The Dispatch: More from CWR...

France’s heritage authorities back controversial plans for Notre-Dame Cathedral’s interior

CNA Staff   By CNA Staff

Notre-Dame de Paris. / D.Bond/Shutterstock.

Paris, France, Dec 10, 2021 / 05:00 am (CNA).

France’s heritage authorities approved on Thursday controversial plans for the interior of Notre-Dame Cathedral in Paris.

Members of the National Heritage and Architecture Commission backed the proposals during a closed-door meeting on Dec. 9 amid an outcry over the restoration of the cathedral badly damaged by fire in 2019.

French media quoted the Ministry of Culture as saying that “the experts gave a favorable opinion on the interior refurbishment program.”

The commission expressed two reservations about the plan. The first concerned a proposal to remove saints’ statues in the chapels. The second related to plans to install moveable pews.

AFP reported that the commission asked to view a prototype of the pews, which would replace the current straw chairs.

The vote by a 24-member committee came shortly after more than 100 of France’s leading figures in the arts and academia criticized the proposals.

In an article published jointly by the magazine La Tribune de l’Art and newspaper Le Figaro on Dec. 7, they wrote: “The Archdiocese of Paris wants to take advantage of the restoration work to transform the interior of Notre-Dame into a project that completely distorts the decor and liturgical space.”

“It believes that the destruction caused by the fire is an opportunity to transform the visitor’s perception of the monument, even though the fire was limited to the roof and the spire and did not destroy any of the heritage inside.”

The Descent from the Cross, also known as Pieta, statue inside the Cathedral Notre-Dame de Paris before the fire. . Jeanne Emmel/Shutterstock.
The Descent from the Cross, also known as Pieta, statue inside the Cathedral Notre-Dame de Paris before the fire. . Jeanne Emmel/Shutterstock.

The signatories, who included television presenter Stéphane Bern and philosopher Alain Finkielkraut, added: “The project foresees the installation of removable benches, lighting that changes according to the seasons, video projections on the walls, etc., in other words, the same fashionable (and therefore already terribly outdated) ‘mediation devices’ that can be found in all ‘immersive’ cultural projects, in which silliness often vies with kitsch.”

The Daily Telegraph, a British newspaper, reported on Nov. 26 that critics feared the changes would turn the building into a “politically correct Disneyland.”

It said that “confessional boxes, altars, and classical sculptures will be replaced with modern art murals, and new sound and light effects to create ‘emotional spaces.’”

“There will be themed chapels on a ‘discovery trail,’ with an emphasis on Africa and Asia, while quotes from the Bible will be projected onto chapel walls in various languages, including Mandarin,” it added.

Maurice Culot, an architect who has seen the plans, told the newspaper: “It’s as if Disney were entering Notre-Dame.”

“What they are proposing to do to Notre-Dame would never be done to Westminster Abbey or St. Peter’s in Rome. It’s a kind of theme park and very childish and trivial given the grandeur of the place,” he commented.

But other experts have welcomed aspects of the plan. Writing in the Washington Post on Dec. 8, art historian Elizabeth Lev noted that the plan proposed the dedication of five chapels to five continents, with Bible verses projected in local languages.

“Perhaps this is what spawned the Disney comparison, a kind of Catholic Epcot Center,” she said. “But for an international icon in a city where 20% of residents are immigrants, what’s the problem with spreading a message of hope to every person who crosses that venerable threshold?”

“And while some have dubbed it ‘Christianity for Dummies,’ in a world where many Catholics are shaky on scripture and many young people are raised without religion, some back-to-basics catechetics might be in order.”

In an interview with AFP, Father Gilles Drouin, the priest overseeing the interior restoration, explained that the restoration sought to preserve the cathedral as a place of worship, but also to welcome and educate visitors “who are not always from a Christian culture.”

He said that side chapels would feature “portraits from the 16th and 18th century that will be in dialogue with modern art objects.”

“The cathedral has always been open to art from the contemporary period, right up to the large golden cross by sculptor Marc Couturier installed by [the then archbishop of Paris] Cardinal Lustiger in 1994,” he said.

The French government is overseeing the cathedral’s structural restoration and conservation, but the cathedral authorities are responsible for its interior renewal.

The plans must ultimately be approved by France’s Ministry of Culture. Culture Minister Roselyne Bachelot has previously said that the restored cathedral should look “identical” to its form before the fire.

The cathedral will reportedly reopen for worship with a Te Deum on April 16, 2024, five years after the blaze. Later that year, Paris will host the Summer Olympics.

Speaking after the commission’s vote, Father Drouin told AFP: “We are very satisfied with this decision which respects the broad principles that we outlined, including the work on the lighting and the guidance for visitors.”

If you value the news and views Catholic World Report provides, please consider donating to support our efforts. Your contribution will help us continue to make CWR available to all readers worldwide for free, without a subscription. Thank you for your generosity!

Click here for more information on donating to CWR. Click here to sign up for our newsletter.

About Catholic News Agency 6486 Articles
Catholic News Agency (


  1. My wife and I both agree that at one time Paris was our favorite city in the world.

    I, now, wouldn’t return to Paris in a million years. The last time we were there, we could have been visiting Morocco or Tangiers.

  2. Curious that Archbishop Aupetit who has been standing up to the Freemasons running their Anti-Catholic Republic was media Executed just in time… with Rome’s Rubber Stamp.

  3. As for an accurate comparison with St. Peter’s Basilica…Pachamama did make a brief appearance in the basilica, but then was tossed in the Tiber. Perhaps the National Heritage and Architecture Commission should all take a dip in the Seine?

    Speaking of which, during the Reign of Terror the row of statues across the facade above the entrances was dismantled and tossed in the Seine—because the figures were believed to be deplorable Christian saints. Nope, they were Old Testament figures. Likewise, today, the original interior of Notre Dame is now is to be treated like merely one layer of random cultural graffiti now to be simply covered over by another layer, however multicultural. Enough!

    As for biblical quotes, how about this for Culture Minister Roselyne Bachelot who “has previously said that the restored cathedral should look ‘identical’ to its form before the fire”: “But let your ‘Yes’ be ‘Yes,’ and your ‘No,’ ‘No.’ For whatever is more than these is from the evil one” (Mt 5:37).

    So, “no” to the Disneyworld not-so-special effects.

  4. I once stood in Notre Dame next to the very column where Paul Claudel, in a miraculous instant on Christmas Eve, received the entirety of the Catholic Faith, with which he proceeded to inspire an entire generation of Catholic writers and converts. I simply could not bear to see what is being proposed for Notre Dame. I have visited Paris, and maybe la France entière, for the last time.

    • Claudel and a legion of others came to my mind as well when reading of the collapse of the Commission in the face of the proposed atrocity. We had been assured of an authentic restoration and then this came up just recently. We were deceived. I had been counting on French academic class to bring this outrage to a halt, but it appears that they too have abandoned all professional principle. One can only imagine what the outrage would be if a work at the Louvre was defaced and then “reimaged” to suit some cleric’s vulgar notion. Such as these are drunk on themselves.

  5. Macron met with the Pope in Rome a few weeks ago. Despite the virulent secular character of the French government if the Pope had objected to the project it would have been brought to a halt. If his quiet personal appeal was not heard there he could have rallied the consciousness of the world to object to this Philistine enterprise. That this desecration is going through is on the lap of this pontificate along with the rest of its deconstructionist projects. One cannot help but contrast at this this moment the love, the fidelity, the heroism of the likes of Judas Macabaeus with the infidelity, the ignorance, the impotence with our clergy class.
    Where is the voice of the French clergy? Where the voice of the French episcopate? Indeed, where is the voice of the world wide episcopate?
    Just how much does anyone have to do to be convicted of odium fidei?
    The tragedy of the Titanic has been seen as prefiguring the catastrophe of WWI and indeed the hell of the twentieth century. The burning and now the immanent purposeful desecration of Notre Dame with its known ecclesial genesis aptly epitomizes the nature of the Bergoglian captivity

  6. It appears Notre Dame Cathedral will now receive the same sentence applied to the
    University of Notre Dame & Georgetown for the visits of Obama/Biden in May of 2010.

  7. Personally, I find today’s more liberal views to be juvenile in nature. It’s as if any deep thought is off limits and only “good feelings” are important. They will ruin Notre Dame and any thing else they touch.

  8. I thought that the Cathedral was Catholic first. I’m glad I wasn’t able to contribute to its restoration. (I know, terrible thing to say.)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

All comments posted at Catholic World Report are moderated. While vigorous debate is welcome and encouraged, please note that in the interest of maintaining a civilized and helpful level of discussion, comments containing obscene language or personal attacks—or those that are deemed by the editors to be needlessly combative or inflammatory—will not be published. Thank you.