‘Major victory’ for pro-lifers as attempt to introduce abortion up to birth in England and Wales fails

CNA Staff   By CNA Staff

Baby Feet. Credit: Morgan via Flickr (CC BY 2.0).

London, England, Jul 5, 2021 / 13:40 pm (CNA).

A pro-life group said Monday that the failure of an attempt to introduce abortion on demand up to birth in England and Wales marked “a major victory for the unborn child.”

The charity Right To Life said July 5 that the Labour Party MP Diana Johnson decided not to take her amendment, known as NC55, to the Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill.

Right To Life UK spokesperson Catherine Robinson said: “This is a major victory for the unborn child and women facing unplanned pregnancies.”

“Diana Johnson’s amendment would have removed all current legal safeguards around abortion provided by the Abortion Act, many of which protect women.”

“It would have been legal for an abortion to happen for any reason right through to birth. This would have left England and Wales with one of the most extreme abortion laws in the world.”

The charity also said that Rupa Huq, another Labour MP, decided not to take her amendment, NC42, which would have made it an offense punishable by up to two years in jail for pro-lifers to offer help to women outside abortion clinics.

Among those voicing concerns ahead of the potential vote on Diana Johnson’s amendment was Bishop John Sherrington, lead bishop for life issues at the Catholic Bishops’ Conference of England and Wales.

“The implications of this amendment would permit the free choice of abortion without restriction. The protections of the present legislation would be swept away,” the auxiliary bishop of Westminster archdiocese said July 4.

“Please pray that this amendment will be rejected by the Speaker as beyond the scope of this particular legislation and, if debated, is rejected.”

More than 800 medical professionals also issued an open letter calling on Johnson to withdraw the amendment.

They wrote: “As health professionals, where required, we are responsible for the care of both women and their babies throughout pregnancy and childbirth. It would be very difficult for us to work in a health service where the lives of these babies could be ended for any reason up to birth and where current legal safeguards around abortion, many of which are there to protect women, have been removed.”

After the amendment was tabled, Right To Life asked its supporters to urge their MPs to vote against the text, which it said would make the Abortion Act 1967 redundant.

After the Act was passed, abortion was permitted up to 28 weeks until 1990, when the time limit was reduced to 24 weeks unless there is a “substantial risk” of disability.

The Society for the Protection of Unborn Children (SPUC) also urged its members to write to their MPs.

The group explained that the amendment would have allowed abortion up to birth by repealing sections of the Offences Against the Person Act 1861, which prohibits the administration of drugs or the use of instruments to cause a miscarriage, and excluding abortion from the Infant Life (Preservation) Act.

A record number of abortions took place in England and Wales in 2020, according to new statistics released last month.

The figures showed that there were 210,860 abortions, the highest number since the Abortion Act 1967 was introduced.

The statistics, published by the Department of Health and Social Care, showed that 3,083 abortions took place in 2020 on the grounds of disability.

Right To Life UK said that 693 of the abortions were due to Down syndrome, an increase from 656 in 2019.

It added that there were also 35 abortions for cleft lip or cleft palate in 2020. Both conditions can be corrected by surgery.

The charity also said that 65 “selective termination” procedures took place, where doctors abort an unborn child carried by a mother expecting multiple babies.

Right To Life UK’s Catherine Robinson said July 5: “Thank you to the thousands of people that rallied over the last week to get friends and family to email their MPs. MPs received more emails ahead of this vote than they have ever received ahead of an abortion vote and some MPs said that they received more emails on this issue than on any other issue while in office.”

“Thank you to the amazing group of pro-life MPs in Parliament who have worked so hard to ensure that these extreme amendments were defeated.”

If you value the news and views Catholic World Report provides, please consider donating to support our efforts. Your contribution will help us continue to make CWR available to all readers worldwide for free, without a subscription. Thank you for your generosity!

Click here for more information on donating to CWR. Click here to sign up for our newsletter.

About Catholic News Agency 1712 Articles
Catholic News Agency (www.catholicnewsagency.com)


  1. As an American of partial English descent, it has been my observation that their country is getting nuttier and nuttier, with more and more laws that punish ordinary people for doing ordinary things and giving more recognition to radicals and radical ideas. Their civil rights have been totally damaged and I would not bet on them coming back. I have always looked to the Brits as models of common sense and stability. I am sorry to see this changing. It is a small moment of sanity that these radical amendments to their abortion laws were not presented for a vote. If they were, I wonder if their Bishops would have mustered the energy to denounce it?? ” Pray that the amendment is rejected?” That’s the best they could do? No mention of fire and sin and brimstone?? Wow. They could be discussing what to have for lunch for all the passion that was in that statement. Would they have denied communion to those Catholic legislators who voted for it??

  2. There’s Bishop Mark Davies who Gavin Ashendon is associated with. There are two or three others but I think it’s an uphill climb. The Church of England has pretty much sold out to the secular culture, according to Anglican Unscripted, so that can’t help.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

All comments posted at Catholic World Report are moderated. While vigorous debate is welcome and encouraged, please note that in the interest of maintaining a civilized and helpful level of discussion, comments containing obscene language or personal attacks—or those that are deemed by the editors to be needlessly combative or inflammatory—will not be published. Thank you.