
Sydney, Australia, Sep 24, 2017 / 12:38 pm (CNA).- Amid the ongoing debate surrounding “Amoris Laetitia,” dubia author Cardinal Raymond Burke said in a new interview that he’s wrongly depicted as the “enemy” of Pope Francis, but he stressed that current division in the Church demands an answer to requests for clarity.
“The urgency of a response to the dubia derives from the harm done to souls by the confusion and error, which result, as long as the fundamental questions raised are not answered in accord with the constant teaching and practice of the Church,” Cardinal Burke said.
“The urgency weighs very heavily on my heart,” he said. In his experience, the cardinal said he’s seen “a great deal of confusion, also people feeling that the Church is not a secure point of reference.”
“Some are feeling even a certain bewilderment…they are looking for a much stronger presentation of the Church’s doctrine.”
Cardinal Burke was one of four signatories of a letter submitted to Pope Francis last September outlining five dubia, or doubts, about the interpretation of his 2016 post-synodal apostolic exhortation “Amoris Laetitia.”
That letter had been submitted to the Pope privately, but released to the public two months later, prompting a firestorm of media commentary and debate.
However, the cardinal also addressed the purported “conflict” between him and Pope Francis, stressing that the media portrayal of he and the Pope is inaccurate, and frequently “overdone.”
“It’s all a caricature. They depict Pope Francis as a wonderful, open person and there’s nothing wrong with that, but they depict me as just the opposite,” he said, explaining that this is done “to advance their own agenda.”
However, Pope Francis “is actually not in favor of their agenda. They use this kind of technique to make it seem like he is and that’s fundamentally dishonest,” Cardinal Burke said.
Neither is there an intention to build up resistance against the Pope, he continued, explaining that the image of him being the “enemy” who is trying to undermine the Pope “isn’t the case at all.”
Cardinal Burke made his comments in a recent interview with Australian journalist Jordan Grantham, published Sept. 21 in Diocese of Parramatta’s online publicaton, “Catholic Outlook.”
The cardinal noted that as faithful Catholics, those who have expressed doubt or concern over the confusion surrounding “Amoris Laetitia” love the Pope “with complete obedience to the office of Peter.”
Yet at the same time, he said, “they don’t accept these questionable interpretations…of ‘Amoris Laetitia,’ interpretations, which in fact contradict what the Church has always taught and practiced.”
Without clarity on these issues, “people are in a very difficult state,” he said, explaining that this is demonstrated by the fact that bishops conferences have issued conflicting guidelines on how to interpret “Amoris Laetitia.”
In addition to Cardinal Burke, other signatories to the dubia letter were Cardinals Walter Brandmüller, president emeritus of the Pontifical Committee for Historical Sciences; Carlo Caffarra, Archbishop Emeritus of Bologna; and Joachim Meisner, Archbishop Emeritus of Cologne.
Cardinals Meisner and Caffarra passed away within two months of each other over the summer, leaving Cardinals Burke and Brandmüller to carry forward the ongoing debate over the dubia.
Cardinal Burke’s latest interview was not related to the release of a letter signed by 62 Catholic clergy and scholars, the most notable being superior general Bishop Bernard Fellay of the breakaway Society of St. Pius X. That letter presented itself as a “filial correction” to Pope Francis for reputed errors and heresies.
Among other things, the letter argues that the Pope has either directly or indirectly perpetrated seven heresies, most of which surround comments he has made about Martin Luther and ambiguities in “Amoris Laetitia,” specifically related to the question of the reception of Holy Communnion by divorced-and-remarried Catholics who cannot get an annulment.
The letter also objects to the Pope’s silence in the face of the “dubia” submitted to the Pope by the four cardinals.
Like the four cardinals’ original dubia letter, the 25-page letter of “filial correction” was also sent to the Pope privately, but the signatories decided to publish it after having received no response from the Pope.
Neither Cardinal Burke nor Cardinal Brandmüller signed the document. According to a Tweet sent out by the traditionalist blog “Rorate Caeli,” which has provided favorable coverage of the document’s release, cardinals were not asked to sign. The letter was “step one only.”
In his interview, Cardinal Burke said that many lay people argue over “Amoris Laetita,” and “many priests are suffering in particular because the faithful come to them, expecting certain things that are not possible because they’ve received one of the these erroneous interpretations of ‘Amoris Laetitia’.”
As a result, these people no longer understand Church teaching, the cardinal said. And in the Church, “we have only one guide, the Magisterium, the teaching of the Church, but we now seem to be divided into so-called political camps.”
The at times volatile “attacks” from parties who disagree is “a very mundane way of approaching things, it has no place in the Church,” Cardinal Burke continued. “But that’s where we’re at right now.”
The only way for the conversation to move forward on these matters, he said, “is to make the point of reference the doctrine of the Church. That’s what unifies us.”
Cardinal Burke also cleared up what he said are several misconceptions about him that are often promoted by the media, namely that he is “only interested in doctrine and law,” and that he is “out of touch with the times and living in the Middle Ages.”
“I am very pastoral and in fact, I don’t see any contradiction between being pastoral and being faithful in announcing the Church’s teaching and following the Church’s law,” he said.
The cardinal insisted that he is also “very conscious of the everyday culture in which we live, and I try to address it, but in a way that is full of compassion in the sense of addressing the Church’s teaching to the cultural situation and trying to lead the culture to a certain transformation.”
Referring to those who at times paint a picture of the Pope as a great revolutionary changing the tide of the Church in modern times, the cardinal said being the Successor of Peter “has nothing to do with revolutions.” Rather, it involves “maintaining the Church in unity with her long and constant tradition.”
Many people also claim the Pope is somehow going against the Church’s centuries-long tradition, he said. “And that isn’t possible either, because the Roman Pontiff is that principle of unity, unity which is not only present now, but unity with those who have gone before over the centuries.
“In fact, the two are one. When we are unified with the saints and especially with the great teachers of the faith along the centuries, then we also find unity with one another.”
Offering a word to all those currently worried about the state of the Church, Cardinal Burke stressed the need to remain confident in the fact that it is Jesus Christ whom they encounter in the Church, and who comes to meet us.
“Therefore, no matter what confusion or even divisions enter into the Church, we should never give up hope,” he said.
“We should cling all the more faithfully to what the Church has always taught and practiced. And that way we will really save our own souls, with the help of God’s grace, which, of course, we must always be about.”
[…]
So Radcliffe, the promoter of LGBTQ agenda, gets the red hat. Surprised Martin didn’t get one too. While Bergoglio talks an orthodox game about how gender theory is the biggest threat to humanity, his actions show his real convictions … and he is a threat to the unity and truth of the faith. Undoing the damage this man has done will take generations.
With God’s grace, Radcliffe is soon 80 and we need to pray that the pontiff’s health continues to deny that horrible possibility of ascending the See of Peter. The way these things go, Francis will probably have another one before Christmas, so Jimmy Martin is still in! What a horrible prospect!!!
Bergoglio will go down in Church history as a failed papacy.
And he has stacked the college with like minded men.
Reminds me of what happened to our Supreme Court! , human nature? 😂
Worse than that, Catullus.
His will go down in history as a perfidious papacy.
Perhaps the worst, most destructive ever.
The president of the United States, as Commander in Chief, has control over our nuclear arsenal. Only a fellow imbecile would vote for an imbecile as president.
Looks like homosexual advocate Fr Timothy Radcliffe OP managed to slip in. Or was he shoved?
What’s notable about Radcliffe’s appointment is not entirely the next consistory for the papacy. It’s the message it sends.
Apparently Radcliffe is 79.
I heard that also. Some of our Church troubles are generational. Young clergy and religious tend to be more orthodox.
The 1970s will eventually give way to the March of Time.
Radcliff will be 80 on August 22, 2025, so maybe his predictable vote will not be part of the next conclave.
Waiting, here, to learn more from bios on the others, and especially and hopefully wondering what to expect from those who are not coupled geographically with the Western apostasy from natural law…Japan, (a Belgian in) Iran, (a Ukrainian in) Australia, India, Peru, Indonesia, Argentina, Ecuador, Chile, Philippines, Serbia, Brazil, Ivory Coast, Algeria and Lithuania. Otherwise, geographically, Canada, United Kingdom (Radcliff), and three from Italy.
Now this profile from the National Catholic Register about the 21 new cardinals:
https://www.ncregister.com/news/pope-francis-latest-cardinal-picks
The one thing I see in this is the usual promotions of his Southern American buddies whose theological background is well known, the prefect dealing with travel????? And a 44 year old?!? But what is interesting is that there is a country that has more Catholic participation than any country in the western world and has been repeatedly been denied a red hat and it is Uganda! Why? Because it takes its theological and committment to values that is needed now in this world and in the Church! But the Pope is content to give out hats to youngsters of 44 years old and to his goucho buddies etc and sodomic life style promoters! Oh Lord Jesus, how hard and difficult thou Cross is and how sore our backs have become in its carrying! COME QUICKLY OH MASTER AND GIVE YOUR BRIDE THE PEACE SHE ULTIMATELY GRAVES!
Congratulations. It’s a fine blend of the young and the young at heart. Wishing the team of the 21 Eminences strength and stamina in their service to God’s people.
And Toronto’s Archbishop Frank Leo is only 53.
I noticed that there are no Americans among the new Cardinals. I live in the Archdiocese of Baltimore and we are the oldest Archdiocese in the US and have often had a Cardinal, but not anymore.
I also noticed that many are from South America or Asia. This new crop of Cardinals should have much influence on the next Papal conclave. Francis has appointed most of the Cardinals eligible to vote. Will he step down now? Perhaps not. He recently did a grueling, very long trip. Perhaps he might just stay on until the end?
“I want to have dialogue, which is why I’m putting all my boys in positions of power” -the great anticlericalist synodalist, Jorge Bergoglio
Oh, oh, oh, pick me to be a Cardinal. I promise not to mention Christ and keep the next Conclave a gay affair.
In the meantime, fly me to Rome for some all-inclusive Synodaling. I don’t even need a voice, since I’ll be a Bishop. I can help Cardinal Radcliffe spiritually sooth the feelings of the papal guests. Trust me, I won’t mention Fr. Aidan Nichols. Mercy alone is the message; all are welcome; blah, blah, blah, no problems here.
Have mercy! It is wrong to make me synodal alone like this.
I’ve read good things about Toronto’s Archbishop Francis Leo.
BTW, his predecessor, Cardinal Thomas Collins, was/is a strong voice in favour of palliative care versus our so-called Medical Aid in Dying.
The German church has a vast over-representation of cardinals for the paltry number of practicing Catholics there.
It all makes sense why Leo was/ is so silent on the scandal of the LGBTQ in his catholic schools. He wanted the red beanie !!