
New York City, N.Y., Oct 17, 2017 / 03:02 pm (CNA/EWTN News).- Anti-Christian persecution is “worse than at any time in history” and in many cases genocide and other crimes against humanity “now mean that the Church in core countries and regions faces the possibility of imminent wipe-out,” says a new report from Aid to the Church in Need.
The report, titled “Persecuted and Forgotten?”, covers the years 2015-2017. Its contents are bleak, describing Christianity as “the world’s most oppressed faith community.” Anti-Christian persecution in the worst regions has reached “a new peak” and its impact is “only now beginning to be felt in all its horror.”
“In 12 of the 13 countries reviewed, the situation for Christians was worse in overall terms in the period 2015–17 than within the preceding two years,” said the report’s executive summary, released Oct. 12.
John Pontifex, the report’s editor, commented that “In terms of the numbers of people involved, the gravity of the crimes committed and their impact, it is clear that the persecution of Christians is today worse than at any time in history. Not only are Christians more persecuted than any other faith group, but ever-increasing numbers are experiencing the very worst forms of persecution.”
China, Eritrea, Iraq, Nigeria, North Korea, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Sudan, and Syria were ranked “extreme” in the scale of anti-Christian persecution. Egypt, India, and Iran were rated “high to extreme,” while Turkey was rated “moderate to high.”
The report’s ratings draw from analyses like the Pew Forum’s Social Hostilities Index and Open Door’s World Watch List, in addition to other factors and sources, including fact-finding trips.
In some countries the state is the principal persecutor, while in other countries social groups are culpable, while in still others a combination of both are responsible.
Aid to the Church in Need, an international Catholic pastoral charity, provides emergency and pastoral relief in 140 countries. Its U.S. affiliate published the report.
The report’s foreword was written by Archbishop Issam John Darwish of the Melkite Archdiocese of Zahlé and Furzo, a Lebanese archdiocese near the Syrian border. He recounted the stories of Christian refugees fleeing the six-year-old Syrian civil war.
“Many refugees have told terrible stories of persecution: like the man whose brother, a priest, was kidnapped – and despite the family paying the ransom they killed the priest. They sent his family a box containing his severed wrist, tattooed with a cross, to show he was dead,” the archbishop said.
The Middle East is a major focus for the report.
“Governments in the West and the U.N. failed to offer Christians in countries such as Iraq and Syria the emergency help they needed as genocide got underway,” the report said. “If Christian organizations and other institutions had not filled the gap, the Christian presence could already have disappeared in Iraq and other parts of the Middle East.”
The exodus of Christians from Iraq has been “very severe.” Christians in the country now may number as few as 150,000, a decline from 275,000 in mid-2015. By spring 2017 there were some signs of hope, with the defeat of the Islamic State group and the return of some Christians to their homes on the Nineveh Plains.
However, the departure of Christians from Syria has also threatened the survival of their communities in the country, including historic Christian centers like Aleppo. Syrian Christians there suffer threats of forced conversion and extortion. One Chaldean bishop in the country estimates the Christian population to be at 500,000, down from 1.2 million before the war.
Many Christians in the region fear going to official refugee camps, due to concerns about rape and other violence.
The Islamic State group and other militants have committed genocide in Syria and Iraq. While Islamic State and other groups have been defeated in their major strongholds, many Christian groups are threatened with extinction and would not survive another attack.
In northern Nigeria, the radical Islamist group Boko Haram has engaged in genocide against Christians.
There are reports from North Korea of forced starvation of Christians and forced abortion. Some Christians have been hung on crosses over fire, and others have been crushed by steamrollers. Protestants and Catholics are ranked among those least sympathetic to the state, which limits their access to food, education, and health care. Christianity is linked with American influence, and Christians are executed as spies.
In Sudan, the government’s pursuit of an extremist Islamist agenda led to orders to tear down Christian churches. Christians are arrested for alleged proselytism, and women face fines for wearing “obscene” or immodest dress. The government stripped citizenship rights of people with origins outside Sudan, leading many to leave for their ancestral homelands in South Sudan. Many had lived in their homes for three decades or more.
In January 2017 the U.S. put a six-month waiver on human rights sanctions against Sudan, on condition that the country improve its human rights and religious freedom record.
In Pakistan, banned fundamentalist cells pose a great threat to Christians, but some charge that the government’s failure to crack down on these groups worsens the problem of violence. On Easter Sunday 2016 as many as 24 Christians were killed in targeted violence in Lahore. A faction of the Pakistan Taliban claimed responsibility for the attack.
In India, persecution has increased since 2014, with the rise of Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s right-wing Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party. Like-minded groups frequently accuse Christians of forced conversion, a charge local Christian leaders strongly deny. An India-based Catholic group reported 365 serious anti-Christian atrocities in 2016, with 10 people killed and more than 500 clergy or church leaders attacked for their faith.
Some Christians have faced pressure to convert under threat of force, while others have been forced to take part in Hindu rituals and deny their faith.
In China, church communities face increased hostility. Authorities in some provinces have removed crosses from some churches and destroyed church buildings. In some regions, Christmas trees and greeting cards have been banned.
President Xi Jinping has depicted Christianity as a means of “foreign infiltration” into China and has advocated more state control and targeting of unofficial churches. There are fears that China’s 2016 announcement of categorization of citizens based on political, commercial, social and legal “credit,” will create a system that disadvantages Christians in a way similar to North Korea.
Christians in Egypt suffered a major suicide bombing attack in December 2016 and again on Palm Sunday in April 2017. Dozens were killed and more injured in both attacks, for which the Islamic State group claimed responsibility.
Saudi Arabia has come under criticism from western powers and the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom. However, President Donald Trump signed a $110 billion arms deal with the country, a deal which had been held up under the Obama administration due to human rights concerns. The Aid to the Church in Need report said sources in the country are supplying arms and finances to Sunni extremist groups including the Islamic State, known in the region as “Daesh.”
“Given that Islamist groups such as Daesh are likely to be heavily reliant on undeclared external sources for weapons and intelligence, there is an urgent need to step up action to stop all entities collaborating with them,” the report continued. “Persecuted Christians are among the many who stand to be beneficiaries of progress in this area.”
Archbishop Darwish said it is imperative to help persecuted Christians.
“When the Christian families who have turned to us need the very basics for daily life – food, shelter and medical care – how can we refuse to help?” he asked, lamenting a lack of aid from the U.N. and other humanitarian organizations.
He praised Aid to the Church in Need’s efforts to report anti-Christian persecution and aid those persecuted.
[…]
I’m surprised that there was no mention of Amendment 3, a pro-abortion measure that passed (barely) in formerly pro-life Missouri. Catholics and other people of faith and reason in this state worked tirelessly to educate the public about the potential dangers of Amendment 3, which essentially opens the door for abortion through all 9 months, possibly with no consent needed for minors to have abortion. (There are other evil possibilities that this new policy may bring about.) But all the work failed to prevent the passage of this heinous amendment. Many of us in Missouri are glad that Pres. Trump won decidedly over VP Harris, even if he isn’t 100% pro-life, he isn’t 100% pro-abortion as VP Harris is. But we are grieving the failure to defeat Amendment 3. I hope that our battle and the methods we used to fight it will be studied by Catholics and other people of faith who are opposed to abortion, and that in the future, evil laws and amendments will fail to pass because of what is learned from the Show-Me State.
Yesterday you ran the article with this title: “3 states reject pro-abortion ballot measures while 7 other states expand abortion.”
Now, today, you ran this article with this title: “Pro-life advocates on election: ‘Americans have rejected Democrats’ abortion agenda’.”
I think the real state of things is this:
The American majority has rejected the extreme Democrat abortion agenda (elective abortion freely available for all 9 months for any reason).
But the American majority also rejects the extreme Republican abortion agenda (no exceptions for rape, incest, or not-immediately-life-threatening health conditions of the mother).
In most states of the USA, for the foreseeable future, the extreme Republican abortion agenda will never be enacted or maintained so long as the will of the majority is allowed to rule.
To me, the sad reality is the famous Dobbs decision did overthrow the evil Roe vs. Wade, but the Dobbs decision also implicitly upheld the view that the U.S. Constitution does not protect the lives of unborn children. In that sense, the Dobbs decision itself is evil, much as the Dred Scott decision was evil.
It seems it would take a dictatorship to really ban abortion in America. But I don’t want that.
So, I am left sad. How about you?
But please, stop the unjustified celebrations.
Dobbs does mean that there will be fewer abortions. But Dobbs fundamentally uphold the prochoice philosophy, except it allows the “choice” to be made by state legislatures instead of by mothers.
So, in my view, we’re still in a big mess, and I don’t see any solution.
We read: “Pro-life advocates are calling attention to the significance of the defeat of a 2024 Democratic presidential candidacy that was largely centered on abortion. [AND] Exit polls revealed that abortion was less of a priority than other issues for voters in this week’s election. Vice President Kamala Harris ran heavily on the abortion issue and lost her bid for the presidency.”
Translation: Harris was simply unable to rearrange voter priorities.
So, instead of an implied referendum on “reproductive rights” versus fetal infanticide, the election was more about Stock-Market politics versus rainbow-coalition politics. The coalition has eroded, but this is a far cry (the Silent Scream) from a political culture centered more on the natural law, and maybe the primacy of the family versus the Beltway.
But, yes, some strategic but mixed good news at the state level, and including at least a possible national “ban on taxpayer funding for abortion overseas and…religious exemptions related to any government program requiring health insurance coverage of IVF treatments.”
The real issue is that deep down, a majority wants abortion on demand, but is still uncomfortable talking about it like a sacrament the way the Democrats are doing. Even in relatively conservative Florida, a majority voted for the abortion amendment to the state’s constitution– only the supermajority requirement barely kept it from passing. And as long as pro-lfe voters refuse to hold Republicans accountable, the pro-life movement will go absolutely nowhere politically. It should also be noted that Trump barely received a majority of the popular vote; this is hardly a resounding rejection of anything. Pro-life people should not be deceived in the slightest about where things stand today– they stand firmly in the abortionist camp. The only debate is about how many abortions should be allowed and under what conditions, not whether human life begins at conception and should be entitled to the equal protection of the law. The undeniable conclusion is that what needs to be overthrown is the entire sexual revolution and all the fruit of that rotten tree. We need a sexual counterrevolution; nothing less will suffice. There is little cause for celebration this week– make no mistake about it.