The real story in the Gosnell trial is bigger than the ugly
allegations against Gosnell himself; it includes the failure the
allergic disinterest of some of our most important national media. A
headline in The Atlantic magazine, April 12, states the obvious: “Why
Dr. Kermit Gosnell’s Trial Should Be a Front-Page Story: The dead
babies. The exploited women. The racism. The numerous governmental
failures. It is thoroughly newsworthy.”
The Atlantic story by Conor Friedersdorf is worth reading. But don’t stop there. Read this by Kirsten Powers, columnist for The Daily Beast, in USA Today. And these excellent analyses by journalists Terry Mattingly, Mollie Hemingway and George Conger.
The irony is that much of the media’s lethargy in covering the
Gosnell case really doesn’t surprise. It’s part of the fabric of a
culture that simply will not see what it doesn’t want to see about the
realities of abortion. And it leads to the kind of implausible claim
made recently by one local commentator that “no sense of guilt is
warranted” by the media because “there is no causal connection between
coverage of [the Gosnell] case and bias.” It’s hard to imagine a more
As I noted in my April 15th editorial, "It's Not a Conspiracy, It's a Culture", the New York Times'
public editor admitted that the Grey Lady had been a bit slack in its
journalistic duties before she took a pot shot at those who believe that
Times is part of a vast, left-wing media conspiracy to ignore the trial
because it may threaten abortion rights." I wrote:
Actually, it is worse than a conspiracy. A conspiracy
involves the secret, coordinated actions of a select and usually small
group of individuals. But that is not what is at work here. No, this is
an example of how a vast, secularist culture has ignored the trial
because it doesn't fit into its understanding of what is happening and,
more importantly, what should happen in this country and the
world at large (hint: abortion on demand, anywhere and anytime). A
conspiracy, at least in theory, can be exposed and perhaps thwarted; it
is like a cancerous tumor that, if caught in time, can be addressed and
removed from the body. But a culture is the body, or at least (to
continue the analogy) the blood and life of a society and civilization.
To speak of a "conspiracy" here is sadly naive, for it fails to
comprehend just how bad the situation really is and just how deep the
sickness goes and widely spread are the resulting weaknesses and
Read the Archbishop's column here and my editorial here.