Denver, Colo., Jul 24, 2018 / 04:16 pm (CNA).- This week, CNA says farewell to our summer intern, Lizzy Joslyn. In her final week at CNA this summer, Lizzy offers “The Genius of Woman,” a four-part series of interviews and profiles, based on Pope St. John Paul II’s “Letter to Women,” and interviews with seven Catholic women from very different walks of life. This is the second piece in that series:
John Paul II’s 1995 “Letter to Women” was written to praise and encourage women to embrace the beauty that God gave them – the“feminine genius”- despite social and cultural messages telling them to become something different.
In contemporary society, the pope wrote, “women’s dignity has often been unacknowledged and their prerogatives misrepresented; they have often been relegated to the margins of society and even reduced to servitude. This has prevented women from truly being themselves and it has resulted in a spiritual impoverishment of humanity.”
The pope, on the contrary, encouraged viewing, and valuing, women, from the perspective of their dignity, and the natural complementarity of men and women:“The creation of woman is thus marked from the outset by the principle of help: a help which is not one-sided but mutual. Woman complements man, just as man complements woman: men and women are complementary. Womanhood expresses the “human” as much as manhood does, but in a different and complementary way.”
Rejecting women’s instinct for nurture and self-sacrifice is a part of a modern effort that “overcorrects” gender imbalances and discrimination against women, “by either repressing men and suggesting that men are bad and pushing them down… or on the other hand by trying to treat women as men,” said Michelle La Rosa, managing editor at CNA.
Careers and vocations based in self-giving are often looked down upon by a “feminist” society. Adding a family, or focusing on motherhood, can also be the source of criticism for some women in contemporary society.
But the Church lifts high the call for women to serve, regarding such selflessness with great respect and importance. John Paul II, speaking of Mary, wrote,“For her, ‘to reign’ is to serve! Her service is ‘to reign’!” The same can be said for every woman’s–and person’s–call, he said.
In light of that encouragement, some Catholic women have learned that lesson- “to reign is to serve.”
“Humanity itself owes much of its survival to the fact that women are nurturing,” said Amy Shupe, a teacher at Christian Brothers High School in St. Louis, Missouri.
Their talents in this area does not necessarily restrict them to one vocation. La Rosa and Ginny Kochis, a blogger on Catholic motherhood, both mentioned the life of Saint Zélie Martin–a woman who worked and raised a family with her husband, Louis Martin, who also worked.
“If a woman doesn’t want to work full time, if she wants to be a stay-at-home-mom, if men or women want to prioritize relationships and family above work, it’s almost seen as weakness and women are looked down upon if they can’t have it all,” said YouTuber Lizzie Reezay.
Two women shared their vocation stories with CNA—they are are wildly different, but both expressions of the “feminine genius” that John Paul II celebrated.
Women educating, raising generations to come
Amy Shupe felt a calling to dedicate her life to teaching a subject she never found easy. Her early years in school, she said, involved a lot of standardized test-taking. Seeing her poor results on such tests–particularly in math–discouraged her.
Her teachers’ reactions didn’t exactly uplift her, either.
“They didn’t point-blank,” tell her she couldn’t achieve higher scores in math, she said, but teachers would place a lot of weight on their students’ scores. “You kind of get the feeling that… it’s gonna be a real struggle for you, so maybe you should think about something else,” Shupe said.
In high school, though, she began to receive greater encouragement from her teachers. That’s when she discovered that she wanted to be that same source of encouragement for students who felt like they couldn’t do math.
“I have to help other people not feel the same way that I felt,” she said.
Now, Shupe is a high school teacher at Christian Brothers High School in St. Louis, Missouri. A 2017 recipient of a prestigious teacher’s award, the Distinguished Lasallian Educator Award, she invests copious amounts of her time and energy to the growth of her students.
“I work very hard at my job. I’m constantly thinking about it,” she said.
The role of a teacher can most certainly be taken on by men or women, but there’s something to be said for the emotionally intuitive side of women that lends itself to working with children, she said.
A mother of two children, Shupe exercises similar skills at work and at home.
“My number one role…is mom,” she said. “First, I’m a mother. I have two kids and I take care of them. And so then I think it easily translates into my classroom. You know, while those boys are not my flesh and blood, but I do know that… they have parents that are looking out for them,” said Shupe. Granted the trust of her students’ parents, she said, they are “put in my care day after day after day and I’m not there just to help them with math. I’m there to help them… learn about life… and have good influence on others.”
A Bride of Christ
A nun.
What the world sees: a humble, quiet, unsuspecting woman. Not exactly the “ideal” successful, commanding businesswoman. Mental pictures of “The Sound of Music” abound.
What Christ sees: His bride.
Sister Maria of the Capuchin Poor Clares in Denver, Colorado grew up in a strong Catholic household, but she never thought she would commit to the consecrated life.
In her younger years, Sister Maria was never a very committed practicer of the faith, she said. She attended Mass and received the Sacraments not “out of my own conviction,” she said, but more “of out of duty” to follow along with her family.
Things began to change one summer when she attended a retreat–one priest’s homily on God’s love “struck” her.
“This priest, I remember very, very clearly… he was talking about the love of God and he said, you know, ‘God loves us all the time, every moment. If he would just stop to love this one moment, we would just stop existing!”
Astounded by the gravity of this statement, Sister Maria began her search for ways to serve the God whose love, she had found, allowed her very existence. The next summer, she went on a mission to a poverty-ridden mountain town in Mexico.
There, she said, she found the poorest–yet, the richest–people.
“They were so pure and simple and giving and generous and they treated us like we were angels from God… they offered everything they had, they took us into their homes,” she remembered. “This pure life!”
Inspired after the mission, Sister Maria began to frequent a monastery near her home. The sisters, she observed, had a strangely similar poor-yet-rich complex. It took her months to admit it to herself, but Maria finally decided to discern her calling to be a nun.
A strong woman, says the world, is independent. But what if there is strength in dependence–on God?
John Paul II, in expressing his thanks for consecrated women, wrote, “Following the example of the greatest of women, the Mother of Jesus Christ, the Incarnate Word, you open yourselves with obedience and fidelity to the gift of God’s love. You help the Church and all mankind to experience a ‘spousal’ relationship to God, one which magnificently expresses the fellowship which God wishes to establish with his creatures.”
This specific and crucial mission, to “help the Church and all mankind to experience a ‘spousal’ relationship to God” is one only women can fulfill. And, because of the world’s disdain for obedience and quietness, this noble mission is also often looked down upon.
Although Sister Maria lives behind closed doors, she lives pray for people outside those doors. “We are here for the world, for the sake of others,” she said.
To some women, a life like Sr. Clare’s might seem to impossible- too simple, too humble, not empowered.
Consecrated life, like motherhood, is sometimes regarded as less significant work than traditional employment.
“People are so afraid of permanent commitment,” said Sister Maria, adding that she has seen fewer and fewer vocations to the Poor Clares.
A strong woman, says society, is a woman who isn’t afraid to invest in herself and do what she pleases.
But a strong woman of faith, says God, is a woman who isn’t afraid to fully commit herself to Christ.
Not only do “feminists” disregard the gravity of such commitment, but they also constantly reach for ways to prove that they are not “different than men, instead of trying to compete or equal in their own way,” the nun said.
Even when it comes to roles in the Church.
“Some groups continue to demand priesthood for women,” she said, but this “doesn’t make much sense.”
Considering Mary, she said, there are many opportunities for women to have a strong influence on the church.
Mary “never claimed to be one of the apostles…. She had her own role, and continues to have it in the church,” she said. “Who can be more important… her role in salvation history… than Mary’s?”
Disclaiming that she did not encourage priesthood for women, she added, “In a way, Mary was a priest. She was the first one who carried Jesus… The body of Christ is Mary’s body. The Eucharistic Body, in a way, is Mary’s flesh.”
“Every Communion, you carry Jesus,” she said, and, quoting St. Francis, “You give birth to Jesus through your good works.”
Sister Maria referenced St. Clare’s teachings: “We can carry Jesus the same way that Mary carried him… Mary carried Jesus in her womb for nine months, but the faithful soul can carry him spiritually, always.”
Women, she said, should embrace the roles in the church that God has offered to them rather than scrambling for more roles. If man and woman were the same, she said, it wouldn’t be as beautiful.
Ultimately, each woman–and man, for that matter–is called to be vigilant of God’s wish for their life, said Sister Maria.
“It’s a journey that never ends. You will always be receiving the vocation from God every day and answering to a vocation every day,” she said. “Do not be afraid to give yourself to Christ.”
[…]
Mass of reparation….have fr rippinger back [he was just there] to exercise the building and rededicate it…and remove the faculties of the priest…[who may need an exorcism himself…]
There are reports that the Mass of Reparation does reconsecrate the cathedral, despite the official statement from its pastor not making that clear. Example: this story at The Postmillennial:
NYC Cathedral offers official Mass of Reparation to reconsecrate St Patrick’s after outcry over trans activist funeral
Yes! That would be a fantastic move!
Now will the Archdiocese rewrite its policies, which seem to allow congregants to take control of liturgies, so that such a scandal cannot reoccur?
As long as eulogizing is allowed at a funeral, rather than being limited to a non-church wake where it belongs, we’ll see such scandals continuing. This one is only more egregious than what is common.
In our parish you/someone in family have/has to generally be a member for a funeral; there’s quite a few where there’s a service at the funeral home/graveside if they’ve fallen away. A priest or deacon usually presides.
Is this somehow following the recent ‘blessings are okay’ directive?
Why does the secular world want to use our facilities for such strange events or videotaping for “artists” that also happened recently?
The decision to do this outrageous blasphemy was given permission for Dolan, he should resign immediately! But this just shows how diabolical the LGBTQ crowd are! They want things like this to show contempt to the Church and her Sacraments, since they are totally dedicated to the world, the flesh and the devil!!!
Doesn’t the priest or the funeral home, presumably in accord with the parish, meet with the family to plan the funeral – the visitation, the procession, the readings, the hymns, etc.?
Was this person a parishioner? Can anybody just walk in off the street and demand a “celebration of life”?
Rev. Salvo says that they “didn’t know” what these people had planned.
I for one DON’T believe that, and, if it IS true – there is NO excuse for their ignorance.
You cannot “request “a funeral mass. Money has to change hands. How much did it cost to sell catholic values?????
Who paid? Who accepted the payment without proper vetting?
Deep connections have to be involved.
A “sorry” mass cannot be the end of it!
I imagine that Cardinal Dolan himself approved the service in St Patrick’s Cathedral. Perhaps he thought that it would be more “normal” than it turned out? Well, I think that he must be embarrassed about the whole thing now. Does he owe an apology to the Catholics of the Archdiocese of New York? It might be wise to do so.
Fr. Edward is the culprit who encouraged, profane, and participated in the sacrilegious mass. He was the celebrant, leader, and shepherd leading all these folks into grave egregious mortal sin. Father Edward Dougherty must be admonished appropriately to his actions.
Or was this clandestinely approved by the Vatican for a fellow countrymen from Argentina?
Are the “wild beasts” located in the Vatican?
Tragic and unnecessary failure to protect the faithful
Matthew 23:9-11 KJV And call no man your father upon the earth: for one is your Father, which is in heaven. Neither be ye called masters: for one is your Master, even Christ. But he that is greatest among you shall be your servant.
Incredibly irreverent. Somebody of note took payment for this charade, without regard to what planned intentions were.
Why didn’t the celebrant of the funeral mass put a stop to it when he saw what was happening?? And why has Cardinal Dolan not made a public statement and apology to Catholics in the US? It is becoming increasingly more difficult to remain a faithful Catholic in light of what’s been going on since Covid. The church did nothing and continues to marginalize the faithful while applauding the radicals.
I read elsewhere that where as the original plan was for a mass, during the “celebration” the director of liturgy saw what was going on and informed the presiding priest to limit it to a simple service instead of a mass. I hope that was the case. Inappropriate regardless.
I cannot understand how this was allowed to continue throughout its entirety. This should have been stopped at the first mention or sight of anything subversive. Throughout all of these videos I kept wondering the same thing, ‘why is the presiding authority not demanding cessation and those taking part out of the church?’ Let us all pray for the intercession of the saints of the past who fought heresy without fear and stood face to face against those who persecuted them. Mother Mary, pray for us!
It’s important to note that this sacrilege is the direct result of Bergoglio’s apostatic directive, ‘Sfiducia Supplicans.’
I fear we have a pope who is in the service of an unholy spirit.
We read: “’At [Archbishop Cardinal Timothy Dolan’s] directive, we have offered an appropriate Mass of Reparation,’ Salvo said. [AND] Several mainstream media outlets had framed the event as a breakthrough occasion and a sign of the Catholic Church shifting its teaching — or at least its tone — on sexuality and human anthropology.”
Reparation after the fact? What about foresight and guardianship?
Yours truly recalls a high cleric from New York who confided (on EWTN) about endorsing Obama Care only to find six months later that the conscientious objection clause had been deleted. “They lied to me,” he said. Of course!!! Why is it that pious clerics are the last to notice in advance the web of mendacity in a fallen world?
Happily, about “tone,” we now see what we need from continental Africa and and many other points of surviving coherence across the globe, but from the inner circle what do we still get: a “tone” that is out of tune, a “blessing” that is not a blessing, a “couple” that is not a couple, a doctrinally “universal Church” that in practice is not universal, and likely endorsement from a “synod” that is not a synod…
Instead, this: “When Jesus sent His disciples out into the world which was full of the ambushes of evil, He told them, ‘Be ye therefore, wise as serpents and simple as doves’ (Mt 10:16). By mentioning the two virtues, prudence and simplicity, together, He clearly shows that they must never be separated from one another, nor should one be used as a pretext for failing in the other” (Fr. Gabriel of St. Mary Magdalen, OCD, “Divine Intimacy,” 1964/1996).
Given the insidiousness of evil and even infiltration into the Church, needed training for bishops might well include a seminar on Mt. 10:16 and counterinsurgency.
CARDINAL DOLAN MUST MAKE A PUBLIC STATEMENT OIF REPENTANCE AND RECOMMITMENT