Rome, Italy, Aug 8, 2020 / 12:11 pm (CNA).- Italy’s health ministry is expected to approve a proposal to remove mandatory hospitalization for the administration of the abortion pill and to expand the time frame in which it can be prescribed.
The RU486 drug is prescribed to induce a chemical abortion. Use of the drug was legalized in Italy in 2009, and in 2010 standards were set which require women to be hospitalized for three days during its administration.
The proposed change in guidelines will allow the drug to be administered in an outpatient clinic or at home. Italy’s Ministry of Health is also expected to expand access to the abortion pill by two weeks, allowing it to be prescribed until the ninth week of pregnancy.
“This is a real abortion. It is no less ‘abortion’ due to the fact that it does not occur with surgical instruments,” Marina Casini, president of Movimento per la Vita told Vatican News.
She pointed to the significant health risks associated with chemical abortions, stating that Italy is “facing propaganda in favor” of the abortion drug RU486.
Casini said the proposed changes are based on ideology — an attempt to convince people that abortion is “a trivial fact — after all, it is enough to drink a glass of water — to make us forget that at stake is the destruction of a human being in the prenatal stage.”
RU486 is the administration of two different drugs several days apart. Mifeprex causes the mother’s body to stop nourishing the unborn child; Misoprostol, taken afterward, causes contractions and expels the child and placenta from the mother’s body.
Currently, only two out of 10 abortions which take place in Italy are chemical abortions.
Italian media noted that dropping the hospitalization requirement could result in more Italian women choosing to have a chemical abortion instead of surgical.
In a document from the Superior Health Council, the drop of the hospitalization requirement was also noted to have potentially cost-saving benefits to the health system.
Casini condemned this attitude. “It is much less expensive to give this product to the woman and say: do it yourself, do it alone. It saves beds, anesthesia and even human investment of doctors and health workers,” she noted. “There is a nice cut in spending, however, it is carried out on the skin of children on their way to birth and their mothers.”
Abortion was legalized in Italy in 1978 with the establishment of “Legge 194.” The law made abortion legal for any reason within the first 90 days of pregnancy, and afterward for certain reasons with the referral of a physician.
Since its legalization, it is estimated that more than 6 million children have been aborted in Italy.
If you value the news and views Catholic World Report provides, please consider donating to support our efforts. Your contribution will help us continue to make CWR available to all readers worldwide for free, without a subscription. Thank you for your generosity!
Click here for more information on donating to CWR. Click here to sign up for our newsletter.
The church must stand tall and firm on abortion on demand, chemical or surgical. However, that edict comes with a conscious compromise. Birth control cannot be an equal “sin”. I have struggled with that dichotomy for most of my life. Should a married loving couple grapple with NFP vs artificial methods? I am no theologian but I say no. Why? Because the intent is the same, to not become pregnant. A prophylactic approach can actually be a plus because it eliminates the “need” for abortion and it promotes population limitations on the environment.
You aren’t a theologian, and I don’t see any reason that anybody should care what you think about the matter. Birth control *is* a sin (and with no quotation marks). And if you genuinely can’t see the difference between continence in order to prevent pregnancy and artificial methods, your mental faculties would appear to be questionable at best.
As a Catholic you should know better about contraception and as someone who reads any news source you might know that global birth rates are at dangerously low levels.