
Vatican City, Oct 8, 2017 / 11:52 am (CNA/EWTN News).- While the challenge of protecting children online is one faced throughout the world, Church leaders from Asia and Africa said that the developing world faces the compounding problem of poverty.
“Online sexual income is one of the many faces and one of the many consequences of poverty,” Cardinal Luis Antonio Tagle said in an Oct. 5 keynote speech at a conference on protecting children online.
“Dehumanizing poverty, addressing the problem of dehumanizing poverty in a humanizing way, deserves the attention of all sectors of each country in Asia,” he said, explaining that in some cases, parents from poor families choose to exploit their children online “to earn money,” believing, whether out of ignorance or willful denial, that there is no harm done.
“What a shame, what a scandal, to see the poor dehumanized many times over, now turning to dehumanizing ways to gain a bit of humanity,” he said.
Businesses and industries ought “to be disturbed by economic growth or wealth generation that excludes the greater part of the population of the world,” he said, noting that “while business enterprises increase their profits though online shopping and online transactions, the lives of poor children are destroyed by online exploitation. Can we please think about that?”
Archbishop of Manila in the Philippines, Cardinal Tagle was a keynote speaker during an Oct. 3-6 conference titled “Child Dignity in the Digital World,” focusing on protecting children in an increasingly global and connected world.
The conference is organized by the Pontifical Gregorian University’s Center for Child Protection (CCP) in collaboration with the UK-based global alliance WePROTECT and the organization “Telefono Azzurro,” which is the first Italian helpline for children at risk.
Vatican Secretary of State Cardinal Pietro Parolin opened the conference on day one, and other participants include social scientists, civic leaders, and religious representatives. Discussion points include prevention of abuse, pornography, the responsibility of internet providers and the media, and ethical governance.
Beside Cardinal Tagle on the panel Cardinal John Njue, Archbishop Nairobi, Kenya, both of whom spoke on safeguarding minors in the developing world, offering the specific perspectives of Asia and Africa, respectively.
Asia
In his speech, Tagle began by noting that while the conference focuses on the digital world, in Asia child exploitation “does not happen only online,” and pointed to the various forms of exploitation that children, who are “the most vulnerable,” endure due to ethnic and religious conflicts, poverty and migration.
Citing information gathered on the Philippines from the International Justice Mission in Manila, Tagle said “it is wise not to equate online sexual exploitation of children with other forms of trafficking in human persons.”
While the two were at one time included under the same general heading, there was a slow realization that “online sexual exploitation of children deserves its own heading, because it has its unique configuration.”
In the Philippines specifically, he said, the main perpetrators of online child exploitation are sadly the parents, or other adults who know them, such as family members or neighbors.
Generally speaking, Tagle said the main victims of online sexual exploitation in the Philippines are younger than those of human trafficking, ranging in age from 10 months to 15-years old, with more boys being victimized online than in physical human trafficking.
He also pointed to the cooperation of other parties, including Western Union and PayPal, which he said both collect international payments for exploitation.
Complicating the situation, he said, is increasing access to the internet and anonymity of contacts, as well as a basic lack of knowledge about the lasting effects of this type of abuse on the victims.
While some laws do exist regarding such crimes, Cardinal Tagle said that more work must be done in educating the public about these laws and enforcing them, as well as to coordinate efforts of police, local government, families, schools, and faith-based groups.
Offering some points for reflection, Tagle said he believes there is a need in Asia specifically, and likely other regions, for “a serious anthropological, philosophical and, for us, theological study on the humanity of the child.”
He explained that in some cultures, “a child is considered a possession of the adults, therefore an object that can be disposed of by the adults according to their whims and desires.”
“Of course this is camouflaged by some acceptable cultural norms like obedience to elders, elders just exercising their responsibility over the children, the responsibility of children to augment the income of their family,” and so forth, he said, so a “holistic view of the child” is needed.
In comments to CNA after his talk, Tagle said he has a “nagging feeling” that while people throughout the world speak about “the dignity of the child,” many might still have a misunderstood vision of the child that is deeply rooted in cultural practices and norms.
“There might be a conflict between the slogans. I don’t want the dignity of children to be just a slogan,” he said. “So can we unearth, can we be honest, especially in our different cultures and in our different religious traditions: What is a child? … Can we be frank? What is our compelling vision?”
There is no universally accepted standard for what constitutes abuse, he said, so in order to eventually arrive at a consensus, “you have to go through cultures,” which is why an anthropological and philosophical study might be necessary.
There might be some cultures that justify abuse through accepted norms, “so how do you confront that culture?” he asked, adding that beyond legislation, “there is a deeper law that people have been following for centuries which is their culture, so you have to address that.”
In his talk, Tagle further reflected on this point. “We need an auto-critique: how does my culture affect my view of children and my behavior toward them?” he said, noting that in some cultures it is accepted that a young girl may be raped in order to restore honor to her family.
The cardinal said he was “aghast” to hear about this, but “it is embedded in the culture,” and this shows the need for dialogue and self-critique, not only for government officials and academics, but for parents, educators, and families as well.
He also said, based on his personal experience in the Philippines, that there is a need for a “serious study on the relation between the virtual, the digital and the real.”
This, he said, is because “some parents say they allow their children to be used online since ‘it is only virtual.’ There is no ‘real’ contact.” This could easily be an excuse, he said, but noted that it could also come from a genuine lack of knowledge “about what the virtual reality is.”
“So we need to hear the stories of children who have been asked to do sexual acts before cameras for viewing, for them to be able to bring across the reality of what is happening through virtual reality.”
Africa
Offering the perspective on the safeguarding of minors in Africa was Cardinal John Njue, Archbishop of Nairobi, which Pope Francis visited in 2015 as part of his first tour of the African continent.
In his speech, Njue painted a general picture of a continent that in many ways is still digitally illiterate, and where issues related to sex are largely taboo, but which also falls prey to the same sorts of abuses and exploitation experienced in other parts of the world, including online.
“The digital world, being a new phenomenon, has found a gray ground of abuse in Africa, where the majority of older generations expected to protect minors are not computer literate, leaving their children exposed to cyber-abuse of all kinds,” he said.
Naming just a few of the online dangers that have affected African youth, Njue cited cyber-bullying, ‘sexting,’ online grooming and gambling for money, as well as a number of suicides that have taken place as a result of the online “Blue Whale Challenge,” in which youth are encouraged to join the game and carry out a number of different challenges, the final one being suicide.
Njue said that according to statistics from communications representatives in Kenya, mobile access among citizens increased to 88.1 percent in 2016, with 37.8 million subscribers to online mobile services.
Other gains were seen in the general internet data market, which spiked to 31.9 million people going digital. However, “telecommunications offices remain largely unregulated, and children remain vulnerable,” he said.
Generally speaking, Njue said that as far as Africa goes, “safeguarding of minors has been neglected in our society.”
In many ways it is a “culture of silence,” he said, explaining that even for parents to bring up human sexuality with their children “is a taboo subject in most of our communities in Kenya, and Africa at large.”
Needed infrastructure is also lacking in many African countries, he said, explaining that law enforcement officers “are not adequately trained and equipped” to deal with cyber-abuse, while the majority of adults “are not computer literate, and therefore are at a disadvantage in knowing what their children are doing with their computers and mobile phones.”
Some have taken advantage of this lack of awareness to promote inappropriate sexual content even through cartoons, with children watching the shows in front of their parents, who are often unconcerned “out of ignorance.”
Poverty, he said, is also a key cause of exploitation, and children are often left alone, as parents are frequently out of the house all day for work.
“This exposes the vulnerable children to all kinds of abuses with no one to protect them from the perpetrators,” Njue said, adding that political strife on the African continent such as the conflicts in Sudan, Somalia, the Democratic Republic of the Congo and the Central African Republic compound the problem, leaving women and children “in danger of all forms of abuse.”
There is also a lack of advocacy and a lack of funds for awareness-raising, he said, because many people are afraid to speak out in a society “which views issues of sexual abuse as taboo, not to be discussed in the open.”
As far as what can be done, Njue echoed Pope Francis’ frequent call for greater training of Church personnel and the enactment of laws “to ensure that these sins have no place in their Church. This is why we are here.”
Laws ought to be more stringent, he said, and the faithful, particularly in schools and educational institutes, must also be educated on the dangers involved in internet activities to so that children do not fall victim to abuse or bullying online.
When in 2011 the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith requested that all bishops’ conferences issue guidelines for safeguarding minors, Kenya responded by issuing a document titled “Safeguarding children, policies and procedures,” Njue said.
However, he said that due to “a lack of data and expertise,” the Kenyan bishops’ conference, as well as others in Africa, “are not able to do much in safeguarding children from cyber-bullying. This is where the conference needs help.”
In terms of action points that could be implemented, Njue said governments must set up a “singular body” that monitors the internet, as was done in the UK, and which takes down websites found to publish and disseminate child pornography.
Parents must also be more pro-active in monitoring what their children do online, he said. And laws must be implemented to handle cases where the child is both the “victim and the perpetrator of cyber-crime” by ‘sexting’ lewd images of themselves on apps like WhatsApp or Snapchat, he said, and again pointed to models already existing in the UK.
Elders, chiefs and local administration in various villages also ought to be informed of digital risks, and educational institutions ought to push media channels to ensure that television companies are offering appropriate content at times when families might be watching, he said.
As far as the Church goes, Njue said she must first of all accompany children by giving them a solid education in Christian values, “thus empowering and creating a good foundation of morals in them.”
The Church should also take advantage of the various groups, associations, movements and educational institutions she runs in order to educate children on cyber-bullying and sexual abuse to ensure their protection. Similarly, clergy and religious should also be given adequate information on risks and prevention.
Njue also called for heavy investment for counseling and rescue services for victims, and for greater cooperation with the state and with law enforcement to ensure proper training and that all cases “are followed to the end.”
“The safeguarding of minors is a multi-faceted social problem that requires the synergy of all disciplines to bring about prevention,” Njue said, stressing that regional and international collaboration are necessary throughout Africa “if we are to respond to the challenges of child online abuse in a digitally, culturally diverse world.”
Sexual abuse is a problem “across all borders,” he said. “From the poorest remote village in Africa, Asia and Latin America, to the richest countries in the developed world, there is no exclusion.”
Because of this, “it is our cardinal duty and obligation to see to it that children are protected from all forms of sexual abuses, including cyber-bullying and pornographic movies, and to fully implement the laws and regulations to the letter,” Njue said.
He insisted that the Church, and society as a whole, “should advertise zero-tolerance to any form of abuse of minors,” and voiced his hope that the conference would “be the beginning of a new journey.”
[…]
While at his incredible journey’s end Pope Francis evocated his political spirit and fired a broadside into the middle of American politics. He detonated Catholic moral doctrine to smithereens declaring that resistance to illegal migration is a grave sin equal to abortion. Obviously he’s supporting Kamala Harris, who supports open borders, by downplaying Trump’s much less egregious position on abortion.
Apart from my hyperbole Pope Francis in calling resistance to migration a sin then comparing it to abortion which does call murder, nevertheless on placing the two moral issues as the lesser evil to consider logically equates the gravity of both.
And he abandoned the proscriptions of the Eighth Commandment when a failure to give resistance to drug cartels, human trafficking, convicted murderers, and international terrorists crossing a border with impunity constitutes an evil in itself. Neither does he consider faulting himself for how his complicity in simplistic characterizations of serious border issues might mask his own involvement in what has become a worldwide hate movement by anti-Christian progressivist forces to slander the intentions of populist resistance to elitism. How does a Church deal with a Pope who shows little self-awareness of complicity with anti-Christian forces?
We read: “There is only one God, and religions are like languages that try to express ways to approach God. Some Sikh, some Muslim, some Hindu, some Christian.”
A good point about our human unity and languages, but nothing in this brief article about the language of the one God–“the Word made flesh” (Jn 1:14)–as God then touches our “expressions” with his own Self-Disclosure (!). The Second Person of the Triune One, as the incarnate Jesus Christ. More than a figure of speech, and in whom Christian witnesses find the graced gift of “Hope”…
Wonderfully revealing words by Pope Francis, as he does his best around the world – at enormous expense – to outdo the intereligious popularity of The Dalai Lama.
“‘Religions are seen as paths trying to reach God. I will use an analogy: They are like different languages that express the divine,’ the pope explained.” Pope Francis on Friday 13th September 2024
This is called unitarianism and it is a heresy. The words Apostle Paul addressed to the Corinthians in about 55 AD, may well still apply:
“Even if our Gospel is veiled, it is veiled to those who are perishing. In their case the god of this world (aka Satan) has blinded the minds of the unbelievers, to keep them from seeing the light of the Gospel of the glory of Christ, who is the image of God.” 2 Corinthians 4:3-4
Sad to reflect: despite the piles of newsgrabbing glamour (that every Catholic has paid for) our current leader may rank, in Saint Paul’s terms, as a ‘perishing pontif’.
Always in the grace & mercy of King Jesus Christ; love & blessings from marty
Love and friendship are his mantras. His Holiness Pope Francis has touched the hearts of the young and the young at heart in Singapore, PNG, Indonesia, and Timor-Leste.
What exactly is “loving” about being so consumed with sentimentality and wanting to be admired as more open than those reduced to strawman caricatures of the past that one would never give a moment’s thought to the evil consequences of what one is validating for the future? Why is it morally superior to endorse the immorality advocated by religions that promote immorality and murder? Is this more of Francis’ “mercy” without qualification? Like when Francis never thinks about mercy for the victims of sin when he only talks about mercy for the sinners no longer having to have repentance?
Is Francis going to be around to pick up the pieces after the damage done from the simplistic platitudes of poison he gave to young people?
While Dr Coelho accents the positive interpretation of the unity of different religions, some absent a specific identification of a unique Godhead as a good thing, an indication of seeking God, which Lumen Gentium recognizes in the three monotheistic religions and by inference others, commenters P Dr Rice perceived the detriment of a Unitarian type vision. I would add Baháʼí, an Iranian Abrahamic unity of all believes reducing God to manifestations of God according to Wikipedia scholars.
Experience in Malawi Africa with Anglicans, Dutch Reformed, 7th day Adventists [across the border in Zambia although prohibited in Malawi] in which all of these religious groups cooperated in offering hospitality, emergency medical care with evident charity was an experience that will forever color my vision. However, the issue with Pope Francis appears to be in the direction of his putative validation of the incomplete conceptions of God and morality held by those outside of Catholicism and the relinquishing of the unique evangelization commission by Christ.
In short: to come to the aid of those in distress, in cooperation with whoever will help, is Catholic Christianity made manifest in social action.
To conceive & announce that this means the teachings of Christ are only one of many ways to God, is a pernicious error. Jesus Christ offers the world ONE way to God; and The Catholic Church, at its best, teaches the world that ONE way.
Being a good person is what all humans, at our best, do! This is not of itself salvific.
Salvation of a human soul depends completely on repentance for our sins, reliance upon Jesus Christ as our Savior, and our living in obedience to His teachings.
Ipso facto, non-Christian religions cannot save a soul. Their teachings are misleading.
For any Christian, let alone a Catholic Pope, to teach otherwise, is an anti-Apostolic abomination. Such teachers are manifestly apostates.
Ever seeking to hear & lovingly obey King Jesus Christ; blessings from marty
Dr Rice. My response to this highly important matter of salvation outside the Church is responded to below. Please read.
Apparently, in the official translation, “ma sono diversi cammini” with which the Pope ended the particular section, was omitted. If I understand correctly what went on overall, omitting this part would enhance the confusion /worsen the foible.
Maybe the Holy Father actually understands the predicament he is placing the faithful in and accepts for it to come out like that; I can not tell. I believe it runs counter to the faith to be rounding up everyone ecumenically as a group into, like, a single herd of wild mustang and driving it all at once to a corral. While telling everyone in advance that the ones to watch out for are the faithful who will be bucking.
“Because it has to be so.” It does?
What to think? “The Holy Father seems at a loss to creatively but faithfully proclaim the faith.” Or, “The Holy Father is saying we can suspend the proclamation.”
https://onepeterfive.com/pope-francis-every-religion-is-a-way-to-arrive-at-god/
From the first reading for Holy Mass, Saturday 14th September –
“Does this mean that the food sacrificed to idols has a real value, or that the idol itself is real? Not at all. It simply means that the sacrifices that they offer they sacrifice to demons who are not God. I have no desire to see you in communion with demons.”
“You cannot drink the cup of the Lord and the cup of demons. You cannot tak your share at the table of the Lord and at the table of demons.”
“Do you want to make the Lord angry; are we stronger than He is?”
From all appearances our current Pope thinks he is stronger. Sad days indeed.
Well has it been written that The Word of God is the sword of The Holy Spirit, finely dividing truth from error.
Catholic brothers & sisters in Christ: let us stay strong in The Word that saves.
Always in the love of The Lamb of God; peace & blessing from marty
Dr Rice. Is salvation possible outside the Church? Is it possible outside of Christianity itself?
Leonard Feeney was a Jesuit priest who was excommunicated in 1953 for preaching that salvation was only available through the Roman Catholic Church. The Holy Office, under Pius XII, sent a letter to the Archbishop of Boston, condemning Feeney’s error.
There are two truths that clash on this issue, the doctrine that there is no salvation outside the Church versus the doctrine that there is indeed salvation outside of formally belonging to the Church. The following attests to the latter:
Holy Office, Aug 9, 1949, condemning doctrine of L. Feeney [DS 3870]: “It is not always required that one be actually incorporated as a member of the Church, but this at least is required: that one adhere to it in wish and desire. It is not always necessary that this be explicit, but when a man labors under invincible ignorance, God accepts even an implicit will, called by that name because it is contained in the good disposition of soul in which a man wills to conform his will to the will of God.”
“Vatican II, #16: [1964 AD] For they who without their own fault do not know of the Gospel of Christ and His Church, but yet seek God with sincere heart, and try, under the influence of grace, to carry out His will in practice, known to them through the dictate of conscience, can attain eternal salvation.”
Dr Rice there are indeed persons who do not know our God as we worship him, yet as indicated in the above are aware of him in the leanings of the heart toward charity, men and women who respond to grace won for all by Christ’s passion and death on the cross. And to your sentiment this doesn’t advocate that salvation is widely available to all men outside the Church, an heretical conflation of the truth explained above. A heresy that has curtailed the extensive missionary activity of the past, lamented by Benedict XVI. That there is salvation outside the Church doesn’t mean that entrance into the Catholic Church is unnecessary, nor that entrance into the Church greatly improves virtually beyond measure our desire for salvation. Nor does it presume those who hear the word of God and have knowledge of his Church and reject it, do not condemn themselves.
Finally, without Christ’s teaching, passion, death, and resurrection there would be no salvation for man, except for the blessed exceptions Abraham, Joseph, Judith, Moses et Al [for example those born before Christ who led holy lives were the retroactive beneficiary of Christ’s grace won for later them].
Dear Fr Peter, thank you for your informed & informative comments on the conundrum of extra-Ecclesial salvations.
The Old Testament assures us of the ascension to Heaven of Enoch, Moses, & Elijah. Maybe these were found to be prolepses of the humbly obedient righteousness of the eternal Christ, meriting their salvation through Him.
The Psalmist assures us that God knows & saves those who love God (E.g. Ps 91:14; Ps 145:20).
The author of Hebrews 9:15 also engages with the question of the salvation of those under the Old Covenant.
Yet, our Lord Jesus Christ is the only complete & perfect revelation of God.
In short – if we don’t love Jesus Christ, we don’t love God.
1 Peter 3:19 may help with this conundrum. It could be extended to imply that every departing human soul that has ever existed experiences Christ preaching The Gospel to them.
None are deprived of the choice to love or reject Jesus, who is truly The Way, The Truth, & and The Life for all who love God.
What then is the value of knowing and obeying God’s commandments, or of being a Catholic or other Christian?
Well, the author of Hebrews 9:27 assures us that when we die we will face judgment. For a Catholic or other Christian who has lived in obedience to Christ that judgment should hold no fear, as in e.g. 1 John 4:18 – “There is no fear in love, but perfect love casts out fear; for fear has to do with punishment, and whoever fears has not reached perfection in love.”
So, bringing people into The Church, its Sacramental journey, and its ministry can ensure that they hear and obey the Apostolic witness to Jesus; preparing them in advance for meeting Christ face-to-face when they die. Obviously a HUGE advantage.
In this way, at least for me, the Scriptures enable one to believe that every departed human soul has an opportunity to chose to love God & be saved eternally by listening to Christ preach His Gospel.
Thus John 10:27-30 might be a salvation statute that applies both in life and, pressingly, at the moment of death . . .
For Catholics: the whole ministry of The Church thus prepares our souls to pass this test-of-all-tests.
Hence: our urgent call to evangelize and baptise all people everywhere, so they become ready to meet Jesus face-to-face.
This is not claiming the lives of non-Christians cannot prepare them to meet The LORD. It claims that becoming a Christian and lovingly following Christ’s Way is BY FAR the best way to prepare for our common, post-mortem encounter with God.
We Catholics, with substantial reasons, claim that ours is the original & best Christian preparation for that fateful, unavoidable meeting with Righteousness-in-Person. May our Catholic faithfulness give us humble, confident assurance. And, a passionate love for all others, to help them join us in our Catholic Christian pilgrimage of preparation.
Well, dear Fr Peter that’s my best reflection at the moment on this famous theological conundrum .
Looking forward to any comments you might make.
Always seeking to be faithful to the Apostolic revelation of King Jesus Christ; blessings from marty
Agreed with your conclusion expressed here Dr Rice, that Christ revealed a singular, exclusive message for salvation to all Mankind.
Agreed.
And that “message for salvation” relies entirely on Jesus Christ in Person.
“For The Father judges no one; He has entrusted all judgment to The Son, so that all may honour The Son as they honour The Father. Whoever refuses honour to The Son refuses honour to The Father who sent Him.” John 5:22-23
Catholics (including every pope) are duty bound to let everyone know that, at death, their soul will answer to King Jesus Christ. Not to any pagan deity, buddha, mohommed, etc., etc.
Failure to do that reveals a lack of love for God and a neglect of human souls. Serious stuff . . .
In the grace & mercy of King Jesus Christ; love & blessings from marty
It might be worth adding that a crucial (even ‘fatal’) distinction often eludes today’s Catholic & other Christian teachers.
Yes! Most certainly, in this life God loves all human souls unconditionally (Christ crucified witnesses to that wonderful truth).
The ungodly are loved unconditionally as much as the godly [Matthew 5:45]. All, all . . .
In contrast: strict conditions apply upon death when each human soul will face Christ as Judge of all.
No longer: “All, all . . .” but: “Well done . . !” for some souls. “Depart from Me . . !” for others.
Surely, it’s that: “Depart from Me, I don’t know you . . !” that should make Catholics, from Pope to pewsitters, deeply serious about obeying the Apostolic instructions that teach us how to be good & faithful servants in the eyes of our one-and-only eternal Judge?
Failure to teach the flock that in this life God’s unconditional love is simply our opportunity to live in obedience to Christ’s instructions, so as to merit His favourable judgment when we die, is very serious. That failure places such a teacher in danger of losing their soul.
Its fatal to think God’s unparalleled goodness in this life to both good & wicked humans means both good & wicked will be approved by King Jesus Christ when He judges our souls. At judgment there’s no: “All, all . . .”.
The Apostolic witness is that only a few are approved – Matthew 7:14; with the majority rejected – Matthew 7:13.
As a life-time teacher, now in my eighties, I appeal to all teachers to teach the living truth the Apostles have given us.
Let’s summarize with the words of John, the Apostle of Love:
“Little children let no one deceive you. Everyone who does what is right is righteous, just as He (Jesus Christ) is righteous. Everyone who commits sin is a child of the devil, for the devil has been sinning from the beginning.” 1 John 3:7-8
Always in awe of God’s revelation in Christ Jesus, our King; love & blessings from marty