Arizona House Republicans blocked two attempts on Wednesday to repeal an 1864 law protecting life at conception.
In a near party-line 30-30 vote on Wednesday, House Democrats failed to gain a majority of votes to suspend the Legislature’s rules to fast-track a so-called “abortion ban repeal” bill that would have overturned the 1864 pro-life law.
Dormant since being invalidated by Roe v. Wade in 1973, the 1864 law protects all unborn life from conception and imposes prison time for those who “provide, supply, or administer” an abortion.
This temporarily stalls ongoing efforts to repeal the law, which is set to go into effect in the next 37 days.
Debate on the House floor was tense just before the vote as Democrats called the pro-life law “abhorrent” and “archaic.”
Democratic Rep. Alma Hernandez bashed Republicans, saying that “the fact that we will not even entertain a motion to allow those who have been raped or pregnant by incest to be able to have an abortion is extremely, extremely disappointing.”
Republican Rep. Ben Toma, meanwhile, said: “I understand that we have deeply held beliefs [about abortion], and I would ask everyone in this chamber to respect the fact that some of us believe that abortion is in fact the murder of children.”
Abortion is currently legal in Arizona until the 15th week of pregnancy. If the 1864 law takes effect, however, all abortion will be illegal, except in cases in which the mother’s life is in danger.
Outrage from abortion advocates erupted last week when the Arizona Supreme Court issued an April 9 ruling that cleared the way for the law to go back into effect. The court ruled that since the U.S. Supreme Court overruled Roe in the 2022 Dobbs v. Jackson decision, there were no legal reasons to keep the law from being enforced.
Planned Parenthood is continuing abortions in Arizona for the time being. The abortion organization holds that a separate ruling by the Maricopa County Superior Court keeps the 1864 law from being enforced until 45 days after the high court’s ruling.
After the state Supreme Court’s ruling, Democrats in the Arizona House moved quickly to repeal the law, demanding a vote on the measure on April 10. That attempt was also blocked by Republicans. After their efforts to repeal the law were blocked, Democrats began shouting “shame” and “blood on your hands” at their Republican colleagues on the House floor.
This comes as Arizona will likely be one of several states considering an abortion-until-birth amendment on the ballot this November. If passed, the amendment would enshrine a “right” to abortion in the state constitution, strike down virtually all of Arizona’s pro-life protections, and legalize abortion until viability and through all nine months of pregnancy for physical or mental health reasons.
The group advocating for the amendment, Arizona for Abortion Access PAC, has surpassed the required number of signatures and already filed language with the state to include the proposal on the November ballot.
The Arizona secretary of state’s office has yet to verify the signatures, which must happen before the initiative will officially be on the ballot.
The Arizona Catholic Conference, which consists of the state’s four bishops, has spoken out against the ballot initiative, saying that it would “remove most safeguards for girls and women” and “allow for painful late-term abortions of viable preborn babies.”
“We do not believe that this extreme initiative is what Arizona wants or needs, and we continue to pray that it does not succeed,” the Arizona bishops said in a statement published April 9.
If you value the news and views Catholic World Report provides, please consider donating to support our efforts. Your contribution will help us continue to make CWR available to all readers worldwide for free, without a subscription. Thank you for your generosity!
Click here for more information on donating to CWR. Click here to sign up for our newsletter.
Sister Josephine Garrett gives a keynote talk at the 2024 National Eucharistic Congress in Indianapolis, which took place July 17–21, 2024. / Credit: Casey Johnson in partnership with the National Eucharistic Congress
U.S. Border czar Tom Homan defended the morality of the Trump administration’s enforcement policies. / Credit: “The World Over with Raymond Arroyo”/Screenshot
Washington, D.C. Newsroom, Nov 14, 2025 / 15:13 pm (CNA).
Border czar Tom Homan stron… […]
The trailer of the upcoming Russell Crowe movie “The Pope’s Exorcist” indicates that the film might not do justice to the Italian exorcist Father Gabriel Amorth or the rite of exorcism as practiced in the Catholic Church, according to an exorcist organization Amorth himself helped to found.
The International Association of Exorcists on March 7 voiced concern that the film seems to fall under the category of “splatter cinema,” which it calls a “sub-genre of horror.”
The Vatican, the statement said, is filmed with a high-contrast “chiaroscuro” effect seen in film noir.
This gives the film a “‘Da Vinci Code’ effect to instill in the public the usual doubt: Who is the real enemy? The devil or ecclesiastical ‘power’?” the exorcists’ association said.
While special effects are “inevitable” in every film about demonic possession, “everything is exaggerated, with striking physical and verbal manifestations, typical of horror films,” the group said.
“This way of narrating Don Amorth’s experience as an exorcist, in addition to being contrary to historical reality, distorts and falsifies what is truly lived and experienced during the exorcism of truly possessed people,” said the association, which claims more than 800 exorcist members and more than 120 auxiliary members worldwide.
“In addition, it is offensive with regard to the state of suffering in which those who are victims of an extraordinary action of the devil find themselves,” the group’s statement added. The statement responded to the release of the movie trailer and promised a more in-depth response to the film’s April 14 theatrical release.
Father Gabriele Amorth, chief exorcist of Rome, speaks to CNA on May 22, 2013. Steven Driscoll/CNA
Amorth, who died at age 91 in 2016, said he performed an estimated 100,000 exorcisms during his life. He was perhaps the world’s best-known exorcist and the author of many books, including “An Exorcist Tells His Story,” reportedly an inspiration for the upcoming movie.
Several of Amorth’s books are carried by the U.S. publisher Sophia Institute Press. The publisher’s newly released book “The Pope’s Exorcist: 101 Questions About Fr. Gabriele Amorth” is an interview in which the priest addresses many topics ranging from prayer to pop music.
Michael Lichens, editor and spokesperson at Sophia Institute Press, voiced some agreement with the exorcist group.
“The International Association of Exorcists is right to be concerned and I’m thankful for their words,” Lichens told CNA. “My hope is that audiences will remember that Father Amorth is a real person with a great legacy and perhaps a few moviegoers will look up an interview or pick up his books.”
“This was a man who included St. Padre Pio and Blessed Giacomo Alberione as mentors, as well as Servant of God Candido Amantini, who was his teacher for the ministry of exorcism,” he said. “Father Amorth fought as a partisan as a young man and grew to fight greater evil as an exorcist. His life is an inspiration and I know that his work and words will still reach many.”
Amorth was born in Modena, Italy, on May 1, 1925. In wartime Italy, he was a soldier with the underground anti-fascist partisans. He was ordained a priest in 1951. He did not become an exorcist until 1986, when Cardinal Ugo Poletti, the vicar general of the Diocese of Rome, named him the diocesan exorcist.
The priest was frequently in the news for his comments on the subject of demonic forces. In an interview with The Sunday Telegraph in 2000, he said: “I speak with the devil every day. I talk to him in Latin. He answers in Italian. I have been wrestling with him, day in, day out, for 14 years.”
The movie “The Pope’s Exorcist” claims to be “inspired by the actual files of the Vatican’s chief exorcist.” The Sony Pictures movie stars the New Zealand-born actor Russell Crowe as Amorth. Crowe’s character wears a gray beard and speaks English with a noticeable accent.
“The majority of cases do not require an exorcism,” the Amorth character says in the movie’s first trailer. A cardinal explains that Crowe’s character recommends 98% of people who seek an exorcism to doctors and psychiatrists instead.
“The other 2%… I call it… evil,” Crowe adds.
The plot appears to concern Amorth’s encounter with a particular demon. Crowe’s character suggests the Church “has fought this demon before” but covered it up.
“We need to find out why,” he says.
The trailer shows short dramatic scenes of exorcism, including a confrontation between Amorth and a girl apparently suffering demonic possession.
The International Association of Exorcists said such a representation makes exorcism become “a spectacle aimed at inspiring strong and unhealthy emotions, thanks to a gloomy scenography, with sound effects such as to inspire only anxiety, restlessness, and fear in the viewer.”
“The end result is to instill the conviction that exorcism is an abnormal, monstrous, and frightening phenomenon, whose only protagonist is the devil, whose violent reactions can be faced with great difficulty,” said the exorcist group. “This is the exact opposite of what occurs in the context of exorcism celebrated in the Catholic Church in obedience to the directives imparted by it.”
CNA sought comment from Sony Pictures and “The Pope’s Exorcist” executive producer Father Edward Siebert, SJ, but did not receive a response by publication.
Amorth co-founded the International Association of Exorcists with Father René Laurentin in 1994. In 2014 the Catholic Church recognized the group as a Private Association of the Faithful.
The association trains exorcists and promotes their incorporation into local communities and normal pastoral care. It also aims to promote “correct knowledge” about exorcism ministry and collaboration with medical and psychiatric experts who have competence in spirituality.
Exorcism is considered a sacramental, not a sacrament, of the Church. It is a liturgical rite that only a priest can perform.
Hollywood made the topic a focus most famously in the 1973 movie “The Exorcist,” based on the novel by William Peter Blatty.
“Most movies about Catholicism and spiritual warfare sensationalize,” Lichens of Sophia Institute Press told CNA. “Sensationalism and terror sell tickets. As a fan of horror movies, I can understand and even appreciate that. As a Catholic who has studied Father Amorth, though, I think such sensationalism distorts the important work of exorcism.”
“On the other hand, ‘The Exorcist’ made the wider public more curious about this overlooked ministry. That is a good thing that came out, despite other reservations and concerns,” he continued. “Still, I would love it if a screenwriter and director spoke to exorcists and tried to show the often-quotidian parts of the ministry.”
An unhealthy curiosity can be a problem, Lichens said.
“When I work as a spokesperson for Amorth’s books, I am always concerned about inspiring curiosity about the demonic,” he told CNA. “As Christians, we know we have nothing to fear from the demonic but curiosity might lead some to want to seek out the supernatural or the demonic. Father Amorth has dozens of stories of people who found themselves afflicted after party game seances.”
Lichens encouraged those who are curious to read more of Amorth’s writings, some of which are excerpted on the Catholic Exchange website. Sophia Institute Press has published “Diary of an American Exorcist” by Monsignor Stephen Rosetti and “The Exorcism Files” by the American lay Catholic Adam Blai.
“First and foremost, Father Amorth was involved in a healing ministry,” Lichens said. “Like other exorcists, his work often involved doctors in physical and mental health because the goal is to bring healing and hope to the potentially afflicted.”
“Those of us who read Amorth might have been excited to read firsthand accounts of spiritual warfare, but readers quickly see a man whose heart was always full of love for those who sought his help,” he added.
The International Association of Exorcists, for its part, praised the 2016 documentary “Deliver Us,” saying this shows “what exorcism really is in the Catholic Church and “the authentic traits of a Catholic exorcist.” It shows exorcism as “a most joyful event,” in their view, because through experiencing “the presence and action of Christ the Lord and of the Communion of the Saints,” those who are “tormented by the extraordinary action of the devil gradually find liberation and peace.”
Trump, by his latest declarations, reveals he is not setting up for an incremental removal of abortion; instead, he is leading what amounts to a abortion inclusive balanced approach to accommodating what are considered to be admissible abortions.
Two of the consequences of that approach would likely be that State level criminalizing of abortion would not be supported -would be undermined- and the FACE law would be made to stand.
Trump has made his move knowing it can marginalize true pro-life. He has made a calculation that he can suffer that and be successful anyway. And, that he can use it to force some pro-life support.
Priests will be suggesting that voting for him will be the lesser evil than voting for Biden. For various reasons. In fact it is not possible for Catholics to vote for a man who has declared openly and explicitly for abortion.
The fact that President Biden can be considered excommunicated does not allow voting for a non-Catholic who promises to arrange structured abortion society and law.
I can’t agree with Stephen P. White -see CATHOLIC THING “Incrementalism and Abortion”.
Trump is not even doing incrementalism and he is saying so. He might read this and try and adjust his tune; however, the horse left the stable. He set his move away from “Dobbs no right to abortion”, by inserting a “Dobbs accommodation of abortion by straight laws”. This is not contemplated in the JPII statement because now pro-life is being actively commandeered into the abortion structuring and adaptations.
Trump and his people have been studying us. They are defining the political engagement with the law as the Dobbs result. It would seem then that, until otherwise shown, the minority opinion in Dobbs is the fallback interpretation key.
They mean to shackle pro-life.
It does not mean pro-life is lost. I suggest it means pro-life needs new targets and modalities and new realism; and that this really could be fortuitous.
I have said elsewhere if you do not come to terms with the new semantics (Dobbs) and how that is followed, they will run circles round you.
“Trump is not even doing incrementalism and he is saying so.” No kidding. His character and his history have been on display all along, so anyone who thought he was the second coming of Ronald Reagan was willfully deceiving himself. Trump is a New Yorker who has New York values, but he opportunistically chose to play the role of what he thinks a conservative is — really, a cartoon caricature of a conservative. It is because he lacks real conservative convictions that he happily endorses Bud Light and Disney World and is baffled when some refuse to go along.
Sometimes the lesser evil is still too evil to accept. Be careful before you deny that, or you’re only being picky about which demon you sell your soul to.
Trump, by his latest declarations, reveals he is not setting up for an incremental removal of abortion; instead, he is leading what amounts to a abortion inclusive balanced approach to accommodating what are considered to be admissible abortions.
Two of the consequences of that approach would likely be that State level criminalizing of abortion would not be supported -would be undermined- and the FACE law would be made to stand.
Trump has made his move knowing it can marginalize true pro-life. He has made a calculation that he can suffer that and be successful anyway. And, that he can use it to force some pro-life support.
Priests will be suggesting that voting for him will be the lesser evil than voting for Biden. For various reasons. In fact it is not possible for Catholics to vote for a man who has declared openly and explicitly for abortion.
The fact that President Biden can be considered excommunicated does not allow voting for a non-Catholic who promises to arrange structured abortion society and law.
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/planned-parenthood-committed-record-392715-abortions-last-year-annual-report/?utm_source=featured-news&utm_campaign=usa
I can’t agree with Stephen P. White -see CATHOLIC THING “Incrementalism and Abortion”.
Trump is not even doing incrementalism and he is saying so. He might read this and try and adjust his tune; however, the horse left the stable. He set his move away from “Dobbs no right to abortion”, by inserting a “Dobbs accommodation of abortion by straight laws”. This is not contemplated in the JPII statement because now pro-life is being actively commandeered into the abortion structuring and adaptations.
Trump and his people have been studying us. They are defining the political engagement with the law as the Dobbs result. It would seem then that, until otherwise shown, the minority opinion in Dobbs is the fallback interpretation key.
They mean to shackle pro-life.
It does not mean pro-life is lost. I suggest it means pro-life needs new targets and modalities and new realism; and that this really could be fortuitous.
I have said elsewhere if you do not come to terms with the new semantics (Dobbs) and how that is followed, they will run circles round you.
https://www.thecatholicthing.org/2024/04/18/incrementalism-and-abortion/
“Trump is not even doing incrementalism and he is saying so.” No kidding. His character and his history have been on display all along, so anyone who thought he was the second coming of Ronald Reagan was willfully deceiving himself. Trump is a New Yorker who has New York values, but he opportunistically chose to play the role of what he thinks a conservative is — really, a cartoon caricature of a conservative. It is because he lacks real conservative convictions that he happily endorses Bud Light and Disney World and is baffled when some refuse to go along.
… and Trump condemns them for it. https://www.theamericanconservative.com/trump-falters-on-abortion/
Sometimes the lesser evil is still too evil to accept. Be careful before you deny that, or you’re only being picky about which demon you sell your soul to.
I’m not sure what the back story is behind all this in AZ, but God bless them.