Pope Francis attends a closed-door meeting with Jesuits in Québec, Canada, July 29, 2022. / Vatican Media
Rome Newsroom, Aug 4, 2022 / 10:59 am (CNA).
Pope Francis told Jesuits in Canada about how his experience in Latin America formed his beliefs about synodality, liturgy, and divisions in the Church, in a private meeting in Québec last week.
He explained: “In Latin America thirty years ago there were monstrous liturgical deformations. Then they moved to the opposite side with a backward-looking intoxication with the old. A division was established in the Church.”
The pope went on to tell the gathering of 15 Jesuits in Quebec on July 29 that his actions with regard to the liturgy have “aimed to follow the line taken by John Paul II and Benedict XVI, who had allowed the ancient rite and had asked for subsequent verification.”
“The most recent verification made it clear that there was a need to regulate the practice, and above all to avoid it becoming a matter, let us say, of ‘fashion’ and remaining instead a pastoral question,” Francis said.
“I look forward to the studies that will refine the reflection on the theme that is important: the liturgy is the people of God’s public praise.”
Doctrine
In the hour-long conversation with the local Jesuits, the pope also spoke about tradition and doctrine.
He said: “The vision of the doctrine of the Church as monolithic, to be defended without nuance is wrong. That is why it is important to have respect for tradition, the authentic one.”
Pope Francis then made a distinction between “tradition” and “traditionalism.” He said that “tradition is the living memory of believers,” while “traditionalism instead is the dead life of our believers.”
“We must take the origin as a reference, not a particular historical experience taken as a perpetual model, as if we had to stop there. ‘Yesterday it was done like this’ becomes ‘it always has been done like this.’ But this is a paganism of thought! What I have said also applies to legal matters, to law,” the pope said.
Unity
Pope Francis praised the Canadian bishops for acting in unity with one another, saying that “miracles … can happen when the Church is united.”
“This Canadian experience is an example of a united episcopate. When an episcopate is united, then it can deal with the challenges that arise,” he said.
“Of course, there is no point hiding it, there are some who work against healing and reconciliation, in society as in the Church. Even last night I saw a small traditionalist group protesting, and saying that the Church is something else. … But that is the way things are,” he added.
The pope cautioned that “one of the worst enemies” of Church unity today is “ideology.”
Synodality
Pope Francis spoke at length about “synodality” and shared a story about his experience participating in the Synod of Bishops in 2001 as a relator when he was Archbishop of Buenos Aires.
A relator presents a summary of the topics that emerge during the synod discussion, as well as information and clarifying points for the synod’s final document.
Pope Francis recalled: “I remember that the opinions were collected and sent to the general secretariat. Then I gathered the material and prepared it for the vote. The secretary of the synod came to see me, read the material, and told me to remove this or that detail.”
“There were things he did not consider appropriate and he censored them. There was, in short, a pre-selection of material. There was little understanding of what a synod is. At the end of the last synod, in the survey on the topics to be dealt with in the next one, the first two were the priesthood and synodality.”
“I understood that it was necessary to reflect on the theology of synodality in order to make a decisive step forward,” he added.
Pope Francis said that he launched the two-year global consultation process leading to the 2023 synod on synodality to reiterate that “the Church is either synodal or it is not Church.”
“If you want to read the best book of theology on the synod, then re-read the Acts of the Apostles,” he said.
If you value the news and views Catholic World Report provides, please consider donating to support our efforts. Your contribution will help us continue to make CWR available to all readers worldwide for free, without a subscription. Thank you for your generosity!
Click here for more information on donating to CWR. Click here to sign up for our newsletter.
Pope Francis’ general audience in St. Peter’s Square, June 1, 2022. / Vatican Media.
Vatican City, Jun 1, 2022 / 06:20 am (CNA).
Pope Francis said Wednesday that old age can be a time to rediscover trust in the Lord.“The elderly, by virtue of t… […]
St. Joseph and the Christ Child, by Guido Reni / Public domain
Vatican City, Mar 19, 2022 / 08:45 am (CNA).
Pope Francis has written a letter urging a congregation of priests to follow St. Joseph’s example by living out the high calling of spir… […]
Pope Francis with Cardinal Arthur Roche, Prefect of the Vatican’s Dicastery of Divine Worship and Discipline of Sacraments, at the consistory in St. Peter’s Basilica, Aug. 27, 2022 / Daniel Ibáñez / CNA
Rome Newsroom, Aug 27, 2022 / 08:31 am (CNA).
Pope Francis created 20 new cardinals for the Catholic Church during a liturgy in St. Peter’s Basilica Saturday.
“Jesus calls us by name; he looks us in the eye and he asks: Can I count on you?” Pope Francis said in a homily addressed to the College of Cardinals and its new members on Aug. 27.
“The Lord,” he said, “wants to bestow on us his own apostolic courage, his zeal for the salvation of every human being, without exception. He wants to share with us his magnanimity, his boundless and unconditional love, for his heart is afire with the mercy of the Father.”
The pope’s reflection followed a reading from the Gospel of Luke, chapter 12, verses 49-50: “In that time, Jesus said to his disciples: ‘I have come to set the earth on fire, and how I wish it were already blazing! There is a baptism with which I must be baptized, and how great is my anguish until it is accomplished!’”
“The words of Jesus, in the very middle of the Gospel of Luke, pierce us like an arrow,” Francis said.
“The Lord calls us once more to follow him along the path of his mission,” he said. “A fiery mission – like that of Elijah – not only for what he came to accomplish but also for how he accomplished it. And to us who in the Church have been chosen from among the people for a ministry of particular service, it is as if Jesus is handing us a lighted torch and telling us: ‘Take this; as the Father has sent me so I now send you.’”
The pope ended his homily mentioning that one cardinal-elect, Richard Kuuia Baawobr of Wa (Ghana), was not present. Francis asked for prayers for the African prelate, explaining Baawobr had been taken ill.
At the beginning of the consistory, Pope Francis pronounced the opening prayer of the ceremony in Latin.
During the ceremony, the new cardinals made a profession of faith by reciting the Creed. They then pronounced an oath of fidelity and obedience to the pope and his successors.
Each cardinal then approached Pope Francis, kneeling before him to receive the red birretta, the cardinal’s ring, and a document naming the titular church he has been assigned.
Pope Francis embraced each new cardinal, saying to him: “Pax Domini sit semper tecum,” which is Latin for “the peace of the Lord be with you always.” Each cardinal responded: “Amen.”
The new cardinals also exchanged a sign of peace with a number of the members of the College of Cardinals, representative of the whole college.
While placing the red biretta on the head of each cardinal, the pope recited these words: “To the glory of almighty God and the honor of the Apostolic See, receive the scarlet biretta as a sign of the dignity of the cardinalate, signifying your readiness to act with courage, even to the shedding of your blood, for the increase of the Christian faith, for the peace and tranquility of the people of God and for the freedom and growth of the Holy Roman Church.”
As he gave each new cardinal the ring, Francis said: “Receive this ring from the hand of Peter and know that, with the love of the Prince of the Apostles, your love for the Church is strengthened.”
In his homily, the pope said: “The Lord wants to bestow on us his own apostolic courage, his zeal for the salvation of every human being, without exception. He wants to share with us his magnanimity, his boundless and unconditional love, for his heart is afire with the mercy of the Father.”
He also recalled another kind of fire, that of charcoal. “This fire,” he said, “burns in a particular way in the prayer of adoration, when we silently stand before the Eucharist and bask in the humble, discreet and hidden presence of the Lord. Like that charcoal fire, his presence becomes warmth and nourishment for our daily life.”
“A Cardinal loves the Church, always with that same spiritual fire, whether dealing with great questions or handling everyday problems, with the powerful of this world or those ordinary people who are great in God’s eyes,” he said.
The pope named three men as examples for the cardinals to follow: Saint Charles de Foucauld, Cardinal Agostino Casaroli, and Cardinal Van Thuân.
The consistory to create cardinals also included a greeting and thank you to Pope Francis, expressed by Cardinal Arthur Roche, prefect of the liturgy dicastery, on behalf of all the new cardinals.
Cardinal Arthur Roche speaking on behalf of the new cardinals in St. Peter’s Basilica, Aug. 27. 2022. Daniel Ibáñez / CNA
“All of us, coming from different parts of the world, with our personal stories and different life situations, carry out our ministry in the vineyard of the Lord. As diocesan and religious priests, we are at the service of preaching the Gospel in many different ways and in different cultures, but always united in the one faith and the one Church,” Roche said.
“Now, in manifesting your trust in us, you call us to this new service, in an even closer collaboration with your ministry, within the broad horizon of the universal Church,” he continued. “God knows the dust of which we are all made, and we know well that without Him we are capable of falling short.”
Roche quoted Saint Gregory the Great, who once wrote to a bishop: “We are all weak, but he is weakest of all who ignores his own weakness.”
“However, we draw strength from you, Holy Father,” he said, “from your witness, your spirit of service and your call to the entire Church to follow the Lord with greater fidelity; living the joy of the Gospel with discernment, courage and, above all, with an openness of heart that manifests itself in welcoming everyone, especially those who suffer the injustice of poverty that marginalizes, the suffering of pain that seeks a response of meaning, the violence of wars that turn brothers into enemies. We share with you the desire and commitment for communion in the Church.”
At the end of the consistory to create cardinals, Pope Francis convened a consistory for the cardinals to give their approval to the canonizations of Blessed Artemide Zatti and Giovanni Battista Scalabrini.
The new cardinals are:
— Cardinal Arthur Roche, 72, prefect of the Congregation for Divine Worship and former Bishop of Leeds (England);
— Lazarus You Heung-sik, 70, prefect of the Congregation for Clergy and former Bishop of Daejeon (South Korea);
— Jean-Marc Noël Aveline, 63, Archbishop of Marseille, the first French diocesan bishop to get the honor during Pope Francis’ pontificate;
— Peter Ebere Okpaleke, 59, Bishop of Ekwulobia in the central region of Nigeria, who was created bishop in 2012 by Benedict XVI;
— Leonardo Ulrich Steiner, 77, Archbishop of Manaus, in Brazil’s Amazon region, a Franciscan who played a leading role during the Amazon Synod and as Vice President of the recently created Amazonian Bishops’ Conference;
— Filipe Neri António Sebastião do Rosário Ferrão, 69, Archbishop of Goa (India), appointed bishop by St. John Paul II in 1993;
— Robert McElroy, 68, Bishop of San Diego (United States), whose diocese is suffragan to the Archdiocese of Los Angeles, led by the President of the USCCB, Archbishop José Gomez;
— Virgilio do Carmo Da Silva, 68, a Salesian, since 2019 the Archbishop of Dili (East Timor);
— Oscar Cantoni, 71, Bishop of Como (Italy), appointed in January 2005 by St. John Paul II, who is suffragan to Milan;
— Archbishop Fernando Vérgez Alzaga, L.C., 77, president of the Governorate of the Vatican City State and of the Pontifical Commission for the Vatican City State; the Spaniard is the first Legionary of Christ to become a cardinal;
— Anthony Poola, 60, Archbishop of Hyderabad (India), a bishop since 2008 and the first dalit to become a cardinal;
–Paulo Cezar Costa, 54, Archbishop of Brasilia (Brazil), the fourth archbishop of the Brazilian capital to become a cardinal;
— Richard Kuuia Baawobr, 62, Bishop of Wa (Ghana), former Superior General of the White Fathers, and bishop since 2016;
— William Goh Seng Chye, 65, Archbishop of Singapore since 2013;
— Adalberto Martinez Flores, 71, Archbishop of Asunción (Paraguay) and the first Paraguayan cardinal;
— Giorgio Marengo, 47, Italian Missionary of the Consolata and Apostolic Prefect of Ulan Bator in Mongolia, the youngest cardinal in recent history, along with Karol Wojtyla, who also was created a cardinal at 47, during the consistory of June 26, 1967.
Furthermore, Pope Francis appointed the following prelates over the age of 80, who are therefore excluded from attending a future conclave.
Jorge Enrique Jiménez Carvajal, 80, Archbishop Emeritus of Cartagena (Colombia); Arrigo Miglio, 80, Archbishop Emeritus of Cagliari (Italy); Fr. Gianfranco Ghirlanda, a Jesuit and former rector of the Pontifical Gregorian University, who extensively collaborated in the drafting of the Apostolic Constitution Praedicate Evangelium; and Fortunato Frezza, 80, (Italy) currently a Canon at the Basilica of St. Peter, who collaborated for several years at the Secretariat General for the Synod of the Bishops.
Pope Francis had originally also nominated Ghent Bishop Luc Van Looy, 80, who later declined to accept the post because of criticism of his response to clergy abuse cases.
It suggests mixed kinds of revisionism. Also the only ones I know who ever saw the Church as monolithic are those denying Christian doctrine.
The Holy Father holds forth “authority from Acts” for “synodality”. It would seem to be a kind of new elevation of status for the aged practice.
I also see over-/under-tones of Modernism. Modernism as it understands itself, an ACTIVITY work-in-progress, mingles sources, ideas, times, to make sense.
Stress is placed on the popular piety as the meaning of the Mass. He says he looks forward to this specifically. Presumably it can’t be ideology?
Likely another newsroom error (this: “tradition is the living memory of believers,” while “traditionalism instead is the dead life of our believers.”). The maxim is “Tradition is the living faith of the dead; traditionalism is the dead faith of the living.”
And, second, might the case be made, that synods (like councils) are what the Church DOES, not what the Church IS? (“the Church is either synodal or it is not Church.”) As if essence precedes existence (with Aquinas), rather than Sartre’s “existence precedes essence”? What comes first, finally, to be or to do? DO-BE-DO-BE-DO-BE-DO!
It seems to me that the mangling of what Peter Beaulieu refers to as the maxim was intentional. “The living memory of the believers” seems apropo of this Pope: he and his most fervent disciples are just waiting for those of us brought up in the Latin Rite and who remember it with great affection to die. Then they may do as they wish, since it is not only the memory of that rite that will be gone, but also the memory of a Church that was universally united by common ritual and belief.
Then I see a problem if that’s his expectation, since the majority of those who attend the EF of the Mass in my experience areat most 30 years of age. That seems to baffle and infuriate Francis in a particular way.
I’ve been a critic of Radical Traditionalism(i.e. Sedes, SSPX, SSPV, Feeneyites, NeoGeocentrists, Jewish Conspiracy Yobs, morons who believe the St Pius V Liturgy is the only true liturgy et) for decades.
But that being said I am a fan of loyal Traditionists(FSSP, Ed Feser etc) and Traditional Thomism.
The problem with the Holy Father here is he just isn’t very good at opposing the lunatic fringe of Traditionalism. He is just going to feed it. He paints every Trad with a broad brush and he ignores the principle of diversity and unity in diversity.
Go back to the pre John Paul II policies of the 70’s which failed horribly is not helpful.
Why should not love of the Old St Pius V Rite be part of that diversity?
Pope Benedict’s policy solved the problem. We had to give it time. Francis is the one going backwards here. Ah well. I’ll pray for him and take comfort in the fact He won’t be Pope forever…
In my experience, as I’ve noed here ar CWR and elsewhere, there’s little difference between the vitriolic hostility of many clergy of the Pope’s generation toward the old EF Latin rite and that I’ve encouintered when requesting that the OF be celebrated in Latin. And it’s not only to Latin: I’ve also often been brusquely dismissed for requesting that the Roman Canon in its present English version be used. That’s in ENGLISH, once again. It doesn’t seem to take much in some clerical quarters or with some older laity to get tagged as a “RadTrad.”
Men In Black movies have their scripting loaded with pithy-type exchanges that serve the purpose of telling the meaning of story and driving the drama. In this trilogy it also puns the drama. How that works is a feature of theatre in that the audience wants to be entertained and the dramatist has to make up a credibility-world within the presentation, proper to it. It does not mean it is NOT a fiction because it propels an experience. Understanding it saves you from the existentialism that is rampant in the fiction industry. And while the pithy offerings and allocutions in there might sometimes ring true, there is the reality that often what they are sounding out is the doom, banality and fate the story wants to represent, even dogmatize. Take for instance, Griffin in Men In Black III:
“Where there is death there will always be death.”
The different types of problems have to be addressed according to their nature, intensity, patterning, nuancing, complexity. Shuttering “extreme traditionalists” and being freely permissive with “humble progressives” would show as forms of “disciplining” intervention on the one hand and “guidance” on the other; but I am left wondering at it when I see the practical limitations it imposes and then also the actual results.
In terms of limitations, each situation needs its own set of attentions and types of justice. This “binary” settlement cuts off growth and improvement.
In terms of result, I cite 2 examples that indicate arbitrary disruption -:
a) The Franciscan Friars of the Immaculate had (have?) promise for piety and mission but got truncated.
b) Argentina seminary was closed because a few (maybe many?) were too rigid, but none is identified.
Curious that the TLM communities which without exception do their best to celebrate the Mass carefully according to the Rubrics in the missal and they do their best to teach the Catholic Faith according to the Catechism of the Catholic Church are the ones accused by the pope of being “Traditionalists.” If doing this is reckoned by the Pope himself to be unacceptable and out of step with whatever it is that he thinks is the right expression of the faith of the church then…. God help the Roman Church.
“A backward-looking intoxication with the old”???? Really?? I look around my church and all I see are people who appear to be 70 years plus.What happens to the church when they finally pass on?? Yet I understand MANY young people love the Latin Traditional Mass. Is the Pope’s problem that people are actually ATTENDING traditional Latin MASS???? Maybe, under the current scandalous circumstances, he should be thanking God that ANYONE is attending Mass, no matter which version.
When there is conflict in theology the liturgy is always mistreated.
The post conciliar movers and shakers set out to deconstruct «tradition»; polyester, synthetised, rolling Catholicism is the legacy.
No room for the transcendent or the numinous at Hotel Neo-Catholicism.
What, pray, is the «theology of synodality»?
It suggests mixed kinds of revisionism. Also the only ones I know who ever saw the Church as monolithic are those denying Christian doctrine.
The Holy Father holds forth “authority from Acts” for “synodality”. It would seem to be a kind of new elevation of status for the aged practice.
I also see over-/under-tones of Modernism. Modernism as it understands itself, an ACTIVITY work-in-progress, mingles sources, ideas, times, to make sense.
Stress is placed on the popular piety as the meaning of the Mass. He says he looks forward to this specifically. Presumably it can’t be ideology?
Likely another newsroom error (this: “tradition is the living memory of believers,” while “traditionalism instead is the dead life of our believers.”). The maxim is “Tradition is the living faith of the dead; traditionalism is the dead faith of the living.”
And, second, might the case be made, that synods (like councils) are what the Church DOES, not what the Church IS? (“the Church is either synodal or it is not Church.”) As if essence precedes existence (with Aquinas), rather than Sartre’s “existence precedes essence”? What comes first, finally, to be or to do? DO-BE-DO-BE-DO-BE-DO!
It seems to me that the mangling of what Peter Beaulieu refers to as the maxim was intentional. “The living memory of the believers” seems apropo of this Pope: he and his most fervent disciples are just waiting for those of us brought up in the Latin Rite and who remember it with great affection to die. Then they may do as they wish, since it is not only the memory of that rite that will be gone, but also the memory of a Church that was universally united by common ritual and belief.
Then I see a problem if that’s his expectation, since the majority of those who attend the EF of the Mass in my experience areat most 30 years of age. That seems to baffle and infuriate Francis in a particular way.
I’ve been a critic of Radical Traditionalism(i.e. Sedes, SSPX, SSPV, Feeneyites, NeoGeocentrists, Jewish Conspiracy Yobs, morons who believe the St Pius V Liturgy is the only true liturgy et) for decades.
But that being said I am a fan of loyal Traditionists(FSSP, Ed Feser etc) and Traditional Thomism.
The problem with the Holy Father here is he just isn’t very good at opposing the lunatic fringe of Traditionalism. He is just going to feed it. He paints every Trad with a broad brush and he ignores the principle of diversity and unity in diversity.
Go back to the pre John Paul II policies of the 70’s which failed horribly is not helpful.
Why should not love of the Old St Pius V Rite be part of that diversity?
I am all for it.
Pope Benedict’s policy solved the problem. We had to give it time. Francis is the one going backwards here. Ah well. I’ll pray for him and take comfort in the fact He won’t be Pope forever…
It only seems like forever, Jim.
I just wish the guy would listen to himself. He’s the one generating all the conflict.
Sorry to disappoint you but there is no such thing as Feeneyism.
After Fr. Leonard Feeny, SJ, for his extreme views on salvation outside of the Church, excommunicated by Richard Cardianl Cushing, ca. 1949-50.
In my experience, as I’ve noed here ar CWR and elsewhere, there’s little difference between the vitriolic hostility of many clergy of the Pope’s generation toward the old EF Latin rite and that I’ve encouintered when requesting that the OF be celebrated in Latin. And it’s not only to Latin: I’ve also often been brusquely dismissed for requesting that the Roman Canon in its present English version be used. That’s in ENGLISH, once again. It doesn’t seem to take much in some clerical quarters or with some older laity to get tagged as a “RadTrad.”
It’s a lively church community in motion. Acts of the Apostles – contain rich food for thought, prayer, and action.
Men In Black movies have their scripting loaded with pithy-type exchanges that serve the purpose of telling the meaning of story and driving the drama. In this trilogy it also puns the drama. How that works is a feature of theatre in that the audience wants to be entertained and the dramatist has to make up a credibility-world within the presentation, proper to it. It does not mean it is NOT a fiction because it propels an experience. Understanding it saves you from the existentialism that is rampant in the fiction industry. And while the pithy offerings and allocutions in there might sometimes ring true, there is the reality that often what they are sounding out is the doom, banality and fate the story wants to represent, even dogmatize. Take for instance, Griffin in Men In Black III:
“Where there is death there will always be death.”
The different types of problems have to be addressed according to their nature, intensity, patterning, nuancing, complexity. Shuttering “extreme traditionalists” and being freely permissive with “humble progressives” would show as forms of “disciplining” intervention on the one hand and “guidance” on the other; but I am left wondering at it when I see the practical limitations it imposes and then also the actual results.
In terms of limitations, each situation needs its own set of attentions and types of justice. This “binary” settlement cuts off growth and improvement.
In terms of result, I cite 2 examples that indicate arbitrary disruption -:
a) The Franciscan Friars of the Immaculate had (have?) promise for piety and mission but got truncated.
b) Argentina seminary was closed because a few (maybe many?) were too rigid, but none is identified.
Curious that the TLM communities which without exception do their best to celebrate the Mass carefully according to the Rubrics in the missal and they do their best to teach the Catholic Faith according to the Catechism of the Catholic Church are the ones accused by the pope of being “Traditionalists.” If doing this is reckoned by the Pope himself to be unacceptable and out of step with whatever it is that he thinks is the right expression of the faith of the church then…. God help the Roman Church.
“A backward-looking intoxication with the old”???? Really?? I look around my church and all I see are people who appear to be 70 years plus.What happens to the church when they finally pass on?? Yet I understand MANY young people love the Latin Traditional Mass. Is the Pope’s problem that people are actually ATTENDING traditional Latin MASS???? Maybe, under the current scandalous circumstances, he should be thanking God that ANYONE is attending Mass, no matter which version.
When there is conflict in theology the liturgy is always mistreated.
The post conciliar movers and shakers set out to deconstruct «tradition»; polyester, synthetised, rolling Catholicism is the legacy.
No room for the transcendent or the numinous at Hotel Neo-Catholicism.
What, pray, is the «theology of synodality»?
What, pray, is the «theology of synodality»?
Mighty prelate (as usual) speaks with forked tongue.