St. John Paul II, circa 1992. / L’Osservatore Romano.
CNA Newsroom, Dec 7, 2022 / 08:00 am (CNA).
Journalists investigating secular and Catholic Church sources in Poland have called into question allegations by a Dutch writer that St. John Paul II “covered up” sexual abuse while still a bishop in Poland.
On Dec. 2, Ekke Overbeek, a journalist from the Netherlands living in Poland, said he had found “concrete cases of priests abusing children in the Archdiocese of Krakow, where the future pope was archbishop. The future pope knew about it and transferred them anyway, which led to new victims.”
Overbeek referred to the case of the priest Eugeniusz Surgent and “many others” whom Karol Wojtyla allegedly “covered up.”
The Dutch publication NOS, in which Overbeek’s statements appeared, reported the journalist spent three years combing “Polish archives.”
“Almost all documents collected directly about Wojtyla have been destroyed. However, in other surviving documents, he is mentioned very often. And if you put them all together, they are pieces of a puzzle that give a picture of how he dealt with it,” the writer stated, without saying which archives he was referring to.
Polish journalists Tomasz Krzyżak and Piotr Litka of Rzeczpospolita published an investigation that countered Overbeek’s accusations, stating St. John Paul II did not cover up any abuse and consistently acted against such cases during his time as archbishop of Krakow from 1964 to 1978.
The reporters point out that the priest in question, Surgent, was not from the Archdiocese of Krakow but from the Diocese of Lubaczów.
As archbishop of Krakow, the then Cardinal Karol Wojtyla made several decisions concerning Surgent, they explained, “within his competencies, leaving the final word on possible sanctioning of the priest to his ordinary, the bishop of Lubaczów.”
The journalists added that “the then archbishop of Krakow could not do anything about the fact that Surgent was working in two other dioceses.”
The Polish reporters also referred to another incident that illustrated how Cardinal Wojtyla at the time dealt with abuse, namely the case of priest Józef Loranc, who was accused of sexually abusing young girls.
“The absence of punitive measures by the ecclesiastical court does not cancel the crime and does not undo the guilt,” Cardinal Wojtyla wrote in a 1971 letter to Loranc after he was released from prison.
For Krzyżak and Litka, “this behavior” of the later Pope John Paul II “differs considerably from the practice of leniency toward those who had committed such crimes, which was common at the time.”
In the case of Loranc, a priest of the Archdiocese of Krakow until his death in 1992, “Cardinal Wojtyla made immediate decisions in accordance with canon law. And while he gradually lifted canonical penalties and showed great mercy, he remained ever vigilant,” the journalists wrote.
When Cardinal Wojtyla learned of the case in 1970, his decision came just days after learning of the accusations against Loranc.
In a letter, the future Pope John Paul II stated that the accused priest was “suspended” and “could not exercise any priestly function” and would have to “live in the monastery for a certain period of time and make a retreat and receive help.”
The journalists said that Wojtyla “made all the necessary decisions at that moment: the quick removal of the priest from the parish, the suspension until the matter was resolved, and the obligation to live in a monastery,” where civil authorities then arrested him.
The case did not reach the Vatican, they said, because the provision directing what is now the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith — then the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith — to deal with abuse cases was not issued until 2001.
Although he was eventually allowed to celebrate Mass again, Loran could not return to the “canonical mission of catechesis of children and youth” or to the ministry of the confessional.
The Polish Bishops’ Conference, in a statement published Nov. 14, spoke of “increasingly hearing questions about John Paul II’s attitude toward the tragedy of sexual abuse of minors and vulnerable people by the clergy and about his response to such crimes during his pontificate.”
“It has been increasingly alleged that the pope did not deal adequately with such acts and did little to address the problem, or even covered it up,” the statement continued.
The bishops decried these as a “media assault” on St. John Paul II and his pontificate. The target of such criticisms was “his teaching expressed, for example, in encyclicals such as Redemptor hominis or Veritatis splendor, as well as in his theology of the body, which does not correspond to contemporary ideologies promoting hedonism, relativism, and moral nihilism.”
The statement was not the first time Polish Catholic leaders responded to allegations against St. John Paul II.
In December 2020, following criticism of the Polish pope in the wake of the McCarrick report, 1,700 professors at Polish universities and research institutes signed an appeal defending St. John Paul II.
The signatories included Hanna Suchocka, Poland’s first female prime minister; former foreign minister Adam Daniel Rotfeld; physicists Andrzej Staruszkiewicz and Krzysztof Meissner; and film director Krzysztof Zanussi.
The professors’ appeal followed an intervention by Archbishop Stanisław Gądecki, president of the Polish Bishops’ Conference. In a Dec. 7, 2020, statement, Gądecki deplored what he called “unprecedented attacks” on St. John Paul II. He insisted that the pope’s “highest priority” was combating clerical abuse and protecting young people.
[…]
And there are no suspects?? At the risk of sounding like a broken record I will say again: Security cameras and alarms are needed at all Catholic churches. I am aware that some churches simply dont want to spend the money in this way, but to fail to take action makes these pastors derelict in their responsibilities. The fact is a security camera system is well cheaper than attempting to rebuild a church which has been burned to the ground. Wake up. This is not 1940 and the criminal haters who commit these types of crimes no longer fear God or the reaction of neighbors. I dare say some would expect plaudits from certain quarters for their actions. Disgusting.
Our church used to be open 24/7. Then some (probably drunks) went in one night and peed on the carpet by the confessional and did some other minor damage, so it is locked most of the time.
It is located near a major expressway (less than two miles either way for an exit). As a greeting usher (a dwindling number in our parish), I stay in the back waiting for the late arrivals and often wonder what to do if a gunperson arrives. Some parishes lock down unchecked walkin shortly after mass starts, requiring someone to open the door from the inside and some don’t.
Your comment that security cameras will prevent attacks is not necessarily correct, as many will disguise themselves. Resurrection in Lansing MI was nastily vandalized from the outside and they have the hooded pro abortion/anti Christians on tape but who are they? If they are on someone’s payroll they will likely be well heeled in their deviant disguises, paint and efficient tools.
Nowall. I did not say a camera would prevent ALL crimes. But most criminals are not interested in getting caught,and criminals who know there is a camera or alarm system will often do their vandalism elsewhere. Its a known thing in the home alarm business that sometimes even putting up a sign saying your house is alarmed, when in fact it is not, will prompt a criminal to walk away rather than risk detection. And the camera may at least help catch the person who perpetrated the crime.Will it deter 100% of criminals? No, sadly it wont. But it is most certainly worth a try. Your church must be in a rough part of a city for you to worry about armed assailants. Those churches which need the doors locked after services start must be in very sad situations. On the plus side their members must make it a point to arrive at church on time!!! (a bad joke), The “solution” to crime, all crime, quite frankly is that criminals, no matter their color, MUST pay a penalty for their crimes. Failure to deliver consequences for anti social and hate behaviors almost guarantees they will commit the crime again.Society can only tolerate that for so long before we devolve into violent chaos.
“Lucifer is right,” “Devil, take me with you,” “Thank you, Satan”.
Rebellion against divine order exemplified by Lucifer echoes in the words. Freedom, the equivalent of licentiousness, is and always the result, occurring in France, which has a longer legacy of philosophical, intellectual leaning, underway as well in the US. Scandal within the Church gives the moral anarchist greater sense of justification.
Evil manifest here assumes a theological focus. Perhaps premonition of what lies ahead of us. It’s difficult not to entertain this thought with what’s occurring in our Church. We’ve taken leaps of impossible corruption of Christ’s revealed truth in so short a time. Error pouring out of clergy from low to high rank abounds. And yet there’s remarkable light effusing from pockets of faith that say that if things are not well, there remains, though better said, a grace inspired strengthening, hope giving, enlivening.
That the Blessed Sacrament is exposed shows the diabolical origins of these messages and those who wrote them!
Hearts that are searching for God…but in all the wrong places. These are the fruits of a misplaced, misdirected search for God. Hearts in need of conversion.
Amen, Deacon Edward.
I honestly don’t know what’s worse: Attacks like this from the outside, or attacks from heretical and schismatic prelates from the inside.