Catholic World Report

Archdiocese of Budapest denounces false statement attributed to Cardinal Erdö opposing Pope Francis

CNA Staff   By CNA Staff

Cardinal Péter Erdő, archbishop of Esztergom-Budapest, Hungary. / Thaler Tamás (CC BY 3.0).

A statement opposing Pope Francis’ recent restriction on the Traditional Latin Mass attributed to Cardinal Péter Erdö, Archbishop of Esztergom-Budapest and primate of Hungary, which was circulating widely on social media, is false, according to a statement released by the archdiocese.

The full statement says: “The English language statement on the new motu proprio issued by the supreme pontiff on the use of the Roman Liturgy prior to the Reform of 1970 and attributed to Cardinal Péter Erdö that has been widely diffused on social media outlets earlier today is entirely false.”

“Cardinal Erdö has not issued any statement on this topic whatsoever. The Archdiocese will act according to the specific indications laid out in the papal document. Therefore, we consider the above alleged statement to be fake news and an ill-willed attempt to sow confusion among the faithful.”

Early on Monday, July 19, a fake “decretum” from Cardinal Péter Erdö, Archbishop of Esztergom-Budapest and primate of Hungary, started to circulate on social media. But, the Hungarian cardinal has not published a statement nor a “decretum” opposing Pope Francis’ motu proprio Traditionis Custodes.

According to the document, the Cardinal essentially declared the Catholic Church in Hungary in de facto rebellion of Pope Francis’ motu proprio Traditionis Custodes by keeping the norms of the Traditional Mass established by Pope Benedict’s Summorum Pontificum.

The now-deleted message allegedly originated in the Reddit social network. It was then retweeted massively, even among prominent Catholic Twitter users, and attributed the following statement to the Hungarian Primate:

“The Primate of Hungary has right by a letter of privilege from the Apostolic See in 1347, which has never been abrogated. It states that the Primate is free to decide on liturgical matters within the territory of all of Hungary and over all Hungarians. The motu proprio of 16 July 2021 does not mention any limitation of the aforementioned privilege. This gives me the right, according to the general norms of the Code of Canon Law, to regulate the question of the “forma extraordinaria” of the Holy Mass, by my own discretion. By this present decretum, I declare that, by virtue of the privilege given to my office, I will continue regulate the celebration of the Tridentine Liturgy on the basis of the practice as it has been (since 2007), which is the same as that provided for in the Motu [sic] proprio Summorum Pontificum.”

Eduard Habsburg, Ambassador of Hungary to the Holy See and a Catholic close to Cardinal Erdö, tweeted a clarification: “The text circulating on the internet by ‘Cardinal Erdö’ on a ‘liturgy privilege of 1347’ is  100% fake! Don’t trust texts that originate on Reddit!”

Since Habsburg’s tweet, several Twitter users deleted the false statement.

Editor’s note: This story has been updated to include the Archdiocese of Budapest’s statement.


If you value the news and views Catholic World Report provides, please consider donating to support our efforts. Your contribution will help us continue to make CWR available to all readers worldwide for free, without a subscription. Thank you for your generosity!

Click here for more information on donating to CWR. Click here to sign up for our newsletter.


About Catholic News Agency 1712 Articles
Catholic News Agency (www.catholicnewsagency.com)

1 Comment

  1. What exactly is the point of this article? Who cares about a stray fake document published somewhere on the internet. Anyone with eyes and Catholic sensibilities can see that the entire pontificate of Jorge Bergoglio is essentially “fake.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

All comments posted at Catholic World Report are moderated. While vigorous debate is welcome and encouraged, please note that in the interest of maintaining a civilized and helpful level of discussion, comments containing obscene language or personal attacks—or those that are deemed by the editors to be needlessly combative or inflammatory—will not be published. Thank you.


*