CNA Staff, Sep 3, 2020 / 03:00 pm (CNA).- The 2020 National Catholic Prayer Breakfast (NCPB) will be streamed online on Sept. 23 the organization announced on Wednesday. The event will honor Attorney General William Barr.
Former presidents and vice presidents have made appearances at the gathering—Vice President Mike Pence addressed the annual event in 2017, and former President George W. Bush spoke at the breakfast each year from 2005 to 2008.
Barr will be the latest high-ranking Trump administration official to appear at the event–Vice President Mike Pence spoke at the NCPB in 2017, and then-acting White House chief-of-staff Mick Mulvaney addressed the gathering in 2019.
The National Catholic Prayer Breakfast has taken place in Washington, D.C. every year since 2004. It was originally scheduled for March 30, before the city curbed public gatherings following the coronavirus pandemic. Now, the NCPB says that the current “uncertainty” as to COVID-related restrictions in D.C. “dictated that we could no longer hold an in-person event of this size.”
Attended by 1,400 people in 2019, the prayer breakfast will now be streamed online with a mix of live and taped segments filling a one-hour schedule. Bishop Robert Barron, auxiliary bishop of Los Angeles, will deliver the keynote address.
While Archbishop Charles Chaput, archbishop emeritus of Philadelphia, was originally scheduled to speak at the prayer breakfast in March, he no longer appears on the schedule.
“Although we will be unable to gather in Washington, DC for our usual in-person event, we believe it has never been more important to host this prayer event,” the group stated on its website.
Attorney General Barr is still scheduled to speak on Sept. 23 and receive the ChristifidelesLaici award, named for Pope St. John Paul II’s 1988 exhortation and reserved to honor the laity who promote the New Evangelization and the Church’s mission in their life and work.
Barr, a Catholic, served as attorney general during the George H.W. Bush administration from 1991 to 1993, and was confirmed as attorney general again in 2019.
Barr’s Justice Department (DOJ) has taken an active role during the pandemic in curbing state public health orders that it says treat churches more harshly than similar establishments such as restaurants and shopping malls.
Barr himself has spoken out about threats to religious freedom, in an October, 2019 speech at the University of Notre Dame law school, where he said that education is “ground zero” in the fight for religious freedom. He warned of a secularism that seeks the “organized destruction” of the Judeo-Christian ethic, which he said the U.S. was founded upon.
However, the attorney general has also overseen the resumption of executions of federal prisoners after a nearly-two decade halt; the U.S. bishops’ conference has spoken repeatedly to condemn the executions, as has Archbishop Charles Thompson of Indianapolis, whose diocese includes the federal prison in Terre Haute, where federal executions take place.
The Vatican in 2018 revised language in the Catechism on the death penalty, calling it “inadmissible.”
Catholic members of religious orders, pro-life activists, bishops and prelates, and politicians—including non-Catholic officeholders—have previously addressed the prayer breakfast. Past speakers have included the second President Bush, late Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, Vice President Pence, and Cardinal Robert Sarah.
If you value the news and views Catholic World Report provides, please consider donating to support our efforts. Your contribution will help us continue to make CWR available to all readers worldwide for free, without a subscription. Thank you for your generosity!
Click here for more information on donating to CWR. Click here to sign up for our newsletter.
Dainelys Soto, Genesis Contreras, and Daniel Soto, who arrived from Venezuela after crossing the U.S. border from Mexico, wait for dinner at a hotel provided by the Annunciation House on Sept. 22, 2022 in El Paso, Texas. / Credit: Joe Raedle/Getty Images
CNA Staff, Sep 9, 2024 / 06:00 am (CNA).
Long a champion of immigrants, particularly those fleeing war-torn countries and impoverished regions, Pope Francis last month delivered some of the clearest words in his papacy yet in support of migrants — and in rebuke of those who turn away from them.
“It must be said clearly: There are those who work systematically and with every means possible to repel migrants,” the pope said during a weekly Angelus address. “And this, when done with awareness and responsibility, is a grave sin.”
“In the time of satellites and drones, there are migrant men, women, and children that no one must see,” the pope said. “They hide them. Only God sees them and hears their cry. This is a cruelty of our civilization.”
The pope has regularly spoken out in favor of immigrants. In June he called on the faithful to “unite in prayer for all those who have had to leave their land in search of dignified living conditions.” The Holy Father has called the protection of migrants a “moral imperative.” He has argued that migrants “[must] be received” and dealt with humanely.
Migrants aboard an inflatable vessel in the Mediterranean Sea approach the guided-missile destroyer USS Carney in 2013. Carney provided food and water to the migrants aboard the vessel before coordinating with a nearby merchant vessel to take them to safety. Credit: Commander, U.S. Naval Forces Europe-Africa/U.S. 6th Fleet, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons
The Catholic Church has long been an advocate and protector of immigrants. The U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) notes on its website that “a rich body of Church teaching, including papal encyclicals, bishops’ statements, and pastoral letters, has consistently reinforced our moral obligation to treat the stranger as we would treat Christ himself.”
The Catechism of the Catholic Church teaches that prosperous nations “are obliged, to the extent they are able, to welcome the foreigner in search of the security and means of livelihood which he cannot find in his country of origin.”
Popes throughout the years, meanwhile, have expressed sentiments on immigration similar to Francis’. Pope Pius XII in 1952, for instance, described the Holy Family’s flight into Egypt as “the archetype of every refugee family.”
The Church, Pius XII said, “has been especially careful to provide all possible spiritual care for pilgrims, aliens, exiles, and migrants of every kind.”
Meanwhile, “devout associations” throughout the centuries have spearheaded “innumerable hospices and hospitals” in part for immigrants, Pius XII said.
Implications and applications of Church teaching
Chad Pecknold, an associate professor of systematic theology at The Catholic University of America, noted that the catechism “teaches that nations have the right to borders and self-definition, so there is no sense in which Catholic teaching supports the progressive goal of ‘open borders.’”
“There is a ‘duty of care’ which is owed to those fleeing from danger,” he told CNA, “but citizenship is not owed to anyone who can make it across a national border, and illegal entry or asylum cannot be taken as a debt of citizenship.”
Paul Hunker, an immigration attorney who previously served as chief counsel of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) in Dallas, agreed.
“States have to have responsibility for their own communities, they have to look out for them,” he told CNA. “So immigration can be regulated so as to not harm the common good.”
Still, Hunker noted, Catholic advocates are not wrong in responding to immigration crises — like the ongoing irregular influx through the U.S. southern border — with aid and assistance.
Paul Hunker, an immigration attorney and former chief counsel of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) in Dallas, says Catholic advocates are not wrong in responding to immigration crises — like the ongoing irregular influx through the U.S. southern border — with aid and assistance. Credit: Photo courtesy of Paul Hunker
Many Catholic organizations offer shelter, food, and legal assistance to men, women, and children who cross into the country illegally; such groups have been overwhelmed in recent years with the crush of arriving migrants at the country’s southern border.
“It’s the responsibility of the federal government to take care of the border,” he said. “When the government has created a crisis at the U.S. border, Catholic dioceses are going to want to help people.”
“I completely support what the Catholic organizations are doing in Mexico and the United States to assist people who are there,” Hunker said. “The people responding are not responsible for these crises.”
Latest crisis and legal challenge
Not everyone feels similarly. Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton has launched an investigation of multiple Catholic nonprofits that serve illegal immigrants in the state. Paxton alleges that through the services it provides to migrants, El Paso-based Annunciation House has been facilitating illegal immigration and human trafficking.
A lawyer for the group called the allegations “utter nonsense,” though attorney Jerome Wesevich acknowledged that the nonprofit “serves undocumented persons as an expression of the Catholic faith and Jesus’ command to love one another, no exceptions.”
There are considerable numbers of Church teachings that underscore the need for a charitable response to immigrants. In his 1963 encyclical Pacem in Terris, Pope John XXIII argued that man “has the right to freedom of movement and of residence within the confines of his own state,” and further that “when there are just reasons in favor of it, he must be permitted to emigrate to other countries and take up residence there.”
In the encyclical Caritas in Veritate, meanwhile, Pope Benedict XVI in 2009 acknowledged that migration poses “dramatic challenges” for nations but that migrants “cannot be considered as a commodity or a mere workforce.”
“Every migrant is a human person who, as such, possesses fundamental, inalienable rights that must be respected by everyone and in every circumstance,” the late pope wrote.
Edward Feser, a professor of philosophy at Pasadena City College in California, noted that the Church “teaches that nations should be welcoming to immigrants, that they should be sensitive to the hardships that lead them to emigrate, that they ought not to scapegoat them for domestic problems, and so on.”
Catholic teaching does not advocate an ‘open borders’ policy
Yet Catholic teaching does not advocate an “open borders” policy, Feser said. He emphasized that the catechism says countries should accept immigrants “to the extent they are able,” and further that countries “may make the exercise of the right to immigrate subject to various juridical conditions.”
There “is nothing per se in conflict with Catholic teaching when citizens and politicians call on the federal government to enforce its immigration laws,” Feser said. “On the contrary, the catechism backs them up on this.”
In addition, it is “perfectly legitimate,” Feser argued, for governments to consider both economic and cultural concerns when setting immigration policy. It is also “legitimate to deport those who enter a country illegally,” he said.
Still, he acknowledged, a country can issue exceptions to valid immigration laws when the moral situation demands it.
“Of course, there can be individual cases where a nation should forgo its right to deport those who enter it illegally, and cases where the manner in which deportations occur is associated with moral hazards, such as when doing so would break up families or return an immigrant to dangerous conditions back in his home country,” he said.
“Governments should take account of this when formulating and enforcing policy,” he said.
The tension between responding charitably to immigrants and ensuring a secure border was perhaps put most succinctly in 1986 by the late Father Theodore Hesburgh, who served as chairman of the U.S. Select Commission for Immigration and Refugee Policy that was created by the U.S. Congress in the early 1980s.
“It is not enough to sympathize with the aspirations and plight of illegal aliens. We must also consider the consequences of not controlling our borders,” said the late Father Theodore Hesburgh, who served as chairman of the U.S. Select Commission for Immigration and Refugee Policy that was created by the U.S. Congress in the early 1980s. Credit: Photo courtesy of University of Notre Dame
Writing several years after the commission, Hesburgh explained: “It is not enough to sympathize with the aspirations and plight of illegal aliens. We must also consider the consequences of not controlling our borders.”
“What about the aspirations of Americans who must compete for jobs and whose wages and work standards are depressed by the presence of large numbers of illegal aliens?” the legendary late president of the University of Notre Dame reflected. “What about aliens who are victimized by unscrupulous employers and who die in the desert at the hands of smugglers?”
“The nation needn’t wait until we are faced with a choice between immigration chaos and closing the borders,” Hesburgh stated nearly 40 years ago.
Washington D.C., May 10, 2021 / 10:00 am (CNA).
The Biden administration on Monday announced it would interpret and enforce existing law to ensure people identifying as LGBTQ were not denied access to health care.“It … […]
9 Comments
Is the meaning of the new-paradigm/polygon Church fully exposed by the vague language of “inadmissible” (versus the implied admissible) having REPLACED the language of Veritatis Splendor grounded in moral absolutes?
Broader than the specifics of capital punishment—the clear meaning of “inadmissible” is left hanging, so to speak, wreaking of NON-BINARY fluidity as also in the temporary, renewable, and equally “provisional agreement” with China; as in the evolutionary separation (?) of dogmas still reaffirmed from disconnected and admissible praxis (the dubia); and as from the secular realm the blurring of binary/complementary human sexuality within meandering gender theory.
Maybe it’s NOT at all about the close-at-hand stencils of theology, or ecclesiology, or the hermeneutics of continuity/discontinuity? Maybe, instead, the winter of our discontent is very simply about the infiltrating/malignant lavender thingy—and lost masculinity? The “smoke of Satan” or at best a random groping in a grey twilight….
The cure? Maybe this, from the secular (!) and robust President Theodore Roosevelt:
“Far better it is to dare mighty things, to win glorious triumphs, even though chequered by failure, than to take rank with those poor souls who neither enjoy much nor suffer much, because they live in the GREY TWILIGHT that knows neither victory nor defeat.”
Foolishness! Barr is a member of President Trumps inner circle. You can’t believe he is in anyway anything but a voice for a corrupt administration. Why aren’t you honoring the Democratic Senator, the Catholic presidential candidate. RESCIND the invitation, or face the reality that a sizable number of practicing Catholics , as myself, will RESCIND our contributions to the church that has become politicized!
or face the reality that a sizable number of practicing Catholics(sic), as myself(sic), will RESCIND our contributions to the church that has become politicized!
And then likely mail that two dollars a week directly to the baby killers and eugenicists at planned barrenhood.
I’m quite sure that you don’t care aat all if the Church is politicized if She were to honor people who share your political views – andyour Trump Derangement Syndrome.
This may very well be the straw that broke this Catholic’s back. I can’t believe the church can overlook the horrendous evils that the Trump administration and his cohorts including Barr Continue to commit. Over 200,000 lost lives are meaningless? I have weathered many storms along with the church and have supported it financially wherever I could. I honestly don’t know that I can do it any longer. This is unbelievable.
Between 1.5 and 2 million lives were originally predicted to be lost. Considering that and that 40 percent or more fatalities were frail elderly folks in care homes I’d say we’re faring much better than expected.
Originally it looked like everyone was at risk. We need to continue to shield the vulnerable but weigh that out with letting others resume their lives. There should be a commonsense balance. I think we’ve mostly done a good job in a very difficult scenario.
Is the meaning of the new-paradigm/polygon Church fully exposed by the vague language of “inadmissible” (versus the implied admissible) having REPLACED the language of Veritatis Splendor grounded in moral absolutes?
Broader than the specifics of capital punishment—the clear meaning of “inadmissible” is left hanging, so to speak, wreaking of NON-BINARY fluidity as also in the temporary, renewable, and equally “provisional agreement” with China; as in the evolutionary separation (?) of dogmas still reaffirmed from disconnected and admissible praxis (the dubia); and as from the secular realm the blurring of binary/complementary human sexuality within meandering gender theory.
Maybe it’s NOT at all about the close-at-hand stencils of theology, or ecclesiology, or the hermeneutics of continuity/discontinuity? Maybe, instead, the winter of our discontent is very simply about the infiltrating/malignant lavender thingy—and lost masculinity? The “smoke of Satan” or at best a random groping in a grey twilight….
The cure? Maybe this, from the secular (!) and robust President Theodore Roosevelt:
“Far better it is to dare mighty things, to win glorious triumphs, even though chequered by failure, than to take rank with those poor souls who neither enjoy much nor suffer much, because they live in the GREY TWILIGHT that knows neither victory nor defeat.”
Barr was from a Jewish background their family converted
And that signifies how?
Foolishness! Barr is a member of President Trumps inner circle. You can’t believe he is in anyway anything but a voice for a corrupt administration. Why aren’t you honoring the Democratic Senator, the Catholic presidential candidate. RESCIND the invitation, or face the reality that a sizable number of practicing Catholics , as myself, will RESCIND our contributions to the church that has become politicized!
or face the reality that a sizable number of practicing Catholics(sic), as myself(sic), will RESCIND our contributions to the church that has become politicized!
And then likely mail that two dollars a week directly to the baby killers and eugenicists at planned barrenhood.
“the Catholic presidential candidate”
Because he promotes butchering babies.
“a corrupt administration.”
Your evidence? Your proof?
“practicing Catholics, as myself,”
Yeah, right.
“the church that has become politicized!”
I’m quite sure that you don’t care aat all if the Church is politicized if She were to honor people who share your political views – andyour Trump Derangement Syndrome.
This may very well be the straw that broke this Catholic’s back. I can’t believe the church can overlook the horrendous evils that the Trump administration and his cohorts including Barr Continue to commit. Over 200,000 lost lives are meaningless? I have weathered many storms along with the church and have supported it financially wherever I could. I honestly don’t know that I can do it any longer. This is unbelievable.
Between 1.5 and 2 million lives were originally predicted to be lost. Considering that and that 40 percent or more fatalities were frail elderly folks in care homes I’d say we’re faring much better than expected.
Originally it looked like everyone was at risk. We need to continue to shield the vulnerable but weigh that out with letting others resume their lives. There should be a commonsense balance. I think we’ve mostly done a good job in a very difficult scenario.
Just how do you think the Trump administration caused the 200,000 Wuhan coronavirus deaths? What did they do, or fail to do? Be specific.