Post Francis’ post-synodal apostolic exhortation Amoris Laetitia in Vatican City on April 8, 2016. / Credit: Daniel Ibanez/CNA
Vatican City, Oct 3, 2023 / 14:00 pm (CNA).
The Vatican on Monday publicly released responses to 10 “dubia” submitted by Czech Cardinal Dominik Duka regarding “the administration of the Eucharist to divorced couples living in a new union.”
Originally submitted by the archbishop emeritus of Prague on July 13 on behalf of the Czech Bishops’ Conference, the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith’s response — signed both by Pope Francis and new prefect Cardinal Victor Manuel Fernández — had been issued to the Czech cardinal on Sept. 25.
At the heart of Duka’s dubia and the Vatican’s response was the practical application of Amoris Laetitia (“The Joy of Love”), Pope Francis’ apostolic exhortation issued after the 2015 Synod on the Family. The questions submitted focus on pastoral guidance for the reception of Communion by those sacramentally married but “divorced and remarried” to another person other than their spouse.
Read the text of the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith’s response below, translated by CNA’s Matthew Santucci:
Response to a series of questions, proposed by His Eminence Cardinal Dominik Duka, OP, regarding the administration of the Eucharist to divorced couples living in a new union.
On July 13, 2023, a request was received by this department from His Eminence Cardinal Dominik Duka, OP, archbishop emeritus of Prague, on behalf of the Czech Bishops’ Conference, who asks a series of questions regarding the administration of the Eucharist to divorced people living in a new union.
Although some of the questions are not drafted clearly enough and, therefore, may be a harbinger of some inaccuracies, this dicastery intends to respond to help resolve the doubts raised by them.
-
Is it possible for a diocese in a union of the bishops’ conference to make decisions completely autonomously, referring to the facts cited in questions 2 and 3?
The apostolic exhortation Amoris Laetitia, a document of the ordinary pontifical magisterium, towards which all are called to offer the homage of intelligence and will, states that “priests have the duty to accompany [the divorced and remarried] in helping them to understand their situation according to the teaching of the Church and the guidelines of the bishop.” In this sense, it is possible, indeed it is desirable, that the ordinary of a diocese establishes some criteria which, in line with the teaching of the Church, can help priests in the accompaniment and discernment of divorced people living in a new union.
-
Can Pope Francis’ response to the question from the pastoral section of the diocese of Buenos Aires, given that the text was published in the Acta Apostolicae Sedis, be considered an affirmation of the ordinary magisterium of the Church?
As indicated in the rescript accompanying the two documents on the Acta Apostolicae Sedis, these are published “velut magisterium authenticum,” that is, as authentic magisterium (teaching).
-
Is it a decision of the ordinary magisterium of the Church based on the document Amoris Laetitiae?
As the Holy Father recalls in his letters to the delegate of the pastoral region of Buenos Aires, Amoris Laetitia was the result of the work and prayer of the whole Church, with the mediation of two synods and the pope. This document is based on the magisterium of previous popes, who already recognized the possibility for divorced people in new unions to access the Eucharist, as long as they assume “the duty to live in complete continence, that is, by abstinence from the acts proper to married couples,” as it was proposed by John Paul II or to “commit (themselves) to living their relationship … as friends” as proposed by Benedict XVI. Francis maintains the proposal of full continence for the divorced and remarried in a new union, but admits that there may be difficulties in practicing it and therefore allows in certain cases, after adequate discernment, the administration of the sacrament of reconciliation even when it is not possible in being faithful to the continence proposed by the Church.
-
Is it Amoris Laetitiae’s intention to institutionalize this solution through a permit or an official decision for individual couples?
Point 1 of the document “basic criteria for the application of chapter VIII of Amoris Laetitia” expressly states: “It is not appropriate to speak of ‘permissions’ to access the sacraments, but rather of a process of discernment accompanied by a pastor. It is a ‘personal and pastoral’ discernment” (AL, 300). It is therefore a question of pastoral accompaniment as an exercise of the “via caritatis,” which is nothing other than an invitation to follow the path “of Jesus: of mercy and reinstatement.” Amoris Laetitia opens the possibility of accessing the sacraments of reconciliation and the Eucharist when, in a particular case, there are limitations that attenuate responsibility and culpability (guilt). On the other hand, this process of accompaniment does not necessarily end with the sacraments, but can be oriented towards other forms of integration in the life of the Church: a greater presence in the community, participation in prayer or reflection groups, or involvement in various ecclesial services.
-
Who should be the evaluator of the situation given the couples in question, any confessor, local parish priest, vicar forane, episcopal vicar, or penitentiary?
It is about starting an itinerary of pastoral accompaniment for the discernment of each individual person. Amoris Laetitia underlines that all priests have the responsibility to accompany interested people on the journey of discernment. It is the priest who welcomes the person, listens to him carefully and shows him the maternal face of the Church, accepting his right intention and his good purpose to place his whole life in the light of the Gospel and to practice charity. But it is each person, individually, who is called to put himself before God and expose his conscience to him, with both his possibilities and limits. This conscience, accompanied by a priest and enlightened by the guidelines of the Church, is called to be formed to evaluate and give a sufficient judgment to discern the possibility of accessing the sacraments.
-
Would it be appropriate for these to be dealt with by the competent ecclesiastical tribunal?
In cases where it is possible to establish a declaration of nullity, the appeal to the ecclesiastical tribunal will be part of the discernment process. The Holy Father wanted to simplify these processes through the motu proprio Mitis Iudex. The problem arises in more complex situations in which it is not possible to obtain a declaration of nullity. In these cases, a process of discernment may also be possible which stimulates or renews the personal encounter with Jesus Christ, also in the sacraments.
-
Can this principle be applied to both parties of a civilly divorced marriage, or distinguish the degree of fault and proceed accordingly?
St. John Paul II had already stated that “the judgment of one’s state of grace obviously belongs only to the person involved, since it is a question of examining one’s conscience.” Therefore, it is a process of individual discernment in which “the divorced and remarried should ask themselves: how did they act towards their children when the conjugal union entered into crisis; whether or not they made attempts at reconciliation; what has become of the abandoned party; what consequences the new relationship has on the rest of the family and the community of the faithful; and what example is being set for young people who are preparing for marriage. A sincere reflection can strengthen trust in the mercy of God, which is not denied anyone.”
-
In the case of this single permission, is it to be understood that married life (the sexual aspect) must not be mentioned in the sacrament of reconciliation?
Even in the sacrament of marriage, the sexual life of the spouses is the subject of an examination of conscience to confirm that it is a true expression of love and that it helps growth in love. All aspects of life must be placed before God.
-
Wouldn’t it be appropriate for the entire issue to be explained better in the text of your competent dicastery?
Based on the words of the Holy Father in the letter of response to the delegate of the Buenos Aires pastoral region, in which it was stated that there are no other interpretations, it seems that the issue is sufficiently explained in the aforementioned document.
-
How to proceed to establish internal unity, but also to avoid disturbing the ordinary magisterium of the Church?
It would be appropriate for the episcopal conference to agree on some minimum criteria, to implement the proposals of Amoris Laetitia, which help priests in the processes of accompaniment and discernment regarding the possible access to the sacraments of some divorcees in a new union, without prejudice to the legitimate authority that each bishop has in his own diocese.
Ex Audientia Die: 25/9/2023
Franciscus
Victor Fernández
[…]
With respect to migrants, given that the majority are Muslim, why don’t they go to those countries where their faith members live in great wealth : Saudi Arabia, UAE?
I assume this is a rhetorical question?
They don’t go because their Muslim “faith members” don’t want them and because Saudi Arabia and UAE are sand kingdoms run by psychopathic thugs.
Impressionistic wisdom of the moment, regardless if it contradicts what he said last week or yesterday or one hour ago. Never any coherent thought or understanding of anything about civilizational and economic interdependence or how improved efficiencies are dependent on economic productivity and independence from central planning. The only thing he needs to care about, his narcissism will not allow him to care about, a morally guided soul that only the Catholic truth he ridicules can provide.
But never a mention of Humanae Vitae.
Then maybe Pope Francis shouldn’t make off the cuff comments about how we’re not meant to breed like rabbits. What’s next? Pope Francis expresses concern for priestly vocations among the young? This guy went from the Vicar of Christ to quasi leader of an NGO to the head of the the mean girls cliche in high school after his treatment of Bishops Strickland and Burke. How much longer will God chastise us for Benedict’s weakness?
As much of the industrialized world is at zero population growth. Not good. I’ve got my video games and a couple pets good enough?
Elon Musk recently was analyzed on this site; I believe he recently said to the effect that the USA will end up being a nation of old folks in diapers
Perhaps refraining from giving the Eucharist to abortion-promoting world leaders would go a long way toward giving us some confidence in his statement about concern for the lack of population growth.
First of all, it is absolutely nobody’s place to make demands of how unrelated people spend their time and money. If they don’t want to have children that is THEIR business. Not YOURS.
Don’t people have free will? I find it entirely despicable when other people think it is their place to start making demands of couples in the realm of marriage and children. You are concerned about the falling birthrate? Fine. YOU have children if that’s what you want to do.You don’t get to make demands on how other people live. You don’t get to spend the money that other people work for. And you definitely have no right to lay claim to any of their time.
Maybe all of the busybodies who spend all of their time disparaging young people for the same old tropes of owning pets and playing video games needto get a real hobby and stop trying to subject innocent people to their very evil and disturbing control issues.
Says the embittered poster who is telling everyone what to think 🤔. A little self-awareness goes a long way.
OK, I get the sarcasm! You are being satirical? Right? Unless you are one of the “new Catholics” who never had a shred of exposure to actual Catholicism, so bankrupt in thought, that there is not even a capacity for sufficient imagination to conceive of a social ethos and all the factors that affect a social ethos, which would include, obviously, the effects of personal commitments of living a self-sacrificing life of virtue, as Our Lord asks of us.
This, obviously, would not involve a life committed to such things like an adolescent misinterpretation of freedom as personal willfulness rather than the opportunity to do what is right.
The government tells us more and more what to spend our money on.
Who will support older folks?
My comments are actually mostly facts and not judgment one way or another.
Who are you to say whether or not you procreate? Don’t you want human life to continue after you’re gone?
First of all, it is absolutely nobody’s place to make demands of how unrelated people spend their time and money. If they don’t want to have children that is THEIR business. Not YOURS.
Don’t people have free will? I find it entirely despicable when other people think it is their place to start making demands of couples in the realm of marriage and children. You are concerned about the falling birthrate? Fine. YOU have children if that’s what you want to do.You don’t get to make demands on how other people live. You don’t get to spend the money that other people work for. And you definitely have no right to lay claim to any of their time.
Maybe all of the busybodies who spend all of their time disparaging young people for the same old tropes of owning pets and playing video games need to get a real job and stop trying to subject innocent people to their very evil and disturbing control issues.
As usual pope Francis is not a leader on this issue but an observer only.
It sounds like this Pope wants to have his cake and eat it too. He thrashes the US for attempting to stem the flow of migrants ( who commit crime and bring in drugs. The jury is still out on terrorism but label it probable). Italy is now full of Muslims who are changing the culture and other things in a way Italians dont like. Possibly there are changes to the degree that young Italians dont see a future with children there?? Its probably why Italian young people do not want babies. I dont think it will prevent Francis from adovcating for open borders.
Italy is a beautiful country blessed with industrious people, awesome architecture, marvelous singers, high culinary culture renowned for delicious pizzas, and pastas. May Italy, the land and her people, be blessed.