Benedict XVI, Francis, and Leo XIV recommend this book, which warns of a world without God

 

null / Credit: TippaPatt/Shutterstock

ACI Prensa Staff, Jun 28, 2025 / 09:00 am (CNA).

The last three popes — Benedict XVI, Francis, and Leo XIV — have on more than one occasion recommended reading “Lord of the World,” the dystopian science fiction novel written by Robert Hugh Benson in 1907.

This apocalyptic novel depicts the consequences of a society that turned its back on God and presents a social critique of the customs of the West, which has succumbed to capitalism and socialism.

Benson, an Anglican cleric who eventually converted to Catholicism and was ordained a priest in 1904, proposes a reality in which “the forces of secularist materialism, relativism, and state control triumph everywhere.”

This work, praised by the last three popes, also describes the arrival of the Antichrist as a charismatic personality but who also promotes ideals destructive to society.

Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, the future Pope Benedict XVI, cited this work during a lecture he gave at the Catholic University of Milan in February 1992, stating that the work “gives much food for thought.”

It was also one of Pope Francis’ favorite books. During his meeting with the academic and cultural world as part of his apostolic journey to Budapest, Hungary, in April 2023, Francis explained that this work “shows that mechanical complexity is not synonymous with true greatness and that in the most ostentatious exteriority is hidden the most subtle insidiousness.”

For the Argentine pope, the book was “in a certain sense prophetic.” Although it was written more than a century ago, “it describes a future dominated by technology and in which everything, in the name of progress, is standardized; everywhere a new ‘humanism’ is preached that suppresses differences, nullifying the life of peoples and abolishing religions,” he said.

The original book cover of “Lord of the World” by Robert Hugh Benson. Credit: Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons
The original book cover of “Lord of the World” by Robert Hugh Benson. Credit: Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons

Specifically, he emphasized that in the society described in the book, all differences are eradicated, as opposing ideologies merge in a homogenization resulting in “ideological colonization — as humanity, in a world run by machines, is gradually diminished and life in society becomes sad and rarefied.”

Francis noted that in the novel, “everyone seems listless and passive, it seems obvious that the sick should be gotten rid of and euthanasia practiced, as well as national languages ​​and cultures be abolished in order to achieve a universal peace.”

This idea of ​​peace, however, “is transformed into an oppression based on the imposition of consensus, to the point of making one of the protagonists state that the world seems at the mercy of a perverse vitality, which corrupts and confuses everything,” Francis said in his address in the Hungarian capital.

Also, while criticizing ideological colonization, Pope Francis during a press conference he gave to the media on his flight back to the Vatican after his Apostolic Journey to Manila, Philippines, in 2015 recommended reading the book.

Cardinal Robert Prevost, before being elected Pope Leo XIV, also recommended the book in an interview given to the Augustinians from Rome. “It speaks about what could happen in the world if we lose faith,” Prevost explained.

He emphasized that Benson’s work contains passages that give a lot of food for thought “in terms of the world we are living in,” presenting challenges about the importance of “continuing to live with faith but also to continue to live with a deep appreciation of who we are as human beings, brothers and sisters, but understanding the relationship of ourselves with God and the love of God in our lives.”

Furthermore, the cardinal, who became Leo XIV on May 8, noted that his two predecessors had also cited this book on more than one occasion.

This story was first published by ACI Prensa, CNA’s Spanish-language news partner. It has been translated and adapted by CNA.


If you value the news and views Catholic World Report provides, please consider donating to support our efforts. Your contribution will help us continue to make CWR available to all readers worldwide for free, without a subscription. Thank you for your generosity!

Click here for more information on donating to CWR. Click here to sign up for our newsletter.


About Catholic News Agency 14724 Articles
Catholic News Agency (www.catholicnewsagency.com)

4 Comments

  1. We can draw myriad allusions from the three Roman pontiffs. First, Vladimir Soloviev who preceded Fr Hugh Benson both had a virtual like vision of a highly intelligent, charismatic Antichrist with a globalist agenda.
    Great Britain and Romanov Russia politically similar and highly cultured produced two similar minded Christian men who envisioned the collapse of religion in competition with a then rapidly becoming industrial political landscape. Could be Fr Benson borrowed from the well known presumed convert to Catholicism Soloviev. Indeed, both were converts. If Soloviev remained Russian Orthodox he was widely known to be an admirer of Catholicism.
    Russian Orthodoxy and Roman Catholicism have an innate global vision and call to expand globally differentiating them from other Christians. Soloviev and Benson perceived the technical industrial society as the bete noire of Christianity drawing the sedate Christian into its orbit. Which in one way or another occurred. So the AntiChrist guy would expectedly be a form of high tech genius with a bent toward religiosity. Can Soloviev and Benson be wrong?
    Lucifer is optimally clever. From that premise of the unpredictable there are a slew of what ifs. What if for example he or she? [I say she because they’re some progressive sisters who frighten me] were to find a home and emerge from a religion?

  2. No one else seems interested in commenting on a relevant subject matter, Lord of the World referring not to Christ, rather either a form of or the actual Antichrist. Why a woman? I spoke sarcastically of frightening progressive sisters. Wasn’t it a woman who was responsible for getting Mankind into the mess it finds itself in?
    A Tolkien Rings character entered my imagination with mention of fearsome sisters. Galadriel. Tempted by the ring. “In place of a Dark Lord you would have a Queen! Not dark but beautiful and terrible as the Dawn! Treacherous as the Seas! Stronger than the foundations of the Earth! All shall love me and despair!”
    Woman is man’s other self. Which is why Apostle Paul says a man who loves his wife loves himself. “So husbands ought also to love their own wives as their own bodies. He who loves his wife loves himself” (Ephesians 5:28).
    Peter adds, “Wives, in the same way, submit yourselves to your own husbands so that, if any of them do not believe the word, they may be won over without words by the behavior of their wives, when they see the purity and reverence of your lives. Your beauty should not come from outward adornment” (1 Peter 3). Both great Apostles in their insights tailor charisma of the perfect woman the Church will come to recognise in Mary.

  3. For the past few years, the periodical “Inside the Vatican” has included installments of Benson’s “The Lord of the World.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

All comments posted at Catholic World Report are moderated. While vigorous debate is welcome and encouraged, please note that in the interest of maintaining a civilized and helpful level of discussion, comments containing obscene language or personal attacks—or those that are deemed by the editors to be needlessly combative or inflammatory—will not be published. Thank you.


*