The Dispatch: More from CWR...

How will the Church respond to “pay-to-slay”?

Apparently, metal detectors are only a problem when installed by Jews.

Palestinians gather in Jerusalem July 27 at the compound known to Muslims as Haram al-Sharif, or Noble Sanctuary, and to Jews as Temple Mount, after Israel removed all security measures it had installed nearby. (CNS photo/Muammar Awad, Reuters)

Catholics who don’t pay attention may think that Jewish-Catholic relations are in good shape. After all, Church documents such as Nostra Aetate decry anti-Semitism and speak of the great “spiritual patrimony common to Christians and Jews.” Moreover, most recent popes have had close personal friendships with Jews.

On the other hand, when one descends from the level of spiritual brotherhood to the level of politics and international relations, it’s difficult to make the case that the Church has been a particular friend to the Jews in recent years. About 40 percent of the world’s Jews live in Israel, yet ever since the creation of the Jewish state, the Vatican attitude toward Israel has been stand-offish at best. The Vatican was the last Western government to recognize the State of Israel and one of the first world governments to recognize Palestine as a state.

Indeed, although the Vatican has adopted the position of neutral peacemaker between Israel and the Palestinians, its sympathy for the Palestinian cause is difficult to ignore.

Take the recent controversy surrounding the Temple Mount in Jerusalem. After two Druze Israeli policemen were murdered by three Palestinian terrorists on the Temple Mount, the Israeli government temporarily closed the site and installed walk-through metal detectors at the entrances. To fair-minded people, this might seem like the sensible thing to do in the circumstances, but Palestinians reacted with angry protests and demands that the metal detectors be removed.

That’s not surprising, of course; that’s what Palestinians often do. What might be surprising to those unfamiliar with the Church’s record of favoritism to the Palestinian side is that Catholic leaders backed them to the hilt. Fouad Twal, the Latin (i.e. Catholic) Patriarch of Jerusalem issued a statement signed by the heads of the 13 Christian communities condemning the violence, but in language that laid most of the blame on Israel.

For starters, the statement referred to the site by its Arab name, Haram ash-Sharif, thus buttressing the Muslim claim that the Temple Mount belongs to Islam. The statement went on to express concern that any change to the prevailing status quo governing the site “could easily lead to serious and unpredictable consequences.”

The change in the status quo refers, of course, to the introduction of metal detectors. But if metal detectors “could easily lead to serious and unpredictable consequences,” it’s an established fact that the absence of metal detectors has already led to serious and predictable consequences, i.e. the murder of the two policemen.

Where does the Vatican stand on the issue? Archbishop Paul Gallagher, the Vatican’s foreign minister, assured the Palestinian Ambassador to the Vatican of the Vatican’s support for the status quo—that is, for the removal of the metal detectors and other security devices. The Vatican is not opposed to metal detectors on principle. In fact, St. Peter’s Basilica is protected by them. Apparently, metal detectors are only a problem when installed by Jews.

This is not the first time that the Vatican has disapproved of an Israeli self-defense measure. When Pope Francis visited the Holy Land in May of 2014, he made a point of stopping to pray at the West Bank Security barrier—a barrier that was built to protect Jews from Palestinian terrorists. In the context of the Pope’s long standing “build-bridges-not-walls” rhetoric, his gesture was clearly meant as a criticism of Israeli policy. The fact that he chose a section of the wall where a large graffiti compared Bethlehem to the Warsaw Ghetto only added to the insult. The implicit message of the graffiti is that the Jews are the new Nazis.

Some have criticized Church leaders for drawing a moral equivalence between Israel and the Palestinian Authority, but it might be more accurate to say that they consistently grant the Palestinians the moral advantage. The double standard is glaring. Typically, Catholic prelates, both in Rome and in the Middle East maintain a respectful silence when rockets are fired into Israel from the Gaza strip, but when Israel eventually fires back, they suddenly feel called upon to speak out. Typically, they are disturbed by the idea of a Jewish state, but less disturbed by the oft-repeated wish that Palestine should stretch from the “river to the sea.”

Another double standard can be seen in the response to the death of innocent children. When Palestinian propagandists began to cast themselves in the role of innocents massacred by King Herod, Catholic clergy were quick to pick up the theme. On the occasion of the war between Hamas and Israel, Cardinal Gianfranco Ravasi, president of the Pontifical Council for Culture, said “I think of the ‘massacre of the innocents.’ Children are dying in Gaza, their mothers’ shouts is a perennial cry.” Patriarch Twal is also fond of the analogy. At the Church of the Nativity in Bethlehem, in the presence of Pope Francis, he likened the Palestinians to the “Divine Child” and the Israelis to King Herod.

On the other hand, the death of Israeli children doesn’t seem to have the same effect. When Israelis suffer civilian casualties, the response is more muted. Instead of reaching for iconic Biblical allusions, Catholic officialdom is content to fall back on boilerplate formulas such as “we-mourn-the-loss-of-life-on-both-sides,” or “we-pray-for-an-end-to-the-cycle-of-violence.”

One might counter that the Gazan children were killed by Israeli government rockets, whereas the Israeli children are killed by terrorists acting on their own, not by the Palestinian Authority. But that’s not quite the case. For many years, the Palestinian Authority has been busy indoctrinating children in state schools and on state television that jihad martyrdom is life’s highest calling. The high esteem in which martyrs are held can be seen in the many street, squares, parks, and schools named after martyrs. The growing number of 18 and 19 year-olds who are currently roaming Jerusalem and environs seeking for Jews to slay, are products of that indoctrination.

But the problem goes deeper than indoctrination. There is also the matter of cash incentives. During the most recent crisis over the Temple Mount, 19-year old Omar al-Abed proclaimed on his Facebook account that “my knife will answer the cry of al-Asqa.” Shortly after, he entered a Jewish home and slaughtered three members of a family, while badly injuring a fourth. When Omar’s mother learned of the murders she exclaimed: “Praise Allah. I am proud of my son. May Allah be pleased with him.” Mrs. al-Abed had several reasons to be proud. In addition to Allah’s blessings, the family can look forward to a monthly stipend of more than $3,100 from the Palestinian Authority. Although Allah rewards jihad murderers in paradise, the Palestinian government rewards them on earth with a hefty monthly lifetime salary. It’s been dubbed the “pay-to-slay” program, and the more Jews the terrorist kills, the higher the payment.

Does the Vatican know about the pay-to-slay program? Does Patriarch Fouad Twal? Because of the proposed Taylor Force Act, the program has been very much in the news of late. Yet a Google search of “Vatican criticizes Palestinian pay-to-slay program” produced no results. If it was revealed that the Israeli government were paying Jewish settlers to kill Palestinians, there can be little doubt that the Vatican would immediately condemn Israel in the strongest possible terms.

The pay-to slay program not only incentivizes the murder of Jews, it is also deeply corrupting of Palestinian families and of Palestinian children who grow up thinking that killing Jews is a noble deed. It is, in short, a singular evil; and one that cannot be explained away as one more revolution of the “cycle of violence.” It calls for a singular and powerful rebuke, not the usual let’s-look-at-both-sides-of-the-issue kind of equivocation we have grown used to.

The Vatican II document Nostra Aetate declares:

The Church, mindful of the patrimony she shares with the Jews and moved not by political reasons but by the Gospel’s spiritual love, decries hatred, persecutions, displays of anti-Semitism, directed against Jews at any time and by anyone.

The pay-to-slay program provides an opportunity to Church leaders to assure the world that they take these words to heart.

About William Kilpatrick 49 Articles
William Kilpatrick taught for many years at Boston College. He is the author of several books about cultural and religious issues, including Psychological Seduction, Why Johnny Can’t Tell Right from Wrong and, most recently, Christianity, Islam, and Atheism: The Struggle for the Soul of the West. Professor Kilpatrick’s articles on cultural and educational topics have appeared in First Things, Policy Review, American Enterprise, American Educator, The Los Angeles Times, and various scholarly journals. His articles on Islam have appeared in Aleteia, National Catholic Register, Investor’s Business Daily, FrontPage Magazine, and other publications. Professor Kilpatrick’s work is supported in part by the Shillman Foundation. For more on his work and writings, visit his website, turningpointproject.com.

19 Comments

  1. Outstanding article, one which should be read by ALL Catholics, especially the anti-Jewish bigots who persist in calling themselves “Catholic” and who reflexively back the Muslims in every Muslim vs. Jewish conflict in the Middle East.

  2. Yes I will totally agree with the duality with the church. One amongst many they cannot seem to see. This long standing attitude towards Israel, and one can also include Jews as well, is not christian.

    Again, I must go against church attitudes and unequivocally state that I fully support Israel. I have a notion that this lingering and insidious low burner hatred of them is because the RCC cannot get their way in the Holy Land as they would like. The church does not like to share with others in every sense of the word, and likes to dictate more than collaborate. It’s really quite shameful and wonder if they even consider the day when they will stand before God explaining their unchristian behavior(s).

    • Patriarch Twal and his co-signers know that the Jews will not kill them for signing this document.

      If they had refused to sign, they would have been marked for assassination by the Palestinians. Also family members, etc.

      If you were one of them, what would you have done?

      Since St John XXIII, the Popes have failed in this area.

      • That’s why these prelates shouldn’t be taken seriously. Let Israel expel the Muslims from Judaea and Samaria and then let’s see what the Christians say about them.

        • Good point.But this is also why Papal leadership is necessary in this area. Local prelates are not able to stand up to the murderous Palestinian pressure. But the Pope should!

  3. The “preference” for Palestinians is a sign moral corruption.

    The 2013 Pew Poll on Islamic attitudes about Sharia violence reveals that the Palestinin people are among the most extremely violent in the Islamic world.

    The Pew Poll used 3 markers for belief in Sharia violence:
    stoning for adultery, cutting off hands, and death for apostacy.
    I know the Palestinians were among the most violent nations in the 20 or so that were polled. They were well above 80% (closer to 85% if I recall correctly) in favor of the 3 violent markers of Sharia.

    It is morally indefensible for Catholics to have a “preferential option” for “the Palestinian people,” who the Pew Poll has shown to be anong the most violent people on earth.

    • Not only are the Palestinians among the most violent people on earth, as Muslims they are the most evil of blasphemers and idolaters, materially similar in every way to the Canaanites whom the ancient Israelites were commanded to drive out.

  4. I have a comment to this issue is oil , money, and the social economic hierarchies that are set or needs changing. If you had a way to make energy so cheap that it would change the world through it’s technology and stop global destruction would you use it for momentary gains or give produce it and give away so it would get established and probably get killed in the process, but the future generations would be able to break the chains of economic enslavement what would you choose being a moral christian being.

  5. If we all were self sufficient and no one was suffering to provide the first three or four parts of the hierarchy of basic human needs there wouldn’t be people with enough passion to kill so the sociopaths would stand alone from the people who fight because thier suffering for basic human needs which money can provide.

  6. Take my previous comment ou please it’s not worth violence if misunderstood my mental term applies to all humans as a whole and not directed at anyone group or rce or color

  7. The problem with militant Islam today is precisely the same as in the 14th century, 1918 and 2001; failure of the west to unite and deal with the problem. Pope Urna II must be turning in his grave.

  8. It’s terrible that we are not treating Israel better, they are the Chosen People of God. I pray we treat Israel better in the future. I can’t stand people defending Muslims at every turn and excusing the bad things they think are okay because it’s “in their book.” The Jews have the truth and we, Christians, have it because of them, Moses and the prophets all pointed to Christ- let us not forget that Christ is Jewish- let’s treat his people much better and quit playing footsie with evil.

  9. What is the Catholic Church going to do when all of the end-time attention is centered on Jerusalem instead of Rome? Maybe the Church should start preparing for this? Jesus is going to rule from Jerusalem when He returns and not Rome.

  10. How many of the people who commented here have been to Bethlehem? Do you realise that Palestinians are both Christians and Muslims.They are restricted to their walled in Ghettos and cannot travel outside without undergoing many indignities like body searches, including sadistic anal examinations. Jewish soldiers are mostly atheists and have no fear of God or man, for the most part. The Palestinians have been living in Palestine for generations, and naturally resent having their property taken from them and their freedom restricted. People in the Vatican have more sense than the insular people commenting in this blog! God bless Pope Francis!

3 Trackbacks / Pingbacks

  1. How will the Church respond to “pay-to-slay”? - Catholic Daily
  2. How will the Church respond to “pay-to-slay”? - Catholic Crossing
  3. MONDAY SÆCVLARIA EDITION | Big Pulpit

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

All comments posted at Catholic World Report are moderated. While vigorous debate is welcome and encouraged, please note that in the interest of maintaining a civilized and helpful level of discussion, comments containing obscene language or personal attacks—or those that are deemed by the editors to be needlessly combative or inflammatory—will not be published. Thank you.


*