Baltimore archbishop issues guidelines for Catholic LGBT ministries

 

null / Juanje Garrido/Shutterstock

Denver, Colo., Jul 24, 2023 / 11:00 am (CNA).

People who identify as LGBT or gender nonconforming should be served by Catholic ministry that shows charity, sensitivity, understanding, and genuine accompaniment in the light of revelation and Church teaching, Archbishop William F. Lori of Baltimore said in a new guidance on ministry to LGBT people and their families released July 20 in his archdiocese.

“Like every disciple, you and I are called to a lifelong journey of turning toward the Lord, seeking to know and love him more and more deeply each day,” Lori said in the introduction to the 14-page guidance “Like Every Disciple.”

The guidance reflects on priorities common to all Catholics and on the diversity of views and experiences among those who identify as LGBT, including those who feel rejected by their families or the Church. It also outlines the qualities needed for ministry leaders and for groups seeking to accompany LGBT people and their families while being faithful to Church teaching.

Lori’s guidance emphasized that the starting point for the Christian journey is “not a decision we make or something we choose but God’s call.”

“God first loved us,” he said. The archbishop emphasized the importance of baptism, in which “God claims us as his own.”

“We became a new creation and were given a new identity: beloved daughters and sons of the Father,” Lori said. “This is the core of who we are. This is our truest identity.”

Reflecting upon cultural changes, Lori noted recent decades of “an increased awareness within the Church of the experience of our sisters and brothers who are same-sex attracted” and the more recent attention to “those who experience gender discordance or those who may consider themselves to be gender nonconforming.” People with these varieties of experiences often identify as LGBT, he said, using the acronym for lesbian, gay, bisexual, or transgender.

“Persons who may identify as LGBT are daughters and sons of God, they are our brothers and sisters in Christ, they are members of the Body of Christ, they are our family members and friends,” the archbishop continued. “Like every human person, they were created with a desire for intimacy with Jesus Christ. Like every disciple, LGBT persons are called to a lifelong journey of turning toward the Lord, seeking to know and love him more and more deeply each day.”

LGBT ministry must be “shaped toward offering pastoral accompaniment rather than advocating for changes to Church teaching,” Lori’s guidance said. Christian revelation and Church teaching are not “an obstacle to human flourishing” but “an invitation to the abundant life that God promises.”

It is also “essential” for such an LGBT ministry to have “the desire for charity, the desire to truly welcome and embrace sexual minorities, to hear their stories, to walk with them in their struggles.”

“We should not presume to understand what each person has gone through or is going through. Openness to the lived experience of LGBT persons and a desire to walk with them is essential,” his guidance continued. “We also recognize the feelings of hurt and rejection that many LGBT persons may have felt from those who should care most deeply for them: family members, clergy, and members of their parish community. The response of the Church must always be the response of Christ, which is love.”

Lori described contemporary life as a “polarized time” with “polarized discourse” that denies the ability to hold two different realities “in tension.” He noted that there are views that “someone can either be Catholic or be LGBT.” This view suggests that either a person must reject some aspect of the Church’s teaching or must reject some part of their identity.

For Lori, however, the main questions are different.

“How do we offer pastoral accompaniment to LGBT persons and their families in a way that truly welcomes and embraces them while faithfully teaching the truth about human sexuality that God has revealed in creation, Scripture, and tradition?” he asked. “How can such accompaniment lead LGBT persons into a deeper relationship with the person of Jesus Christ and his body, the Church?”

Accompaniment of LGBT persons means holding “a life-giving tension” of two elements: the desire to “welcome every person into relationship with Christ and his body, the Church” and also the desire “to lead people to the fullness of life that flows from knowing the liberating truth about the human person” revealed through Jesus Christ.

While people experience tension and difficulty in balancing charity and truth, in Jesus these are united, Lori said.

“The response of the Church must also always be one of truth,” he added. This includes questions about the destiny of human beings, the meaning of the human person, and the meaning of human sexuality and embodied human nature.

Any LGBT ministry exists “to help people on the lifelong path of discipleship,” starting with “an awareness of our need for the Lord,” Lori said. This ministry should be seen as “pastoral care rather than social justice.” He criticized any “ideology” that “proposes an incomplete answer to the desires of the human heart.” Ultimately, people all need “an openness to a relationship with Christ that fills the infinite hunger of our hearts.”

“We recognize the struggles of LGBT persons, and the feelings of pain and rejection that they may have, even with the Church and her ministers,” Lori said. “These ministries must be a safe place where people are free to share their stories and know that they will be welcomed and listened to without condemnation.”

These people have diverse experiences and ministries must not make assumptions about individuals, the guidance continued. Self-identified LGBT people themselves have “a variety of views on the nature of same-sex attraction or gender” and they, their friends, or family members may be “at different places in their own journey of faith,” so ministries must “respect the unique gifts and experience of each person.”

Lori’s guidance focuses on six different “essential characteristics of pastoral accompaniment.” These are: recognizing the reality of our need; showing compassion, respect, and sensitivity; journeying together in light of our calling; having a different kind of conversation; living “rooted in the Church”; and a willingness to “make the long journey.”

While he said no set of guidelines “will say all that needs to be said or say it in the best way,” Lori emphasized the need to build relationships and for ongoing dialogue. Any parish with any kind of ministry to LGBT persons and their families must have Lori’s approval. Pastors and leaders of these ministries must have “ongoing” conversations with their regional vicar, Emmaus team members, and the archdiocese’s coordinator of LGBT outreach.

The archbishop also considered the characteristics of LGBT ministry leaders. They must be “disciples” aware of their own need for Christ and “his call to follow more closely each day.” They should be “people of prayer who are attentive to the voice of the Spirit and faithful to Christ and his Church.” They must also “possess the capacity to facilitate a different kind of conversation which holds in tension both openness and fidelity, charity and truth.”

Such leaders should have a “solid foundation” in Church teaching, must “truly embrace it” and have “an ability to convey it clearly and charitably.” They must be willing “to put in the long and hard work of walking with others on this long journey.” They should mirror the “patient mercy” of God the Father. The path to Jesus Christ is “often slow and winding” and there will be “missteps” as their work of accompaniment moves toward a greater fidelity to Christ.

“None of us, regardless of gender or sexual orientation, is perfect just the way we are,” Lori wrote. “But our desire for God is more than merely a remedy for sin. … The essential disposition we need is an openness to receive the love of God, to hear his word and to respond to his love.”


If you value the news and views Catholic World Report provides, please consider donating to support our efforts. Your contribution will help us continue to make CWR available to all readers worldwide for free, without a subscription. Thank you for your generosity!

Click here for more information on donating to CWR. Click here to sign up for our newsletter.


About Catholic News Agency 11969 Articles
Catholic News Agency (www.catholicnewsagency.com)

4 Comments

  1. Good grief. Shame on CNA, thought not surprising, for reporting this as though there’s nothing wrong with it- Lori has caved in to the world by using the “lgbtxyz” language, and concepts contrary to Catholic anthropology, i.e., that people’s identities can be “gay,” or accepting the ideological term gender, etc.

    • I think the Archbishop’s comments seemed balanced. I don’t see that any good can come of making fun of the “current language”; e.g., “lgbtxyz”. “Making fun” of people and their customs is not Christian. I think that there are a lot of people who are very confused and suffering about their “gender identity”. I think that a lot of this confusion is happening because of the times in which we are living and the power of the online world that so many people immerse themselves in throughout most of the day–music, social media sites, streaming movies, gaming, “Influencers,” etc.–all of this has created a cacophony of confusion and causes many to question virtually everything, including their sexuality. Meanwhile, the great books of human history, philosophy, theology, etc. that could help bring clarity are gathering dust in places called “libraries” that no one visits nowadays because they are “downtown” in unsafe locations. People stay home alone and spend hours staring at screens instead of talking to real people living real lives. Fewer people are attending “church” than any time in American history! Babies and toddlers are left in daycare centers (often secular, not church centers) while parents are away from them for 8-12 hours out of every 24! No one actually talks to anyone–if you strike up a conversation at a restaurant or store, people stare at you as though you were a leper! It’s no wonder that people everywhere are confused, scared, rebellious, and easy marks for every new idea that comes along, including evil ideas that appear to be “good” due to the marketing skills of those who present these ideas. I think that the Archbishop is attempting to be a bridge-builder by trying to use terminology that doesn’t immediately drive people away or create further animosity towards Christianity. Jesus was a Master at reaching out to people where they are, not where they should be. I think we should try to emulate our Lord and be “wise as serpents but gentle as doves.” Remember the old fairy tale about the Sun and the Wind–in the end, it was the gentle Sun that won the challenge, and NOT the fierce Wind.

  2. The archbishop also considered the characteristics of LGBT ministry leaders. They must be “disciples” aware of their own need for Christ and “his call to follow more closely each day.” They should be “people of prayer who are attentive to the voice of the Spirit and faithful to Christ and his Church.” They must also “possess the capacity to facilitate a different kind of conversation which holds in tension both openness and fidelity, charity and truth.”

    * * * * *

    All the words are there, I think, but cloaked in a sort of hazy sweetness. It’s the “We need Christ!” without exactly saying WHY that is frustrating. This portion is addressed to the ministry leaders, but if any minister of the Church has not understood his own redemption, then he cannot in turn explain it to those to whom he ministers—thus he may not be right for the task. Evangelisation is more than affirmation therapy, and yet that seems to be the only selling point that the clergy are willing to commit to ink.

  3. Well, it’s different to say “God claims us as his own,” rather than the sophomoric “God made you that way” (genome research debunks such flippancy). Yet, I find myself at odds with both Archbishop Lori, only because it seems incomplete, and his likely critics from the so-called right.

    So, here, three imperatives:

    FIRST–as for the present–“Yes” to accompaniment (not accommodation), but “no” to the contradiction of insisting that we are dealing with “individuals,” and then still using the political slogan “LGBT” as if this denotes a community of some sort.
    At the Synod on Youth, some unnamed cleric slipped the slogan into the draft report after the synod on youth, and then only after all sixteen caucuses of bishops “demanded” (the word used in at least two media accounts) that this subterfuge be removed, did Cardinal Baldiserri relent. Butt, the slogan is back again, like a bad smell.

    The earlier demand should be respected here–and especially at the upcoming Synod on Synodality, regardless of the surely subtle steerage likely to be floated from the microphone. Sex trafficking and harmonized (!) text trafficking are joined at the hip.
    SECOND–as for the past–the accompaniment must be explicit that a longitudinal (sociological jargon!) approach be offered and applied to each individual.
    As to causes and personal self-understanding, were you sexually abused? Are you damaged by an absentee or abusive father? And, when did you actually discover that you were supposedly not binary, and possibly get locked-in? (Sexual experimentation at the age of six!) What about our intrusive porn culture and visual victimization of tech-savvy young people? How about a focus on causes rather than mostly on symptoms—most broadly the loneliness of modernity (sociological “anomie”), broken families, and fear of an unknown future?

    THIRD–as to the future–accompaniment must explicitly incorporate concrete personal solution paths such as Courage International (couragerc.org). This rather than the infiltrated James Martin counterfeit.

    Otherwise, all the tailored verbiage in the world is useless, AND will be twisted as giving added license to the activist LGBT demographic, and the Church will be responsible for witlessly enabling more of the same for a phenomenon that multiples by means other than biological. The Scandal of 2002 in a new variant? Been there, done that.

    So, drop the enabling code language. Stop the hemorrhaging. After all, ours is a “field hospital” Church, so it is said. More than “walking together” synodally in the park.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

All comments posted at Catholic World Report are moderated. While vigorous debate is welcome and encouraged, please note that in the interest of maintaining a civilized and helpful level of discussion, comments containing obscene language or personal attacks—or those that are deemed by the editors to be needlessly combative or inflammatory—will not be published. Thank you.


*