London, England, Sep 18, 2018 / 02:30 pm (CNA).- British politicians have called for a review of the availability of early sex detection tests for pregnant women. The proposal was made by Labour Members of Parliament and prompted by concerns that the tests are leading to sex-selective abortions.
The MP’s expressed particular concern that women, especially those in the UK’s Asian communities, are being pressured or coerced into having an abortion if they are pregnant with a girl.
Labour MP Naz Shah said it was “morally wrong” that women are using the Non-Invasive Prenatal Test (NIPT) to determine whether or not they are pregnant with a girl, and then scheduling an abortion based on the result. Shah, the Shadow Secretary of State for Women and Equalities, called for a government investigation into the practice.
The call for government intervention against the practice comes almost 18 months after the Nuffield Council on Bioethics, a government-funded think tank, found that NIPT promoted sex-selective abortions.
The NIPT consists of a blood test given to the mother at the ninth week of pregnancy, at which time the baby’s DNA is detectable in their mother’s bloodstream.
The test is currently administered by the UK’s National Health Service to screen for genetic conditions, such as Down syndrome. Pro-life advocates have already warned that the test is used to “screen out” children with Down’s syndrome and other conditions. Currently in the UK, 90% of children with a prenatal diagnosis of Down’s syndrome are aborted.
While the gender can be detected by the NIPT, the NHS does not share this information with parents unless there is a specific need to do so. While the test is not made available by the NHS expressly for gender screening, it is privately available to parents and can be purchased at a clinic for about £150-£200.
In the London suburb of Slough, which has a substantial South Asian population, the tests are roadside advertisements explicitly market the test as being able to determine the sex of the child. This, said Shah, is where the government should consider stepping in.
“NIPT screenings should be used for their intended purpose, to screen for serious conditions and Down’s syndrome,” said Shah.
“The government needs to look into this exploitative practice and enforce appropriate restrictions.”
Slough’s Labour MP Tan Dhesi agreed with Shah, and pointed out that some Asian countries have “made huge strides in tackling this social evil,” particularly when the government has banned prenatal gender tests.
“In the UK I think we need to be doing likewise, with regards to the private sector as well,” said Dhesi.
Prenatal sex detection has been illegal in India since 1994.
The calls follow a BBC has report on online forums where women have discussed how NIPT results will directly inform their decision to continue with their pregnancy or to have an abortion.
“I need a son to heal me…,” wrote one woman. “My only bet is NIPT followed by continuation, only if it’s a boy.”
Clare McCarthy, spokesperson for Right To Life UK, told CNA that she agrees with the need for government action to address the problem of sex-selective abortion.
“This BBC investigation adds to a growing body of evidence that we have a sex-selective abortion problem here in the UK,” said McCarthy.
“It’s time for the Government to stop denying there is a problem here and take urgent action to put in place a ban on sex-selective abortion.”
McCarthy, however, said it was “seriously concerning” that the same Labour MPs who are opposed to sex-selective abortion also are in favor of removing all legal restrictions on abortion, “under the guise of ‘decriminalisation.’”
If this were happen, McCarthy told CNA that “the evidence from overseas shows that this could make our sex-selective abortion problem even worse.”
While sex-selection abortion is technically illegal in the United Kingdom, women may give other reasons as for why they want to have an abortion.
In England, Scotland, and Wales, abortion must be signed off by two doctors and cannot be performed later than 24 weeks gestation. After 24 weeks of pregnancy the grounds upon which an abortion can be sought narrow significantly.
In Northern Ireland, abortion is illegal, but it is legal for a Northern Irish woman to travel to England, Scotland, or Wales for an abortion.
[…]
Holding fast to the legacy of the so called ” democratic” republic of 1936! These reds delighted then and now in the shedding of innocent blood and their legacy is one word: DEATH!!
Ms Redondo’s concern for the freedom of women to slaughter prenatal infants reveals how far the travesty of freedom of conscience has taken us. France, now Spain historically bulwarks of Catholic Christianity now the purveyors of infanticide. Freedom, conceptualized as the unprincipled right to do as one pleases regardless of its effect on Mankind, our humanness, and our justification before God.
Justice Anthony Kennedy, the creator of the definition of Liberty [see Planned Parenthood v Casey 1992] that has swept jurisprudence on this life and death matter was present with the current Supreme Court Justices Tuesday during Pres Trump’s Address to Congress. He seemed quite at ease and pleased. As a lifelong Catholic who promoted abortion rights and opposed the Defense of Marriage Act does he represent more than a sliver of Catholic thought?
Liberty, freedom of conscience, a right or a function? If we examine Kennedy’s famed conceptualization,”At the heart of liberty is the right to define one’s own concept of existence, of meaning, of the universe, and of the mystery of human life” in substance defines the liberty each person possesses that defines the function of free will. We are free to choose good, or evil if we wish. If we assumed that as our standard of Liberty, where does that locate Justice? If Justice itself means what is right and good, we abrogate its meaning. As has actually occurred in America as well as France and Spain. The juridical notion of justice is reduced to license.
Freedom, as a lawful standard of justice, is not simply the function of the human will to choose between good and evil. As a lawful juridical standard it transcends function, rather it is the exercise of the pursuit of Justice. That which is just and good. Freedom is the right to act within parameters of individual freedoms that must observe the rights of others particularly the right to life, the natural law reality of marriage exclusively between a man and a woman.
To Justice Anthony Kennedy, should you peruse the Internet I hope you find this article and its comments. If you find your concept of liberty a brilliant philosophical muse, this said in honest charity I advise you return to Catholic Catechesis for serious contemplation lest the verbally attractive hand basket you created will carry you off to Hell.