Catholic nurse unfairly dismissed over cross necklace, UK tribunal rules

CNA Staff   By CNA Staff


Nurse Mary Onuoha holds the cross on her necklace. / Christian Concern.

London, England, Jan 7, 2022 / 06:00 am (CNA).

A Catholic nurse was unfairly dismissed by a U.K. hospital trust for wearing a cross necklace, an employment tribunal ruled this week.

In a decision published on Jan. 5, the tribunal said that the trust’s treatment of Mary Onuoha was “directly discriminatory.”

The campaign group Christian Concern hailed the verdict as a “landmark ruling” strengthening the legal principle that employers cannot discriminate against employees for “reasonable manifestations” of faith in the workplace.

Onuoha was forced to leave her job as a National Health Service (NHS) theater practitioner at Croydon University Hospital in south London in June 2020 after a two-year battle with her employers over wearing the cross.

With support from the Christian Legal Centre, Christian Concern’s legal ministry, she took her case against Croydon Health Services NHS Trust to an employment tribunal.

At a hearing in October 2021, the trust argued that the cross necklace had presented an infection risk. But the tribunal concluded that the risk was “very low.”

It added that there was “no cogent explanation” of why religious head coverings such as hijabs and turbans were permitted under the dress code and uniform policy, but “a fine necklace with a small pendant of religious devotional significance is not.”

Christian Concern said that Onuoha, who was born in Nigeria and moved to the U.K. in 1988, was delighted and relieved by the ruling.

Andrea Williams, chief executive of the Christian Legal Centre, commented: “From the beginning, this case has been about the high-handed attack from the NHS bureaucracy on the right of a devoted and industrious nurse to wear a cross — the worldwide, recognized and cherished symbol of the Christian faith. It is very uplifting to see the tribunal acknowledge this truth.”

“It was astonishing that an experienced nurse, during a pandemic, was forced to choose between her faith and the profession she loves.”

“Any employer will now have to think very carefully before restricting wearing of crosses in the workplace. You can only do that on specific and cogent health and safety grounds. It is not enough to apply general labels such as ‘infection risk’ or ‘health and safety.’”

The U.K. has seen a number of high-profile cases of employers demanding that employees remove or cover cross necklaces.

In 2013, the European Court of Human Rights ruled in favor of Nadia Eweida, a Coptic Christian who was asked by her employer British Airways to cover up her white gold cross.

But the court declined to support Shirley Chaplin, a nurse who was told by the Royal Devon and Exeter NHS trust hospital not to wear a cross necklace, on health and safety grounds, that she had worn to work for 30 years.

“We are delighted that the tribunal have ruled in Mary’s favor and delivered justice in this case,” Williams said.

“Shirley Chaplin, who also fought for the freedom to wear a cross necklace 10 years ago has also now been vindicated.”

If you value the news and views Catholic World Report provides, please consider donating to support our efforts. Your contribution will help us continue to make CWR available to all readers worldwide for free, without a subscription. Thank you for your generosity!

Click here for more information on donating to CWR. Click here to sign up for our newsletter.

About Catholic News Agency 6551 Articles
Catholic News Agency (

2 Trackbacks / Pingbacks

  1. Catholic nurse unfairly dismissed over cross necklace, UK tribunal rules – Catholic World Report - Catholic Feed
  2. Catholic nurse unfairly dismissed over cross necklace, UK tribunal rules – Via Nova Media

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

All comments posted at Catholic World Report are moderated. While vigorous debate is welcome and encouraged, please note that in the interest of maintaining a civilized and helpful level of discussion, comments containing obscene language or personal attacks—or those that are deemed by the editors to be needlessly combative or inflammatory—will not be published. Thank you.