The exterior of Georgetown University’s School of Medicine in Washington, D.C. / Shutterstock
Denver, Colo., Jul 10, 2023 / 08:44 am (CNA).
The U.S. bishops have reaffirmed the importance of education access for marginalized racial groups after the U.S. Supreme Court ruled against affirmative action in higher education.
“Education is a gift, an opportunity, and an important aspect of our democracy that is not always within the reach of all, especially racial and ethnic groups who find themselves on the margins,” Auxiliary Bishop Joseph Perry of Chicago, chairman of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops’ Ad Hoc Committee Against Racism, said in a July 7 statement. “It is our hope that our Catholic institutions of higher learning will continue to find ways to make education possible and affordable for everyone, regardless of their background.”
Perry cited St. Katharine Drexel, a pioneer of Catholic education: “If we wish to serve God and love our neighbor as well, we must manifest our joy in the service we render to him and them. Let us open wide our hearts. It is joy which invites us. Press forward and fear nothing,” Drexel said.
Perry noted Drexel was quoted in the title of the U.S. bishops’ 2018 pastoral letter “Open Wide Our Hearts: The Enduring Call to Love.”
The June 29 U.S. Supreme Court decision Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard concerned the affirmative action programs at Harvard University and the University of North Carolina.
However, the decision will impact all universities across the country, including Catholic institutions.
In the 6-3 decision, authored by Chief Justice John Roberts, the nation’s highest court effectively struck down public and private universities’ ability to include race-based affirmative action in their admissions decisions.
For decades, many universities have used affirmative action in their admissions programs to increase minority representation on their campuses. However, some have argued that affirmative action promotes the admission of certain ethnic minorities at the expense of others, often negatively impacting Asian students.
In the ruling, Roberts wrote that “Harvard’s consideration of race has led to an 11.1% decrease in the number of Asian-Americans admitted to Harvard.”
Leaders of numerous individual Catholic universities strongly criticized the decision, as did the Association of Catholic Colleges and Universities (ACCU). The association, founded in 1899, has dozens of Catholic institutions as members and describes itself as the “voice of Catholic higher education.”
In a June 29 statement, the ACCU said the decision ignores “the more-than-apparent effects of continued racism in our society.” It objected that the decision undermines higher education’s voluntary efforts to solve the “social evil” of racism “in a society that provides too few solutions.”
The statement added that the ACCU would seek to act within the boundaries of the Supreme Court decision and continue to be guided by Catholic social teaching “to create paths by which those in society who do not have opportunity find it at our institutions.”
Georgetown University, a Jesuit school in the District of Columbia, led a coalition of Catholic universities and colleges that filed an amicus brief to the Supreme Court in support of affirmative action in the Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard case. The brief was joined by The Catholic University of America in Washington, D.C., and 55 other Catholic universities and colleges from across the country.
The brief argued for the “allowance of the use of race as one factor among others in college and university admissions policies.” It suggested affirmative action was part of religious freedom, saying “the free exercise of religion provides additional constitutional weight to the compelling interest in racial diversity in admissions for the Catholic institutions of higher learning.”
Justice Sonia Sotomayor cited the brief in her dissenting opinion.
Georgetown University President John DeGioia issued a June 29 statement decrying the court’s decision. He vowed that the university would “remain committed” to “recruit, enroll, and support students from all backgrounds to ensure an enriching educational experience.”
[…]
Do Catholics want Universal Brotherhood or Catholicism? With all due respect to the active Ministerium you occupy, you might meditate ppBXVI :
“By her nature the Church does not herself engage in politics; rather, She respects the autonomy of the state and its ordering.”
Ignatius Press, God is Love, Annexe. Introduction written by the former holder of the Papal Munus, ppBXVI.
Like all fellow mortals, politicians are human, fragile and mortal. During their brief tenure of humble service to humankind and Planet Earth, they are known to generate good and very ideas. We need to pray for their wellbeing and good health.
Yes on all points. And yet, there falls the shadow…
The problem is that even elected folks who attend to the needs of abstract “humankind” too often do not much care for real people in the concrete. The most egregious example is the Gulag. And, as for “Planet Earth,” this too has merit, but we also pray that politicians can tell the difference between responsible stewardship and an airbrush and one-world ideology.
So, too, the “service of their own people, working for integral human development and the common good.” With “integral human development” defined as the whole person [!] and all persons. And, about the elusive riddle of the rarely-defined “common good,” how to do both Solidarity AND Subsidiarity always together?
Some clues:
CLUE #1: “The common good does not consist in the simple sum of the particular goods of each subject of a social entity. Belonging to everyone and to each person, it is and remains ‘common,’ because it is indivisible and because only together is it possible to attain it, increase it and safeguard its effectiveness, with regard also to the future” (“Compendium of the Social Doctrine of the Church,” 2004, n. 164).
CLUE #2: “Catholic political philosophy asserts that in human nature is the origin of the state. Here it must be stated that ‘human nature’ should be understood in its full philosophical meaning. Human nature does not [!] mean the empirical, psychological nature as the politician or the advertising businessman sees it. The state originates in the bodily and spiritual nature of man. Nature or essence is also the end of man’s activity and striving. Therefore the political status is necessary for the fulfillment of man’s end; the state is an intentional disposition of human nature . . . the state is not a supernatural, immediately divine establishment. Yet, as originating in human nature, divinely established, the state is part and subject of the order of the Creator” (Heinrich Rommen, LL.D., The State in Catholic Thought: A Treatise in Political Philosophy (St. Louis, Mo.: Herder Book Co., 1945), 220-1.
CLUE #3: The common good “embraces the sum of those conditions of social life by which individuals, families, and groups can achieve their own fulfillment [!] in a relatively thorough and ready way” (Rommen).
Subsidiarity is not only the lower and more local levels of government, but also those communities and initiatives other than any level of government or within the domain of politicians.
July 25 I had called on the Holy Father in the CWR Extra, extra! feature of July 24, to condemn the abortion meeting the Jesuits and the Kennedys held between themselves back in the Sixites. See in the Comments in the CWR link.
I said “Correct and condemn it.” This month’s Papal intention could be the correction?
https://www.catholicworldreport.com/2024/07/24/extra-extra-news-and-views-for-wednesday-july-24-2024/