St. Paul, Minn., Jan 30, 2020 / 02:22 pm (CNA).- A priest of the Archdiocese of Saint Paul and Minneapolis has apologized for a homily that described Islam as the biggest threat in the world to the United States and to Christianity.
“My homily on immigration contained words that were hurtful to Muslims,” Fr. Nick VanDenBroeke, pastor of the Church of the Immaculate Conception in Lonsdale, Minn., said in a Jan. 29 statement posted on the website of the Archdiocese of Saint Paul and Minneapolis.
“I’m sorry for this. I realize now that my comments were not fully reflective of the Catholic Church’s teaching on Islam,” he stated.
Archbishop Bernard Hebda also issued a statement on the homily, in which he said that he addressed the issue with VanDenBroeke, who “has expressed sorrow for his words and an openness to seeing more clearly the Church’s position on our relationship with Islam.”
“The teaching of the Catholic Church is clear. As Pope Benedict XVI noted, ‘The Catholic Church, in fidelity to the teachings of the Second Vatican Council, looks with esteem to Muslims, who worship God above all by prayer, almsgiving and fasting, revere Jesus as a prophet while not acknowledging his divinity, and honour Mary, his Virgin Mother,’” Hebda said.
“That continues to be our teaching today,” he added.
“Pope Francis has echoed Pope Benedict, stating that it is important to intensify the dialogue between Catholics and Islam. He has emphasized ‘the great importance of dialogue and cooperation among believers, in particular Christians and Muslim, and the need for it to be enhanced.’ He has called for all Christians and Muslims to be ‘true promoters of mutual respect and friendship, in particular through education,’’ he noted.
VanDenBroeke gave the homily for which he apologized Jan. 5, which Minnesota’s Catholic bishops have designated as Immigration Sunday.
According to the local newspaper City Pages, VanDenBroeke said in his homily that unlike issues such as abortion and same-sex marriage, Church teaching on immigration is not “black and white.”
He noted that nations have the right to protect their “ideas and ideals” as well as the duty to “welcom(e) the stranger.”
He then said that “as Americans and as Christians, we do not need to pretend that everyone who seeks to enter America should be treated the same.”
“I believe it is essential to consider the religion and worldview of the immigrants or refugees. More specifically, we should not be allowing large numbers of Muslims asylum or immigration into our country,” he said.
He added that Islam is “the greatest threat in the world” to Christianity and the U.S. and that the Church must work to “(keep) bad ideas out of the country,” City Pages reported.
“I’m not saying we hate Muslims,” VanDenBroeke said in the homily. “They are people created out of love by God just as each one of us is. But while we certainly do not hate them as people, we must oppose their religion and worldview.”
He added that he supported President Donald Trump’s plan to build a wall along the border between the U.S. and Mexico, and that he supported a pathway to citizenship for Dreamers – undocumented students and young people brought into the United States by their parents.
The Minnesota Star Tribune reported that VanDenBroeke has given political homilies in the past, including a homily in 2018 in which he urged his parishioners to pray for Brett Kavanaugh’s nomination to the Supreme Court. Kavanaugh, who is pro-life, was seen by many Catholics as a key nomination to the court for a possible overturning of Roe v. Wade, the 1973 Supreme Court decision which allowed for legalized abortion in the United States.
According to City Pages, the Jan. 5 homily was posted to VanDenBroeke’s parish website (it appears to have since been taken down). It caused an uproar in the local community, including from the Minnesota chapter of the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR-Minnesota), which issued a statement calling on Catholic leaders to condemn the homily.
“We urge leaders of the Catholic Church in Minnesota to repudiate these hate-filled and un-Christian remarks as unrepresentative of the faith they hold dear,” Jaylani Hussein, CAIR-Minnesota’s executive director, said in a statement reported in the Minnesota Star Tribune.
In his statement, Hebda concluded by saying that he was “grateful for the many examples of friendship that have been offered by the Muslim community in our region and we are committed to strengthening the relationship between the two communities.”
If you value the news and views Catholic World Report provides, please consider donating to support our efforts. Your contribution will help us continue to make CWR available to all readers worldwide for free, without a subscription. Thank you for your generosity!
Click here for more information on donating to CWR. Click here to sign up for our newsletter.
Sad that he had to apologize for offering an opinion, no less authoritative than the USCCB. And that text from Vatican II is not of Tradition nor is it covered under infallibility.
Incidents like these may be partly the reason Priests have such low morale. I cannot believe if a Muslim cleric spoke ill of Christians, Jews, Hundus, etc, he would be forced to apologize.
You, madam, are a master (mistress?) of understatement.
Go the http://www.memri.org to see their latest rantings, etc.
Unfortunately it is the truth. We cannot accept Islam who hate us in any case. Individuals have to be respected and we are not against individuals but against a religion which hates us .
This homily was much less hurtful than the beheading of Christian martyrs by Muslim extremists. May the blood of these martyrs not be forgotten in our rush to be “nice”.
Let ME say it – Islam is the biggest threat in the world to the United States and to Christianity.
Facts are stubborn things.
In interreligious dialogue, how to say the right thing, AND to how to say it in exactly the right way? In part, to be sorted out are underlying cultural (not theological) predispositions…
The Catholic-Muslim Forum began a new phase of DIALOGUE in 2007, as a response to Pope Benedict’s Regensburg Address (late 2006). An immediate response from an initial 138 Muslim leaders is entitled “A Common Word as Between You and Us” (see http://www.acommonword.com). But, the title is TRUNCATED from a longer verse in the Qur’an: “O People of the Scripture! Come to a common word as between us and you: that we worship none but God and that we shall ascribe no partner unto Him, that we erect not, from among ourselves, lords and patrons other than Allah.” (Q 3:64).
The “Common Word” explains that none have “to prostrate before kings and the like.” But how does this interpretation fit DIFFERENTLY in the fused Mosque-state (with politicians “and the like” who are monitored by clerics, and where natural religion and politics are most certainly mingled!), and the different context of the West where Church and state are separate and not fused (and where the distinct Church includes the Apostolic Succession and the indwelling of the Holy Spirit)?
Regarding the Church, we find this MUSLIM EXPLANATION: “Apart from doctrinal lapses from the unity of the One True God, there is the question of a consecrated priesthood . . . as if a mere human being—Cohen, or Pope, or Priest, or Brahman—could claim superiority . . . or could stand between man and God in some special sense.” (Ali, Abdullah Yusuf, The Holy Qur’an: Text, Translation and Commentary, Lahore, Pakistan: S.H. Muhammad Ashraf, 1983 [1938], Q 3:64, note 402).
The particular Muslim commentator’s reference to the “unity of the one true God” (and “doctrinal lapses”) contests a CORE difference between the Christian revelation and Islam—namely, the Trinitarian Oneness versus an embedded pagan, carnal, accreted and CULTURAL preconception (that triune Christianity is polytheistic): “How can he have a son when he hath no consort?” [Q 6:101]).
Catholic bishops and priests do not stand between man and God. Instead, as “servants of the servants of God”, theirs is a sacramental role distinct in both degree and kind from the laity because instituted by Christ, to advance “the universal call to holiness” (“apostle”: to be sent).
The symmetrical comparison between Islam and Christianity is NOT simply and simplistically between the two scriptures (“People of the Scripture”), BUT RATHER between the eternal Triune Oneness/incarnate Jesus Christ, compared to the Qur’an (believed by Islam to be “uncreated”).
As a precondition for interreligious dialogue, why should the Catholic faith begin by seemingly conceding in a pluralist sort of way to the CULTURAL BAGGAGE embedded in Q 3:64?
One year later – Obviously a forced apology, he must have known that this would happen, and it’s still true. It would be interesting to know where Fr. VanDenBroeke is now.