Providence bishop: Catholic congressman’s abortion position ‘terribly disappointing’

Joe Bukuras   By Joe Bukuras for CNA

Congressman James Langevin. / (public domain)

Providence, R.I., Sep 10, 2021 / 11:00 am (CNA).

Bishop Tomas Tobin of Providence on Thursday lambasted a local congressman’s newspaper editorial which explains his support for federally codifying abortion rights, despite his Catholic faith and professed personal pro-life views.

“We are so tired of hearing Catholic politicians say, as Jim Langevin does, ‘Although I remain personally opposed to abortion . . .’ and then go on to support abortion,” Bishop Tobin wrote in a Sept. 9 statement. “That pathetic excuse doesn’t fly anymore.”

A Sept. 9 column in the Providence Journal by Rep. James Langevin, a Democrat who represents Rhode Island’s second congressional district, explains how his position on legalized abortion has “evolved.” He says his increased support for abortion rights is the reason he will be voting for the Women’s Health Protection Act when he arrives in Washington D.C. in the coming weeks.

“Although I remain personally opposed to abortion, as a matter of public policy, my position has evolved,” Langevin wrote. “I will join as a co-sponsor of the Women’s Health Protection Act. And when I return to Washington, D.C., in two weeks, I will vote to codify the protections afforded by Roe into federal law.”

The Women’s Health Protection Act would grant women the right to undergo an abortion, and health care workers the right to perform an abortion. It would prohibit states from restricting abortions through laws requiring mandatory ultrasounds or waiting periods before an abortion. It would also block restrictions on pre-viability abortions and on the method of abortions.

The bill would eliminate the possibility for pro-life riders like the Hyde Amendment, which have protected Americans from paying for abortions with their tax dollars.

Abortion activist politicians have introduced the bill multiple times since 2013, but have had no success in passage. The bill has 48 co-sponsors in the Senate and 205 in the House.

Bishop Tobin said that “although Congressman Langevin had previously attempted to nuance his pro-life position, his new statement on behalf of the ‘Women’s Health Protection Act’ removes any doubt about where he stands and is terribly disappointing.”

In his column, Langevin criticized Republicans for claiming to be pro-life while “consistently vote against policies that help millions of kids and families across our country.”

The congressman explained how he has fought to expand access to healthcare and protect the social safety net, as well as “championed initiatives to ensure every child can find their forever home with a safe and loving family.”

He added that he hopes the policies he fought for would continue, but “cannot, in good conscience, sit idly by as the right-wing legislators of Texas — and a soon to be bevy of copycat states — take our country in a very dangerous direction.”

“Nor can I cast a vote against a policy that the people of Rhode Island have already seen fit to enshrine in our state law,” he said.

The congressman said he is “deeply alarmed by the direction the Republican Party and the right-wing Supreme Court are headed,” adding that he believes “the consequences will be disastrous, and the already fraying fabric of our nation will tear even further.”

Bishop Tobin said Langevin’s decision to “reconsider” his position on abortion shows he has joined the “partisan pro-abortion bandwagon.”

“Jim Langevin claims to be a ‘practicing Catholic,’” Bishop Tobin wrote, “but practicing Catholics do not promote the legalization of abortion which the Church clearly teaches is an ‘abominable crime.’”

Bishop Tobin concluded by acknowledging the obligation to speak the truth: “that every time an abortion takes place, a child dies.”

“Sadly,” he said, “that reality will now be on the heart and soul and conscience of Jim Langevin.”

If you value the news and views Catholic World Report provides, please consider donating to support our efforts. Your contribution will help us continue to make CWR available to all readers worldwide for free, without a subscription. Thank you for your generosity!

Click here for more information on donating to CWR. Click here to sign up for our newsletter.

About Catholic News Agency 6504 Articles
Catholic News Agency (


  1. Stop being disappointed. Start expelling them. Do something besides wringing your hands and talking about how unfortunate it is. Do something.

    • Amen. But would the Vatican slap him down if he took any action? Of course it would. It does not matter, he should do it anyway.

  2. G Poulin is right, start kicking them out. I’m fed up with the roundabout declaration of words of accompiment! The example of San Francisco is prime amongst these waverers. If he can do an exorcism over statue violation, surely excommunications aren’t astro physics!!!!?????

  3. Good words from this bishop. But we have all heard these words before, Bishop Tobin, for decades.
    Please ‘do’ something to show your words have some kind of strength. Otherwise, Langevin will continue to laugh at the impotent Church. Bet on it.

  4. The problem with the “personally opposed, but” type of politicians is they dont make ANY effort to restrict abortion to in any way at all. Not in the smnallest way. They just jump in the pool across the board with unrestricted pro abortion advocates. What is the motivation behind third trimester abortions? That the mother couldnt make up her mind for 6 months? If so, I say, tough. Why should anyone at all be permitted an abortion a week before giving birth? The whole picture is beyond grotesque and inhuman. There are PLENTY of American couples dying to adopt who would be glad to take on these so-called “unwanted ” babies. Many people would have some sympathy for a woman carrying a child that was the product of rape or incest and would be less opposed to abortion in those rare instances, as the lesser of two evils. But it appears that the “opposed, but” types want as much unlimited abortion as do the pro-abortion legislators. The biggest lie is that this is a womans “health care issue”. Nothing could be further from the truth. Pregnancy is not a disease to be cured. Trying to present it that way is an outright lie. I agree that it is past time for the church to start expelling “Catholics” who publicly support unrestricted abortion. Abortion advocates have made their position clear. So should the church.

  5. Just maybe Bishop Tomas Tobin of Providence needs a shot in the arm called,

    Here’s an example:

    ” As Bishop of Providence, R.I. I am deeply grieved that Congressman James Langevin, a member of my dear flock would LEND HIMSELF to the GRAVE EVIL of attacking the right of pre-born human children to Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness.

    For Congressman James Langevin to say publicly that he is personally opposed to abortion, then by saying, as this article states, “his increased support for abortion rights is the reason he will be voting for the Women’s Health Protection Act when he arrives in Washington D.C. in the coming weeks,” is coopering with evil in the most heinous manner.

    As Congressman James Langevin’s Bishop, I will inform him in writing that because he has publicly and unequivocally stated that he will be party to continuing the enshrinement of abortion on demand, I, as his bishop will enforce Canon Law, as is my duty. I will inform him unless he repents, he has clearly separated himself from the flock and I will instruct the priests of my diocese to deny him the Sacrament of the Holy Eucharist. Charity and solicitude for the salvation of Congressman James Langevin’s soul is my utmost concern and responsibility.

1 Trackback / Pingback

  1. Zap Big Pulpit – Big Pulpit

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

All comments posted at Catholic World Report are moderated. While vigorous debate is welcome and encouraged, please note that in the interest of maintaining a civilized and helpful level of discussion, comments containing obscene language or personal attacks—or those that are deemed by the editors to be needlessly combative or inflammatory—will not be published. Thank you.