Vatican City, Apr 11, 2018 / 04:16 pm (CNA/EWTN News).- In a letter addressed to Chile’s bishops, Pope Francis admitted to making “serious mistakes” in handling the nation’s massive sex abuse crisis and asked for forgiveness. The pope summoned Chile’s bishops to Rome to address the issue, and invited victims to meet with him as well.
Referring to a recent investigation of abuse cover-up in Chile carried out by Archbishop Charles Scicluna of Malta, Pope Francis said that after a “slow reading” of the report, “I can affirm that all the testimonies collected speak in a stark manner, without additives or sweeteners, of many crucified lives and I confess that this has caused me pain and shame.”
Francis admitted to misjudging the severity of the affair, telling Chile’s bishops that “I have made serious mistakes in the judgement and perception of the situation, especially due to a lack of truthful and balanced information.”
Please find below CNA’s translation of the full text of Pope Francis’ April 8 letter:
Dear brothers in the episcopate: The reception last week of the final documents which complete the report delivered to me by my two special envoys to Chile on March 20, 2018, with a total of more than 2,300 pages, moves me to write this letter. I assure you of my prayers and I want to share with you the conviction that the present difficulties are also an occasion to re-establish trust in the Church, a trust broken by our errors and sins and in order to heal the wounds that do not cease to bleed in the whole of Chilean society.
Without faith and without prayer, fraternity is impossible. Thus, on this second Sunday of Easter, on the day of mercy, I offer you this reflection with the desire that each one of you accompany me on the inner journey that I have been traveling in recent weeks, so that it would be the Spirit who would guide us with his gift, and not our interests, or even worse, our wounded pride.
Sometimes when so many evils frighten the soul and throw us listlessly into the world buttoned up in our comfortable “winter palaces,” the love of God comes out to meet us and purifies our intentions in order to love as free, mature, and judicious men. When the media shames us, presenting a Church almost always in the darkness of the new moon, deprived of the Sun of justice, we have the temptation of doubting the Paschal victory of the Risen One. I believe that like Saint Thomas the Apostle we must not fear doubt but rather fear the pretension of wanting to see without trusting the testimony of those who heard from the lips of the Lord the most beautiful promise.
Today I want to speak to you not of assurances, but rather of the one thing that the Lord offers us to experience every day: the joy, the peace of forgiveness of our sins and the action of his grace.
In that regard I wish to express my gratitude to His Excellency Charles Scicluna, the Archbishop of Malta and to Rev. Jordi Bertomeu Farnós, official of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, for his prodigious work in considerately and empathetically listening to the 64 testimonies he recently gathered both in New York and Santiago de Chile. I sent them to listen from the heart and with humility. Later on, when they delivered to me the report and, in particular, its juridical and pastoral assessment of the gathered information, they acknowledged before me of having felt overwhelmed with the pain of so many victims of grave abuses of conscience and power and, in particular, of the acts of sexual abuse committed by various consecrated men of your country against minors, those who were not taken seriously then and were even robbed of their innocence.
The most heartfelt and cordial gratitude we must express as pastors to those who with honesty, courage and the sense of the Church requested a meeting with my envoys and showed them the wounds of their souls. Bishop Scicluna and Rev. Bertomeu have told me how some bishops, priests and deacons, lay men and women of Santiago and Osorno came to Holy Name parish in New York or to the office of Sotero Sanz, in Providencia, with a maturity, respect and kindness that was overwhelming.
In addition, the days following that special mission, have witnessed another meritorious fact that we should keep very much in mind for other occasions, because not only has the climate of confidentiality achieved during the visit been maintained, but at no time has the temptation been yielded to to turn this delicate mission into a media circus. In that regard, I wish to thank the different organizations and media for their professionalism in treating such a delicate case, respecting the right of citizens to the information and the good reputation of the declarants.
Now, after a careful reading of the proceedings of this “special mission,” I believe I can affirm that the collected testimonies speak in a stark way, without additives or sweeteners, of many crucified lives and I confess to you that that causes me pain and shame.
Taking all this into account, I am writing to you, meeting together in the 115th Plenary Assembly, to humbly request your collaboration and assistance in discerning the short, mid and long term measures that must be adopted to re-establish ecclesial communion in Chile, with the goal of repairing as much as possible the scandal and re-establishing justice.
I plan to call you to Rome to discuss the conclusions and the aforementioned visit and my conclusions. I have thought of that meeting has a fraternal moment, without prejudices or preconceived ideas, with the only goal of making the truth shine forth in our lives. Regarding the date, I entrust it to the Secretary of the Bishops’ Conference to show me the possibilities.
As for my own responsibility, I acknowledge, and I want you to faithfully convey it that way, that I have made serious mistakes in the assessment and perception of the situation, especially because of the lack of truthful and balanced information. Right now I ask forgiveness from all those I offended and I hope to be able to do so personally, in the coming weeks, in the meetings I will have with representatives of the people who were interviewed.
Abide in me: these words of the Lord resound again and again in these day. They speak of personal relationships, of communion, of fraternity which attracts and summons. United to Christ as the branches are to the vine, I invite you graft into your prayers in the coming days a magnanimity that prepares us for the aforementioned meeting and will then allow what we will have reflected on to be translated into concrete actions.
It maybe even be opportune to have the Church in Chile be in ongoing prayer. Now more than ever we cannot fall back into the temptation of verbiage or dwell in “generalities.” These days, let us look at Christ. Let us look at his life and his gestures, especially when he shows compassion and mercy to those who have erred. Let us love in truth, let us ask for wisdom of heart and let us be converted.
Waiting for news from you and asking His Excellency Santiago Silva Retamales, President of the Chilean Conference of Bishops, to publish this letter as quickly as possible, I impart my blessing and ask you to please keep praying for me.
[…]
By 
This event more than anything else made me lose respect for Pope Leo. He gave credence to a complete fraud of a LARPing female bishop who advocates for heretical and gravely evil things. What for? Receive her in a private audience as a courtesy, perhaps. But to put on such a public show that appears to validate her claim to ordination and office? Preposterous and scandalous. Pope Leo, I respect you no more.
His strange actions are on all fronts:
Counter-Islamists Accuse Vatican of Promoting ‘Islamophobia’ Regime Catholics Join in Protesting Holy See’s and U.S. Bishops’ Use of Ideological Term
A global organization monitoring Islamism has reprimanded the Vatican for embracing the disputed term “Islamophobia” while turning a blind eye to the threat of Islamic ideology, Sharia, and the persecution of Christians in Muslim nations.
The Center for the Study of Political Islam International (CSPII) issued a strongly worded statement on April 23 after the Vatican condemned the “persistence of Islamophobia” in an intervention at the United Nations marking the International Day to Combat Islamophobia.
Is there no end to their appeasement of Islam?
“While framed as a defense of universal liberty, the Vatican’s intervention adopts a highly contested political term—‘Islamophobia’—without addressing the ideological and legal dimensions of Islam that generate legitimate public concern,” CSPII warned.
https://www.meforum.org/fwi/fwi-news/counter-islamists-accuse-vatican-of-promoting-islamophobia-regime
“First of all, I think it’s very important to understand that the unity or division of the Church should not revolve around sexual matters,” he said. “We tend to think that when the Church is talking about morality, that the only issue of morality is sexual, and in reality, I believe there are much greater and more important issues, such as justice, the equality, freedom of men and women, freedom of religion, that would all take priority before that particular issue.”
His pontifications prioritize Marxist Liberation Theology, not Holy Scripture or even St. Augustine, the patron of his order:
Romans 1:26-27
26 Because of this, God gave them over to shameful lusts. Even their women exchanged natural sexual relations for unnatural ones. 27 In the same way the men also abandoned natural relations with women and were inflamed with lust for one another. Men committed shameful acts with other men, and received in themselves the due penalty for their error.
1 Corinthians 6:9-11
9 Or do you not know that wrongdoers will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: Neither the sexually immoral nor idolaters nor adulterers nor men who have sex with men[a]
10 nor thieves nor the greedy nor drunkards nor slanderers nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God.
11 And that is what some of you were. But you were washed, you were sanctified, you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and by the Spirit of our God. AND SAINT AUGUSTINE:
“Those sins which are against nature, like those of the men of Sodom, are in all times and places to be detested and punished. Even if all nations committed such sins, they should all alike be held guilty by God’s law” (Confessions 3.8).
An Imam, a woman Protestant “Bishop” and a Pope all entered a bar at the same time. Which one of these three was Catholic.
(Gold Medal of the Day to anyone who gets the answer corret)
Not a one for $1000, Alex.
Well, if the pope was Pius V, it was the pope. Then again, maybe there was good Irish bartender too.
Is that real gold?
None, as in 0.00, of these pagans, heretics, and apostates
The Holy Father refers to the Anglicans distinctly and correctly as a “communion” and not as a “church,” and then we also read of its: “…significant theological and ecumenical divides… particularly regarding the ordination of women and sexuality.”
In the first instance, the vocabulary reflects the clarity of Vatican II and the follow-up “Dominus Iesus” (August 6, 2000) regarding the absence of valid Holy Orders in “ecclesial communions” that have historically amputated themselves from the sacramentality of the Apostolic Succession. In the second instance, within the Anglican ecclesial communion some 80 percent of Anglicans do not recognize Canterberry’s (female…and laywoman) Mullally nor the Anglican blessing of gay “marriages.”
Meanwhile, in the Catholic Church a similar divide lingers over the doublespeak half-blessing of gay couples as “couples” (Fiducia Supplicans). A wording slippery slope predictably now being fully Anglicanized by der Synodal Weg. And, which was called out early by the Catholic Church in all of continental Africa, and in Poland, Hungary, the Netherlands, Ukraine, Peru, Kazakhstan, and parts of Argentina, France and Spain, and by others.
But, yes, to Pope Leo’s steps of “hospitality” as a form of “ministry”…
But how, exactly, to fully witness and evangelize a fallen world now in freefall? It’s almost as if words matter, and as if marginalized Natural Law—moral theology and sexual “ethics”— is the canary in a coal mine.
The Church has to inform even declare that in spite of hospitality some things are deviations from truth and well-being and remain integrally un-Christian that can’t attain the “being Christian together”.
Tell them to look at the muddles in their own “societies” and their own patterns in psychological badgering that hard or soft don’t make anything right and can’t.
What’s there to talk about?
You’re a confused man Brother. Phony gestures of solidarity with influential “Christians” forcefully advocating crimes against humanity is a crime against humanity in itself.
Forgive them, Father, for they should know better. And shame on the author for calling her archbishop. In charity, she’s a confused woman. It’s not different than calling her a man or husband, for that is what an archbishop is: the manly husband of his bride the (local) church.
Since Robert Prevost chose to insinuate himself into American politics, I no longer have faith in him as a spiritual leader (NB I am NOT saying that Robert Prevost is not the Pope).
An extremely unfortunate (to use a very mild term) event. I agree that as a courtesy the pope could have had a private meeting with her. But the big hoopla surrounding this visit just gives impetus to indifferentism – one faith as good as another. The treatment given to her makes it seem that she has valid orders.
I mean no offense to women, but in her full “bishops” garb she looks like someone going to a Halloween costume party.
Surely, for the 2 people in the photograph, DAVID AXELROD IS THE WAY.
Classic damned if you do damned if you don’t. Although, at closer exam, is that in the end false?
Protocol demands Leo Meets with a woman who represents a Church fallen into the embrace of radical progressive irreligiosity. Anglicanism no longer represents Christ’s revelation to the world. In a real sense its religiosity is on par with the German ‘Catholic’ Synodaler Weg.
Benefit in Leo XIV meeting with Mullally is the image of magnanimity. An expected politeness. That the Catholic Church is big enough to be tolerant. After all, the Church meets with Muslim leadership.
Then there’s the opposing perception of tolerance that borders on complacency, a form of accommodation. Accommodation to worldly values was evident in Leo’s predecessor. Leo claims discipleship.
If weighed in the balance the difference here is a Church that once validly, at least in common beliefs with Catholic Christianity, represented Christianity. That has changed. Anglicanism now represents the digressive process of the repudiation of what Christ revealed to the world. In that context, particularly in consideration of a like tendency to dilute Christ’s message within our Church it would have been better to offer a polite refusal. Perhaps a compromise proposal to privately meet with Mullally if and when the Pope visits Britain.
@Donald. The Supreme Governor of the Church of England is the King or Queen of England. This impetus for the beginning of the C of E was Henry VIII’s desire to commit adultery, which he did. She was later beheaded and Henry married a third time. My guess is the Holy Spirit was not around for Henry’s second and third marriages
BY the time of Henry VIII’s third marriage to Jane Seymour, his first two wives were dead, so he was canonically free to enter a new union. He didn’t pursue reconciliation with Rome then because he’d already confiscated the monasteries.
A long-winded retired and resident Monsignor made a rare appearance at the ambo in my parish, but then put us all at ease: “As Henry VIII said to each of his six wives, I won’t keep you long…”
Please clarify: Were his first two wives dead because he had them murdered? If so, I not certain he’d be “free” to marry another.
Katharine of Aragon wasn’t murdered – though I don’t imagine being put under terrible stress for years helped her health.
WIKIPEDIA has a graphic showing the lifespan of Catharine of Aragon relative to Anne Boleyn and Jane Seymour. If you wish to do all the reading needed you will see there is clear evidence that the King was involved with Seymour during the life of his wife and during his adultery with Boleyn. A pattern with all the future women -constantly abusing women.
It could possibly be that while he was involved with Boleyn before Catherine had died, he was also involved with Seymour.
Henry VIII had an illegitimate child Henry FitzRoy born 1519, by Elizabeth Blount. He died 1536. She died 1540. Apparently the King had kept up relations with her for as many as 8 years until she got married to another in 1522.
I think Henry VIII had a kind of “confidence: he could and would have a male heir for whom he would arrange the inheritance of the Kingdom at any cost. He demonstrated he had no respect for women which fell also onto his true wife and sacrament, hatred that gave him into rage at the Church and murder.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wives_of_Henry_VIII
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elizabeth_Blount
Pope Prevost will only NOT meet with those for whom Catholic orthodoxy is preeminent in their spirituality.
I succumbed to Francis-Fatigue with the previous occupant of Peter’s Chair. I now sense an incipient case of the same syndrome with the current one. I guess it will remain for orthodox laity to preserve the patrimony of the Catholic faith. Our prelates are not up to the task. They’re too busy jumping into bed with Moloch.
Finally, in refusing to meet with the SSPX while meeting with and praying the Liturgy of the Hours with Ms Mullally mean that what she represents is acceptable and that the SSPX does not?
Add to this that an entire national Church now called the Synodaler Weg drifting off into something akin to congregationalism our Christian world has become a bewildering wilderness. Fortuitously and miraculously it appears Protestant converts to the faith are presenting, as evident in the editors of Catholic websites a growing light in the enveloping darkness.
We might muse, did the Reformation contain some mysterious alter purpose to be revealed centuries later among a unique corps of men with the complete sense of analytic freedom to research and discover where and what the truth is?
Quote: Finally, in refusing to meet with the SSPX while meeting with and praying the Liturgy of the Hours with Ms Mullally mean that what she represents is acceptable and that the SSPX does not?
Yes. It is a fake and easy “unity” which is not based in Christ that feels good and comfortable.
I do not idealize trads and know only basics about SSPX but they are straight Catholics. They have their own temptation, of swapping Christ with various “trad things” and many already went for that, refusing to criticize PL in exchange for his preservation of their little “trad ghetto”. But SSPX seems not to belong to that category, at this point at least. They will fall however if they begin to put their “traditionalism” above Christ, being attached to it more than to Our Lord.
The true basis for unity, Christ, exposes the fake unity based on “niceness” and “all-acceptance”. Hence, the true unity together with Christ must go away. This is, in a nutshell, what is happening now. This process will speed up and increase in magnitude.
As I see it, the would and the Church are tested now re: Christ, their attitude to Him (and to the Truth and true Love, for those who do not believe in Him but have conscience). Only putting Him above and beyond anything and clinging on Him will do.
Finally, in refusing to meet with the SSPX while meeting with and praying the Liturgy of the Hours with Ms Mullally mean that what she represents is acceptable and that the SSPX does not?
Add to this that an entire national Church now called the Synodaler Weg drifting off into something akin to congregationalism our Christian world has become a bewildering wilderness. Fortuitously and miraculously it appears Protestant converts to the faith are presenting, as evident in the editors of Catholic websites a growing light in the enveloping darkness.
We might muse, did the Reformation contain some mysterious alter purpose to be revealed centuries later among a unique corps of men with the complete sense of analytic freedom to research and discover where and what the truth is? That God might turn the tables on Satan and draw some good from evil?
I look at the CofE episcopacy as children playing dress-up. The old saw “smells and bells”.
Some years ago a coworker, an attorney who did pro bono work for the Episcopal community, conceded his concern for the future of it, and this was before its surrender to new temporal powers.
Very sad indeed. Yes the Pope is a very kind and good man, and yet I wonder what the great English martyrs of the 1535-1681 period view this? They took would look and react with sadness. Would the pope meet someone who dressed up as Napoleon, of course not! And yet he gives this woman who dresses up as a “bishop” and whose orders were declared by his named predessor as null and utterly void!!!?? With respect, Holiness I would have used the time by meeting with the SSpx that with this clown, who actually didn’t think it was worth her time to vote in the recent parliament decision to bring in infanticide! Again, such a sad photo 😢