Silence and the Meaning of the Mass

I will confess that during many years as a priest, and now as a bishop, I have often wondered whether our hyper-stimulated congregations know exactly what they are participating in. They know that they are active, but active precisely in what?

Robert Cardinal Sarah’s recent book The Power of Silence: Against the Dictatorship of Noise explores a number of themes both theological and spiritual, all centering around the unhappy role that noise has come to play in our culture and more specifically in the Church. His observations are most trenchant in regard to the liturgy, which should come as no great surprise, given his role as head of the Vatican Congregation devoted to liturgy and sacraments. As I read the sections of his book dealing with the importance of silence during Mass, I often found myself nodding vigorously.

I came of age in the period immediately following the Second Vatican Council, when an enormous stress was placed, quite legitimately, on the conciliar call for “full, conscious, and active participation” in the Mass. That famous phrase, derived from the ground-breaking work of the theologians of the liturgical movement of the early and mid twentieth century, was a clarion call to the laity to assume their rightful role as real actors in the liturgy and not mere spectators. But in its practical application this came too often to imply that the laity must be continually stimulated into action during the Mass: processing, standing, singing, responding, clapping, etc. It was as though the directors and leaders of the liturgy felt they must be constantly grabbing the congregation by the shoulders and shaking them into conscious participation.

Silence, accordingly, tended to be construed as the enemy, for it would lull the people into inattention and boredom. Hardly anyone in the post-conciliar liturgical establishment appreciated that silence could be a sign of heightened, even enraptured, attention on the part of the congregation, a deeply contemplative entry into the mystery of the Mass. And what several decades of this in turn has produced, especially among the young today, is the impression that the Mass is a sort of religiously-themed jamboree, during which our fellowship is celebrated and at which lots and lots of sound is indispensable. I will confess that during many years as a priest, and now as a bishop, I have often wondered whether our hyper-stimulated congregations know exactly what they are participating in. They know that they are active, but active precisely in what?

The Mass is the act by which the Son of God, in union with his mystical body, turns toward the Father in worship. Through our full, conscious, and active participation in this right praise, we become more rightly ordered, more completely configured to Christ and more thoroughly directed toward the Father. We do indeed experience heightened fellowship with one another during the Mass, but this is because we are realizing, not so much our mutual affection, but our common love of a transcendent third, to use Aristotle’s language.

In this regard, one of the most illuminating rubrics under which to read the Mass is that of call and response: Christ the head, through the priest who is acting in Christ’s person, calls out to the members of his mystical body, and they respond, somewhat in the manner of the lovers in the Song of Songs. At the very commencement of the liturgy, the priest (again, operating not in his own name but in persona Christi) says, “The Lord be with you,” and the people respond, “and with your spirit.” The spirit in question here is the power of Christ dwelling in the priest through the sacrament of Holy Orders. This exchange continues throughout the Mass, Head and members conversing with one another and solidifying their communion. Jesus speaks his Word in the Old Testament readings and in the Pauline epistles, and the members of his body sing back to him in the responsorial psalm; Jesus announces himself in the Gospel, and the people chant back, “Praise to you, Lord Jesus Christ;” Jesus breaks open the Word through the preaching of the priest, and the people respond with the Creed, a signal of their faith.

Having prepared the gifts (presented by the people), the priest says, “Pray, brothers and sisters, that my sacrifice and yours may be acceptable to God, the Father almighty.” This line is of great significance, for it signals the moment when Christ and the members of his body are turning toward the Father in order to perform an act of sacrifice and thanksgiving. How beautifully the Preface to the Eucharistic Prayer expresses this dynamic: “Lift up your hearts!” says Christ to his people; they respond, “We lift them up to the Lord,” and then Jesus, through his priest, says, “Let us give thanks to the Lord our God.” What follows is the magnificent Eucharistic Prayer, directed toward the Father and prayed by Head and members together, the latter’s many sacrifices—small and large—subsumed into the former’s definitive sacrifice on the cross. At the conclusion of the liturgy, Christ sends his mystical body, now more perfectly ordered to the Father, back into the world to effect its transformation.

Cardinal Sarah imitates his master Joseph Ratzinger in insisting that silence rightly asserts itself throughout this entire process. The silence of gathering, recollecting, listening, praying, offering, etc. There is plenty of sound in the Mass, but unless silence is cultivated therein as well, we can easily lose sight of what we are doing in this most sublime of prayers.

About Bishop Robert Barron 113 Articles
Bishop Robert Barron is an auxiliary bishop of the Archdiocese of Los Angeles and the founder of Word on Fire Catholic Ministries. He is the creator of the award winning documentary series, "Catholicism" and "Catholicism:The New Evangelization." Learn more at www.WordonFire.org.

10 Comments

  1. God bless our strong and holy Cardinal Sarah. I will read ‘this book at the earliest opportunity.
    But likely a bit too late. The pews are mostly empty and will stay that way with the likes of this pope and his
    Lieutenants in charge. There is no beauty or solemnity or mystery to draw any young person.
    There will need to be a miracle to recover. Pray for a miracle

  2. I actually don’t think that those attending Mass in the pre-VII liturgy were as disengaged as Bishop Barron, like so many other commentators suggests. There was a great deal of “active silence” in the old liturgy, especially during the canon. And wherever Gregorian chant was sung competently, it also engaged people from strikingly different stations of life, and appealed equally to professors, plumbers, cops and bag men, as the frequent experiences of large downtown n churches confirmed prior to the Council. Thomas Merton, no stodgy reactionary, interestingly describes how the aesthetic power of old liturgy was the initial hook that drew him to the faith.

    Unfortunately, the liturgical reforms beneficial or otherwise – in my view principally otherwise – were relentlessly force-fed, ironically amid incessant rhetoric about the Age of the Laity, etc., etc., and no small attempt was ever made to actually solicit the views of those in the pews. Some really took to the reforms, of course, but many others simply left and haven’t returned. There may be many reasons for that exodus, but I have to think at least some were driven away by the drastic changes which left the Mass de-sacralized and unrecognizable. Worst of all, what we had a short time previously held sacred was no banned as if it were a crime.

    Overall, a very bad experience which is still far from being redressed, although Cardinal Sarah’s initiatives offer a faint glimmer of hope.

  3. I have no problem with the revised Novus Ordo which for Eucharist Prayer II is the exact English translation of the Latin that I say for my private Masses. I’m fortunate to have an early 7 am Mass that has no “jamboree” qualities noted by Bishop Barron. We don’t have music. The Mass is quiet. I focus on the altar and the Eucharist, look up at the congregation only when the Liturgy calls for it. My complaint is the endless announcements before Mass starts and interminable prayers of the faithful, which can be streamlined. All is available in the bulletin handouts. It takes away from the flow of the Liturgy. And calling the person making the announcements “Leader” makes the priest appear to be a peripheral functionary. Nonetheless the people have responded beautifully. The silence and focus on the Eucharist is

  4. All I ask for is a few seconds to contemplate my sins in the beginning of mass. I can’t even get that from our priest!

  5. Am in agreement with Glenn’s comments. Adding: pre Vatican 11 there was plenty of “active participation” in the Masses I attended…as evidenced by the number of people reading with Missals. ( That show up in the used book stores today!) Active doesn’t have to mean noise, physical movement,etc. There is plenty of active participation in a classroom lecture setting, a symphonic concert,…. Our liturgists seem to think that we need contstant stimulation, as in a movie, or sports arena..
    We are in God’s House, let there be a reverence and a silence to be found there.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

All comments posted at Catholic World Report are moderated. While vigorous debate is welcome and encouraged, please note that in the interest of maintaining a civilized and helpful level of discussion, comments containing obscene language or personal attacks—or those that are deemed by the editors to be needlessly combative or inflammatory—will not be published. Thank you.


*