March 17, 2016. Cardinal George Pell speaks with CNA at the Vatican’s Apostolic Palace on March 17, 2016. / null
Sydney, Australia, Mar 8, 2022 / 06:05 am (CNA).
People who took part in a “pile-on” against Cardinal George Pell are refusing to reconsider the case almost two years after the Australian Church leader’s acquittal, a speaker said on Tuesday.
He argued that the Australian Broadcasting Corporation, Australia’s national broadcaster, and many of the country’s newspapers had overlooked critical accounts of the Pell trial and its coverage by the media.
“In short, members of the Pell pile-on will not engage in any reconsideration of the Pell case. In my view, that’s intellectual cowardice. In certain circumstances, it’s censorship,” he said.
Australia’s High Court unanimously overturned Pell’s conviction for five counts of alleged sexual abuse on April 7, 2020. The cardinal was released after more than 13 months of imprisonment and returned to Rome, where he had served as the Vatican’s economy czar.
Monica Doumit, the director of public affairs and engagement of the Archdiocese of Sydney, recalled that she was working for the archdiocese’s communications team when allegations against the cardinal were aired on an Australian television program.
Doumit, a columnist with The Catholic Weekly, a national Catholic newspaper, said that after the broadcast, she spoke over the phone to the cardinal, who was in Rome. As she returned home in the early hours, she received a call from a colleague at Pell’s behest. The caller explained that the cardinal was “really worried” about Doumit and wanted someone to check that she was OK.
“That’s the measure of the man we’re speaking about tonight,” she said. “And the reason I want to tell it is because when I look back on this, that’s actually the most important aspect of this for me, that first and foremost we’re talking about a man who cares deeply about other people.”
Doumit said that, two years on, many questions about the case remain unanswered. But she expressed hope that an ongoing Vatican finance trial would reveal why the Vatican sent more than $2 million to Australia during the Pell trial.
She said that Cardinal Angelo Becciu, one of the defendants, was connected to the transfer of funds from the Vatican to the tech company Neustar in Melbourne.
“So far witnesses at the trial have insisted that the money was sent to the Catholic bishops in Australia for the cardinal’s defense, but it’s demonstrably untrue,” she said. “We know the money went to Neustar.”
She noted that in a recent interview Pell challenged Becciu, who rejects all allegations of wrongdoing, to explain why the funds were transferred.
“Becciu has said he will not answer because to do so would be beneath the dignity of cardinals,” she said.
Brennan, a human rights lawyer, said: “When we go with the mob with the highest level of judiciary, we forfeit the rule of law. That’s why the High Court majority, seven to nil, was so essential to restore the rule of law, for the good of bonafide complainants, for the good of victims, and for the good of citizens including those like Citizen Pell.”
If you value the news and views Catholic World Report provides, please consider donating to support our efforts. Your contribution will help us continue to make CWR available to all readers worldwide for free, without a subscription. Thank you for your generosity!
Click here for more information on donating to CWR. Click here to sign up for our newsletter.
Vatican City, Mar 19, 2021 / 04:01 pm (CNA).- Among the seven clerics and religious whose heroic virtues were recognized by the Vatican on Thursday are three Italian religious sisters who died while serving victims of the Ebola virus in the Democratic Republic of the Congo in 1995.
The Congregation for the Causes of Saints promulgated a decree March 18 recognizing the heroic virtues of seven clerics and religious.
The religious sisters — Sr. Annelvira Ossoli, Sr. Vitarosa Zorza, and Sr. Danielangela Sorti — were members of the Sisters of the Poor, Palazzolo Institute. They contracted and died of Ebola while serving the poor. Three of their fellow religious who also died of Ebola were recognized for their heroic virtue Feb. 20.
The six religious sisters died while attending to Ebola patients at a hospital in the Diocese of Kikwit between April 25 and May 28, 1995.
They had reportedly assisted in an operation on a patient who, unbeknownst to them, had the Ebola virus.
Following the death of the six religious and the resultant uncertainty about the Ebola epidemic, the Palazzolo Sisters in the DRC wrote a fax to their Mother General in Bergamo, saying, in part, “We understand your trepidation, but we are totally in God’s hands. No evacuation can be done. It is very hard for you and us to accept this separation from the Sisters.”
They continued, “Painful events have overwhelmed us but the life of the Congregation must continue; the situation is quite dramatic especially inside. But it is necessary to remain calm. In Kinshasa there are no outbreaks and all the roads towards the interior are blocked.”
Founded in 1869 by Italian Priest, Blessed Luigi Maria Palazzolo, the Sisters of the Poor serve the poor, orphans, and the sick.
The March 18 decree also recognized the heroic virtues of Mercurio Maria Teresi, Archbishop of Monreale from 1802 to 1805; Cosme Muñoz Pérez, a diocesan priest who founded the Congregation of the Daughters of the Patronage of Mary and who died in 1636; Salvatore Valera Parra, a diocesan priest who died in 1889; and Leone Veuthey, a Conventual Franciscan who died in 1974.
Thousands of pro-life advocates gathered outside the U.S. Supreme Court in Washington, D.C., on Dec. 1, 2021, in conjunction with oral arguments in the Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization abortion case. / Katie Yoder/CNA
Washington D.C., Dec 2, 2021 / 08:04 am (CNA).
Anna Del Duca and daughter, Frances, woke up at 5 a.m. Wednesday morning to brave the 30-degree weather outside the U.S. Supreme Court in Washington, D.C. They arrived hours before oral arguments began in the highly-anticipated abortion case, Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization.
The case, which involves a Mississippi law restricting most abortions after 15 weeks, challenges two landmark decisions: Roe v. Wade, the 1973 ruling that legalized abortion nationwide, and Planned Parenthood v. Casey, which upheld Roe in 1992.
“We’re looking forward to the end of Roe versus Wade in our country,” Anna, who drove from Pittsburgh Tuesday night, told CNA. In her hands, she held a sign reading, “I regret my abortion.”
Anna Del Duca (right) and her daughter, Frances, traveled from Pittsburgh to attend a pro-life rally outside the U.S. Supreme Court on Dec. 1, 2021, in conjunction with oral arguments for the Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization abortion case. Katie Yoder/CNA
“I would like to use my testimony to be a blessing to others,” she said, so that “others will choose life or those who have regretted abortion or had an abortion would turn to Jesus.”
Anna remembered having an abortion when she was just 19. Today, she and her daughter run a group called Restorers of Streets to Dwell In Pittsburgh that offers help to women seeking healing after abortion.
Anna and Frances were among thousands of Americans who rallied outside the Supreme Court before, during, and after the oral arguments. To accommodate them, law enforcement closed the street in front of the court. Capitol police also placed fencing in the space in front of the building in an attempt to physically separate rallies held by abortion supporters and pro-lifers.
At 21-weeks pregnant, pro-life speaker Alison Centofante emceed the pro-life rally, called, “Empower Women Promote Life.” The event featured a slew of pro-life women of diverse backgrounds and numerous politicians.
“It’s funny, there were so many diverse speakers today that the only unifying thread was that we want to protect preborn children,” Centofante told CNA. They included Democrats, Republicans, Christians, Catholics, agnostics, atheists, women who chose life, and women who regretted their abortions, she said.
She recognized women there, including Aimee Murphy, as people who are not the typical “cookie cutter pro-lifer.”
Aimee Murphy, 32, founder of pro-life group Rehumanize International, arrived at the Supreme Court around 6:30 a.m. She drove from Pittsburgh the night before. Her sign read, “Queer Latina feminist rape survivor against abortion.”“At Rehumanize International, we oppose all forms of aggressive violence,” she told CNA. “Even as a secular and non-partisan organization, we understand that abortion is the most urgent cause that we must stand against in our modern day and age because it takes on average over 800,000 lives a year.”
She also had a personal reason for attending.
“When I was 16 years old, I was raped and my rapist then threatened to kill me if I didn’t have an abortion,” she revealed.
“It was when he threatened me that I felt finally a solidarity with unborn children and I understood then that, yeah, the science told me that a life begins at conception, but that I couldn’t be like my abusive ex and pass on the violence and oppression of abortion to another human being — that all that I would be doing in having an abortion would be telling my child, ‘You are an inconvenience to me and to my future, therefore I’m going to kill you,’ which is exactly the same thing that my rapist was telling me when he threatened to kill me.”
On the other side of the police fence, the Center for Reproductive Rights and the National Abortion Access Coalition and NARAL Pro-Choice America participated in another rally. Yellow balloons printed with the words “BANS OFF OUR BODIES” escaped into the sky. Several pro-choice demonstrators declined to speak with CNA.
Voices clashed in the air as people, the majority of whom were women, spoke into their respective microphones at both rallies. Abortion supporters stressed bodily autonomy, while pro-lifers recognized the humanity of the unborn child. Chants arose from both sides at different points, from “Whose choice? My choice!” to “Hey hey, ho ho, Roe v. Wade has got to go!”
At 10 a.m., the pro-life crowd sudddenly went silent as the oral arguments began and the rally paused temporarily as live audio played through speakers.
Hundreds of students from Liberty University in Lynchburg, Virginia, traveled to Washington, D.C. for a pro-life rally outside the U.S. Supreme Court on Dec. 1, 2021, in conjunction with oral arguments in the Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization abortion case. Katie Yoder/CNA
During the oral arguments, students from Liberty University knelt in prayer. One student estimated that more than a thousand students from the school made the more than 3-hour trip from Lynchburg, Virginia.
“Talking about our faith is one thing, but actually acting upon it is another,” he said. “We have to be the hands and feet of Jesus Christ. So to me this is part of doing that.”
Sister Mary Karen, who has been with the Sisters of Life for 21 years, also stressed the importance of prayer. She drove from New York earlier that morning because, she said, she felt drawn to attend. She came, she said, to pray for the country and promote the dignity of a human person.
“Our culture is post-abortive,” she explained. “So many people have suffered and the loss of human life is so detrimental, just not knowing that we have value and are precious and sacred.”
Theresa Bonopartis, of Harrison, New York, was among the pro-life demonstrators outside the U.S. Supreme Court on Dec. 1, 2021. She runs a nonprofit group called Entering Canaan that ministers to women and others wounded by abortion. Katie Yoder/CNA
She stood next to Theresa Bonopartis, who traveled from Harrison, New York, and ministers to women and others wounded by abortion.
“I’ve been fighting abortion for 30 years at least,” she told CNA.
Her ministry, called Entering Canaan, began with the Sisters of Life and is observing its 25th anniversary this year. It provides retreats for women, men, and even siblings of aborted babies.
Abortion is personal for Bonopartis, who said she had a coerced abortion when she was just 17.
“I was kicked out of the house by my father and then coerced into getting an abortion,” she said. “Pretty much cut me off from everything, and that’s something people don’t really talk about … they make it try to seem like it’s a woman’s right, it’s a free choice. It’s all this other stuff, but many women are coerced in one way or another.”
She guessed that she was 14 or 15 weeks pregnant at the time.
“I saw my son. I had a saline abortion, so I saw him, which I always considered a blessing because it never allowed me to deny what abortion was,” she said. Afterward, she said she struggled with self-esteem issues, hating herself, guilt, shame, and more. Then, she found healing.
“I know what that pain is like, I know what that experience is like, and you know that you can get past it,” she said. “You just want to be able to give that message to other people, that they’re able to heal.”
Residents of Mississippi, where the Dobbs v. Jackson case originated, also attended.
Marion, who declined to provide her last name, drove from Mississippi to stand outside the Supreme Court. She said she was in her early 20s when Roe v. Wade was decided in 1973.
“At the time, of course, I could care less,” she said. Since then, she had a change of heart.
“We were the generation that allowed it,” she said, “and so we are the generation who will help close that door and reverse it.”
Marion, who declined to provide her last name, was among those who attended a pro-life rally outside the U.S. Supreme Court on Dec. 1, 2021, from Mississippi, where the Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization abortion case originated. Katie Yoder/CNA
The crowd at the pro-life rally included all ages, from those who had witnessed Roe to bundled-up babies, children running around, and college students holding up homemade signs.
One group of young friends traveled across the country to stand outside the Supreme Court. They cited their faith and family as reasons for attending.
Mathilde Steenepoorte, 19, from Green Bay, Wisconsin, identified herself as “very pro-life” in large part because of her younger brother with Down syndrome. She said she was saddened by the abortion rates of unborn babies dianosed with Down syndrome.
Juanito Estevez, from Freeport, a village on Long Island, New York, at a pro-life rally outside the U.S. Supreme Court on Dec. 1, 2021. Katie Yoder/CNA
Juanito Estevez, from Freeport, a village on Long Island, New York, arrived Tuesday. He woke up at 6 a.m. to arrive at the Supreme Court with a crucifix in hand.
“I believe that God is the giver of life and we don’t have the right [to decide] whether a baby should live or die,” he said.
He also said that he believed women have been lied to about abortion.
“We say it’s their right, and there’s a choice,” he said. When girls tell him “I have the right,” his response, he said, is to ask back, “You have the right for what?”
Mallory Finch, from Charlotte, North Carolina, was among the pro-life demonstrators outside the U.S. Supreme Court on Dec. 1, 2021.
Mallory Finch, from Charlotte, North Carolina, also woke up early but emphasized “it was worth it.” A pro-life podcast host, she called abortion a “human-rights issue.”
“I hope that it overturns Roe,” she said of the case, “but that doesn’t mean that our job as pro-lifers is done. It makes this, really, just the beginning.”
Scythian rocked a completely packed house full of over 2,000 Knights of Columbus and their families July 31, 2023, kicking off the Knights’ 141st Supreme Convention in Orlando, Florida. / Photo courtesy of the Knights of Columbus
If Pell was wrongly convicted, he stands in good company, for the Lord Jesus went through a mockery of a trial. He knows what he did or did not do, the matter being one of the eternal soul, with God as adjudicator.
Exodus 23:7 Keep far from a false charge, and do not kill the innocent and righteous, for I will not acquit the wicked.
Exodus 23:1- “You shall not spread a false report. You shall not join hands with a wicked man to be a malicious witness. You shall not fall in with the many to do evil, nor shall you bear witness in a lawsuit, siding with the many, so as to pervert justice, nor shall you be partial to a poor man in his lawsuit. “If you meet your enemy’s ox or his donkey going astray, you shall bring it back to him. If you see the donkey of one who hates you lying down under its burden, you shall refrain from leaving him with it; you shall rescue it with him. …
1 Peter 3:16 Having a good conscience, so that, when you are slandered, those who revile your good behaviour in Christ may be put to shame.
Isaiah 54:17 No weapon that is fashioned against you shall succeed, and you shall confute every tongue that rises against you in judgment. This is the heritage of the servants of the Lord and their vindication from me, declares the Lord.”
John 17:17 Sanctify them in the truth; your word is truth.
I always knew he was innocent.
An absolutely admirable man.
Truly courageous. Cardinal Pell makes me very proud of being Catholic.
God bless him and protect him always!
In the eyes of the Lunatic Left, Cardinal Pell will always be guilty, even if they are not sure what exactly he is guilty of.
This is what happens when you substitute truth a narrative, and become ideologically and emotionally wedded to that narrative that, at the point the narrative gets shattered by truth and reality, you suffer emotional trauma and psychological damage.
Cardinal Pell, like Kyle Rittenhouse, will never receive forgiveness for the crime of being innocent.
Buongiorno.. conosco abbastanza il Cardinale Pell. Nel 2014 quando e diventato prefetto della segreteria per l’economia, sono stato scelto per essere a suo servizio come usciere/autista e non solo. Ho avuto piena fiducia da parte di tutto lo staff del Cardinale. Fin da sempre ero sicuro della sua innocenza. Il Cardinale è una persona che ti fa lavorare bene e ti mette a proprio agio.ho lavorato con S.Eminenza fino al suo ritorno in Australia per difendersi dalle accuse infamanti . Ero e sono sicuro della sua innocenza.persona stimata è direttissima. Da quando è tornato a Roma, ho incontrato almeno 5/6 volte. La prima volta era molto provato, ora si è ripreso benissimo. Mi dispiace tantissimo che il Papa non gli abbia dato un incarico.
Why assume the easily influenced High Court is more credible than a jury trial and Court of Appeals ? And, even if the charges against Pell for alleged PERSONAL acts of abuse were false, why should he be absolved of all responsibility for predators like Risdale, whom he defended and protected ?
Have you actually read the decision of the High Court? And the dissent to the decision of the Court of Appeals by the one judge on it who had experience in criminal law?
Cardinal Pell was tried for alleged personal acts of abuse. Ridsdale had nothing to do with the matter.
The Cardinal did not “defend and protect” Ridsdale.
Brian Young what happened to Cardinal Pell was a horrific hit job to ruin and destroy his reputation which is totally beyond repute. The good and holy Cardinal would have been a terrific papal candidate in the next conclave making him the first Pope from an English speaking country. The very same thing is now happening to Pope Benedict XVI. He too is a good and Holy man of God. Evil will not triumph! God is totally in charge and will ensure that next Holy Father will be the right man at the right time in Catholic Church and world history. Our Lady of Fatima pray for and protect Cardinal Pell and Pope Benedict XVI. PRAY! PRAY! PRAY!
Unfortunately, some Conservative commentators such as Joseph Sciambra are filled with hatred for Cardinal Pell and sees the Church defending him as gas-lighting. Sadly, Joseph has now left the Catholic Church for the Russian Orthodox and his Facebook timeline is mostly him bashing the Catholic Church. So keep him in your prayers!
Essentially we all have 3 things at our disposal, Truth, Reason and for those who choose, Faith. Issues relating to Cardinal Pell go well beyond the series of court hearings and final verdict this article refers to. As many readers here will be aware, I am one who often posted in terms considered hostile to Cardinal Pell. I would like to emphasise that my hostility was directed to a deliberate and sustained misrepresentation of the wider circumstances pertaining to Cardinal Pell that was evident in the writing on the subject, by George Weigle. His articles included vitriolic misrepresentations and condemnation of elements within Australian society and within the Catholic Church community who had years of involvement advocating for those wounded by the scourge of Clergy abuse. Mr Weigles writing to say the least, lacked nuance.
One can not separate the sordid mechanisms of political manoeuvring from these discussions relating to Cardinal Pell. Gerard Henderson, referred to in this article is a prominent player in the arena of Australian politics as Mr Weigel is in the US political power play being a signatory of the Statement of Principals by The Project For The New American Century making him a key player in the Neo Conservative political movement.
I stridently reject any accusation, implied by this article, upon my stated opinions in the many comments I have made on this site that I was involved in a pile on that also implied intellectual cowardice.
I will go further to say it is evident to me that many ( and I will emphasise not all ) advocating for Cardinal Pell are guilty of intellectual dishonesty and deliberate selective misrepresentation that has had a direct impact on those in the church community of the state of Victoria in Australia. Your carelessness is more than evident for those who have lived close to the truth that they have been a witness of.
To the CNA staff I say look at your headline to this article:
“ People who joined Cardinal Pell ‘ pile-on’ guilty of ‘intellectual cowardice’ says speaker, the speaker being Mr Gerard Henderson.
This statement endorsed by this website is an implied condemnation of Chrissie Foster, and all the other advocates, many of who I know personally who worked for and on behalf of the children abused by the clergy of Victoria, again I say because the subject matter goes beyond the specific legal case.
I ask any one who cares to search and read my many contributions to discussions pertaining to Cardinal Pell in articles mainly written by George Weigell. Read them in context of linear dialogue as I stand by every word I have written.
I have to the best of my ability been governed by truth, reason and faith.
I am an ex prison officer and I am totally disgusted in how Mr Pell was treated by the Victorian legal system. I am very sure that his physical treatment by both Police and most Prison guards would have been awerful.I hope that God will bless him in every way and forgive those who were such bastards towards him.
If Pell was wrongly convicted, he stands in good company, for the Lord Jesus went through a mockery of a trial. He knows what he did or did not do, the matter being one of the eternal soul, with God as adjudicator.
Exodus 23:7 Keep far from a false charge, and do not kill the innocent and righteous, for I will not acquit the wicked.
Exodus 23:1- “You shall not spread a false report. You shall not join hands with a wicked man to be a malicious witness. You shall not fall in with the many to do evil, nor shall you bear witness in a lawsuit, siding with the many, so as to pervert justice, nor shall you be partial to a poor man in his lawsuit. “If you meet your enemy’s ox or his donkey going astray, you shall bring it back to him. If you see the donkey of one who hates you lying down under its burden, you shall refrain from leaving him with it; you shall rescue it with him. …
1 Peter 3:16 Having a good conscience, so that, when you are slandered, those who revile your good behaviour in Christ may be put to shame.
Isaiah 54:17 No weapon that is fashioned against you shall succeed, and you shall confute every tongue that rises against you in judgment. This is the heritage of the servants of the Lord and their vindication from me, declares the Lord.”
John 17:17 Sanctify them in the truth; your word is truth.
“When we go with the mob . . .”
That about sums up the media these days. Not just in Australia.
I always knew he was innocent.
An absolutely admirable man.
Truly courageous. Cardinal Pell makes me very proud of being Catholic.
God bless him and protect him always!
In the eyes of the Lunatic Left, Cardinal Pell will always be guilty, even if they are not sure what exactly he is guilty of.
This is what happens when you substitute truth a narrative, and become ideologically and emotionally wedded to that narrative that, at the point the narrative gets shattered by truth and reality, you suffer emotional trauma and psychological damage.
Cardinal Pell, like Kyle Rittenhouse, will never receive forgiveness for the crime of being innocent.
Buongiorno.. conosco abbastanza il Cardinale Pell. Nel 2014 quando e diventato prefetto della segreteria per l’economia, sono stato scelto per essere a suo servizio come usciere/autista e non solo. Ho avuto piena fiducia da parte di tutto lo staff del Cardinale. Fin da sempre ero sicuro della sua innocenza. Il Cardinale è una persona che ti fa lavorare bene e ti mette a proprio agio.ho lavorato con S.Eminenza fino al suo ritorno in Australia per difendersi dalle accuse infamanti . Ero e sono sicuro della sua innocenza.persona stimata è direttissima. Da quando è tornato a Roma, ho incontrato almeno 5/6 volte. La prima volta era molto provato, ora si è ripreso benissimo. Mi dispiace tantissimo che il Papa non gli abbia dato un incarico.
Why assume the easily influenced High Court is more credible than a jury trial and Court of Appeals ? And, even if the charges against Pell for alleged PERSONAL acts of abuse were false, why should he be absolved of all responsibility for predators like Risdale, whom he defended and protected ?
Have you actually read the decision of the High Court? And the dissent to the decision of the Court of Appeals by the one judge on it who had experience in criminal law?
Cardinal Pell was tried for alleged personal acts of abuse. Ridsdale had nothing to do with the matter.
The Cardinal did not “defend and protect” Ridsdale.
Brian Young what happened to Cardinal Pell was a horrific hit job to ruin and destroy his reputation which is totally beyond repute. The good and holy Cardinal would have been a terrific papal candidate in the next conclave making him the first Pope from an English speaking country. The very same thing is now happening to Pope Benedict XVI. He too is a good and Holy man of God. Evil will not triumph! God is totally in charge and will ensure that next Holy Father will be the right man at the right time in Catholic Church and world history. Our Lady of Fatima pray for and protect Cardinal Pell and Pope Benedict XVI. PRAY! PRAY! PRAY!
Unfortunately, some Conservative commentators such as Joseph Sciambra are filled with hatred for Cardinal Pell and sees the Church defending him as gas-lighting. Sadly, Joseph has now left the Catholic Church for the Russian Orthodox and his Facebook timeline is mostly him bashing the Catholic Church. So keep him in your prayers!
Essentially we all have 3 things at our disposal, Truth, Reason and for those who choose, Faith. Issues relating to Cardinal Pell go well beyond the series of court hearings and final verdict this article refers to. As many readers here will be aware, I am one who often posted in terms considered hostile to Cardinal Pell. I would like to emphasise that my hostility was directed to a deliberate and sustained misrepresentation of the wider circumstances pertaining to Cardinal Pell that was evident in the writing on the subject, by George Weigle. His articles included vitriolic misrepresentations and condemnation of elements within Australian society and within the Catholic Church community who had years of involvement advocating for those wounded by the scourge of Clergy abuse. Mr Weigles writing to say the least, lacked nuance.
One can not separate the sordid mechanisms of political manoeuvring from these discussions relating to Cardinal Pell. Gerard Henderson, referred to in this article is a prominent player in the arena of Australian politics as Mr Weigel is in the US political power play being a signatory of the Statement of Principals by The Project For The New American Century making him a key player in the Neo Conservative political movement.
I stridently reject any accusation, implied by this article, upon my stated opinions in the many comments I have made on this site that I was involved in a pile on that also implied intellectual cowardice.
I will go further to say it is evident to me that many ( and I will emphasise not all ) advocating for Cardinal Pell are guilty of intellectual dishonesty and deliberate selective misrepresentation that has had a direct impact on those in the church community of the state of Victoria in Australia. Your carelessness is more than evident for those who have lived close to the truth that they have been a witness of.
To the CNA staff I say look at your headline to this article:
“ People who joined Cardinal Pell ‘ pile-on’ guilty of ‘intellectual cowardice’ says speaker, the speaker being Mr Gerard Henderson.
This statement endorsed by this website is an implied condemnation of Chrissie Foster, and all the other advocates, many of who I know personally who worked for and on behalf of the children abused by the clergy of Victoria, again I say because the subject matter goes beyond the specific legal case.
I ask any one who cares to search and read my many contributions to discussions pertaining to Cardinal Pell in articles mainly written by George Weigell. Read them in context of linear dialogue as I stand by every word I have written.
I have to the best of my ability been governed by truth, reason and faith.
Christopher, you say “again I say because the subject matter goes beyond the specific legal case.
Yes! Absolutely!
kevin your brother
In Christ
I am an ex prison officer and I am totally disgusted in how Mr Pell was treated by the Victorian legal system. I am very sure that his physical treatment by both Police and most Prison guards would have been awerful.I hope that God will bless him in every way and forgive those who were such bastards towards him.